Relative Intelligence · Healthcare REITs

How Ventas (VTR) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on VTR alone. It places VTR (Ventas, Inc.) against 17 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where VTR stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: VTR's full trading record, from September 1989 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 22, 2026.
Data as of October 22, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
This page answers the following questions about VTR
Key findings
Not AI-generatedThese key findings are generated by our proprietary relative intelligence engine, directly from the data on this page.
- Right nowVTR has gone against the market, falling 9.9% over the past 3 months while the S&P 500 rose 2.5%. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?Not a move of its own: the healthcare reits ETF VNQ (Vanguard Real Estate ETF) fell 5.6% over the past 3 months, with OHI (Omega Healthcare Investors, down 7.3%) and DOC (Healthpeak Properties, down 11.5%), while the S&P 500 rose 2.5%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsThe past 3 years (ahead of 76% of the stocks worth at least $300 million) have been far stronger than the record over 10 years (behind 62% of them). Over the past year, VTR rose 26.5% against 15.6% for the S&P 500 and 16.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (129% against 88.4%). Market rank ↓
- Long termVTR turned $10,000 into $19,200 over the past decade, against $41,600 in the S&P 500. That said, the past 5 years have been the better stretch: VTR rose 86.4% against 80.3% for the S&P 500, after trailing over the decade. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashVTR fell harder than the S&P 500 in five of seven sell-offs. The late-2018 sell-off was the exception: VTR fell 12.2%, less than the S&P 500's 19.3%. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationOver 10 years VTR took more of the market's losses than of its gains: in the S&P 500's rising months it gained 70% as much as the index, and in falling months it lost 1.0 times as much, with a beta of 0.96. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- WELL (Welltower) earned more than VTR with less volatility over the past 5 years: 27.0% a year at 23.8% volatility, against 13.3% a year at 25.3%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- ABBV (AbbVie, specialty pharmaceuticals) and NVS (Novartis, pharmaceuticals) earned more than VTR with less volatility over the past 5 years. ABBV returned 25.5% a year at 23.4% volatility, against 13.3% a year at 25.3%.
- Whole market
- 88 of the 3,641 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than VTR with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them WMT (Walmart), ABBV (AbbVie) and COST (Costco Wholesale).
How much would $10,000 in VTR have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in VTR over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of VTR over the same span and VTR's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in VTR at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $219,687 by September 2026, more than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of VTR, and WELL finished highest, at $467,035.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 273 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of VTR; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- WELL$467,035+4,570% total · +14.2% a year
- RY$442,765+4,328% total · +14.0% a year
- TD$422,896+4,129% total · +13.8% a year
- BTI$388,024+3,780% total · +13.4% a year
- MO$372,045+3,620% total · +13.3% a year
- VTR$219,687+2,097% total · +11.2% a year
- LTC$148,178+1,382% total · +9.7% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
- OHI$101,776+918% total · +8.3% a year
- DOC$86,723+767% total · +7.7% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 1,034 of the 3,630 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of VTR; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- WELL$31,492+215% total · +25.8% a year
- DHC$25,372+154% total · +20.5% a year
- ENSG$23,206+132% total · +18.3% a year
- CTRE$22,963+130% total · +18.1% a year
- OHI$22,926+129% total · +18.0% a year
- SBRA$19,879+98.8% total · +14.7% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- HCA$18,335+83.3% total · +12.9% a year
- VTR$18,167+81.7% total · +12.7% a year
- BKD$17,191+71.9% total · +11.4% a year
VTR at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- VTR's deepest decline since it began trading in 1989 was 89.5%, from June 1997 to March 2000. It took about three years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, VTR's best was 2001, when it returned 130%, and its worst was 1999, when it lost 64.1%. It lost money in eight of those years.
- VTR is 13.0% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $45B
- Industry
- REIT - Healthcare Facilities
- Price history from
- September 1989
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +26.5%total return
- Past 3 years
- +129%+31.9% a year
- Past 5 years
- +86.4%+13.3% a year
- Past 10 years
- +91.6%+6.7% a year
- Best calendar year
- +130%2001
- Worst calendar year
- −64.1%1999
- Losing years
- 8 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 25.3%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.62return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −89.5%Jun 1997 to Mar 2000
- From its all-time high
- −13.0%below the peak
VTR against the whole market
Where VTR ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does VTR rank among all stocks?
