Relative Intelligence · Cybersecurity

How Zscaler (ZS) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on ZS alone. It places ZS (Zscaler, Inc.) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where ZS stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: ZS's full trading record, from March 2018 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 22, 2026.
Data as of October 22, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
This page answers the following questions about ZS
Key findings
Not AI-generatedThese key findings are generated by our proprietary relative intelligence engine, directly from the data on this page.
- Right nowOver the past 3 months, ZS rose 67.1% against 2.5% for the S&P 500. That said, the slide is ZS's own: it is 35.5% below its high, against 1.9% for the S&P 500. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?More than an industry move: ZS rose 67.1% over the past 3 months, against 15.1% for the cybersecurity ETF CIBR (First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF). The S&P 500 rose 2.5%. Last month cut against the tape: ZS rose 13.1% while the S&P 500 fell 1.2%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsZS has gone against the market, falling 22.8% over the past year while the S&P 500 rose 15.6%. The same gap shows up over 3 years (46.3% against 88.4%). By year ↓
- Long termZS turned $10,000 into $7,720 over the past 5 years, against $18,000 in the S&P 500. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashIn the 2022 bear market, ZS fell 55.3%, against 24.5% for the S&P 500. That was more than CSCO (Cisco Systems, 35.4%) but less than NET (Cloudflare, 69.5%). ZS fell further than the S&P 500 in three of the last three sell-offs, including the 2022 bear market (55.3% against 24.5%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationZS is a real diversifier: a correlation of 0.30 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.31 with the total US market, less closely than 71% of stocks worth at least $300 million. On the flip side, over 5 years, ZS's beta versus the S&P 500 was 0.93: in the S&P 500's rising months it gained 39% as much as the index, and in falling months it lost 1.0 times as much. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- PANW (Palo Alto Networks), CRWD (CrowdStrike) and FTNT (Fortinet) earned more than ZS with less volatility over the past 5 years. PANW returned 33.4% a year at 43.4% volatility, against a loss of 5.0% a year at 58.0%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- CVLT (Commvault Systems, enterprise software) and BOX (enterprise software) earned more than ZS with less volatility over the past 5 years. CVLT returned 17.1% a year at 44.2% volatility, against a loss of 5.0% a year at 58.0%.
- Whole market
- 2,571 of the 3,641 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than ZS with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them NVDA (NVIDIA), AAPL (Apple) and GOOG (Alphabet).
How much would $10,000 in ZS have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in ZS over the past 8 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of ZS over the same span and ZS's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: ZS began trading on March 16, 2018, so the chart cannot reach back to the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or four other sell-offs. It covers the most recent 8 years of ZS's record, starting at the end of September 2018.
- $10,000 invested in ZS at the end of September 2018 would have grown to $48,901 by September 2026, more than the $29,568 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of ZS, and DELL finished highest, at $217,228.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2018 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 261 of the 3,001 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of ZS; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- DELL$217,228+2,072% total · +46.9% a year
- PANW$105,834+958% total · +34.3% a year
- FTNT$96,887+869% total · +32.8% a year
- AGYS$59,557+496% total · +25.0% a year
- GOOG$57,644+476% total · +24.5% a year
- ZS$48,901+389% total · +21.9% a year
- MSFT$48,443+384% total · +21.8% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$29,568+196% total · +14.5% a year
- CSCO$27,854+179% total · +13.7% a year
- FFIV$22,323+123% total · +10.6% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 2,957 of the 3,630 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of ZS; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- PANW$49,770+398% total · +37.8% a year
- CRWD$43,090+331% total · +33.9% a year
- FTNT$30,603+206% total · +25.1% a year
- GOOG$25,811+158% total · +20.9% a year
- CSCO$22,737+127% total · +17.9% a year
- DDOG$19,374+93.7% total · +14.1% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- MSFT$18,958+89.6% total · +13.6% a year
- SNOW$11,228+12.3% total · +2.3% a year
- ZS$7,605−24.0% total · −5.3% a year
ZS at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
Note: ZS began trading on March 16, 2018, so every figure here, including its worst decline, covers only the time since then. None of them reflect the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or four other sell-offs.
- ZS is still 35.5% below its all-time high.
- ZS's deepest decline since it began trading in 2018 was 76.4%, from November 2021 to May 2023. It has not yet climbed back to that peak.
- Over seven full calendar years, ZS's best was 2020, when it returned 329%, and its worst was 2022, when it lost 65.2%. It lost money in two of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $39B
- Industry
- Software - Infrastructure
- Price history from
- March 2018
Returns
- Past 1 year
- −22.8%total return
- Past 3 years
- +46.3%+13.5% a year
- Past 5 years
- −22.8%−5.0% a year
- Best calendar year
- +329%2020
- Worst calendar year
- −65.2%2022
- Losing years
- 2 of 7full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 58.0%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.20return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −76.4%Nov 2021 to May 2023
- From its all-time high
- −35.5%below the peak
ZS against the whole market
Where ZS ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does ZS rank among all stocks?
This section ranks ZS on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how ZS stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- ZS's 1-year return ranks in the bottom 17% of the 3,282 stocks worth at least $300 million with 1 year of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | ZS | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | −22.8% | 2,734 of 3,282 | bottom 18% |
| 3-year return | +46.3% | 1,634 of 3,016 | bottom 47% |
| 5-year return | −22.8% | 2,062 of 2,897 | bottom 30% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 58.0% | 2,221 of 2,897 | bottom 24% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.20 | 1,846 of 2,897 | bottom 37% |
What has beaten ZS on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). ZS sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than ZS with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 1,587 stocks and 984 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than ZS over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 71% of the 3,641 screened.
