Relative Intelligence · Oncology

How BeOne Medicines (ONC) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on ONC alone. It places ONC (BeOne Medicines AG) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where ONC stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: ONC's full trading record, from February 2016 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 22, 2026.
Data as of October 22, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
This page answers the following questions about ONC
Key findings
Not AI-generatedThese key findings are generated by our proprietary relative intelligence engine, directly from the data on this page.
- Right nowONC has run far ahead of the market, rising 19.5% over the past 3 months against 2.5% for the S&P 500. Its oncology peers were far apart over the past 3 months, from GMAB (Genmab A/S, up 38.6%) to AZN (AstraZeneca, up 2.3%). Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?ONC held up far better than its industry: it rose 19.5% over the past 3 months while the oncology ETF XBI (State Street SPDR S&P Biotech ETF) fell 0.3%. The S&P 500 rose 2.5%. Its oncology peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: GMAB (Genmab A/S) rose 38.6%, while AZN (AstraZeneca) rose 2.3%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, ONC rose 21.9% against 15.6% for the S&P 500 and 16.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (127% against 88.4%). ONC lagged its oncology peers in 2023, then moved up the pack in 2025. By year ↓
- Long termONC turned $10,000 into $115,000 over the past decade, against $41,600 in the S&P 500. That said, the past 5 years only trailed the S&P 500 (0.9% against 80.3%), after a much stronger decade (1,054% against 316%). Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashThe 2022 bear market took 52.4% off ONC, against 24.5% for the S&P 500. That was more than ABBV (AbbVie, 21.9%) but less than HCM (HUTCHMED (China), 76.7%). ONC fell further than the S&P 500 in three of the last four sell-offs, including the 2022 bear market (52.4% against 24.5%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, ONC has a correlation of 0.22 over 5 years, less closely than 83% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is a real diversifier. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- EXEL (Exelixis), ABBV (AbbVie) and GILD (Gilead Sciences) earned more than ONC with less volatility over the past 5 years. EXEL returned 25.0% a year at 35.8% volatility, against 0.2% a year at 54.5%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- LLY (Eli Lilly and Company, pharmaceuticals) and RPRX (Royalty Pharma, pharmaceuticals) earned more than ONC with less volatility over the past 5 years. LLY returned 41.2% a year at 32.8% volatility, against 0.2% a year at 54.5%.
- Whole market
- 2,112 of the 3,641 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than ONC with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL (Apple), GOOG (Alphabet) and MSFT (Microsoft).
How much would $10,000 in ONC have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in ONC over the past 10 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of ONC over the same span and ONC's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: ONC began trading on February 3, 2016, so the chart cannot reach back to the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs. It covers the most recent 10 years of ONC's record, starting at the end of September 2016.
- $10,000 invested in ONC at the end of September 2016 would have grown to $118,769 by September 2026, more than the $41,286 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of ONC, and NTRA finished highest, at $372,028.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2016 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 88 of the 2,698 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of ONC; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- NTRA$372,028+3,620% total · +43.6% a year
- UMC$212,960+2,030% total · +35.8% a year
- MEDP$209,040+1,990% total · +35.5% a year
- LLY$168,620+1,586% total · +32.6% a year
- AAPL$128,826+1,188% total · +29.1% a year
- ONC$118,769+1,088% total · +28.1% a year
- ABBV$62,529+525% total · +20.1% a year
- EXEL$45,666+357% total · +16.4% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$41,286+313% total · +15.2% a year
- ILMN$15,502+55.0% total · +4.5% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 2,508 of the 3,630 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of ONC; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- NTRA$37,089+271% total · +30.0% a year
- MEDP$32,977+230% total · +27.0% a year
- ABBV$29,134+191% total · +23.8% a year
- EXEL$27,629+176% total · +22.5% a year
- GILD$25,496+155% total · +20.6% a year
- MRK$22,538+125% total · +17.6% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- IQV$11,224+12.2% total · +2.3% a year
- ONC$10,081+0.8% total · +0.2% a year
- ILMN$6,943−30.6% total · −7.0% a year
ONC at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
Note: ONC began trading on February 3, 2016, so every figure here, including its worst decline, covers only the time since then. None of them reflect the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs.
- ONC's deepest decline since it began trading in 2016 was 70.0%, from September 2021 to May 2022. It has not yet climbed back to that peak.
- Over nine full calendar years, ONC's best was 2017, when it returned 222%, and its worst was 2022, when it lost 18.8%. It lost money in two of those years.
- ONC is 5.2% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $41B
- Industry
- Biotechnology
- Price history from
- February 2016
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +21.9%total return
- Past 3 years
- +127%+31.3% a year
- Past 5 years
- +0.9%+0.2% a year
- Past 10 years
- +1,054%+27.7% a year
- Best calendar year
- +222%2017
- Worst calendar year
- −18.8%2022
- Losing years
- 2 of 9full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 54.5%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.27return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −70.0%Sep 2021 to May 2022
- From its all-time high
- −5.2%below the peak
ONC against the whole market
Where ONC ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does ONC rank among all stocks?
This section ranks ONC on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how ONC stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- ONC's 10-year return ranks in the top 4% of the 2,201 stocks worth at least $300 million with 10 years of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | ONC | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +21.9% | 1,216 of 3,282 | top 37% |
| 3-year return | +127% | 743 of 3,016 | top 25% |
| 5-year return | +0.9% | 1,726 of 2,897 | bottom 41% |
| 10-year return | +1,054% | 95 of 2,201 | top 4% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 54.5% | 2,097 of 2,897 | bottom 29% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.27 | 1,656 of 2,897 | bottom 44% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −70.0% | 1,288 of 2,184 | bottom 42% |
What has beaten ONC on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). ONC sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than ONC with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 1,267 stocks and 845 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than ONC over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 58% of the 3,641 screened.
- Among those with at least half ONC's swings, FIX has the best return for its risk: 73.0% a year at 46.9% volatility, 14% less than ONC's 54.5%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.41 against 0.27 for ONC.