This section ranks VTR on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how VTR stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- VTR is among the steadier stocks: its price swings rank in the top 12% of the 2,897 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top is the calmest.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | VTR | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +26.5% | 1,091 of 3,282 | top 33% |
| 3-year return | +129% | 722 of 3,016 | top 24% |
| 5-year return | +86.4% | 787 of 2,897 | top 27% |
| 10-year return | +91.6% | 1,372 of 2,201 | bottom 39% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 25.3% | 355 of 2,897 | top 12% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.62 | 630 of 2,897 | top 22% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −76.9% | 1,521 of 2,184 | bottom 31% |
What has beaten VTR on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). VTR sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than VTR with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 36 stocks and 52 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than VTR over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 2% of the 3,641 screened.
- Among those with at least half VTR's swings, DXJ has the best return for its risk: 26.6% a year at 19.1% volatility, 25% less than VTR's 25.3%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.34 against 0.62 for VTR. WELL earned the most, 27.0% a year, while still swinging less than VTR (23.8% against 25.3%).
- Among VTR's popular alternatives, WELL is in the region. WELL earned 27.0% a year against 13.3% a year for VTR, at 23.8% volatility, 6% less than VTR's 25.3%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to VTR; faint dots are 60 more of the 88 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,641 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
- 1 with more than 1.6× VTR's volatility is in the table only
Is there a better investment than VTR?
Investments that beat VTR over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among VTR's popular alternatives, WELL earned more than VTR with less volatility over the past 5 years: 27.0% a year at 23.8% volatility, against 13.3% a year at 25.3%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, ABBV (specialty pharmaceuticals) and NVS (pharmaceuticals) earned more than VTR with less volatility over the past 5 years. ABBV returned 25.5% a year at 23.4% volatility, against 13.3% a year at 25.3%.
- Across the whole market, 88 of the 3,641 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than VTR with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them WMT, ABBV and COST.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat VTR over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks VTR's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than VTR follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than VTR's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× VTR's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than VTR's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with VTR?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +13.3% | 25.3% | 0.62 | −76.9% | +91.6% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.5% | 17.2% | 0.78 | −33.7% | +316% | 0.41 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 5 shownThe investments people most often weigh against VTR. 5 of 16 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +27.0% | 23.8% | 1.13 | −63.3% | +378% | 0.83 | — | ||
OHIOmega Healthcare Investors, Inc. · Healthcare REITs | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +17.6% | 24.3% | 0.79 | −66.9% | +208% | 0.38 | — | |
ENSGThe Ensign Group, Inc. · Health Care Facilities | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +20.1% | 26.9% | 0.82 | −55.5% | +919% | 0.30 | — | |
CTRECareTrust REIT, Inc. · Healthcare REITs | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +17.0% | 24.6% | 0.76 | −67.4% | +316% | 0.51 | — | |
DHCDiversified Healthcare Trust · Healthcare REITs | Higher return in most periods | +18.2% | 68.8% | 0.57 | −96.3% | −46.4% | 0.15 | — | |