- Among those with at least half ZS's swings, FIX has the best return for its risk: 73.0% a year at 46.9% volatility, 19% less than ZS's 58.0%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.41 against 0.20 for ZS. BELFB earned the most, 75.9% a year, while still swinging less than ZS (52.3% against 58.0%).
- Among ZS's popular alternatives, PANW, CSCO and CRWD are in the region. PANW earned 33.4% a year against a loss of 5.0% a year for ZS, at 43.4% volatility, 25% less than ZS's 58.0%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to ZS; faint dots are 90 more of the 2,571 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,641 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than ZS?
Investments that beat ZS over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among ZS's popular alternatives, PANW, CRWD and FTNT earned more than ZS with less volatility over the past 5 years. PANW returned 33.4% a year at 43.4% volatility, against a loss of 5.0% a year at 58.0%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, CVLT (enterprise software) and BOX (enterprise software) earned more than ZS with less volatility over the past 5 years. CVLT returned 17.1% a year at 44.2% volatility, against a loss of 5.0% a year at 58.0%.
- Across the whole market, 2,571 of the 3,641 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than ZS with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them NVDA, AAPL and GOOG.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat ZS over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks ZS's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than ZS follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than ZS's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× ZS's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than ZS's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 5Y returntotal | Corr. with ZS?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| −5.0% | 58.0% | 0.20 | −76.4% | −22.8% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.5% | 17.2% | 0.78 | −33.7% | +80.3% | 0.30 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against ZS. 15 of 21 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +33.4% | 43.4% | 0.89 | −48.0% | +322% | 0.56 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +27.4% | 52.7% | 0.72 | −67.7% | +236% | 0.63 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +20.9% | 44.8% | 0.65 | −38.3% | +158% | 0.33 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +18.5% | 32.0% | 0.69 | −44.6% | +134% | 0.15 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +11.9% | 28.2% | 0.54 | −37.1% | +75.6% | 0.41 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +9.7% | 59.8% | 0.45 | −68.1% | +58.7% | 0.56 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Cybersecurity and Software and the categories next to it (Cloud Computing, Communications Equipment, Application Software, Enterprise Software), plus ZS's specific themes. 70 of 168 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
CVLTCommvault Systems, Inc. · Enterprise Software | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +17.1% | 44.2% | 0.58 | −61.5% | +120% | 0.23 | — | |
BOXBox, Inc. · Enterprise Software | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +10.3% | 33.3% | 0.46 | −68.6% | +63.5% | 0.35 | — | |
AGYSAgilysys, Inc. · Application Software | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +18.4% | 49.0% | 0.59 | −64.7% | +132% | 0.16 | — | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +6.4% | 44.3% | 0.36 | −64.6% | +36.7% | 0.32 | — | ||
FROGJFrog Ltd. · Application Software | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +21.6% | 58.0% | 0.63 | −80.4% | +166% | 0.43 | — | |
| Similar return, lower volatility | −5.6% | 41.7% | 0.07 | −63.4% | −25.2% | 0.63 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 2,712 of 3,480 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +3.7% | 0.3% | 14.07 | −0.2% | +20.0% | 0.18 | 0.14% | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +53.8% | 54.5% | 1.06 | −59.6% | +761% | 0.10 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +32.7% | 32.9% | 1.03 | −64.2% | +312% | -0.03 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +41.2% | 32.8% | 1.22 | −34.5% | +461% | 0.01 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +32.8% | 42.3% | 0.89 | −56.9% | +313% | 0.16 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +11.4% | 17.5% | 0.71 | −35.0% | +71.5% | 0.31 | 0.03% | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +67.0% | 57.1% | 1.19 | −57.6% | +1,199% | 0.11 | — | ||
CRLCharles River Laboratories International, Inc. · Life Sciences Tools | Similar return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | −4.2% | 44.1% | 0.13 | −78.2% | −19.2% | 0.27 | — | |
What these numbers mean for ZS
- Annual return