- Among ONC's popular alternatives, ABBV, GILD and EXEL are in the region. ABBV earned 25.5% a year against 0.2% a year for ONC, at 23.4% volatility, 57% less than ONC's 54.5%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to ONC; faint dots are 89 more of the 2,112 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,641 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than ONC?
Investments that beat ONC over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among ONC's popular alternatives, EXEL, ABBV and GILD earned more than ONC with less volatility over the past 5 years. EXEL returned 25.0% a year at 35.8% volatility, against 0.2% a year at 54.5%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, LLY (pharmaceuticals) and RPRX (pharmaceuticals) earned more than ONC with less volatility over the past 5 years. LLY returned 41.2% a year at 32.8% volatility, against 0.2% a year at 54.5%.
- Across the whole market, 2,112 of the 3,641 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than ONC with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL, GOOG and MSFT.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat ONC over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks ONC's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than ONC follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than ONC's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× ONC's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than ONC's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with ONC?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +0.2% | 54.5% | 0.27 | −70.0% | +1,054% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.5% | 17.2% | 0.78 | −33.7% | +316% | 0.22 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against ONC. 12 of 22 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
EXELExelixis, Inc. · Oncology | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +25.0% | 35.8% | 0.81 | −57.2% | +478% | 0.09 | — | |
MEDPMedpace Holdings, Inc. · Contract Research | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +28.4% | 52.1% | 0.73 | −42.9% | +2,003% | 0.32 | — | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +25.5% | 23.4% | 1.09 | −45.1% | +600% | 0.16 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +202% | 0.36 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +16.1% | 24.8% | 0.73 | −43.4% | +245% | 0.03 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +28.4% | 57.6% | 0.73 | −77.7% | +3,934% | 0.12 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Oncology and Biotechnology and the categories next to it (Cancer Immunotherapy, Precision Oncology, Pharmaceuticals, Life Sciences Tools, Rare Disease Therapeutics, Medical Devices), plus ONC's specific themes. 89 of 359 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +41.2% | 32.8% | 1.22 | −34.5% | +1,870% | -0.01 | — | ||
RPRXRoyalty Pharma plc · Pharmaceuticals | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +13.8% | 23.8% | 0.67 | −49.7% | — | 0.34 | — | |
HALOHalozyme Therapeutics, Inc. · Biotechnology | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +26.2% | 40.4% | 0.78 | −49.1% | +1,255% | 0.26 | — | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +31.7% | 42.8% | 0.85 | −85.3% | −3.6% | -0.03 | — | ||
ROIVRoivant Sciences Ltd. · Immunology Therapeutics | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +40.7% | 58.6% | 0.87 | −79.2% | — | 0.19 | — | |
| Similar return, lower volatility | +0.5% | 25.4% | 0.15 | −33.5% | +65.1% | 0.09 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 2,371 of 3,346 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +41.7% | 24.7% | 1.54 | −46.1% | +345% | 0.01 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +19.1% | 28.0% | 0.77 | −38.5% | +1,194% | 0.11 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +18.8% | 43.3% | 0.61 | −54.3% | +1,470% | 0.05 | — | ||
DHTDHT Holdings, Inc. · Oil & Gas | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +40.3% | 39.0% | 1.07 | −39.7% | +1,094% | 0.03 | — | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +33.5% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −54.9% | +485% | 0.23 | — | ||
CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF · Cybersecurity | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +14.5% | 26.2% | 0.65 | −33.9% | +461% | 0.06 | 0.58% | |
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +67.0% | 57.1% | 1.19 | −57.6% | +5,050% | 0.02 | — | ||
SHMState Street SPDR Nuveen ICE Short Term Municipal Bond ETF · Short-Term Municipal Bonds | Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +0.9% | 2.2% | 0.43 | −11.6% | +12.5% | 0.36 | 0.20% | |
What these numbers mean for ONC
- Annual return
