Relative Intelligence · Neurology Therapeutics
Updated · refreshed every trading day

How Biogen (BIIB) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
The short answer
- Returns
- −1.8% a year over the past 5 years, against +11.7% for the S&P 500. $10,000 grew to $9,000 over 10 years, against $42,000 in SPY. Details ↓
- Risk
- More volatile than the S&P 500: volatility 34.8% against 17.2%; worst decline in 10 years −72.7% against −33.7%. Details ↓
- Better options
- 10 of its 21 popular alternatives earned more with less volatility over the past 5 years, including LLY, REGN and AMGN. Details ↓
- Track record
- BIIB beat the S&P 500 in 14 of 29 full calendar years, and fell less than it in 5 of 10 major crashes. Details ↓
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on BIIB alone. It places BIIB (Biogen Inc.) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where BIIB stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: BIIB's full trading record, from September 1991 through October 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of November 2, 2026.
Data as of November 2, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
This page answers the following questions about BIIB
Key findings
Not AI-generatedThese key findings are generated by our proprietary relative intelligence engine, directly from the data on this page.
- Right nowBIIB has run far ahead of the market, rising 33.0% over the past 6 months against 5.3% for the S&P 500 and 1.4% for the Nasdaq 100. That said, it is 47.7% below its high, bear-market territory, while the S&P 500 sits 3.5% below a record. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?BIIB's 23.4% gain over the past 3 months far outran its industry: the neurology therapeutics ETF XBI (State Street SPDR S&P Biotech ETF) rose 3.2%. The S&P 500 fell 0.5%. BIIB rose 13.2% last month as the S&P 500 fell 2.3% and the Nasdaq 100 fell 9.1%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, BIIB rose 64.4% against 11.3% for the S&P 500 and 8.3% for the Nasdaq 100. By year ↓
- Long termBIIB turned $10,000 into $8,980 over the past decade, against $42,000 in the S&P 500. BIIB's 10-year loss of 10.2% puts it behind 86% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 320%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashThe Covid crash took 21.2% off BIIB, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. That was more than LLY (Eli Lilly and Company, 16.9%) but less than NVS (Novartis, 25.5%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, BIIB has a correlation of 0.06 over 5 years, less closely than 97% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is a real diversifier. That said, over 10 years BIIB took more of the market's losses than of its gains: 35% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 76% of its losses in falling ones, with a beta of 0.26. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Nearby categories and themes
- MRK (Merck & Co., Inc., pharmaceuticals) and BBH (VanEck Biotech ETF, biotechnology) earned more than BIIB with less volatility over the past 5 years. MRK returned 14.2% a year at 24.7% volatility, against a loss of 1.8% a year at 34.8%.
- Whole market
- 1,703 of the 3,627 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than BIIB with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL (Apple), MSFT (Microsoft) and GOOG (Alphabet).
How much would $10,000 in BIIB have grown?
- $10,000 invested in BIIB at the end of October 1997 would have grown to $399,429 by October 2026, more than the $135,020 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of BIIB, and GILD finished highest, at $2,337,632.
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in BIIB over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of BIIB over the same span and BIIB's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Choose a period
From the end of October 1997 to the end of October 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 165 of the 1,050 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of BIIB; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- GILD$2M+23,276% total · +20.7% a year
- REGN$897,454+8,875% total · +16.8% a year
- DHR$860,141+8,501% total · +16.6% a year
- AMGN$566,944+5,569% total · +14.9% a year
- LLY$438,164+4,282% total · +13.9% a year
- BIIB$399,429+3,894% total · +13.6% a year
- VRTX$378,940+3,689% total · +13.4% a year
- TMO$260,575+2,506% total · +11.9% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$135,020+1,250% total · +9.4% a year
- NVS$117,283+1,073% total · +8.9% a year
From the end of October 2021 to the end of October 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 2,659 of the 3,626 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of BIIB; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- LLY$58,232+482% total · +42.2% a year
- GILD$31,433+214% total · +25.7% a year
- AMGN$26,308+163% total · +21.3% a year
- NVS$23,565+136% total · +18.7% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$17,593+75.9% total · +12.0% a year
- REGN$14,637+46.4% total · +7.9% a year
- TMO$11,169+11.7% total · +2.2% a year
- IQV$10,226+2.3% total · +0.4% a year
- BIIB$9,510−4.9% total · −1.0% a year
- ILMN$5,850−41.5% total · −10.2% a year
BIIB at a glance
- BIIB is still 47.7% below its all-time high.
- BIIB's deepest decline since it began trading in 1991 was 90.0%, from October 1991 to December 1994. It took 12 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, BIIB's best was 1999, when it returned 318%, and its worst was 2002, when it lost 51.9%. It lost money in 11 of those years.
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
The company
- Market value
- $37B
- Industry
- Drug Manufacturers - General
- Price history from
- September 1991
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +64.4%total return
- Past 3 years
- +3.0%+1.0% a year
- Past 5 years
- −8.6%−1.8% a year
- Past 10 years
- −10.2%−1.1% a year
- Best calendar year
- +318%1999
- Worst calendar year
- −51.9%2002
- Losing years
- 11 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 34.8%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.11return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −90.0%Oct 1991 to Dec 1994
- From its all-time high
- −47.7%below the peak
BIIB against the whole market
Where BIIB ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does BIIB rank among all stocks?
- BIIB's 10-year return ranks in the bottom 14% of the 2,186 stocks worth at least $300 million with 10 years of history.
- BIIB's 1-year return ranks in the top 11% of the 3,272 stocks worth at least $300 million with 1 year of history.
This section ranks BIIB on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how BIIB stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | BIIB | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +64.4% | 361 of 3,272 | top 11% |
| 3-year return | +3.0% | 2,266 of 2,999 | bottom 25% |
| 5-year return | −8.6% | 1,864 of 2,886 | bottom 36% |
| 10-year return | −10.2% | 1,875 of 2,186 | bottom 15% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 34.8% | 1,116 of 2,886 | top 39% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.11 | 2,097 of 2,886 | bottom 28% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −72.7% | 1,381 of 2,183 | bottom 38% |
What has beaten BIIB on both return and risk?
- 774 stocks and 929 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than BIIB over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 47% of the 3,627 screened.
- Among those with at least half BIIB's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 41.9% a year at 24.8% volatility, 29% less than BIIB's 34.8%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.54 against 0.11 for BIIB. HWM earned the most, 47.8% a year, while still swinging less than BIIB (33.0% against 34.8%).
- Among BIIB's popular alternatives, LLY, GILD and NVS are in the region. LLY earned 41.9% a year against a loss of 1.8% a year for BIIB, at 33.0% volatility, 5% less than BIIB's 34.8%.
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). BIIB sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than BIIB with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to BIIB; faint dots are 88 more of the 1,703 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,627 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than BIIB?
- Among BIIB's popular alternatives, LLY, REGN and AMGN earned more than BIIB with less volatility over the past 5 years. LLY returned 41.9% a year at 33.0% volatility, against a loss of 1.8% a year at 34.8%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, MRK (pharmaceuticals) and BBH (biotechnology) earned more than BIIB with less volatility over the past 5 years. MRK returned 14.2% a year at 24.7% volatility, against a loss of 1.8% a year at 34.8%.