- ZS lost 5.0% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.5% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $7,720. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- ZS's volatility over the past 5 years was 58.0%, 3.4 times the S&P 500's 17.2%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, ZS's return lands within 58.0% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- ZS's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.20, against 0.78 for the S&P 500, so ZS earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- ZS's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 76.4%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 76.4% fall takes a 324% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, ZS's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.30 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against ZS instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a ZS holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 2,571 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than ZS with less volatility
Out of 3,641 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 5Y return | Corr. with ZS | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +3.7% | 0.3% | 14.07 | −0.2% | +20.0% | 0.18 | 0.14% | |
| 2 | Whole market | +53.8% | 54.5% | 1.06 | −59.6% | +761% | 0.10 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +32.7% | 32.9% | 1.03 | −64.2% | +312% | -0.03 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +41.2% | 32.8% | 1.22 | −34.5% | +461% | 0.01 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +32.8% | 42.3% | 0.89 | −56.9% | +313% | 0.16 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +11.4% | 17.5% | 0.71 | −35.0% | +71.5% | 0.31 | 0.03% | |
| 7 | Whole market | +12.6% | 16.9% | 0.79 | −34.0% | +80.8% | 0.30 | 0.03% | |
| 8 | Whole market | +21.1% | 22.6% | 0.97 | −25.7% | +161% | 0.01 | — | |
| 9 | Whole market | +13.5% | 17.2% | 0.83 | −30.4% | +88.5% | -0.07 | — | |
| 10 | Whole market | +20.6% | 35.3% | 0.71 | −58.1% | +155% | 0.28 | — | |
| 11 | Whole market | +25.5% | 23.4% | 1.09 | −45.1% | +212% | -0.11 | — | |
| 12 | Whole market | +13.5% | 18.0% | 0.80 | −27.4% | +88.0% | -0.20 | — | |
| 13 | Whole market | +32.8% | 25.9% | 1.23 | −62.3% | +313% | -0.08 | — | |
| 14 | Whole market | +13.2% | 22.9% | 0.66 | −36.4% | +86.1% | 0.05 | — | |
| 15 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · Japan Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +225% | -0.03 | 0.48% |
| 16 | VRIGInvesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF · Investment Grade Bonds | Whole market | +4.7% | 1.3% | 3.52 | −13.1% | +25.6% | 0.16 | 0.30% |
| 17 | Whole market | +15.2% | 16.8% | 0.93 | −37.0% | +103% | -0.25 | — | |
| 18 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Dividend Equity | Whole market | +16.9% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +119% | -0.23 | 0.40% |
| 19 | Whole market | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +123% | 0.33 | — | |
| 20 | Whole market | +8.0% | 16.4% | 0.56 | −36.0% | +47.2% | 0.03 | 0.05% | |
| 21 | Whole market | +14.2% | 23.0% | 0.69 | −35.1% | +94.0% | 0.44 | 0.18% | |
| 22 | HALOHalozyme Therapeutics, Inc. · Biotechnology | Whole market | +26.2% | 40.4% | 0.78 | −49.1% | +220% | 0.07 | — |
| 23 | Whole market | +17.4% | 20.7% | 0.89 | −26.8% | +123% | -0.25 | — | |
| 24 | Whole market | +50.0% | 33.4% | 1.39 | −79.7% | +660% | -0.05 | — | |
| 25 | Whole market | +16.1% | 24.8% | 0.73 | −43.4% | +111% | -0.22 | — | |
| 26 | Whole market | +37.8% | 25.1% | 1.41 | −38.1% | +397% | 0.08 | — | |
| 27 | Whole market | +12.2% | 13.7% | 0.91 | −36.8% | +78.0% | 0.02 | 0.03% | |
| 28 | FLRTPacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF · Bank Loans | Whole market | +6.0% | 2.3% | 2.55 | −20.9% | +33.8% | 0.22 | 0.60% |
| 29 | Whole market | +20.1% | 24.9% | 0.86 | −24.9% | +150% | -0.21 | — | |
| 30 | Whole market | +31.3% | 32.4% | 1.01 | −37.5% | +290% | 0.30 | — | |
| 31 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +179% | -0.12 | — | |
| 32 | Popular alternative | +33.4% | 43.4% | 0.89 | −48.0% | +322% | 0.56 | — | |
| 33 | Whole market | +9.1% | 16.9% | 0.60 | −35.8% | +54.8% | 0.04 | 0.03% | |
| 34 | Whole market | +35.3% | 46.9% | 0.88 | −50.9% | +353% | 0.18 | — | |
| 35 | Whole market | +35.3% | 35.5% | 1.03 | −55.1% | +354% | 0.32 | — | |
| 36 | Whole market | +5.8% | 18.4% | 0.40 | −23.8% | +32.9% | -0.19 | — | |
| 37 | Whole market | +33.9% | 30.6% | 1.11 | −45.7% | +330% | -0.07 | — | |
| 38 | Whole market | +11.7% | 20.9% | 0.64 | −32.6% | +73.8% | -0.04 | — | |
| 39 | Whole market | +17.1% | 19.0% | 0.93 | −26.4% | +120% | -0.11 | 0.40% | |
| 40 | Popular alternative | +27.4% | 52.7% | 0.72 | −67.7% | +236% | 0.63 | — | |
| 41 | Whole market | +34.0% | 29.4% | 1.15 | −47.6% | +332% | -0.20 | — | |
| 42 | Whole market | +21.8% | 25.7% | 0.90 | −30.3% | +168% | -0.10 | — | |
| 43 | Whole market | +23.9% | 29.1% | 0.89 | −41.6% | +192% | 0.00 | — | |