- ONC returned 0.2% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.5% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $10,100. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- ONC's volatility over the past 5 years was 54.5%, 3.2 times the S&P 500's 17.2%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, ONC's return lands within 54.5% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- ONC's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.27, against 0.78 for the S&P 500, so ONC earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- ONC's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 70.0%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 70.0% fall takes a 233% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, ONC's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.22 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against ONC instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a ONC holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 2,112 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than ONC with less volatility
Out of 3,641 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with ONC | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Same or nearby category | +41.2% | 32.8% | 1.22 | −34.5% | +1,870% | -0.01 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +41.7% | 24.7% | 1.54 | −46.1% | +345% | 0.01 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +19.1% | 28.0% | 0.77 | −38.5% | +1,194% | 0.11 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +18.8% | 43.3% | 0.61 | −54.3% | +1,470% | 0.05 | — | |
| 5 | DHTDHT Holdings, Inc. · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +40.3% | 39.0% | 1.07 | −39.7% | +1,094% | 0.03 | — |
| 6 | Whole market | +33.5% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −54.9% | +485% | 0.23 | — | |
| 7 | Whole market | +21.3% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +240% | 0.24 | — | |
| 8 | INSWInternational Seaways, Inc. · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +58.7% | 40.6% | 1.35 | −57.4% | — | -0.14 | — |
| 9 | Whole market | +33.4% | 43.4% | 0.89 | −48.0% | +1,306% | -0.16 | — | |
| 10 | Whole market | +32.7% | 32.9% | 1.03 | −64.2% | +413% | 0.16 | — | |
| 11 | Whole market | +47.3% | 43.3% | 1.11 | −52.5% | +883% | -0.11 | — | |
| 12 | Whole market | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +360% | 0.20 | — | |
| 13 | Whole market | +13.2% | 20.0% | 0.73 | −46.9% | +191% | 0.14 | — | |
| 14 | Whole market | +20.9% | 44.8% | 0.65 | −38.3% | +2,668% | 0.02 | — | |
| 15 | Whole market | +32.8% | 42.3% | 0.89 | −56.9% | +481% | -0.07 | — | |
| 16 | Whole market | +20.6% | 35.3% | 0.71 | −58.1% | +696% | 0.00 | — | |
| 17 | WSMWilliams-Sonoma, Inc. · Specialty Retail | Whole market | +24.8% | 44.4% | 0.72 | −59.7% | +1,298% | 0.28 | — |
| 18 | FFIVF5, Inc. · Cybersecurity | Whole market | +16.7% | 30.8% | 0.66 | −54.6% | +279% | 0.20 | — |
| 19 | FROFrontline Plc · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +53.9% | 49.7% | 1.12 | −52.0% | +1,270% | 0.03 | — |
| 20 | Whole market | +53.5% | 37.4% | 1.34 | −71.7% | +733% | 0.00 | — | |
| 21 | CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF · Cybersecurity | Whole market | +14.5% | 26.2% | 0.65 | −33.9% | +461% | 0.06 | 0.58% |
| 22 | Whole market | +50.0% | 33.4% | 1.39 | −79.7% | +1,314% | 0.02 | — | |
| 23 | Whole market | +3.8% | 0.3% | 13.25 | −0.3% | — | 0.18 | 0.09% | |
| 24 | HASHasbro, Inc. · Toys & Games | Whole market | +9.9% | 33.3% | 0.45 | −63.8% | +94.7% | 0.19 | — |
| 25 | VCTRVictory Capital Holdings, Inc. · Asset Management | Whole market | +27.7% | 35.0% | 0.88 | −45.2% | — | 0.27 | — |
| 26 | LTHLife Time Group Holdings, Inc. · Leisure Facilities | Whole market | +19.6% | 46.6% | 0.62 | −58.4% | — | — | — |
| 27 | NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Health Care Facilities | Whole market | +31.2% | 28.6% | 1.10 | −35.3% | +385% | -0.03 | — |
| 28 | MATXMatson, Inc. · Marine Shipping | Whole market | +23.5% | 39.5% | 0.73 | −53.6% | +554% | 0.13 | — |
| 29 | TNKTeekay Tankers Ltd. · Marine Shipping | Whole market | +52.2% | 45.1% | 1.16 | −63.4% | +511% | -0.19 | — |
| 30 | Whole market | +41.8% | 31.7% | 1.27 | −90.8% | +829% | 0.17 | — | |
| 31 | CNOCNO Financial Group, Inc. · Life Insurance | Whole market | +19.1% | 28.1% | 0.77 | −63.8% | +348% | 0.30 | — |
| 32 | LPGDorian LPG Ltd. · Marine Shipping | Whole market | +55.8% | 43.6% | 1.24 | −62.9% | +1,827% | 0.06 | — |
| 33 | RPRXRoyalty Pharma plc · Pharmaceuticals | Same or nearby category | +13.8% | 23.8% | 0.67 | −49.7% | — | 0.34 | — |
| 34 | HALOHalozyme Therapeutics, Inc. · Biotechnology | Same or nearby category | +26.2% | 40.4% | 0.78 | −49.1% | +1,255% | 0.26 | — |
| 35 | SXTSensient Technologies Corporation · Specialty Chemicals | Whole market | +8.6% | 30.3% | 0.42 | −50.6% | +116% | 0.14 | — |
| 36 | EXELExelixis, Inc. · Oncology | Popular alternative | +25.0% | 35.8% | 0.81 | −57.2% | +478% | 0.09 | — |
| 37 | Whole market | +17.5% | 18.2% | 0.98 | −40.0% | +361% | 0.09 | — | |
| 38 | JAAAJanus Henderson AAA CLO ETF · AAA CLO Debt | Whole market | +5.1% | 1.7% | 2.98 | −2.6% | — | 0.27 | 0.20% |
| 39 | Whole market | +27.0% | 23.8% | 1.13 | −63.3% | +378% | 0.35 | — | |
| 40 | UFCSUnited Fire Group, Inc. · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +24.6% | 39.1% | 0.76 | −64.5% | +91.7% | 0.04 | — |
| 41 | RBCAARepublic Bancorp, Inc. · Regional Banks | Whole market | +14.8% | 28.0% | 0.63 | −44.7% | +287% | 0.21 | — |
| 42 | SENEASeneca Foods Corporation · Packaged Foods | Whole market | +26.0% | 36.4% | 0.82 | −51.3% | +468% | 0.15 | — |
| 43 | KRTKarat Packaging Inc. · Packaging | Whole market | +24.4% | 44.1% | 0.72 | −48.4% | — | 0.04 | — |
| 44 | Whole market | +73.0% | 46.9% | 1.41 | −49.7% | +4,888% | 0.15 | — | |