- Across the whole market, 1,703 of the 3,627 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than BIIB with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL, MSFT and GOOG.
Investments that beat BIIB over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat BIIB over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks BIIB's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than BIIB follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than BIIB's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× BIIB's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than BIIB's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with BIIB?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| −1.8% | 34.8% | 0.11 | −72.7% | −10.2% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +11.7% | 17.2% | 0.73 | −33.7% | +320% | 0.06 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against BIIB. 11 of 21 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +41.9% | 33.0% | 1.23 | −34.5% | +2,172% | 0.31 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +8.7% | 31.6% | 0.42 | −59.7% | +182% | 0.42 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +20.5% | 24.9% | 0.88 | −24.9% | +352% | 0.33 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +25.3% | 25.0% | 1.03 | −30.5% | +235% | 0.16 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +18.5% | 20.7% | 0.93 | −26.8% | +265% | 0.22 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +25.0% | 29.1% | 0.92 | −41.6% | +609% | 0.25 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Neurology Therapeutics and Biotechnology and the categories next to it (Neurodegenerative Disease Therapies, Specialty Pharmaceuticals, Pharmaceuticals, Life Sciences Tools, Rare Disease Therapeutics, Medical Devices), plus BIIB's specific themes. 60 of 356 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +14.2% | 24.7% | 0.66 | −43.4% | +259% | 0.42 | — | ||
BBHVanEck Biotech ETF · Biotechnology | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +5.2% | 21.9% | 0.34 | −39.9% | +161% | 0.43 | 0.35% | |
EXELExelixis, Inc. · Oncology | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +26.2% | 35.9% | 0.83 | −57.2% | +549% | 0.12 | — | |
GMABGenmab A/S · Antibody Therapeutics | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +4.1% | 36.7% | 0.29 | −63.1% | +235% | 0.32 | — | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +24.3% | 23.4% | 1.05 | −45.1% | +665% | 0.14 | — | ||
| Similar return, lower volatility | −1.0% | 23.2% | 0.07 | −39.6% | +243% | 0.03 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 2,143 of 3,340 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
USFRWisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund · Treasury Bonds | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +4.0% | 0.4% | 9.82 | −0.8% | +28.9% | -0.03 | 0.15% | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +33.6% | 32.9% | 1.05 | −64.2% | +410% | 0.01 | — | ||
FLRTPacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF · Bank Loans | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +6.0% | 2.3% | 2.54 | −20.9% | +58.7% | -0.14 | 0.60% | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +16.7% | 19.1% | 0.91 | −28.3% | +193% | -0.03 | 0.40% | ||
SAICScience Applications International Corporation · Business Services | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +12.5% | 30.7% | 0.54 | −45.9% | +163% | -0.07 | — | |
FLOTiShares Floating Rate Bond ETF · Floating Rate Bonds | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +4.5% | 1.8% | 2.50 | −13.5% | +35.9% | -0.06 | 0.15% | |
| On the frontierHigher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +49.4% | 33.6% | 1.37 | −79.7% | +1,315% | 0.06 | — | ||
| Similar return, lower volatilitySmaller losses in recent crashes | −1.4% | 7.7% | -0.14 | −23.9% | +5.4% | 0.14 | 0.15% | ||
What these numbers mean for BIIB
- Annual return
- BIIB lost 1.8% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 11.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $9,140. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- BIIB's volatility over the past 5 years was 34.8%, about twice the S&P 500's 17.2%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, BIIB's return lands within 34.8% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- BIIB's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.11, against 0.73 for the S&P 500, so BIIB earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- BIIB's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 72.7%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 72.7% fall takes a 266% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, BIIB's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.06 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are close to unrelated, or move in opposite directions, so it can steady a stock portfolio. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against BIIB instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a BIIB holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 1,703 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than BIIB with less volatility
Out of 3,627 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with BIIB | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Popular alternative | +41.9% | 33.0% | 1.23 | −34.5% | +2,172% | 0.31 | — | |
| 2 | USFRWisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund · Treasury Bonds | Whole market | +4.0% | 0.4% | 9.82 | −0.8% | +28.9% | -0.03 | 0.15% |
| 3 | Whole market | +33.6% | 32.9% | 1.05 | −64.2% | +410% | 0.01 | — | |
| 4 | FLRTPacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF · Bank Loans | Whole market | +6.0% | 2.3% | 2.54 | −20.9% | +58.7% | -0.14 | 0.60% |
| 5 | Whole market | +16.7% | 19.1% | 0.91 | −28.3% | +193% | -0.03 | 0.40% | |
| 6 | SAICScience Applications International Corporation · Business Services | Whole market | +12.5% | 30.7% | 0.54 | −45.9% | +163% | -0.07 | — |