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Healthcare REITs and the categories next to it (Health Care Facilities, Office REITs, Pharmaceuticals, Gaming REITs), plus VTR's specific themes. 14 of 67 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +25.5% | 23.4% | 1.09 | −45.1% | +600% | 0.30 | — | ||
EHCEncompass Health Corporation · Health Care Facilities | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +18.7% | 26.9% | 0.77 | −39.5% | +354% | 0.40 | — | |
NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Health Care Facilities | Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +31.2% | 28.6% | 1.10 | −35.3% | +385% | 0.28 | — | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +17.4% | 20.7% | 0.89 | −26.8% | +234% | 0.50 | — | ||
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +13.5% | 18.0% | 0.80 | −27.4% | +209% | 0.44 | — | ||
REZiShares Residential and Multisector Real Estate ETF · Residential REITs · Senior Housing theme | Smaller losses in recent crashes | +2.8% | 19.1% | 0.24 | −44.1% | +97.6% | 0.73 | 0.48% | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 558 of 3,561 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +15.2% | 16.8% | 0.93 | −37.0% | +205% | 0.52 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +17.5% | 18.2% | 0.98 | −40.0% | +361% | 0.59 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +20.4% | 23.3% | 0.92 | −48.8% | +294% | 0.53 | — | ||
DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · Japan Equity | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +415% | 0.28 | 0.48% | |
LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Dividend Equity | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +16.9% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.64 | 0.40% | |
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +14.1% | 18.6% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +461% | 0.28 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +41.7% | 24.7% | 1.54 | −46.1% | +345% | 0.25 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +17.1% | 19.0% | 0.93 | −26.4% | +206% | 0.32 | 0.40% | ||
What these numbers mean for VTR
- Annual return
- VTR returned 13.3% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.5% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $18,600. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- VTR's volatility over the past 5 years was 25.3%, 1.5 times the S&P 500's 17.2%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, VTR's return lands within 25.3% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- VTR's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.62, against 0.78 for the S&P 500, so VTR earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- VTR's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 76.9%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 76.9% fall takes a 333% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, VTR's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.41 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against VTR instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a VTR holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 88 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than VTR with less volatility
Out of 3,641 tested over 5 years. The strongest 69 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with VTR | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +15.2% | 16.8% | 0.93 | −37.0% | +205% | 0.52 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +17.5% | 18.2% | 0.98 | −40.0% | +361% | 0.59 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +20.4% | 23.3% | 0.92 | −48.8% | +294% | 0.53 | — | |
| 4 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · Japan Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +415% | 0.28 | 0.48% |
| 5 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Dividend Equity | Whole market | +16.9% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.64 | 0.40% |
| 6 | Whole market | +21.3% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +240% | 0.48 | — | |
| 7 | Popular alternative | +27.0% | 23.8% | 1.13 | −63.3% | +378% | 0.83 | — | |