| 45 | Whole market | +18.5% | 32.0% | 0.69 | −44.6% | +696% | 0.07 | — | |
| 46 | TRSTTrustCo Bank Corp NY · Regional Banks | Whole market | +15.5% | 26.8% | 0.67 | −49.5% | +127% | 0.18 | — |
| 47 | CLMBClimb Global Solutions, Inc. · Technology Distribution | Whole market | +38.4% | 45.5% | 0.94 | −53.4% | +886% | 0.19 | — |
| 48 | ORRFOrrstown Financial Services, Inc. · Regional Banks | Whole market | +16.9% | 28.7% | 0.69 | −54.7% | +187% | 0.22 | — |
| 49 | Whole market | +11.9% | 28.2% | 0.54 | −37.1% | +862% | 0.09 | — | |
| 50 | Whole market | +31.0% | 38.6% | 0.90 | −56.6% | +1,440% | -0.01 | — | |
| 51 | FBIZFirst Business Financial Services, Inc. · Regional Banks | Whole market | +23.2% | 29.4% | 0.86 | −50.2% | +315% | 0.20 | — |
| 52 | Whole market | +46.9% | 44.6% | 1.09 | −48.3% | +2,254% | -0.15 | — | |
| 53 | RCBCRiver City Bank · Regional Banks | Whole market | +15.3% | 27.2% | 0.66 | −45.5% | +354% | 0.15 | — |
| 54 | Whole market | +52.4% | 37.4% | 1.32 | −75.3% | +647% | -0.01 | — | |
| 55 | Whole market | +11.4% | 17.5% | 0.71 | −35.0% | +298% | 0.23 | 0.03% | |
| 56 | BWFGBankwell Financial Group, Inc. · Regional Banks | Whole market | +20.3% | 28.5% | 0.79 | −64.7% | +241% | 0.17 | — |
| 57 | VBNKVersaBank · Regional Banks | Whole market | +14.5% | 35.1% | 0.56 | −50.7% | — | 0.11 | — |
| 58 | IBEXIBEX Limited · Business Services | Whole market | +22.2% | 47.3% | 0.66 | −56.0% | — | 0.14 | — |
| 59 | Whole market | +12.6% | 16.9% | 0.79 | −34.0% | +319% | 0.22 | 0.03% | |
| 60 | SHBIShore Bancshares, Inc. · Regional Banks | Whole market | +8.8% | 28.9% | 0.44 | −58.8% | +140% | 0.12 | — |
| 61 | Whole market | +8.5% | 36.6% | 0.41 | −56.1% | +498% | 0.06 | — | |
| 62 | Whole market | +21.1% | 22.6% | 0.97 | −25.7% | +521% | 0.19 | — | |
| 63 | Whole market | +13.5% | 17.2% | 0.83 | −30.4% | +281% | 0.20 | — | |
| 64 | Whole market | +43.8% | 36.9% | 1.18 | −71.9% | +1,014% | -0.04 | — | |
| 65 | Whole market | +27.5% | 26.5% | 1.05 | −61.0% | +216% | 0.14 | — | |
| 66 | Whole market | +17.3% | 24.3% | 0.78 | −43.6% | +534% | 0.28 | — | |
| 67 | Whole market | +33.1% | 32.5% | 1.05 | −73.5% | +289% | 0.13 | — | |
| 68 | Whole market | +32.8% | 25.9% | 1.23 | −62.3% | +314% | 0.18 | — | |
| 69 | Whole market | +13.2% | 22.9% | 0.66 | −36.4% | +435% | 0.19 | — | |
| 70 | VRIGInvesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF · Investment Grade Bonds | Whole market | +4.7% | 1.3% | 3.52 | −13.1% | +40.7% | 0.28 | 0.30% |
| 71 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · Japan Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +415% | -0.10 | 0.48% |
| 72 | Whole market | +15.2% | 16.8% | 0.93 | −37.0% | +205% | 0.26 | — | |
| 73 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Dividend Equity | Whole market | +16.9% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.25 | 0.40% |
| 74 | Whole market | +19.7% | 25.2% | 0.84 | −55.8% | +243% | 0.15 | — | |
| 75 | Whole market | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +692% | 0.19 | — | |
| 76 | BALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · US Equity Buffer | Whole market | +6.2% | 3.3% | 1.84 | −4.9% | — | 0.35 | 0.69% |
| 77 | Whole market | +30.7% | 32.0% | 1.00 | −43.4% | +913% | 0.12 | — | |
| 78 | Whole market | +8.0% | 16.4% | 0.56 | −36.0% | +137% | 0.32 | 0.05% | |
| 79 | Whole market | +12.7% | 23.8% | 0.62 | −41.0% | +551% | 0.20 | — | |
| 80 | Whole market | +14.2% | 23.0% | 0.69 | −35.1% | +531% | 0.11 | 0.18% | |
| 81 | Whole market | +15.3% | 43.5% | 0.55 | −56.9% | +1,527% | 0.10 | — | |
| 82 | Whole market | +16.9% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | +361% | 0.08 | — | |
| 83 | Whole market | +37.8% | 25.1% | 1.41 | −38.1% | +582% | -0.04 | — | |
| 84 | Whole market | +47.6% | 49.1% | 1.04 | −52.2% | +3,158% | -0.01 | — | |
| 85 | FLRTPacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF · Bank Loans | Whole market | +6.0% | 2.3% | 2.55 | −20.9% | +58.7% | 0.28 | 0.60% |
| 86 | Whole market | +34.2% | 50.1% | 0.84 | −56.4% | +2,542% | 0.05 | — | |
| 87 | Whole market | +12.2% | 13.7% | 0.91 | −36.8% | +237% | 0.29 | 0.03% | |
| 88 | Whole market | +18.7% | 24.4% | 0.83 | −52.0% | +319% | 0.24 | — | |
| 89 | Whole market | +31.3% | 32.4% | 1.01 | −37.5% | +887% | 0.03 | — | |
| 90 | Whole market | +53.4% | 48.8% | 1.12 | −57.0% | +2,597% | 0.15 | — | |
| 91 | Whole market | +23.6% | 47.6% | 0.69 | −55.1% | +1,334% | 0.00 | — | |
| 92 | Whole market | +19.4% | 28.6% | 0.77 | −48.8% | +524% | 0.31 | — | |
| 93 | Whole market | +16.5% | 20.0% | 0.87 | −42.0% | +319% | 0.17 | — | |
| 94 | Whole market | +16.2% | 28.9% | 0.67 | −51.3% | +630% | 0.19 | — | |
| 95 | Whole market | +9.1% | 16.9% | 0.60 | −35.8% | +152% | 0.30 | 0.03% | |
| 96 | Whole market | +20.1% | 30.2% | 0.76 | −41.1% | +163% | 0.09 | — | |
| 97 | Whole market | +35.3% | 46.9% | 0.88 | −50.9% | +2,224% | 0.02 | — | |
| 98 | Whole market | +35.3% | 35.5% | 1.03 | −55.1% | +929% | 0.23 | — | |
| 99 | Whole market | +18.8% | 25.8% | 0.80 | −59.6% | +237% | 0.12 | — | |
| 100 | Whole market | +5.8% | 18.4% | 0.40 | −23.8% | +156% | 0.17 | — |
ONC against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against ONC, compared period by period and year by year.