| 7 | FLOTiShares Floating Rate Bond ETF · Floating Rate Bonds | Whole market | +4.5% | 1.8% | 2.50 | −13.5% | +35.9% | -0.06 | 0.15% |
| 8 | EXLSExlService Holdings, Inc. · IT Services | Whole market | +10.4% | 32.6% | 0.47 | −51.3% | +377% | -0.08 | — |
| 9 | Whole market | +2.7% | 2.9% | 0.96 | −6.3% | +33.3% | -0.14 | 0.03% | |
| 10 | Popular alternative | +8.7% | 31.6% | 0.42 | −59.7% | +182% | 0.42 | — | |
| 11 | VGSHVanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF · Short-Term Treasuries | Whole market | +2.1% | 2.0% | 1.04 | −5.6% | +19.6% | 0.02 | 0.03% |
| 12 | Whole market | +26.9% | 23.9% | 1.12 | −63.3% | +408% | 0.06 | — | |
| 13 | Whole market | +2.5% | 2.9% | 0.86 | −12.9% | +29.9% | 0.07 | 0.03% | |
| 14 | JAAAJanus Henderson AAA CLO ETF · AAA CLO Debt | Whole market | +5.1% | 1.7% | 3.00 | −2.6% | — | -0.02 | 0.20% |
| 15 | NEARiShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF · Short-Term Bonds | Whole market | +4.0% | 1.4% | 2.77 | −9.6% | +32.5% | 0.02 | 0.25% |
| 16 | Whole market | +41.9% | 24.8% | 1.54 | −46.1% | +388% | 0.11 | — | |
| 17 | Whole market | +18.2% | 28.0% | 0.74 | −38.5% | +1,226% | 0.07 | — | |
| 18 | FLTRVanEck IG Floating Rate ETF · Floating Rate Bonds | Whole market | +4.8% | 2.1% | 2.21 | −17.8% | +41.7% | -0.09 | 0.14% |
| 19 | FLRNState Street SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF · Floating Rate Bonds | Whole market | +4.5% | 1.7% | 2.62 | −14.6% | +36.1% | -0.08 | 0.15% |
| 20 | STIPiShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF · Inflation-Protected Bonds | Whole market | +3.0% | 2.8% | 1.09 | −5.5% | +35.7% | -0.16 | 0.03% |
| 21 | Whole market | +19.0% | 17.1% | 1.11 | −58.1% | +205% | -0.03 | — | |
| 22 | SUBiShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF · Short-Term Municipal Bonds | Whole market | +1.6% | 1.7% | 0.94 | −9.5% | +16.4% | 0.07 | 0.07% |
| 23 | Whole market | +14.0% | 32.4% | 0.57 | −44.6% | +630% | 0.11 | — | |
| 24 | BWFGBankwell Financial Group, Inc. · Regional Banks | Whole market | +22.0% | 28.6% | 0.84 | −64.7% | +271% | -0.08 | — |
| 25 | Whole market | +9.7% | 28.2% | 0.47 | −37.1% | +861% | -0.07 | — | |
| 26 | Same or nearby category | +14.2% | 24.7% | 0.66 | −43.4% | +259% | 0.42 | — | |
| 27 | PFISPeoples Financial Services Corp. · Regional Banks | Whole market | +14.3% | 31.6% | 0.58 | −43.0% | +171% | 0.17 | — |
| 28 | RAVINorthern Trust Ultra-Short Fixed Income ETF · Ultrashort Bonds | Whole market | +3.8% | 1.4% | 2.65 | −3.7% | +31.4% | -0.03 | 0.26% |
| 29 | Whole market | +10.7% | 17.5% | 0.67 | −35.0% | +304% | 0.06 | 0.03% | |
| 30 | LMBSFirst Trust Low Duration Opportunities ETF · Mortgage-Backed Securities | Whole market | +3.2% | 2.6% | 1.20 | −6.5% | +26.2% | 0.04 | 0.66% |
| 31 | Whole market | +11.8% | 16.9% | 0.75 | −34.0% | +323% | 0.06 | 0.03% | |
| 32 | Whole market | +22.2% | 22.7% | 1.00 | −25.7% | +552% | 0.12 | — | |
| 33 | Whole market | +13.9% | 17.2% | 0.85 | −30.4% | +288% | 0.09 | — | |
| 34 | BBHVanEck Biotech ETF · Biotechnology | Same or nearby category | +5.2% | 21.9% | 0.34 | −39.9% | +161% | 0.43 | 0.35% |
| 35 | Popular alternative | +20.5% | 24.9% | 0.88 | −24.9% | +352% | 0.33 | — | |
| 36 | Whole market | +27.0% | 26.6% | 1.04 | −61.0% | +231% | 0.01 | — | |
| 37 | SHYGiShares 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond ETF · Short-Term High Yield | Whole market | +4.6% | 5.8% | 0.81 | −19.3% | +59.0% | 0.10 | 0.30% |
| 38 | NEUNewMarket Corporation · Specialty Chemicals | Whole market | +19.9% | 26.4% | 0.82 | −40.7% | +134% | 0.01 | — |
| 39 | Whole market | +17.7% | 24.3% | 0.80 | −43.6% | +543% | -0.02 | — | |
| 40 | ERIEErie Indemnity Company · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +7.2% | 31.5% | 0.38 | −60.9% | +235% | 0.16 | — |
| 41 | SJMThe J. M. Smucker Company · Packaged Foods | Whole market | +4.8% | 25.2% | 0.31 | −38.1% | +38.1% | 0.22 | — |
| 42 | CCZComcast Holdings Corp. · Exchange-Traded Debt | Whole market | +2.6% | 22.6% | 0.23 | −24.7% | +72.5% | -0.10 | — |
| 43 | Whole market | +16.1% | 22.7% | 0.78 | −36.4% | +467% | 0.02 | — | |
| 44 | ULSTState Street Ultra Short Term Bond ETF · Ultrashort Bonds | Whole market | +3.8% | 1.0% | 3.75 | −6.2% | +30.8% | 0.05 | 0.20% |
| 45 | Whole market | +30.9% | 26.0% | 1.17 | −62.3% | +298% | -0.13 | — | |
| 46 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Dividend Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +204% | 0.12 | 0.40% |
| 47 | Whole market | +15.6% | 23.7% | 0.73 | −41.0% | +571% | -0.01 | — | |
| 48 | BALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · US Equity Buffer | Whole market | +6.2% | 3.4% | 1.82 | −4.9% | — | -0.04 | 0.69% |
| 49 | Whole market | +14.6% | 16.9% | 0.90 | −37.0% | +211% | 0.12 | — | |
| 50 | Whole market | +19.6% | 25.3% | 0.84 | −55.8% | +229% | -0.01 | — | |
| 51 | Whole market | +17.2% | 23.0% | 0.81 | −31.4% | +741% | 0.06 | — | |
| 52 | VRIGInvesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF · Investment Grade Bonds | Whole market | +4.7% | 1.3% | 3.55 | −13.1% | +40.8% | -0.11 | 0.30% |
| 53 | Whole market | +22.8% | 23.4% | 1.00 | −42.9% | +255% | -0.06 | — | |
| 54 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · Japan Equity | Whole market | +26.2% | 19.1% | 1.32 | −39.1% | +424% | 0.11 | 0.48% |
| 55 | Whole market | +34.3% | 29.4% | 1.16 | −54.9% | +481% | -0.14 | — | |
| 56 | Whole market | +18.3% | 18.2% | 1.02 | −40.0% | +381% | 0.18 | — | |
| 57 | Whole market | +22.9% | 24.8% | 0.96 | −67.2% | +231% | -0.01 | — | |
| 58 | Whole market | +12.5% | 23.1% | 0.63 | −35.1% | +534% | 0.06 | 0.18% | |
| 59 | LDURPIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active Exchange-Traded Fund · Short-Term Bonds | Whole market | +2.5% | 2.1% | 1.18 | −8.7% | +27.3% | 0.02 | 0.54% |
| 60 | Whole market | +26.3% | 32.3% | 0.89 | −43.4% | +836% | 0.14 | — | |
| 61 | Whole market | +15.1% | 26.3% | 0.67 | −42.0% | +348% | 0.06 | — | |