| 8 | Whole market | +16.5% | 20.0% | 0.87 | −42.0% | +319% | 0.45 | — | |
| 9 | Whole market | +19.4% | 22.0% | 0.92 | −56.1% | +110% | 0.35 | — | |
| 10 | Whole market | +18.3% | 21.4% | 0.90 | −53.7% | +133% | 0.41 | — | |
| 11 | Whole market | +15.8% | 20.4% | 0.82 | −42.6% | +256% | 0.41 | — | |
| 12 | Whole market | +19.5% | 21.6% | 0.94 | −47.3% | +409% | 0.55 | — | |
| 13 | Whole market | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +360% | 0.46 | — | |
| 14 | Whole market | +23.3% | 24.0% | 1.00 | −57.5% | +386% | 0.62 | — | |
| 15 | Whole market | +17.1% | 23.1% | 0.80 | −48.4% | +834% | 0.35 | — | |
| 16 | Same or nearby category | +25.5% | 23.4% | 1.09 | −45.1% | +600% | 0.30 | — | |
| 17 | WRBW. R. Berkley Corporation · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +18.6% | 22.9% | 0.86 | −45.3% | +466% | 0.25 | — |
| 18 | FDLFirst Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund · High Dividend Yield | Whole market | +14.6% | 14.5% | 1.02 | −41.4% | +207% | 0.59 | 0.43% |
| 19 | VLUEiShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +16.2% | 18.4% | 0.91 | −39.5% | +286% | 0.40 | 0.15% |
| 20 | THGThe Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +15.2% | 22.9% | 0.73 | −40.1% | +309% | 0.37 | — |
| 21 | Whole market | +17.1% | 19.0% | 0.93 | −26.4% | +206% | 0.32 | 0.40% | |
| 22 | MLPXGlobal X - MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF · Energy Infrastructure | Whole market | +19.0% | 19.7% | 0.98 | −64.6% | +189% | 0.47 | 0.45% |
| 23 | IXCiShares Global Energy ETF · Energy Equity | Whole market | +20.9% | 23.2% | 0.94 | −64.2% | +183% | 0.32 | 0.37% |
| 24 | FRDMFreedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF · Emerging Markets Equity | Whole market | +16.8% | 22.9% | 0.80 | −40.5% | — | 0.46 | 0.49% |
| 25 | Whole market | +15.8% | 23.4% | 0.75 | −42.0% | +394% | 0.17 | — | |
| 26 | Whole market | +19.8% | 22.4% | 0.92 | −42.0% | +326% | 0.54 | — | |
| 27 | CHCOCity Holding Company · Regional Banks | Whole market | +15.1% | 22.8% | 0.73 | −32.3% | +272% | 0.31 | — |
| 28 | ATOAtmos Energy Corporation · Gas Utilities | Whole market | +15.9% | 18.5% | 0.90 | −32.9% | +207% | 0.67 | — |
| 29 | DBJPXtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF · Japan Equity | Whole market | +20.9% | 19.3% | 1.09 | −31.3% | +339% | 0.25 | 0.45% |
| 30 | CRAKVanEck Oil Refiners ETF · Oil Refining | Whole market | +19.5% | 20.9% | 0.96 | −58.8% | +325% | 0.33 | 0.61% |
| 31 | GSGiShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust · Broad Commodities | Whole market | +15.5% | 22.9% | 0.75 | −57.6% | +144% | 0.11 | 0.75% |
| 32 | IGEiShares North American Natural Resources ETF · Natural Resources Equity | Whole market | +18.1% | 22.0% | 0.87 | −60.6% | +158% | 0.40 | 0.37% |
| 33 | NINiSource Inc · Gas Utilities | Whole market | +15.5% | 20.3% | 0.81 | −30.9% | +166% | 0.68 | — |
| 34 | NXTGFirst Trust Indxx NextG ETF · Technology Equity | Whole market | +16.1% | 19.1% | 0.88 | −33.6% | +323% | 0.37 | 0.70% |
| 35 | PNWPinnacle West Capital Corporation · Electric Utilities | Whole market | +14.6% | 19.9% | 0.79 | −39.3% | +110% | 0.59 | — |
| 36 | Whole market | +21.1% | 22.6% | 0.97 | −25.7% | +521% | 0.34 | — | |
| 37 | Whole market | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +692% | 0.38 | — | |
| 38 | Whole market | +19.8% | 22.3% | 0.93 | −42.5% | +357% | 0.24 | — | |
| 39 | Whole market | +16.3% | 17.1% | 0.98 | −58.1% | +178% | 0.35 | — | |
| 40 | Whole market | +23.6% | 22.8% | 1.05 | −32.4% | +403% | 0.40 | — | |
| 41 | Whole market | +20.1% | 22.3% | 0.94 | −55.1% | +159% | 0.43 | — | |
| 42 | Whole market | +19.5% | 20.8% | 0.97 | −54.9% | +344% | 0.56 | — | |
| 43 | Whole market | +15.2% | 23.6% | 0.72 | −32.8% | +639% | 0.32 | — | |
| 44 | Whole market | +14.4% | 17.5% | 0.86 | −34.7% | — | 0.37 | 0.26% | |
| 45 | SDCIUSCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund · Broad Commodities | Whole market | +21.1% | 18.4% | 1.14 | −45.7% | — | 0.22 | 0.80% |
| 46 | HIGThe Hartford Insurance Group, Inc. · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +15.8% | 22.0% | 0.78 | −57.6% | +302% | 0.41 | — |