| 44 | Whole market | +18.6% | 34.2% | 0.67 | −33.6% | +135% | -0.04 | — | |
| 45 | Whole market | +15.8% | 31.4% | 0.63 | −44.3% | +109% | -0.14 | — | |
| 46 | Whole market | +10.1% | 33.8% | 0.45 | −33.4% | +61.8% | 0.05 | — | |
| 47 | Whole market | +8.9% | 35.7% | 0.42 | −28.7% | +53.2% | -0.23 | — | |
| 48 | Whole market | +15.1% | 29.9% | 0.62 | −37.9% | +102% | -0.01 | — | |
| 49 | Whole market | +10.4% | 14.1% | 0.77 | −31.7% | +63.9% | 0.15 | 0.04% | |
| 50 | Popular alternative | +20.9% | 44.8% | 0.65 | −38.3% | +158% | 0.33 | — | |
| 51 | FLOTiShares Floating Rate Bond ETF · Floating Rate Bonds | Whole market | +4.5% | 1.8% | 2.49 | −13.5% | +24.6% | 0.16 | 0.15% |
| 52 | Whole market | +29.7% | 42.2% | 0.83 | −51.5% | +268% | -0.10 | — | |
| 53 | Whole market | +5.7% | 27.0% | 0.34 | −36.8% | +32.2% | 0.02 | — | |
| 54 | Whole market | +11.6% | 13.8% | 0.87 | −35.2% | +72.8% | -0.03 | 0.04% | |
| 55 | Whole market | +10.2% | 14.4% | 0.75 | −33.4% | +62.8% | -0.05 | 0.06% | |
| 56 | Whole market | +28.2% | 38.5% | 0.84 | −54.2% | +246% | -0.08 | — | |
| 57 | Whole market | +2.7% | 2.9% | 0.95 | −6.3% | +14.2% | -0.09 | 0.03% | |
| 58 | Whole market | +12.3% | 18.9% | 0.71 | −38.4% | +78.9% | -0.30 | — | |
| 59 | Whole market | +7.0% | 22.9% | 0.41 | −38.7% | +40.4% | 0.20 | — | |
| 60 | Whole market | +9.5% | 25.4% | 0.49 | −39.4% | +57.5% | -0.20 | — | |
| 61 | HURNHuron Consulting Group Inc. · Consulting Services | Whole market | +31.3% | 40.8% | 0.87 | −51.4% | +290% | 0.02 | — |
| 62 | Whole market | +7.4% | 26.1% | 0.41 | −44.0% | +42.9% | -0.08 | — | |
| 63 | Whole market | +17.8% | 39.1% | 0.62 | −62.4% | +127% | -0.09 | — | |
| 64 | Whole market | +11.9% | 29.0% | 0.54 | −37.5% | +75.6% | -0.19 | — | |
| 65 | Whole market | +17.4% | 24.9% | 0.77 | −30.4% | +123% | -0.11 | — | |
| 66 | Whole market | +11.6% | 20.8% | 0.63 | −37.4% | +73.2% | 0.14 | — | |
| 67 | Whole market | +10.1% | 16.2% | 0.68 | −34.2% | +62.0% | 0.22 | 0.06% | |
| 68 | Whole market | +5.2% | 8.9% | 0.62 | −25.4% | +28.7% | 0.12 | — | |
| 69 | Whole market | +6.5% | 19.5% | 0.42 | −38.7% | +37.0% | 0.05 | 0.09% | |
| 70 | Whole market | +5.0% | 17.5% | 0.36 | −36.4% | +27.4% | 0.02 | 0.06% | |
| 71 | Whole market | +14.1% | 18.6% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +93.2% | 0.17 | — | |
| 72 | Whole market | +17.5% | 18.2% | 0.98 | −40.0% | +124% | -0.02 | — | |
| 73 | Whole market | +5.7% | 21.6% | 0.37 | −30.1% | +31.9% | -0.21 | — | |
| 74 | Whole market | +15.8% | 23.4% | 0.75 | −42.0% | +108% | -0.04 | — | |
| 75 | PJULInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · US Equity Buffer | Whole market | +10.4% | 8.6% | 1.20 | −18.2% | +64.2% | 0.26 | 0.79% |
| 76 | Whole market | +9.5% | 19.3% | 0.57 | −30.1% | +57.4% | 0.02 | — | |
| 77 | JAAAJanus Henderson AAA CLO ETF · AAA CLO Debt | Whole market | +5.1% | 1.7% | 2.98 | −2.6% | +28.0% | 0.22 | 0.20% |
| 78 | Whole market | +12.3% | 22.6% | 0.63 | −39.2% | +78.6% | -0.07 | — | |
| 79 | Whole market | +6.1% | 25.0% | 0.36 | −47.7% | +34.5% | -0.22 | — | |
| 80 | Whole market | +56.5% | 51.9% | 1.12 | −66.3% | +839% | 0.46 | — | |
| 81 | Whole market | +9.5% | 24.5% | 0.50 | −37.6% | +57.8% | -0.14 | — | |
| 82 | Whole market | +7.9% | 18.1% | 0.52 | −37.4% | +46.5% | -0.27 | — | |
| 83 | ESLTElbit Systems Ltd. · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +39.7% | 34.6% | 1.14 | −35.4% | +432% | 0.09 | — |
| 84 | Whole market | +12.8% | 20.2% | 0.70 | −32.9% | +82.7% | -0.28 | — | |
| 85 | Whole market | +25.8% | 37.0% | 0.81 | −46.7% | +215% | -0.04 | — | |
| 86 | Whole market | +27.0% | 23.8% | 1.13 | −63.3% | +230% | -0.10 | — | |
| 87 | Whole market | +1.8% | 2.8% | 0.67 | −8.5% | +9.4% | -0.02 | 0.03% | |
| 88 | Whole market | +16.2% | 24.6% | 0.74 | −30.7% | +112% | 0.15 | — | |
| 89 | Whole market | +5.0% | 30.4% | 0.32 | −56.8% | +27.6% | 0.01 | — | |
| 90 | Whole market | +2.4% | 2.9% | 0.84 | −12.9% | +12.8% | 0.02 | 0.03% | |
| 91 | Whole market | +38.0% | 50.0% | 0.90 | −66.3% | +400% | -0.06 | — | |
| 92 | Whole market | +24.5% | 39.9% | 0.75 | −38.2% | +199% | 0.03 | — | |
| 93 | CVLTCommvault Systems, Inc. · Enterprise Software | Same or nearby category | +17.1% | 44.2% | 0.58 | −61.5% | +120% | 0.23 | — |
| 94 | Whole market | +12.8% | 22.5% | 0.65 | −34.5% | +82.4% | 0.47 | 0.04% | |
| 95 | Whole market | +11.6% | 24.3% | 0.57 | −44.4% | +72.8% | 0.13 | — | |
| 96 | Whole market | +17.8% | 37.4% | 0.63 | −53.9% | +127% | -0.10 | — | |
| 97 | Whole market | +7.8% | 19.3% | 0.48 | −29.0% | +45.3% | -0.24 | — | |
| 98 | Whole market | +7.2% | 28.8% | 0.39 | −57.4% | +41.8% | -0.03 | — | |
| 99 | Whole market | +5.9% | 21.8% | 0.37 | −34.3% | +33.0% | 0.20 | — | |
| 100 | Whole market | +4.8% | 21.0% | 0.33 | −35.8% | +26.6% | 0.04 | — |
ZS against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against ZS, compared period by period and year by year.