| 62 | Whole market | +20.8% | 24.4% | 0.90 | −52.0% | +328% | -0.06 | — | |
| 63 | Whole market | +34.1% | 32.5% | 1.07 | −37.5% | +994% | 0.11 | — | |
| 64 | Whole market | +12.3% | 13.7% | 0.92 | −36.8% | +245% | 0.12 | 0.03% | |
| 65 | Whole market | +36.2% | 25.0% | 1.37 | −38.1% | +693% | -0.04 | — | |
| 66 | Whole market | +19.1% | 28.7% | 0.75 | −48.8% | +524% | 0.02 | — | |
| 67 | Whole market | +16.2% | 20.0% | 0.85 | −42.0% | +317% | 0.08 | — | |
| 68 | GVIiShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF · Investment Grade Bonds | Whole market | +1.1% | 4.0% | 0.29 | −12.9% | +18.6% | 0.10 | 0.20% |
| 69 | Whole market | +15.8% | 28.9% | 0.65 | −51.3% | +648% | 0.10 | — | |
| 70 | Whole market | +20.4% | 30.3% | 0.77 | −41.1% | +161% | 0.00 | — | |
| 71 | Whole market | +9.1% | 16.9% | 0.60 | −35.8% | +158% | 0.11 | 0.03% | |
| 72 | TRTootsie Roll Industries, Inc. · Food & Beverages | Whole market | +8.2% | 25.5% | 0.44 | −36.4% | +68.8% | 0.08 | — |
| 73 | Whole market | +19.6% | 25.9% | 0.82 | −59.6% | +259% | 0.07 | — | |
| 74 | MUNIPIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund · Intermediate Municipal Bonds | Whole market | +1.2% | 3.5% | 0.36 | −11.2% | +22.4% | 0.13 | 0.35% |
| 75 | Whole market | +33.6% | 30.7% | 1.10 | −45.7% | +333% | 0.03 | — | |
| 76 | Whole market | +5.2% | 18.5% | 0.37 | −23.8% | +147% | 0.06 | — | |
| 77 | Whole market | +13.6% | 29.5% | 0.58 | −64.5% | +148% | -0.08 | — | |
| 78 | Whole market | +21.0% | 22.0% | 0.98 | −56.1% | +118% | -0.06 | — | |
| 79 | Whole market | +20.8% | 21.4% | 0.99 | −53.7% | +136% | 0.00 | — | |
| 80 | Whole market | +11.2% | 20.9% | 0.61 | −32.6% | +433% | 0.07 | — | |
| 81 | Whole market | +11.5% | 30.0% | 0.51 | −52.5% | +216% | 0.02 | — | |
| 82 | Whole market | +18.1% | 31.4% | 0.69 | −44.3% | +398% | 0.14 | — | |
| 83 | AOMiShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF · Balanced Allocation | Whole market | +4.2% | 8.3% | 0.54 | −20.0% | +79.9% | 0.10 | 0.20% |
| 84 | Whole market | +34.5% | 29.4% | 1.16 | −47.6% | +464% | 0.00 | — | |
| 85 | Whole market | +24.5% | 30.4% | 0.88 | −59.8% | +382% | -0.02 | — | |
| 86 | Whole market | +22.5% | 25.7% | 0.93 | −30.3% | +892% | -0.08 | — | |
| 87 | Whole market | +17.6% | 22.4% | 0.84 | −42.5% | +346% | 0.10 | — | |
| 88 | Whole market | +15.0% | 29.3% | 0.63 | −49.6% | +474% | -0.03 | — | |
| 89 | Whole market | +16.3% | 29.4% | 0.66 | −56.5% | +245% | 0.00 | — | |
| 90 | CIBGrupo Cibest S.A. · Banks | Whole market | +32.2% | 33.0% | 1.01 | −70.4% | +343% | -0.04 | — |
| 91 | Whole market | +16.5% | 26.2% | 0.72 | −35.1% | +743% | 0.03 | 0.09% | |
| 92 | Whole market | +26.8% | 29.0% | 0.97 | −54.7% | +795% | 0.00 | — | |
| 93 | DBAInvesco DB Agriculture Fund · Agricultural Commodities | Whole market | +9.3% | 13.8% | 0.72 | −35.3% | +52.4% | -0.31 | 0.90% |
| 94 | Whole market | +17.6% | 24.0% | 0.80 | −36.7% | +237% | -0.09 | — | |
| 95 | Whole market | +15.8% | 20.4% | 0.82 | −42.6% | +254% | 0.12 | — | |
| 96 | Whole market | +3.2% | 26.6% | 0.25 | −49.0% | +276% | 0.02 | — | |
| 97 | WMKWeis Markets, Inc. · Grocery Stores | Whole market | +7.9% | 28.7% | 0.41 | −48.6% | +66.9% | -0.10 | — |
| 98 | FTQIFirst Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF · Nasdaq Options Income | Whole market | +11.0% | 14.8% | 0.78 | −19.5% | +121% | -0.04 | 0.75% |
| 99 | Whole market | +19.7% | 21.7% | 0.94 | −47.3% | +434% | 0.12 | — | |
| 100 | Whole market | +23.1% | 24.4% | 0.98 | −50.5% | +345% | 0.00 | — |
BIIB against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against BIIB, compared period by period and year by year.
How do BIIB's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
- Ten of the 21 popular alternatives, led by LLY, GILD and VRTX, were both more rewarding and calmer than BIIB over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, BIIB returned -1.8% a year, less than the S&P 500's 11.7%, with higher volatility (34.8% against 17.2%).
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at BIIB, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
Green points earned more than BIIB with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| LLY Eli Lilly and Company | +41.9% | 33.0% |
| GILD Gilead Sciences, Inc. | +25.3% | 25.0% |
| VRTX Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated | +25.0% | 29.1% |
| AMGN Amgen Inc. | +20.5% | 24.9% |
| NVS Novartis AG | +18.5% | 20.7% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +11.7% | 17.2% |
| PTCT PTC Therapeutics, Inc. | +8.8% | 55.1% |
| NBIX Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. | +8.8% | 32.9% |
| REGN Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | +8.7% | 31.6% |
| BMY Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | +5.7% | 25.0% |
| IONS Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | +4.6% | 43.9% |
| TMO Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | +1.7% | 27.9% |
| SNY Sanofi | +1.4% | 25.4% |
| ACAD Acadia Pharmaceuticals Inc. | +1.3% | 55.0% |
| IQV IQVIA Holdings Inc. | +0.1% | 34.8% |
| ALNY Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | −1.2% | 51.7% |
| BIIB This pageBiogen Inc. | −1.8% | 34.8% |
| DHR Danaher Corporation | −3.4% | 29.2% |
| PRAX Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. | −3.4% | 127% |
| BMRN BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. | −7.1% | 32.8% |
| ILMN Illumina, Inc. | −11.0% | 47.8% |
| DNLI Denali Therapeutics Inc. | −18.1% | 62.2% |
| SRPT Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. | −25.8% | 70.4% |
Has BIIB consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
- Five of the 21 popular alternatives, led by LLY, AMGN and GILD, outperformed BIIB in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- LLY, GILD and NVS earned more for the risk they took than BIIB (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
- NVS outperformed BIIB over all three long-term periods but in only one of the five short-term ones, so BIIB has had the better of it lately.