| 47 | DFIVDimensional - International Value ETF · International Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +14.8% | 16.4% | 0.93 | −25.4% | — | 0.66 | 0.27% |
| 48 | SPMOInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF · US Momentum Equity | Whole market | +18.1% | 20.9% | 0.91 | −30.9% | +485% | 0.22 | 0.13% |
| 49 | LLoews Corporation · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +15.0% | 19.2% | 0.83 | −48.5% | +190% | 0.47 | — |
| 50 | PVALPutnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +15.9% | 15.1% | 1.06 | −41.3% | — | 0.51 | 0.56% |
| 51 | Same or nearby category | +17.4% | 20.7% | 0.89 | −26.8% | +234% | 0.50 | — | |
| 52 | PAVEGlobal X - U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF · Infrastructure Equity | Whole market | +14.6% | 21.7% | 0.74 | −44.1% | — | 0.42 | 0.47% |
| 53 | IOOiShares Global 100 ETF · Global Equity | Whole market | +15.6% | 17.2% | 0.94 | −31.4% | +357% | 0.42 | 0.40% |
| 54 | ITAiShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +14.4% | 20.4% | 0.77 | −51.0% | +253% | 0.34 | 0.37% |
| 55 | ORIOld Republic International Corporation · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +17.3% | 22.2% | 0.83 | −47.8% | +353% | 0.49 | — |
| 56 | EMLPFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund · Energy Infrastructure | Whole market | +15.2% | 14.5% | 1.06 | −43.6% | +155% | 0.59 | 0.95% |
| 57 | GCOWPacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF · Global Equity | Whole market | +14.4% | 13.6% | 1.06 | −37.6% | +170% | 0.66 | 0.60% |
| 58 | WTMWhite Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. · Insurance | Whole market | +15.4% | 23.6% | 0.73 | −40.2% | +174% | 0.20 | — |
| 59 | Whole market | +24.0% | 18.8% | 1.25 | −75.2% | +337% | 0.33 | — | |
| 60 | ILFiShares Latin America 40 ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +15.6% | 23.1% | 0.75 | −57.8% | +93.1% | 0.49 | 0.47% |
| 61 | EUFNiShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF · Financial Sector Equity | Whole market | +18.1% | 21.8% | 0.88 | −53.2% | +224% | 0.64 | 0.49% |
| 62 | GARPiShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF · US Large-Cap Growth | Whole market | +16.6% | 22.5% | 0.80 | −31.4% | — | 0.22 | 0.15% |
| 63 | SPUSSP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Whole market | +14.8% | 19.5% | 0.81 | −30.8% | — | 0.27 | 0.45% |
| 64 | DIVBiShares Core Dividend ETF · High Dividend Yield | Whole market | +14.6% | 15.5% | 0.96 | −36.9% | — | 0.53 | 0.05% |
| 65 | FFLCFidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF · Active Core Equity | Whole market | +15.5% | 16.8% | 0.94 | −19.7% | — | 0.40 | 0.38% |
| 66 | IUSInvesco RAFI Strategic US ETF · US Total Market | Whole market | +14.7% | 14.9% | 1.00 | −34.7% | — | 0.51 | 0.19% |
| 67 | VFMFVanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF · US Multifactor Equity | Whole market | +14.5% | 17.6% | 0.86 | −41.3% | — | 0.43 | 0.18% |
| 68 | EWJViShares MSCI Japan Value ETF · Japan Equity | Whole market | +15.1% | 18.2% | 0.87 | −30.1% | — | 0.49 | 0.15% |
| 69 | AMLPAlerian MLP ETF · Energy Equity | Whole market | +16.4% | 18.9% | 0.90 | −72.9% | +90.8% | 0.28 | 1.01% |
VTR against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against VTR, compared period by period and year by year.
How do VTR's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at VTR, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- WELL, OHI and CTRE were both more rewarding and calmer than VTR over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, VTR returned 13.3% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.5%, with higher volatility (25.3% against 17.2%).
Green points earned more than VTR with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| WELL Welltower Inc. | +27.0% | 23.8% |
| ENSG The Ensign Group, Inc. | +20.1% | 26.9% |
| DHC Diversified Healthcare Trust | +18.2% | 68.8% |
| OHI Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. | +17.6% | 24.3% |
| CTRE CareTrust REIT, Inc. | +17.0% | 24.6% |
| SBRA Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc. | +14.1% | 27.2% |
| HCA HCA Healthcare, Inc. | +14.0% | 30.1% |