How do ZS's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at ZS, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- 15 of the 21 popular alternatives, led by PANW, CRWD and FTNT, were both more rewarding and calmer than ZS over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, ZS returned -5.0% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.5%, with higher volatility (58.0% against 17.2%).
Green points earned more than ZS with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | +33.4% | 43.4% |
| CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | +27.4% | 52.7% |
| FTNT Fortinet, Inc. | +20.9% | 44.8% |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | +18.5% | 32.0% |
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | +16.9% | 26.1% |
| FFIV F5, Inc. | +16.7% | 30.8% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.5% | 17.2% |
| QLYS Qualys, Inc. | +12.2% | 42.9% |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | +11.9% | 28.2% |
| NET Cloudflare, Inc. | +10.9% | 69.1% |
| DDOG Datadog, Inc. | +9.7% | 59.8% |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | +8.5% | 36.6% |
| CHKP Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. | +4.2% | 29.2% |
| GEN Gen Digital Inc. | +0.7% | 32.9% |
| SNOW Snowflake Inc. | −1.6% | 62.6% |
| AKAM Akamai Technologies, Inc. | −3.3% | 39.2% |
| RDWR Radware Ltd. | −3.5% | 38.8% |
| TENB Tenable Holdings, Inc. | −4.1% | 47.8% |
| VRNS Varonis Systems, Inc. | −5.0% | 53.7% |
| OKTA Okta, Inc. | −5.0% | 60.2% |
| ZS This pageZscaler, Inc. | −5.0% | 58.0% |
| S SentinelOne, Inc. | −18.8% | 62.9% |
| RPD Rapid7, Inc. | −34.9% | 58.6% |
Has ZS consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares ZS with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over seven periods from one month to five years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than ZS helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Five of the 21 popular alternatives, led by PANW, CRWD and FTNT, outperformed ZS in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 2 long-term timeframes.
- PANW, CSCO and CRWD earned more for the risk they took than ZS (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
- GOOG outperformed ZS over all two long-term periods but in only one of the five short-term ones, so ZS has had the better of it lately.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than ZS over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 2 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| ZS Zscaler, Inc. (this page) | — | +13.1% | +67.1% | +66.7% | +7.8% | −22.8% | +46.3% | −22.8% | 58.0% | 0.20 | −76.4% | — | $39B | — |
| PANW QualifiedPalo Alto Networks, Inc. | 3/5 short2/2 long | −5.2% | +5.9% | +95.9% | +97.9% | +67.1% | +188% | +322% | 43.4% | 0.89 | −48.0% | — | $290B | — |
| CRWD QualifiedCrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | 3/5 short2/2 long | −4.8% | +26.3% | +104% | +110% | +90.3% | +431% | +236% | 52.7% | 0.72 | −67.7% | — | $244B | — |
| FTNT QualifiedFortinet, Inc. | 3/5 short2/2 long | −0.7% | +11.6% | +98.6% | +122% | +104% | +208% | +158% | 44.8% | 0.65 | −38.3% | — | $127B | — |
| DDOG QualifiedDatadog, Inc. | 3/5 short2/2 long | +4.2% | +4.9% | +95.1% | +92.7% | +67.1% | +201% | +58.7% | 59.8% | 0.45 | −68.1% | — | $93B | — |
| SNOW QualifiedSnowflake Inc. | 3/5 short2/2 long | −6.7% | +17.2% | +102% | +44.9% | +29.9% | +111% | −7.6% | 62.6% | 0.28 | −73.0% | — | $111B | — |
| CSCO Communication EquipmentCisco Systems, Inc. | 2/5 short2/2 long | −1.1% | −6.2% | +17.7% | +39.7% | +51.2% | +117% | +118% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | — | $414B | — |
| FFIV Software - InfrastructureF5, Inc. | 2/5 short2/2 long | −0.7% | +12.3% | +44.6% | +75.4% | +51.1% | +207% | +116% | 30.8% | 0.66 | −54.6% | — | $25B | — |
| MSFT Software - InfrastructureMicrosoft Corporation | 2/5 short2/2 long | +4.6% | +33.7% | +20.9% | +10.9% | +0.9% | +61.9% | +75.6% | 28.2% | 0.54 | −37.1% | — | $3.9T | — |
| NET Software - InfrastructureCloudflare, Inc. | 2/5 short2/2 long | −14.0% | +12.9% | +46.3% | +54.9% | +44.1% | +417% | +67.4% | 69.1% | 0.49 | −82.6% | — | $108B | — |
| AMZN Specialty RetailAmazon.com, Inc. | 2/5 short2/2 long | −1.8% | +2.3% | −1.9% | +10.5% | +14.9% | +97.8% | +50.1% | 36.6% | 0.41 | −56.1% | — | $2.7T | — |
| RDWR Software - InfrastructureRadware Ltd. | 2/5 short2/2 long | +0.5% | +1.1% | +11.1% | +25.2% | +15.9% | +92.0% | −16.5% | 38.8% | 0.10 | −65.5% | — | $1.3B | — |
| GOOG Internet Content & InformationAlphabet Inc. | 1/5 short2/2 long | −7.7% | −6.1% | −4.9% | +1.9% | +27.4% | +135% | +134% | 32.0% | 0.69 | −44.6% | — | $3.9T | — |
| GEN Software - InfrastructureGen Digital Inc. | 1/5 short2/2 long | −8.8% | −2.3% | +25.7% | −3.1% | −6.7% | +56.2% | +3.5% | 32.9% | 0.18 | −48.4% | — | $15B | — |
| TENB Software - InfrastructureTenable Holdings, Inc. | 4/5 short1/2 long | +17.0% | +27.9% | +104% | +84.8% | +39.5% | −0.6% | −19.0% | 47.8% | 0.15 | −74.4% | — | $4.6B | — |
| QLYS Software - InfrastructureQualys, Inc. | 3/5 short1/2 long | +13.6% | +48.5% | +135% | +58.9% | +62.4% | +35.0% | +77.4% | 42.9% | 0.48 | −63.0% | — | $7.2B | — |