How do ONC's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at ONC, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- 11 of the 22 popular alternatives, led by MEDP, ABBV and EXEL, were both more rewarding and calmer than ONC over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, ONC returned 0.2% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.5%, with higher volatility (54.5% against 17.2%).
Green points earned more than ONC with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| MEDP Medpace Holdings, Inc. | +28.4% | 52.1% |
| NTRA Natera, Inc. | +28.4% | 57.6% |
| ABBV AbbVie Inc. | +25.5% | 23.4% |
| EXEL Exelixis, Inc. | +25.0% | 35.8% |
| GILD Gilead Sciences, Inc. | +22.8% | 24.9% |
| MRK Merck & Co., Inc. | +16.2% | 24.8% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.5% | 17.2% |
| INCY Incyte Corporation | +12.2% | 30.1% |
| AZN AstraZeneca PLC | +8.9% | 35.7% |
| JAZZ Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc | +8.2% | 31.5% |
| BMY Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | +6.1% | 25.0% |
| TMO Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | +2.3% | 27.8% |
| IQV IQVIA Holdings Inc. | +1.6% | 34.8% |
| ONC This pageBeOne Medicines AG | +0.2% | 54.5% |
| GMAB Genmab A/S | −3.1% | 34.1% |
| IMCR Immunocore Holdings plc | −3.2% | 49.3% |
| BMRN BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. | −5.1% | 33.0% |
| ILMN Illumina, Inc. | −7.5% | 47.0% |
| NUVB Nuvation Bio Inc. | −12.8% | 75.5% |
| HCM HUTCHMED (China) Limited | −15.0% | 65.0% |
| LEGN Legend Biotech Corporation | −18.7% | 57.0% |
| BNTX BioNTech SE | −20.1% | 52.5% |
| ZLAB Zai Lab Limited | −26.2% | 75.2% |
| ARVN Arvinas, Inc. | −38.1% | 68.6% |
Has ONC consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares ONC with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than ONC helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- NTRA outperformed ONC in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- Two of the 22 popular alternatives, NTRA and EXEL, outperformed ONC in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- ABBV, GILD and EXEL earned more for the risk they took than ONC (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than ONC over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| ONC BeOne Medicines AG (this page) | — | +3.9% | +19.5% | +22.4% | +22.9% | +21.9% | +127% | +0.9% | +1,054% | 54.5% | 0.27 | −70.0% | — | $41B | — |
| NTRA QualifiedNatera, Inc. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +2.7% | +51.9% | +93.2% | +75.4% | +113% | +901% | +249% | +3,934% | 57.6% | 0.73 | −77.7% | — | $58B | — |
| EXEL QualifiedExelixis, Inc. | 4/5 short2/3 long | +12.3% | +18.8% | +39.4% | +49.9% | +81.0% | +239% | +205% | +478% | 35.8% | 0.81 | −57.2% | — | $16B | — |
| MEDP Medical - Diagnostics & ResearchMedpace Holdings, Inc. | 2/5 short3/3 long | +3.8% | +23.8% | +28.6% | +14.5% | +19.6% | +187% | +250% | +2,003% | 52.1% | 0.73 | −42.9% | — | $18B | — |
| ILMN Medical - Diagnostics & ResearchIllumina, Inc. | 5/5 short1/3 long | +8.9% | +41.1% | +106% | +101% | +177% | +132% | −32.2% | +94.8% | 47.0% | 0.07 | −86.2% | — | $41B | — |
| ABBV Drug Manufacturers - GeneralAbbVie Inc. | 4/5 short1/3 long | +8.1% | +13.2% | +44.0% | +28.0% | +28.3% | +117% | +212% | +600% | 23.4% | 1.09 | −45.1% | — | $503B | — |
| IQV Medical - Diagnostics & ResearchIQVIA Holdings Inc. | 3/5 short1/3 long | +3.0% | +40.2% | +58.8% | +23.5% | +27.8% | +51.5% | +8.3% | +273% | 34.8% | 0.22 | −51.5% | — | $46B | — |
| MRK Drug Manufacturers - GeneralMerck & Co., Inc. | 3/5 short1/3 long | −2.4% | +16.2% | +32.1% | +41.2% | +73.0% | +56.1% | +111% | +245% | 24.8% | 0.73 | −43.4% | — | $363B | — |
| GILD Drug Manufacturers - GeneralGilead Sciences, Inc. | 3/5 short1/3 long | +3.0% | +21.3% | +19.7% | +31.6% | +32.6% | +123% | +179% | +202% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | — | $195B | — |
| TMO Medical - Diagnostics & ResearchThermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | 2/5 short1/3 long | +2.7% | +28.6% | +31.9% | +14.5% | +19.7% | +47.9% | +12.1% | +355% | 27.8% | 0.22 | −40.9% | — | $250B | — |
| JAZZ BiotechnologyJazz Pharmaceuticals plc | 2/5 short1/3 long | −10.8% | −14.3% | +6.1% | +24.0% | +55.0% | +66.9% | +48.2% | +80.5% | 31.5% | 0.41 | −52.1% | — | $14B | — |
| BMY Drug Manufacturers - GeneralBristol-Myers Squibb Company | 1/5 short1/3 long | +2.3% | +4.8% | +9.5% | +21.6% | +48.2% | +29.6% | +34.5% | +82.7% | 25.0% | 0.36 | −47.7% | — | $129B | — |
| INCY BiotechnologyIncyte Corporation | 1/5 short1/3 long | −7.9% | +1.0% | +20.9% | +15.3% | +32.8% | +112% | +77.7% | +32.6% | 30.1% | 0.53 | −66.5% | — | $24B | — |
| AZN Drug Manufacturers - GeneralAstraZeneca PLC | 0/5 short1/3 long | +2.5% | +2.3% | −10.8% | −4.9% | +4.1% | +46.6% | +53.2% | +276% | 35.7% | 0.42 | −28.7% | — | $268B | — |
| NUVB BiotechnologyNuvation Bio Inc. | 0/5 short1/3 long | −23.0% | −28.2% | −8.2% | −45.2% | +13.3% | +309% | −49.7% | — | 75.5% | 0.18 | −93.4% | — | $1.6B | — |
| GMAB BiotechnologyGenmab A/S | 5/5 short0/3 long | +13.6% | +38.6% | +44.5% | +25.7% | +33.7% | +35.1% | −14.4% | +139% | 34.1% | 0.08 | −63.1% | — | $25B | — |
| HCM Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & GenericHUTCHMED (China) Limited | 1/5 short0/3 long | +1.5% | +28.4% | −1.9% | +4.6% | −5.5% | −14.6% | −55.6% | +22.8% | 65.0% | 0.07 | −82.2% | — | $2.5B | — |