This section compares BIIB with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than BIIB helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than BIIB over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| BIIB Biogen Inc. (this page) | — | +13.2% | +23.4% | +33.0% | +40.0% | +64.4% | +3.0% | −8.6% | −10.2% | 34.8% | 0.11 | −72.7% | — | $37B | — |
| LLY QualifiedEli Lilly and Company | 3/5 short3/3 long | +23.5% | +26.0% | +46.3% | +31.3% | +58.4% | +148% | +475% | +2,172% | 33.0% | 1.23 | −34.5% | — | $1.3T | — |
| AMGN QualifiedAmgen Inc. | 3/5 short3/3 long | +15.5% | +23.6% | +45.7% | +45.0% | +61.4% | +91.0% | +154% | +352% | 24.9% | 0.88 | −24.9% | — | $252B | — |
| GILD QualifiedGilead Sciences, Inc. | 3/5 short3/3 long | +17.7% | +30.6% | +29.9% | +42.6% | +43.0% | +130% | +209% | +235% | 25.0% | 1.03 | −30.5% | — | $211B | — |
| REGN QualifiedRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 3/5 short3/3 long | +30.7% | +26.8% | +35.9% | +24.3% | +50.4% | +18.5% | +51.9% | +182% | 31.6% | 0.42 | −59.7% | — | $99B | — |
| ILMN QualifiedIllumina, Inc. | 3/5 short2/3 long | −17.0% | +14.3% | +62.6% | +68.6% | +88.8% | +108% | −44.1% | +71.9% | 47.8% | -0.01 | −86.2% | — | $34B | — |
| TMO Medical - Diagnostics & ResearchThermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | 1/5 short3/3 long | +4.3% | +19.0% | +47.8% | +15.5% | +21.3% | +54.0% | +8.8% | +382% | 27.9% | 0.20 | −40.9% | — | $252B | — |
| NVS Drug Manufacturers - GeneralNovartis AG | 1/5 short3/3 long | +14.6% | +5.1% | +11.7% | +18.9% | +32.9% | +86.1% | +134% | +265% | 20.7% | 0.93 | −26.8% | — | $305B | — |
| IQV Medical - Diagnostics & ResearchIQVIA Holdings Inc. | 1/5 short3/3 long | +0.1% | +10.7% | +60.6% | +14.7% | +20.8% | +35.7% | +0.2% | +257% | 34.8% | 0.17 | −51.5% | — | $43B | — |
| SNY Drug Manufacturers - GeneralSanofi | 1/5 short3/3 long | +14.1% | +6.1% | +5.1% | −1.8% | −5.4% | +10.8% | +7.1% | +70.2% | 25.4% | 0.18 | −33.5% | — | $110B | — |
| PTCT BiotechnologyPTC Therapeutics, Inc. | 0/5 short3/3 long | −4.1% | −10.6% | −7.0% | −20.7% | −10.4% | +237% | +52.8% | +874% | 55.1% | 0.43 | −73.8% | — | $5.1B | — |
| VRTX BiotechnologyVertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated | 0/5 short3/3 long | +9.6% | +17.5% | +28.7% | +22.3% | +29.8% | +46.9% | +205% | +609% | 29.1% | 0.92 | −41.6% | — | $140B | — |
| NBIX BiotechnologyNeurocrine Biosciences, Inc. | 0/5 short3/3 long | +1.5% | −12.6% | +8.4% | +3.4% | +2.4% | +28.2% | +52.1% | +242% | 32.9% | 0.42 | −46.4% | — | $15B | — |
| BMY Drug Manufacturers - GeneralBristol-Myers Squibb Company | 0/5 short3/3 long | +3.1% | −2.7% | +12.2% | +21.7% | +43.0% | +42.0% | +32.2% | +77.9% | 25.0% | 0.35 | −47.7% | — | $129B | — |
| ALNY BiotechnologyAlnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 0/5 short2/3 long | −28.1% | −28.3% | −47.0% | −60.5% | −63.6% | −2.2% | −5.8% | +339% | 51.7% | 0.23 | −67.8% | — | $21B | — |
| DHR Medical - Diagnostics & ResearchDanaher Corporation | 0/5 short2/3 long | +6.5% | +15.7% | +31.5% | −0.4% | +7.3% | +20.3% | −15.7% | +253% | 29.2% | 0.03 | −43.8% | — | $160B | — |
| IONS BiotechnologyIonis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 0/5 short2/3 long | −5.3% | −24.3% | −45.3% | −48.2% | −44.0% | −5.7% | +25.1% | +52.7% | 43.9% | 0.32 | −70.4% | — | $6.9B | — |
| ACAD BiotechnologyAcadia Pharmaceuticals Inc. | 0/5 short2/3 long | +2.6% | −20.1% | −7.8% | −22.1% | −8.5% | −11.0% | +6.7% | −7.0% | 55.0% | 0.30 | −77.2% | — | $3.5B | — |
| PRAX BiotechnologyPraxis Precision Medicines, Inc. | 0/5 short1/3 long | −7.3% | −10.3% | −18.8% | −4.3% | +50.6% | +1,709% | −15.8% | — | 127% | 0.56 | −98.7% | — | $7.6B | — |
| BMRN BiotechnologyBioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | +0.5% | −4.3% | +3.6% | −3.4% | +8.7% | −27.9% | −30.9% | −29.0% | 32.8% | -0.06 | −62.1% | — | $11B | — |
| SRPT BiotechnologySarepta Therapeutics, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | +4.7% | +15.4% | −16.9% | −14.0% | −25.1% | −76.4% | −77.5% | −51.0% | 70.4% | -0.05 | −93.3% | — | $1.9B | — |
| DNLI BiotechnologyDenali Therapeutics Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −5.7% | −18.5% | +1.0% | +15.9% | +22.8% | −3.7% | −63.1% | — | 62.2% | -0.02 | −87.7% | — | $3.0B | — |
How did BIIB do year by year?
- BIIB finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 14 of its 29 full calendar years, and behind it in each of the last three.
- Among its popular alternatives, IQV came out ahead of BIIB most often, in ten of the 12 years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, BIIB finished in the top quarter in six of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in five. In 2025, it ranked 10 of 22.