| VRNS Software - InfrastructureVaronis Systems, Inc. | 3/5 short1/2 long | +3.4% | +7.9% | +94.5% | +52.6% | −20.2% | +53.4% | −22.7% | 53.7% | 0.20 | −78.2% | — | $5.6B | — |
| OKTA Software - InfrastructureOkta, Inc. | 3/5 short1/2 long | +2.4% | +47.3% | +156% | +141% | +131% | +190% | −22.7% | 60.2% | 0.21 | −84.6% | — | $34B | — |
| CHKP Software - InfrastructureCheck Point Software Technologies Ltd. | 1/5 short1/2 long | +10.8% | +18.8% | +7.3% | −16.0% | −22.0% | +14.8% | +22.7% | 29.2% | 0.29 | −51.8% | — | $16B | — |
| AKAM Software - InfrastructureAkamai Technologies, Inc. | 1/5 short1/2 long | −23.0% | −26.7% | −6.2% | +7.1% | +22.0% | −11.9% | −15.6% | 39.2% | 0.11 | −46.8% | — | $13B | — |
| S Software - InfrastructureSentinelOne, Inc. | 2/5 short0/2 long | −5.7% | +23.5% | +53.8% | +53.7% | +30.1% | +40.2% | −64.7% | 62.9% | -0.01 | −84.4% | — | $7.7B | — |
| RPD Software - InfrastructureRapid7, Inc. | 2/5 short0/2 long | +14.6% | +48.6% | +133% | +3.2% | −23.2% | −69.7% | −88.3% | 58.6% | -0.44 | −96.4% | — | $993M | — |
How did ZS do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2019, along with where ZS ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with ZS and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
Note: ZS began trading on March 16, 2018, so the table starts with 2019, its first full calendar year, and cannot show how it fared during the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or four other sell-offs.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, ZS finished in the top quarter in four of seven years and in the bottom quarter in one. In 2025, it ranked 6 of 22.
- ZS finished ahead of the S&P 500 in four of its seven full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, GOOG came out ahead of ZS most often, in five of the seven years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of ZS; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places ZS among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of ZS | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZS This pageZscaler, Inc. | — | +24.7% | −18.6% | +98.0% | −65.2% | +60.9% | +329% | +18.6% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 4 of 7 | 6 of 22 | 17 of 22 | 3 of 22 | 18 of 22 | 5 of 21 | 2 of 20 | 11 of 17 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 3 of 7 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% |
| PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | 4 of 7 | +1.2% | +23.4% | +111% | −24.8% | +56.7% | +53.7% | +22.8% |
| CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | 4 of 6 | +37.0% | +34.0% | +143% | −48.6% | −3.3% | +325% | — |
| FTNT Fortinet, Inc. | 4 of 7 | −16.0% | +61.4% | +19.7% | −32.0% | +142% | +39.2% | +51.5% |
| DDOG Datadog, Inc. | 3 of 6 | −4.8% | +17.7% | +65.1% | −58.7% | +80.9% | +161% | — |
| SNOW Snowflake Inc. | 2 of 5 | +42.1% | −22.4% | +38.6% | −57.6% | +20.4% | — | — |
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 3 of 7 | +33.5% | +21.0% | +9.3% | −22.5% | +45.8% | −3.5% | +13.8% |
| FFIV F5, Inc. | 2 of 7 | +1.5% | +40.5% | +24.7% | −41.3% | +39.1% | +26.0% | −13.8% |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 3 of 7 | +15.6% | +12.9% | +58.2% | −28.0% | +52.5% | +42.5% | +57.6% |
| NET Cloudflare, Inc. | 4 of 6 | +83.1% | +29.3% | +84.2% | −65.6% | +73.0% | +345% | — |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 3 of 7 | +5.2% | +44.4% | +80.9% | −49.6% | +2.4% | +76.3% | +23.0% |
| RDWR Radware Ltd. | 2 of 7 | +6.9% | +35.1% | −15.5% | −52.6% | +50.0% | +7.6% | +13.5% |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | 5 of 7 | +65.4% | +35.6% | +58.8% | −38.7% | +65.2% | +31.0% | +29.1% |
| GEN Gen Digital Inc. | 3 of 7 | +1.1% | +22.4% | +9.2% | −15.8% | +27.6% | +44.4% | +37.1% |
| TENB Tenable Holdings, Inc. | 2 of 7 | −40.3% | −14.5% | +20.7% | −30.7% | +5.4% | +118% | +8.0% |
| QLYS Qualys, Inc. | 1 of 7 | −5.2% | −28.6% | +74.9% | −18.2% | +12.6% | +46.2% | +11.6% |
| VRNS Varonis Systems, Inc. | 3 of 7 | −26.2% | −1.9% | +89.1% | −50.9% | −10.6% | +111% | +46.9% |
| OKTA Okta, Inc. | 2 of 7 | +9.7% | −13.0% | +32.5% | −69.5% | −11.8% | +120% | +80.8% |
| CHKP Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. | 2 of 7 | −0.6% | +22.2% | +21.1% | +8.2% | −12.3% | +19.8% | +8.1% |
| AKAM Akamai Technologies, Inc. | 2 of 7 | −8.8% | −19.2% | +40.4% | −28.0% | +11.5% | +21.6% | +41.4% |
| S SentinelOne, Inc. | 0 of 4 | −32.4% | −19.1% | +88.1% | −71.1% | — | — | — |
| RPD Rapid7, Inc. | 1 of 7 | −62.2% | −29.5% | +68.0% | −71.1% | +30.5% | +60.9% | +79.8% |
Risk and diversification
How ZS has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were ZS's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents ZS's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2018, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
Note: ZS began trading on March 16, 2018, so this list cannot include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or four other sell-offs. The crash tests on this page show how older funds and the S&P 500 fared through those years.