| ZLAB BiotechnologyZai Lab Limited | 1/5 short0/3 long | −16.5% | +7.5% | −3.6% | +27.2% | −24.2% | −8.3% | −78.1% | — | 75.2% | -0.04 | −92.8% | — | $2.5B | — |
| BMRN BiotechnologyBioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −10.6% | −3.0% | +4.6% | −4.7% | +6.1% | −31.6% | −23.2% | −31.1% | 33.0% | 0.00 | −62.1% | — | $11B | — |
| ARVN BiotechnologyArvinas, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −9.3% | −6.5% | −27.4% | −32.7% | −17.1% | −46.9% | −90.9% | — | 68.6% | -0.34 | −94.4% | — | $498M | — |
| BNTX BiotechnologyBioNTech SE | 0/5 short0/3 long | −11.1% | −2.4% | −17.4% | −7.3% | −15.6% | −3.1% | −67.4% | — | 52.5% | -0.17 | −82.3% | — | $23B | — |
| IMCR BiotechnologyImmunocore Holdings plc | 0/5 short0/3 long | −0.9% | −9.6% | +7.1% | −4.9% | −1.2% | −30.6% | −15.0% | — | 49.3% | 0.18 | −67.5% | — | $1.6B | — |
| LEGN BiotechnologyLegend Biotech Corporation | 0/5 short0/3 long | +1.4% | −19.7% | −27.1% | −12.1% | −41.1% | −71.1% | −64.4% | — | 57.0% | -0.09 | −78.2% | — | $3.5B | — |
How did ONC do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2017, along with where ONC ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with ONC and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
Note: ONC began trading on February 3, 2016, so the table starts with 2017, its first full calendar year, and cannot show how it fared during the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs.
- Among its popular alternatives, MEDP came out ahead of ONC most often, in eight of the nine years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, ONC finished in the top quarter in three of nine years and in the bottom quarter in no. In 2025, it ranked 3 of 23.
- ONC finished ahead of the S&P 500 in four of its nine full calendar years.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of ONC; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places ONC among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of ONC | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ONC This pageBeOne Medicines AG | — | +64.5% | +2.4% | −18.0% | −18.8% | +4.9% | +55.9% | +18.2% | +43.5% | +222% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 3 of 9 | 3 of 23 | 10 of 23 | 16 of 23 | 15 of 23 | 10 of 22 | 7 of 20 | 13 of 19 | 3 of 18 | 1 of 17 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 5 of 9 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% |
| NTRA Natera, Inc. | 5 of 9 | +44.7% | +153% | +55.9% | −57.0% | −6.2% | +195% | +141% | +55.3% | −23.2% |
| EXEL Exelixis, Inc. | 3 of 9 | +31.6% | +38.8% | +49.6% | −12.3% | −8.9% | +13.9% | −10.4% | −35.3% | +104% |
| MEDP Medpace Holdings, Inc. | 8 of 9 | +69.1% | +8.4% | +44.3% | −2.4% | +56.4% | +65.6% | +58.8% | +46.0% | +0.5% |
| ILMN Illumina, Inc. | 0 of 9 | −1.8% | −1.3% | −31.1% | −46.9% | +2.8% | +11.5% | +10.6% | +37.3% | +70.7% |
| ABBV AbbVie Inc. | 4 of 9 | +33.1% | +18.9% | −0.2% | +24.0% | +32.4% | +27.7% | +1.5% | −1.0% | +60.1% |
| IQV IQVIA Holdings Inc. | 3 of 9 | +14.7% | −15.1% | +12.9% | −27.4% | +57.5% | +16.0% | +33.0% | +18.7% | +28.7% |
| MRK Merck & Co., Inc. | 3 of 9 | +9.8% | −6.3% | +1.0% | +49.4% | +1.8% | −7.2% | +22.3% | +40.0% | −1.5% |
| GILD Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 4 of 9 | +36.6% | +18.7% | −2.0% | +23.6% | +29.9% | −6.7% | +7.9% | −9.9% | +3.0% |
| TMO Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | 4 of 9 | +11.8% | −1.7% | −3.4% | −17.3% | +43.5% | +43.7% | +45.6% | +18.2% | +35.0% |
| JAZZ Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc | 2 of 9 | +38.0% | +0.1% | −22.8% | +25.1% | −22.8% | +10.6% | +20.4% | −7.9% | +23.5% |
| BMY Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | 3 of 9 | +0.1% | +15.8% | −26.1% | +19.0% | +2.9% | +0.4% | +27.7% | −12.9% | +7.7% |
| INCY Incyte Corporation | 3 of 9 | +43.0% | +10.0% | −21.8% | +9.4% | −15.6% | −0.4% | +37.3% | −32.9% | −5.5% |
| AZN AstraZeneca PLC | 4 of 9 | +38.0% | −1.2% | +0.8% | +20.4% | +17.9% | +2.9% | +37.4% | +13.9% | +35.3% |
| NUVB Nuvation Bio Inc. | 2 of 5 | +237% | +76.2% | −21.3% | −77.4% | −27.4% | — | — | — | — |
| GMAB Genmab A/S | 3 of 9 | +47.6% | −34.4% | −24.9% | +7.1% | −2.7% | +82.1% | +35.5% | −0.6% | 0.0% |
| HCM HUTCHMED (China) Limited | 2 of 9 | −7.5% | −20.4% | +22.5% | −57.9% | +9.6% | +27.7% | +8.6% | −41.4% | +190% |
| ZLAB Zai Lab Limited | 3 of 8 | −32.6% | −4.2% | −11.0% | −51.1% | −53.6% | +225% | +79.1% | +9.4% | — |
| BMRN BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. | 2 of 9 | −9.6% | −31.8% | −6.8% | +17.1% | +0.8% | +3.7% | −0.7% | −4.5% | +7.6% |
| ARVN Arvinas, Inc. | 3 of 7 | −38.1% | −53.4% | +20.3% | −58.4% | −3.3% | +107% | +220% | — | — |
| BNTX BioNTech SE | 3 of 6 | −16.4% | +8.0% | −29.7% | −41.0% | +216% | +141% | — | — | — |
| IMCR Immunocore Holdings plc | 2 of 4 | +17.7% | −56.8% | +19.7% | +66.7% | — | — | — | — | — |
| LEGN Legend Biotech Corporation | 3 of 5 | −33.2% | −45.9% | +20.5% | +7.1% | +65.5% | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How ONC has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were ONC's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents ONC's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2016, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
Note: ONC began trading on February 3, 2016, so this list cannot include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs. The crash tests on this page show how older funds and the S&P 500 fared through those years.