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where BIIB ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with BIIB and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of BIIB; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places BIIB among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of BIIB | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BIIB This pageBiogen Inc. | — | +15.1% | −40.9% | −6.6% | +15.4% | −2.0% | −17.5% | −1.4% | −5.5% | +12.3% | −7.4% | −9.8% | +21.4% | +91.0% | +33.0% | +64.1% | +25.3% | +12.3% | −16.3% | +15.7% | +8.6% | −32.0% | +81.5% | +10.6% | −51.9% | +9.1% | +93.0% | +318% | +36.6% | +44.7% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 6 of 29 | 10 of 22 | 21 of 22 | 14 of 22 | 11 of 22 | 13 of 22 | 21 of 21 | 20 of 21 | 16 of 21 | 13 of 20 | 5 of 20 | 19 of 20 | 14 of 20 | 6 of 18 | 12 of 18 | 2 of 18 | 7 of 18 | 11 of 18 | 9 of 18 | 10 of 18 | 12 of 18 | 18 of 18 | 1 of 16 | 11 of 16 | 11 of 15 | 6 of 15 | 4 of 14 | 1 of 13 | 4 of 13 | 5 of 12 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 15 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| LLY Eli Lilly and Company | 15 of 29 | +40.3% | +33.3% | +60.9% | +34.3% | +66.1% | +31.0% | +16.2% | +40.5% | +17.8% | −10.4% | +25.4% | +39.8% | +7.3% | +24.2% | +25.2% | +3.6% | −6.2% | −21.3% | +5.7% | −5.2% | +2.6% | −17.6% | +13.1% | −17.6% | −14.4% | +41.9% | −24.3% | +29.1% | +93.6% |
| AMGN Amgen Inc. | 17 of 29 | +29.7% | −6.8% | +13.5% | +20.4% | +0.9% | −2.0% | +27.6% | +15.2% | +22.3% | −7.6% | +4.0% | +42.3% | +34.8% | +36.8% | +18.2% | −3.0% | −2.0% | +24.3% | −32.0% | −13.4% | +22.9% | +3.8% | +27.8% | −14.4% | −11.7% | +6.5% | +130% | +93.3% | −0.4% |
| GILD Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 19 of 29 | +36.6% | +18.7% | −2.0% | +23.6% | +29.9% | −6.7% | +7.9% | −9.9% | +3.0% | −27.6% | +8.6% | +25.5% | +105% | +79.5% | +12.9% | −16.3% | −15.4% | +11.2% | +41.7% | +23.4% | +50.2% | +20.1% | +71.4% | +3.6% | +58.2% | +53.9% | +31.7% | +6.7% | +53.6% |
| REGN Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 17 of 29 | +9.0% | −18.9% | +21.7% | +14.2% | +30.7% | +28.7% | +0.5% | −0.7% | +2.4% | −32.4% | +32.3% | +49.0% | +60.9% | +209% | +68.8% | +35.8% | +31.7% | −24.0% | +20.3% | +26.2% | +72.7% | −37.4% | −20.6% | −34.3% | −20.2% | +177% | +72.8% | −13.8% | −46.9% |
| ILMN Illumina, Inc. | 17 of 25 | −1.8% | −1.3% | −31.1% | −46.9% | +2.8% | +11.5% | +10.6% | +37.3% | +70.7% | −33.3% | +4.0% | +66.9% | +99.0% | +82.4% | −51.9% | +106% | +17.8% | −12.1% | +50.8% | +179% | +48.6% | +34.4% | +109% | −71.3% | −26.9% | — | — | — | — |
| TMO Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | 17 of 29 | +11.8% | −1.7% | −3.4% | −17.3% | +43.5% | +43.7% | +45.6% | +18.2% | +35.0% | −0.1% | +13.8% | +13.1% | +75.8% | +43.2% | −18.8% | +16.1% | +40.0% | −40.9% | +27.4% | +50.3% | −0.2% | +19.8% | +25.3% | −15.7% | +5.6% | +98.2% | −11.4% | −61.5% | +6.7% |
| NVS Novartis AG | 15 of 29 | +46.0% | −0.5% | +21.1% | +6.6% | −5.0% | +2.2% | +29.1% | +6.2% | +19.8% | −11.8% | −4.3% | +19.4% | +32.2% | +16.1% | +1.5% | +12.6% | +14.6% | −5.4% | −3.4% | +11.3% | +6.0% | +12.3% | +27.5% | +2.1% | −17.2% | +30.6% | −24.1% | +21.9% | +52.9% |
| IQV IQVIA Holdings Inc. | 10 of 12 | +14.7% | −15.1% | +12.9% | −27.4% | +57.5% | +16.0% | +33.0% | +18.7% | +28.7% | +10.8% | +16.6% | +27.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SNY Sanofi | 12 of 23 | +4.9% | +1.1% | +6.5% | +0.5% | +7.0% | +0.4% | +20.5% | +6.0% | +9.9% | −1.2% | −3.4% | −11.9% | +17.1% | +36.0% | +18.8% | −13.4% | +28.7% | −26.5% | +1.0% | +7.2% | +11.6% | +8.2% | +26.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PTCT PTC Therapeutics, Inc. | 7 of 12 | +68.3% | +63.8% | −27.8% | −4.2% | −34.7% | +27.1% | +40.0% | +106% | +52.9% | −66.3% | −37.4% | +205% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| VRTX Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated | 15 of 29 | +12.6% | −1.0% | +40.9% | +31.5% | −7.1% | +7.9% | +32.1% | +10.6% | +103% | −41.4% | +5.9% | +59.9% | +77.3% | +26.2% | −5.2% | −18.3% | +41.0% | +30.8% | −37.9% | +35.2% | +162% | +2.1% | −34.7% | −35.5% | −65.6% | +309% | +17.6% | −9.8% | −18.0% |
| NBIX Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. | 13 of 29 | +3.9% | +3.6% | +10.3% | +40.2% | −11.1% | −10.8% | +50.5% | −8.0% | +100% | −31.6% | +153% | +139% | +24.9% | −12.0% | +11.3% | +181% | −15.0% | −29.5% | −56.4% | −83.4% | +27.2% | −9.6% | +19.4% | −11.0% | +54.9% | +33.9% | +260% | −12.7% | −21.2% |
| BMY Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | 13 of 29 | +0.1% | +15.8% | −26.1% | +19.0% | +2.9% | +0.4% | +27.7% | −12.9% | +7.7% | −13.5% | +19.3% | +14.2% | +70.0% | −3.8% | +39.4% | +8.8% | +14.8% | −6.1% | +4.8% | +19.9% | −6.2% | −7.2% | +29.1% | −52.4% | −26.2% | +17.1% | −2.8% | +42.9% | +77.1% |
| ALNY Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 15 of 21 | +69.0% | +22.9% | −19.5% | +40.1% | +30.5% | +12.8% | +58.0% | −42.6% | +239% | −60.2% | −2.9% | +50.8% | +252% | +124% | −17.3% | −44.0% | −28.7% | −15.0% | +35.9% | +60.2% | +78.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| DHR Danaher Corporation | 16 of 29 | +0.4% | −0.4% | −1.2% | −19.0% | +48.6% | +45.4% | +49.5% | +11.8% | +20.0% | +73.2% | +9.3% | +11.6% | +38.3% | +19.1% | −0.1% | +25.7% | +33.0% | −35.4% | +21.3% | +30.1% | −2.7% | +25.3% | +39.7% | +9.1% | −11.7% | +41.5% | −11.0% | +72.4% | +35.2% |
| IONS Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 16 of 29 | +126% | −30.9% | +33.9% | +24.1% | −46.2% | −6.4% | +11.8% | +7.5% | +5.2% | −22.8% | +0.3% | +55.0% | +282% | +44.8% | −28.7% | −8.9% | −21.6% | −10.0% | +41.6% | +112% | −11.2% | −9.2% | −1.4% | −70.3% | +109% | +70.1% | −51.7% | +5.1% | −31.6% |
| ACAD Acadia Pharmaceuticals Inc. | 11 of 21 | +45.6% | −41.4% | +96.7% | −31.8% | −56.3% | +25.0% | +165% | −46.3% | +4.4% | −19.1% | +12.3% | +27.1% | +437% | +331% | −10.0% | −9.1% | +46.7% | −91.9% | +25.9% | −10.8% | +45.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PRAX Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. | 2 of 5 | +283% | +245% | −37.6% | −87.9% | −64.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BMRN BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. | 15 of 26 | −9.6% | −31.8% | −6.8% | +17.1% | +0.8% | +3.7% | −0.7% | −4.5% | +7.6% | −20.9% | +15.9% | +28.5% | +43.0% | +43.1% | +27.7% | +43.2% | +5.7% | −49.7% | +116% | +52.0% | +68.7% | −17.6% | +10.1% | −47.5% | +38.7% | −17.5% | — | — | — |
| SRPT Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. | 12 of 28 | −82.3% | +26.1% | −25.6% | +43.9% | −47.2% | +32.1% | +18.2% | +96.1% | +103% | −28.9% | +167% | −29.0% | −21.1% | +473% | −64.6% | +45.2% | +121% | −53.2% | −55.7% | −7.8% | +46.8% | −42.3% | −18.6% | −54.2% | +130% | −12.7% | +36.0% | −41.3% | — |
| DNLI Denali Therapeutics Inc. | 3 of 8 | −19.0% | −5.0% | −22.8% | −37.6% | −46.8% | +381% | −15.7% | +32.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How BIIB has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were BIIB's worst declines?