- In all five of ZS's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: ZS fell 28.9% from February to May 2021, while the S&P 500 rose 4.8%.
- None of these declines kept ZS below its old high for long; the longest climb back took two months.
Green means ZS fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | ZS fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 bear market | −76.4% | −10.3% | Nov 2021 | May 2023 | 18 months | Not yet | — |
| Covid crash | −55.2% | −17.1% | Jul 2019 | Mar 2020 | 8 months | May 2020 | 2 months |
| Late-2018 sell-off | −31.8% | −8.4% | Aug 2018 | Nov 2018 | 3 months | Jan 2019 | 2 months |
| No named crash | −28.9% | +4.8% | Feb 2021 | May 2021 | 3 months | Jul 2021 | 2 months |
| No named crash | −24.4% | −0.8% | Mar 2018 | May 2018 | 2 months | Jun 2018 | 1 month |
How did ZS do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far ZS, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: ZS began trading on March 16, 2018, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or four other sell-offs. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- ZS fell further than the S&P 500 in all four crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when ZS fell 55.3% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
- Among its popular alternatives, CSCO held up best, falling less than ZS in all four crashes they both traded through.
- ZS began trading after the 2008 financial crisis, but nine of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was CHKP's 34.4%, against 55.2% for the S&P 500.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than ZS.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZS This pageZscaler, Inc. | — | −8.3% | −55.3% | −39.4% | −24.4% | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 4 of 4 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | 2 of 4 | −2.1% | −30.6% | −46.8% | −29.1% | −3.3% | −40.2% | — | — | — | — |
| CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | 2 of 3 | −7.1% | −42.7% | −50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FTNT Fortinet, Inc. | 3 of 4 | −4.9% | −30.6% | −36.5% | −29.0% | −4.4% | −50.2% | −23.0% | −4.1% | — | — |
| DDOG Datadog, Inc. | 2 of 3 | −9.5% | −53.0% | −38.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SNOW Snowflake Inc. | 0 of 2 | −7.8% | −64.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 4 of 4 | −1.4% | −35.4% | −29.1% | −17.5% | −5.3% | −22.8% | −16.6% | −3.1% | −60.0% | −89.3% |
| FFIV F5, Inc. | 3 of 4 | −5.6% | −42.7% | −32.1% | −24.7% | −5.5% | −35.0% | −31.6% | −3.7% | −59.2% | −96.8% |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 4 of 4 | −2.0% | −31.0% | −27.7% | −18.2% | −7.4% | −14.4% | −14.1% | −2.6% | −57.9% | −62.9% |
| NET Cloudflare, Inc. | 1 of 3 | −11.1% | −69.5% | −31.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 3 of 4 | −3.4% | −39.6% | −22.7% | −33.2% | −7.1% | −30.6% | −20.7% | −2.9% | −65.3% | −91.8% |
| RDWR Radware Ltd. | 4 of 4 | −7.0% | −45.4% | −29.8% | −18.9% | −3.5% | −49.2% | −42.6% | −2.9% | −70.5% | −88.9% |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | 4 of 4 | −3.9% | −35.0% | −30.8% | −18.9% | −9.9% | −12.7% | −21.1% | −1.1% | −65.3% | — |
| GEN Gen Digital Inc. | 3 of 4 | −10.5% | −33.6% | −19.8% | −22.7% | −5.5% | −17.1% | −20.8% | −5.5% | −55.7% | −63.1% |
| TENB Tenable Holdings, Inc. | 2 of 4 | −5.2% | −51.8% | −40.9% | −47.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| QLYS Qualys, Inc. | 3 of 4 | −4.2% | −24.9% | −27.9% | −24.4% | −6.2% | −55.8% | — | — | — | — |
| VRNS Varonis Systems, Inc. | 1 of 4 | −12.4% | −54.6% | −44.3% | −31.5% | −4.4% | −43.4% | — | — | — | — |
| OKTA Okta, Inc. | 2 of 4 | −7.0% | −76.4% | −31.1% | −33.4% | −2.9% | — | — | — | — | — |
| CHKP Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. | 4 of 4 | −1.9% | −26.6% | −30.2% | −15.9% | −3.5% | −16.7% | −18.5% | −1.3% | −34.4% | −89.3% |
| AKAM Akamai Technologies, Inc. | 4 of 4 | −4.9% | −36.0% | −21.9% | −20.6% | −4.9% | −47.6% | −39.2% | −4.5% | −77.0% | −99.8% |
| S SentinelOne, Inc. | 0 of 2 | −10.4% | −59.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| RPD Rapid7, Inc. | 0 of 4 | −19.3% | −65.8% | −39.5% | −28.2% | −3.3% | −62.2% | — | — | — | — |
How closely does ZS move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares ZS with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 5 years.
- 17 of the 20 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than ZS's 0.37, led by CRWD, NET and FTNT.
- PANW took just -13% of the S&P 500's losses, against 105% for ZS, while still keeping 104% of its gains.
- Over the past 5 years, ZS captured 39% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 105% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.93. Its share of the market's losses was larger than its share of the gains.