- In all five of ONC's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: ONC fell 50.6% from June to October 2018, while the S&P 500 slipped only 4.3%.
- The longest climb back to a previous high took 21 months, after ONC fell 50.6% from June to October 2018.
Green means ONC fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | ONC fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 bear market | −70.0% | −10.4% | Sep 2021 | May 2022 | 8 months | Not yet | — |
| Late-2018 sell-off | −50.6% | −4.3% | Jun 2018 | Oct 2018 | 4 months | Jul 2020 | 21 months |
| No named crash | −34.7% | +13.8% | Feb 2021 | Aug 2021 | 6 months | Sep 2021 | 1 month |
| No named crash | −30.6% | +1.2% | Oct 2017 | Nov 2017 | 1 month | Jan 2018 | 2 months |
| No named crash | −30.1% | +5.6% | Oct 2020 | Dec 2020 | 2 months | Jan 2021 | 1 month |
How did ONC do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far ONC, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: ONC began trading on February 3, 2016, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or three other sell-offs. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- ONC fell further than the S&P 500 in four of the five crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when ONC fell 52.4% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
- Among its popular alternatives, MRK held up best, falling less than ONC in all five crashes they both traded through.
- ONC began trading after the 2008 financial crisis, but ten of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was GILD's 34.3%, against 55.2% for the S&P 500.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than ONC.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ONC This pageBeOne Medicines AG | — | −5.0% | −52.4% | −27.3% | −38.9% | −10.2% | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 4 of 5 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| NTRA Natera, Inc. | 0 of 5 | −6.2% | −68.0% | −57.0% | −51.1% | −11.2% | −61.5% | — | — | — | — |
| EXEL Exelixis, Inc. | 4 of 5 | 0.0% | −35.4% | −33.7% | −24.9% | −8.7% | −36.4% | −43.7% | −5.4% | −80.0% | — |
| MEDP Medpace Holdings, Inc. | 3 of 5 | −11.9% | −36.4% | −39.5% | −26.1% | −2.1% | — | — | — | — | — |
| ILMN Illumina, Inc. | 2 of 5 | −6.7% | −58.2% | −31.0% | −25.8% | −5.3% | −36.1% | −48.7% | −1.9% | −57.9% | — |
| ABBV AbbVie Inc. | 4 of 5 | −1.5% | −21.9% | −32.1% | −18.1% | −5.8% | −29.8% | — | — | — | — |
| IQV IQVIA Holdings Inc. | 3 of 5 | −6.8% | −35.9% | −48.9% | −19.2% | −5.3% | −28.7% | — | — | — | — |
| MRK Merck & Co., Inc. | 5 of 5 | −2.4% | −10.8% | −19.3% | −9.7% | −6.6% | −18.2% | −17.4% | −2.3% | −63.3% | −57.5% |
| GILD Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 5 of 5 | −1.6% | −20.0% | −13.7% | −22.7% | −5.5% | −28.7% | −18.2% | −2.1% | −34.3% | −53.6% |
| TMO Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | 5 of 5 | −2.4% | −19.8% | −24.8% | −17.2% | −8.7% | −14.7% | −24.4% | −3.6% | −53.9% | −41.8% |
| JAZZ Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc | 4 of 5 | −4.2% | −24.9% | −36.2% | −31.0% | −3.7% | −39.9% | −21.9% | −3.0% | −96.6% | — |
| BMY Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | 4 of 5 | −2.3% | −16.0% | −29.4% | −22.9% | −4.1% | −16.3% | −10.5% | 0.0% | −39.2% | −69.5% |
| INCY Incyte Corporation | 5 of 5 | −2.4% | −20.4% | −23.7% | −16.4% | −4.8% | −50.2% | −32.9% | −4.5% | −83.5% | −97.1% |
| AZN AstraZeneca PLC | 5 of 5 | −0.5% | −25.7% | −22.6% | −11.4% | −6.4% | −18.0% | −16.4% | −1.1% | −37.4% | −43.5% |
| NUVB Nuvation Bio Inc. | 0 of 2 | −8.6% | −75.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| GMAB Genmab A/S | 4 of 5 | −0.7% | −30.5% | −32.0% | −28.1% | −2.7% | −30.4% | −31.9% | 0.0% | — | — |
| HCM HUTCHMED (China) Limited | 1 of 5 | −10.7% | −76.7% | −44.7% | −36.5% | −17.2% | — | — | — | — | — |
| ZLAB Zai Lab Limited | 1 of 5 | −13.5% | −61.2% | −29.2% | −25.3% | −22.8% | — | — | — | — | — |
| BMRN BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. | 3 of 5 | −4.5% | −22.9% | −26.3% | −24.4% | −11.6% | −53.6% | −23.1% | −4.1% | −74.9% | −89.7% |
| ARVN Arvinas, Inc. | 0 of 3 | −10.7% | −54.4% | −35.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BNTX BioNTech SE | 2 of 3 | −1.2% | −45.7% | −49.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| IMCR Immunocore Holdings plc | 2 of 2 | −3.4% | −41.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| LEGN Legend Biotech Corporation | 1 of 2 | −5.9% | −33.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
How closely does ONC move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares ONC with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- None of the 16 popular alternatives with the same record had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than ONC's 2.23.