- In all four of BIIB's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: BIIB fell 76.2% from March 2015 to April 2025, while the S&P 500 rose 196%.
- The slowest recovery came after BIIB fell 62.6% from December 2000 to March 2003; it did not regain that peak until October 2007, five years later.
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents BIIB's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1991, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
Green means BIIB fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | BIIB fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No named crash | −90.0% | — | Oct 1991 | Dec 1994 | 3.2 years | Dec 1995 | 12 months |
| 2022 bear market | −76.2% | +196% | Mar 2015 | Apr 2025 | 10.1 years | Not yet | — |
| Dot-com bust | −66.5% | +2.1% | Mar 2000 | Apr 2000 | 1 month | Sep 2000 | 5 months |
| Dot-com bust | −62.6% | −37.6% | Dec 2000 | Mar 2003 | 2.3 years | Oct 2007 | 4.6 years |
| No named crash | −61.9% | +2.9% | Oct 1997 | Sep 1998 | 11 months | Dec 1998 | 3 months |
How did BIIB do in stock market crashes?
- Among its popular alternatives, LLY held up best, falling less than BIIB in all ten crashes they both traded through.
- BIIB fell less than the S&P 500 in five of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the Covid crash, when BIIB fell 21.2% and the S&P 500 fell 33.7%.
This section measures how far BIIB, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than BIIB.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BIIB This pageBiogen Inc. | — | −2.5% | −22.4% | −21.2% | −21.7% | −9.3% | −24.6% | −19.4% | −0.6% | −52.7% | −59.8% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 5 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| LLY Eli Lilly and Company | 10 of 10 | −0.6% | −11.7% | −16.9% | −10.2% | −8.6% | −19.6% | −10.9% | 0.0% | −50.0% | −54.3% |
| AMGN Amgen Inc. | 8 of 10 | −1.2% | −11.9% | −18.3% | −14.3% | −7.4% | −22.1% | −12.6% | −0.5% | −31.3% | −60.2% |
| GILD Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 7 of 10 | −1.6% | −20.0% | −13.7% | −22.7% | −5.5% | −28.7% | −18.2% | −2.1% | −34.3% | −53.6% |
| REGN Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 5 of 10 | −0.2% | −25.8% | −12.7% | −17.3% | −7.3% | −37.7% | −23.2% | −7.2% | −49.9% | −71.6% |
| ILMN Illumina, Inc. | 1 of 9 | −6.7% | −58.2% | −31.0% | −25.8% | −5.3% | −36.1% | −48.7% | −1.9% | −57.9% | — |
| TMO Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | 5 of 10 | −2.4% | −19.8% | −24.8% | −17.2% | −8.7% | −14.7% | −24.4% | −3.6% | −53.9% | −41.8% |
| NVS Novartis AG | 7 of 10 | −1.1% | −20.4% | −25.5% | −9.9% | −6.6% | −30.1% | −14.5% | −2.6% | −41.7% | −25.7% |
| IQV IQVIA Holdings Inc. | 2 of 6 | −6.8% | −35.9% | −48.9% | −19.2% | −5.3% | −28.7% | — | — | — | — |
| SNY Sanofi | 3 of 9 | −0.5% | −33.5% | −25.2% | −9.0% | −9.8% | −30.2% | −20.7% | −2.8% | −46.6% | — |
| PTCT PTC Therapeutics, Inc. | 1 of 6 | −8.2% | −43.4% | −45.5% | −36.8% | −7.4% | −47.7% | — | — | — | — |
| VRTX Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated | 4 of 10 | 0.0% | −19.2% | −19.4% | −21.2% | −8.8% | −43.7% | −23.9% | −2.7% | −59.9% | −86.7% |
| NBIX Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. | 1 of 10 | −3.5% | −24.3% | −27.9% | −45.1% | −5.7% | −44.1% | −32.8% | −7.1% | −83.0% | −65.8% |
| BMY Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | 6 of 10 | −2.3% | −16.0% | −29.4% | −22.9% | −4.1% | −16.3% | −10.5% | 0.0% | −39.2% | −69.5% |
| ALNY Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 1 of 9 | −4.1% | −28.9% | −30.0% | −33.7% | −6.9% | −48.9% | −39.3% | −1.5% | −58.6% | — |
| DHR Danaher Corporation | 4 of 10 | −3.2% | −22.8% | −25.9% | −13.4% | −9.8% | −14.0% | −21.8% | −0.6% | −45.7% | −33.7% |
| IONS Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 3 of 10 | −5.8% | −26.3% | −32.6% | −18.1% | −8.5% | −48.8% | −25.7% | −2.1% | −45.6% | −74.6% |
| ACAD Acadia Pharmaceuticals Inc. | 1 of 9 | −6.6% | −52.7% | −31.0% | −37.5% | −7.1% | −59.5% | −44.9% | −6.1% | −95.2% | — |
| PRAX Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. | 1 of 2 | 0.0% | −91.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BMRN BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. | 0 of 10 | −4.5% | −22.9% | −26.3% | −24.4% | −11.6% | −53.6% | −23.1% | −4.1% | −74.9% | −89.7% |
| SRPT Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. | 0 of 10 | −6.7% | −29.7% | −33.6% | −39.7% | −12.6% | −74.3% | −39.5% | −5.0% | −84.4% | −87.3% |
| DNLI Denali Therapeutics Inc. | 1 of 5 | −9.8% | −54.3% | −45.8% | −36.2% | −5.5% | — | — | — | — | — |
How closely does BIIB move with the S&P 500?
- 15 of the 18 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than BIIB's 0.45, led by VRTX, GILD and PTCT.
- LLY took just -14% of the S&P 500's losses, against 76% for BIIB, while still keeping 101% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, BIIB captured 35% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 76% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.26. Its share of the market's losses was larger than its share of the gains.