Monthly total returns over the past 5 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than ZS's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZS This pageZscaler, Inc. | 39% | 105% | 0.37 | 0.93 |
| CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | 122% | 38% | 3.21 | 1.19 |
| NET Cloudflare, Inc. | 118% | 72% | 1.65 | 1.64 |
| FTNT Fortinet, Inc. | 119% | 75% | 1.59 | 1.03 |
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 98% | 75% | 1.31 | 0.99 |
| FFIV F5, Inc. | 102% | 83% | 1.22 | 1.03 |
| QLYS Qualys, Inc. | 65% | 53% | 1.22 | 0.61 |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | 140% | 132% | 1.07 | 1.20 |
| DDOG Datadog, Inc. | 112% | 119% | 0.94 | 1.51 |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 115% | 126% | 0.91 | 1.10 |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 125% | 170% | 0.74 | 1.45 |
| CHKP Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. | 53% | 80% | 0.66 | 0.47 |
| SNOW Snowflake Inc. | 83% | 134% | 0.62 | 1.35 |
| AKAM Akamai Technologies, Inc. | 66% | 117% | 0.56 | 0.62 |
| GEN Gen Digital Inc. | 97% | 177% | 0.55 | 1.26 |
| RDWR Radware Ltd. | 55% | 114% | 0.48 | 0.87 |
| OKTA Okta, Inc. | 39% | 87% | 0.45 | 0.74 |
| TENB Tenable Holdings, Inc. | 48% | 116% | 0.41 | 1.00 |
| VRNS Varonis Systems, Inc. | 23% | 74% | 0.32 | 0.77 |
| S SentinelOne, Inc. | 16% | 129% | 0.12 | 0.70 |
| RPD Rapid7, Inc. | -17% | 238% | -0.07 | 1.02 |
| PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | 104% | -13% | — | 0.93 |
What diversifies ZS?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with ZS's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing ZS with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in ZS into XLE would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 22% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (-5.3% for ZS alone, +2.8% for the mix).
- XLE made money in two of the two calendar years in which ZS lost money.
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of ZS over the past 5 years, with correlations of -0.03 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which ZS lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% ZS and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2024 | 2022 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZS Zscaler, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | −22.8% | 0.20 | −18.6% | −65.2% | 49.0% | −5.3% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | -0.23 | +119% | 1.48 | +15.9% | +3.8% | 38.8% | +0.9% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | -0.03 | +225% | 1.34 | +29.8% | +6.0% | 39.2% | +2.5% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | -0.12 | +103% | 1.06 | +33.4% | +10.4% | 38.9% | +0.7% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | -0.19 | +86.8% | 1.03 | +14.2% | +7.0% | 38.8% | +0.1% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.05 | +83.6% | 0.95 | +13.4% | −5.1% | 39.4% | +0.1% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.32 | +304% | 0.94 | +39.1% | −33.5% | 41.9% | +4.2% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | -0.26 | +178% | 0.94 | +5.6% | +64.4% | 38.2% | +2.8% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | -0.11 | +120% | 0.93 | +26.7% | −0.8% | 39.0% | +1.3% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2024 | 2022 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZS Zscaler, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | −22.8% | 0.20 | −18.6% | −65.2% | 49.0% | −5.3% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.14 | +471% | 1.54 | +19.0% | +54.1% | 40.3% | +4.3% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.32 | +2,780% | 1.43 | +215% | +1.3% | 44.4% | +14.7% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.08 | +397% | 1.41 | +23.7% | +51.8% | 39.9% | +4.0% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.10 | +1,452% | 1.41 | +107% | +17.0% | 41.1% | +12.2% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | -0.05 | +660% | 1.39 | −4.0% | +86.6% | 39.4% | +6.6% |
Common questions
What was ZS's worst drawdown?
ZS's deepest decline since it began trading in 2018 was 76.4%, from November 2021 to May 2023. It has not yet climbed back to that peak. Because ZS launched in March 2018, that record does not include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or four other sell-offs.
What were ZS's best and worst years?
Over seven full calendar years, ZS's best year was 2020, when it returned 329%. Its worst was 2022, with a return of -65.2%.
Is there a better investment than ZS?
Among ZS's popular alternatives, PANW, CRWD and FTNT earned more than ZS with less volatility over the past 5 years. PANW returned 33.4% a year at 43.4% volatility, against a loss of 5.0% a year at 58.0%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, CVLT (enterprise software) and BOX (enterprise software) earned more than ZS with less volatility over the past 5 years. CVLT returned 17.1% a year at 44.2% volatility, against a loss of 5.0% a year at 58.0%.
Is ZS more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. ZS's volatility over the past 5 years was 58.0%, 3.4 times the S&P 500's 17.2%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, ZS's return lands within 58.0% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is ZS's Sharpe ratio?
ZS's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.20, against 0.78 for the S&P 500, so ZS earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is ZS with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, ZS's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.30 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against ZS instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a ZS holding.
What are the best alternatives to ZS?
Of the 21 popular alternatives we compared, five outperformed ZS in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 2 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: PANW, CRWD and FTNT.
Did ZS outperform the S&P 500?
ZS finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in four of seven full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +24.7%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did ZS do in stock market crashes?
ZS fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in none of the four major crashes it has traded through, and further in four. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when ZS fell 55.3% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
What diversifies ZS?
These had a low correlation with ZS over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation -0.23), DXJ (correlation -0.03) and EMLP (correlation -0.12); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.14), CLS (correlation 0.32) and MCK (correlation 0.08). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than ZS's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of ZS's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 2 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to ZS
PANWPalo Alto Networks
CRWDCrowdStrike
FTNTFortinet
DDOGDatadog
SNOWSnowflake
CSCOCisco Systems
MSFTMicrosoft
NETCloudflare
AMZNAmazon.com
GOOGAlphabet