- Over the past 10 years, ONC captured 111% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 50% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.71. Its share of the market's gains was larger than its share of the losses.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than ONC's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ONC This pageBeOne Medicines AG | 111% | 50% | 2.23 | 0.71 |
| NTRA Natera, Inc. | 169% | 82% | 2.06 | 1.40 |
| EXEL Exelixis, Inc. | 74% | 43% | 1.72 | 0.73 |
| ABBV AbbVie Inc. | 92% | 57% | 1.62 | 0.54 |
| AZN AstraZeneca PLC | 60% | 39% | 1.52 | 0.39 |
| GILD Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 52% | 36% | 1.44 | 0.35 |
| MEDP Medpace Holdings, Inc. | 168% | 118% | 1.42 | 1.24 |
| MRK Merck & Co., Inc. | 64% | 46% | 1.39 | 0.30 |
| TMO Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | 104% | 104% | 1.00 | 0.81 |
| GMAB Genmab A/S | 65% | 78% | 0.83 | 0.72 |
| JAZZ Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc | 62% | 78% | 0.79 | 0.64 |
| IQV IQVIA Holdings Inc. | 128% | 167% | 0.77 | 1.31 |
| BMY Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | 55% | 75% | 0.73 | 0.41 |
| ILMN Illumina, Inc. | 120% | 200% | 0.60 | 1.19 |
| INCY Incyte Corporation | 52% | 87% | 0.60 | 0.77 |
| HCM HUTCHMED (China) Limited | 50% | 85% | 0.59 | 0.63 |
| BMRN BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. | 20% | 70% | 0.29 | 0.38 |
What diversifies ONC?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with ONC's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing ONC with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in ONC into DXJ would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 20% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+0.2% for ONC alone, +6.9% for the mix).
- DXJ made money in two of the two calendar years in which ONC lost money.
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of ONC over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.26 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which ONC lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% ONC and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2023 | 2022 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ONC BeOne Medicines AG (this page) | 1.00 | +0.9% | 0.27 | −18.0% | −18.8% | 43.4% | +0.2% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.25 | +119% | 1.48 | +17.4% | +3.8% | 35.2% | +4.8% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | -0.10 | +225% | 1.34 | +42.0% | +6.0% | 34.5% | +6.9% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.26 | +103% | 1.06 | +8.0% | +10.4% | 35.5% | +4.5% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.31 | +86.8% | 1.03 | +1.7% | +7.0% | 35.7% | +3.8% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.21 | +83.6% | 0.95 | +20.1% | −5.1% | 35.2% | +4.2% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | -0.01 | +304% | 0.94 | +73.4% | −33.5% | 35.3% | +9.3% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.14 | +178% | 0.94 | −0.6% | +64.4% | 35.8% | +6.2% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.29 | +120% | 0.93 | +12.7% | −0.8% | 35.8% | +5.0% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2023 | 2022 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ONC BeOne Medicines AG (this page) | 1.00 | +0.9% | 0.27 | −18.0% | −18.8% | 43.4% | +0.2% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.01 | +471% | 1.54 | +34.1% | +54.1% | 35.1% | +9.0% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.08 | +2,780% | 1.43 | +160% | +1.3% | 37.5% | +20.8% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | -0.04 | +397% | 1.41 | +24.1% | +51.8% | 34.8% | +8.5% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.15 | +1,452% | 1.41 | +79.6% | +17.0% | 37.1% | +16.8% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.02 | +660% | 1.39 | +30.4% | +86.6% | 35.4% | +10.9% |
Common questions
What was ONC's worst drawdown?
ONC's deepest decline since it began trading in 2016 was 70.0%, from September 2021 to May 2022. It has not yet climbed back to that peak. Because ONC launched in February 2016, that record does not include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs.
What were ONC's best and worst years?
Over nine full calendar years, ONC's best year was 2017, when it returned 222%. Its worst was 2022, with a return of -18.8%.
Is there a better investment than ONC?
Among ONC's popular alternatives, EXEL, ABBV and GILD earned more than ONC with less volatility over the past 5 years. EXEL returned 25.0% a year at 35.8% volatility, against 0.2% a year at 54.5%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, LLY (pharmaceuticals) and RPRX (pharmaceuticals) earned more than ONC with less volatility over the past 5 years. LLY returned 41.2% a year at 32.8% volatility, against 0.2% a year at 54.5%.
Is ONC more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. ONC's volatility over the past 5 years was 54.5%, 3.2 times the S&P 500's 17.2%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, ONC's return lands within 54.5% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is ONC's Sharpe ratio?
ONC's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.27, against 0.78 for the S&P 500, so ONC earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is ONC with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, ONC's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.22 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against ONC instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a ONC holding.
What are the best alternatives to ONC?
Of the 22 popular alternatives we compared, two outperformed ONC in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: NTRA and EXEL.
Did ONC outperform the S&P 500?
ONC finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in four of nine full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +64.5%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did ONC do in stock market crashes?
ONC fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in one of the five major crashes it has traded through, and further in four. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when ONC fell 52.4% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
What diversifies ONC?
These had a low correlation with ONC over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.25), DXJ (correlation -0.10) and EMLP (correlation 0.26); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.01), CLS (correlation 0.08) and MCK (correlation -0.04). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than ONC's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of ONC's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to ONC
NTRANatera
ILMNIllumina
ABBVAbbVie
IQVIQVIA
MRKMerck & Co., Inc.
GILDGilead Sciences
TMOThermo Fisher Scientific
BMYBristol-Myers Squibb
AZNAstraZeneca