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares BIIB with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than BIIB's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BIIB This pageBiogen Inc. | 35% | 76% | 0.45 | 0.26 |
| VRTX Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated | 87% | 36% | 2.42 | 0.43 |
| GILD Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 52% | 22% | 2.37 | 0.33 |
| PTCT PTC Therapeutics, Inc. | 112% | 66% | 1.69 | 0.78 |
| AMGN Amgen Inc. | 74% | 46% | 1.62 | 0.51 |
| NVS Novartis AG | 69% | 49% | 1.42 | 0.47 |
| REGN Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 55% | 42% | 1.30 | 0.15 |
| NBIX Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. | 69% | 54% | 1.26 | 0.54 |
| ALNY Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 92% | 78% | 1.19 | 0.70 |
| TMO Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | 104% | 97% | 1.07 | 0.79 |
| DHR Danaher Corporation | 84% | 81% | 1.04 | 0.75 |
| IQV IQVIA Holdings Inc. | 128% | 160% | 0.80 | 1.29 |
| BMY Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | 55% | 71% | 0.77 | 0.40 |
| SNY Sanofi | 53% | 71% | 0.76 | 0.46 |
| IONS Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 71% | 105% | 0.67 | 0.71 |
| ILMN Illumina, Inc. | 120% | 192% | 0.62 | 1.18 |
| ACAD Acadia Pharmaceuticals Inc. | 40% | 89% | 0.45 | 0.74 |
| SRPT Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. | 71% | 188% | 0.38 | 0.84 |
| BMRN BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. | 20% | 63% | 0.32 | 0.37 |
| LLY Eli Lilly and Company | 101% | -14% | — | 0.34 |
What diversifies BIIB?
- Moving a fifth of the money in BIIB into AMLP would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 20% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (-1.0% for BIIB alone, +3.5% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of BIIB over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.12 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- FTLS made money in seven of the 11 calendar years in which BIIB lost money.
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with BIIB's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing BIIB with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which BIIB lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% BIIB and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2024 | 2023 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2016 | 2015 | 2008 | 2005 | 2002 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BIIB Biogen Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | −8.6% | 0.11 | −40.9% | −6.6% | −2.0% | −17.5% | −1.4% | −5.5% | −7.4% | −9.8% | −16.3% | −32.0% | −51.9% | 28.4% | −1.0% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.12 | +119% | 1.48 | +15.9% | +17.4% | +17.8% | −9.0% | +17.8% | −5.2% | — | — | — | — | — | 23.0% | +3.0% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.11 | +220% | 1.32 | +29.8% | +42.0% | +18.0% | +3.9% | +18.9% | −19.8% | +1.1% | +7.7% | −20.8% | — | — | 23.1% | +4.6% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | -0.02 | +108% | 1.09 | +33.4% | +8.0% | +23.1% | −13.4% | +23.4% | −8.7% | +29.8% | −25.3% | — | — | — | 22.8% | +3.0% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.10 | +87.1% | 1.03 | +14.2% | +1.7% | +19.6% | −6.5% | +20.2% | −3.0% | +15.8% | −0.3% | — | — | — | 23.2% | +2.4% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.18 | +82.4% | 0.94 | +13.4% | +20.1% | +19.6% | +2.1% | +24.9% | −9.5% | +6.3% | +4.1% | — | — | — | 23.2% | +2.2% |
| FTLS Broad MarketFirst Trust Long/Short Equity ETF | 0.03 | +58.7% | 0.94 | +18.8% | +16.9% | +19.7% | +2.6% | +16.2% | −4.8% | +6.5% | +4.7% | — | — | — | 22.8% | +1.7% |
| AMLP EnergyAlerian MLP ETF | -0.09 | +120% | 0.93 | +22.8% | +21.4% | +39.1% | −32.3% | +6.0% | −12.6% | +14.9% | −25.7% | — | — | — | 22.7% | +3.5% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | -0.01 | +177% | 0.93 | +5.6% | −0.6% | +53.3% | −32.7% | +11.7% | −18.2% | +28.0% | −21.5% | −39.0% | +40.1% | −14.8% | 23.2% | +4.7% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2024 | 2023 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2016 | 2015 | 2008 | 2005 | 2002 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BIIB Biogen Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | −8.6% | 0.11 | −40.9% | −6.6% | −2.0% | −17.5% | −1.4% | −5.5% | −7.4% | −9.8% | −16.3% | −32.0% | −51.9% | 28.4% | −1.0% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.11 | +476% | 1.54 | +19.0% | +34.1% | −0.4% | +10.1% | +18.0% | −24.5% | −17.5% | +12.6% | −39.6% | +18.7% | −8.3% | 23.9% | +7.5% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.06 | +644% | 1.37 | −4.0% | +30.4% | +61.0% | −27.4% | +6.0% | −8.2% | +0.7% | +17.4% | — | — | — | 24.0% | +9.0% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | -0.04 | +368% | 1.37 | +23.7% | +24.1% | +44.2% | +27.1% | +26.7% | −28.4% | −28.3% | −4.5% | −40.4% | +64.9% | −27.2% | 23.1% | +7.0% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | -0.15 | +2,294% | 1.36 | +215% | +160% | +37.9% | −2.4% | −5.7% | −16.3% | +7.4% | −6.0% | −20.5% | −25.2% | −65.1% | 24.1% | +17.5% |
| HWM Aerospace & DefenseHowmet Aerospace Inc. | -0.14 | +604% | 1.35 | +103% | +37.8% | +11.7% | −7.2% | +83.6% | −37.5% | −11.5% | −36.3% | −67.4% | −1.8% | −33.1% | 22.8% | +9.0% |
Common questions
What was BIIB's worst drawdown?
BIIB's deepest decline since it began trading in 1991 was 90.0%, from October 1991 to December 1994. It took 12 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were BIIB's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, BIIB's best year was 1999, when it returned 318%. Its worst was 2002, with a return of -51.9%.
Is there a better investment than BIIB?
Among BIIB's popular alternatives, LLY, REGN and AMGN earned more than BIIB with less volatility over the past 5 years. LLY returned 41.9% a year at 33.0% volatility, against a loss of 1.8% a year at 34.8%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, MRK (pharmaceuticals) and BBH (biotechnology) earned more than BIIB with less volatility over the past 5 years. MRK returned 14.2% a year at 24.7% volatility, against a loss of 1.8% a year at 34.8%.
Is BIIB more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. BIIB's volatility over the past 5 years was 34.8%, about twice the S&P 500's 17.2%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, BIIB's return lands within 34.8% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is BIIB's Sharpe ratio?
BIIB's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.11, against 0.73 for the S&P 500, so BIIB earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is BIIB with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, BIIB's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.06 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are close to unrelated, or move in opposite directions, so it can steady a stock portfolio. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against BIIB instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a BIIB holding.
What are the best alternatives to BIIB?
Of the 21 popular alternatives we compared, five outperformed BIIB in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: LLY, AMGN and GILD.
Did BIIB outperform the S&P 500?
BIIB finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 14 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +15.1%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did BIIB do in stock market crashes?
BIIB fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in five of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in five. The clearest case was the Covid crash, when BIIB fell 21.2% and the S&P 500 fell 33.7%.
What diversifies BIIB?
These had a low correlation with BIIB over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.12), DXJ (correlation 0.11) and EMLP (correlation -0.02); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.11), MPC (correlation 0.06) and MCK (correlation -0.04). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than BIIB's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of BIIB's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to BIIB
LLYEli Lilly and Company
AMGNAmgen
GILDGilead Sciences
REGNRegeneron Pharmaceuticals
TMOThermo Fisher Scientific
NVSNovartis
IQVIQVIA
SNYSanofi
VRTXVertex Pharmaceuticals
BMYBristol-Myers Squibb
DHRDanaher