| VTR This pageVentas, Inc. | +13.3% | 25.3% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.5% | 17.2% |
| LTC LTC Properties, Inc. | +12.1% | 21.2% |
| NHI National Health Investors, Inc. | +9.7% | 23.8% |
| BKD Brookdale Senior Living Inc. | +9.0% | 52.9% |
| VICI VICI Properties Inc. | +1.0% | 20.9% |
| UHT Universal Health Realty Income Trust | −1.7% | 24.4% |
| HR Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated | −1.8% | 28.6% |
| DOC Healthpeak Properties, Inc. | −4.1% | 26.7% |
| CHCT Community Healthcare Trust Incorporated | −16.4% | 28.8% |
| ARE Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. | −23.5% | 34.7% |
Has VTR consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares VTR with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than VTR helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- WELL outperformed VTR in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- Two of the 17 popular alternatives, WELL and DHC, outperformed VTR in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- WELL, ENSG and OHI earned more for the risk they took than VTR (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than VTR over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| VTR Ventas, Inc. (this page) | — | +0.8% | −9.9% | +9.9% | +14.6% | +26.5% | +129% | +86.4% | +91.6% | 25.3% | 0.62 | −76.9% | — | $45B | — |
| WELL QualifiedWelltower Inc. | 5/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +3.0% | −2.8% | +19.7% | +28.4% | +36.9% | +203% | +230% | +378% | 23.8% | 1.13 | −63.3% | — | $171B | — |
| DHC QualifiedDiversified Healthcare Trust | 3/5 short2/3 long | −3.6% | −15.1% | +13.6% | +59.0% | +88.3% | +374% | +131% | −46.4% | 68.8% | 0.57 | −96.3% | — | $1.9B | — |
| HCA Medical - Care FacilitiesHCA Healthcare, Inc. | 2/5 short2/3 long | +6.7% | +25.9% | −0.5% | −0.1% | +6.6% | +98.5% | +92.5% | +517% | 30.1% | 0.59 | −54.7% | — | $101B | — |
| ENSG Medical - Care FacilitiesThe Ensign Group, Inc. | 1/5 short2/3 long | +1.2% | +5.5% | −4.2% | +2.7% | −3.3% | +87.4% | +150% | +919% | 26.9% | 0.82 | −55.5% | — | $10B | — |
| OHI REIT - Healthcare FacilitiesOmega Healthcare Investors, Inc. | 1/5 short2/3 long | −0.4% | −7.3% | +5.8% | +8.5% | +20.8% | +71.9% | +125% | +208% | 24.3% | 0.79 | −66.9% | — | $14B | — |
| CTRE REIT - Healthcare FacilitiesCareTrust REIT, Inc. | 0/5 short2/3 long | −1.1% | −12.7% | +0.2% | +4.0% | +8.9% | +95.4% | +119% | +316% | 24.6% | 0.76 | −67.4% | — | $8.7B | — |
| SBRA REIT - Healthcare FacilitiesSabra Health Care REIT, Inc. | 0/5 short1/3 long | −1.1% | −9.5% | +3.1% | +6.9% | +14.1% | +72.8% | +93.3% | +73.6% | 27.2% | 0.62 | −74.9% | — | $5.0B | — |
| BKD Medical - Care FacilitiesBrookdale Senior Living Inc. | 0/5 short1/3 long | −10.5% | −30.4% | −24.1% | −6.0% | +17.1% | +175% | +53.7% | −34.9% | 52.9% | 0.43 | −89.3% | — | $2.4B | — |
| LTC REIT - Healthcare FacilitiesLTC Properties, Inc. | 5/5 short0/3 long | +2.6% | +4.5% | +19.2% | +31.2% | +30.7% | +69.0% | +77.2% | +52.9% | 21.2% | 0.65 | −51.4% | — | $2.3B | — |
| AHR REIT - Healthcare FacilitiesAmerican Healthcare REIT, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +3.8% | −6.0% | +12.9% | +14.7% | +26.4% | — | — | — | — | — | −14.1% | — | $12B | — |
| DOC REIT - Healthcare FacilitiesHealthpeak Properties, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | −5.6% | −11.5% | +22.0% | +26.0% | +11.0% | +44.8% | −18.8% | +17.7% | 26.7% | -0.02 | −50.7% | — | $13B | — |
| VICI REIT - DiversifiedVICI Properties Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +0.2% | −7.9% | −11.8% | −10.2% | −17.8% | +5.2% | +5.0% | — | 20.9% | 0.15 | −60.2% | — | $26B | — |
| NHI REIT - Healthcare FacilitiesNational Health Investors, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | +0.8% | −15.1% | −10.2% | −9.6% | −6.9% | +60.6% | +58.6% | +51.5% | 23.8% | 0.51 | −63.0% | — | $3.3B | — |
| HR REIT - Healthcare FacilitiesHealthcare Realty Trust Incorporated | 0/5 short0/3 long | −1.4% | −14.7% | +0.3% | +9.8% | +1.6% | +53.2% | −8.5% | +26.4% | 28.6% | 0.08 | −47.4% | — | $6.2B | — |
| CHCT REIT - Healthcare FacilitiesCommunity Healthcare Trust Incorporated | 0/5 short0/3 long | −10.4% | −27.8% | −20.6% | −14.3% | +2.3% | −37.2% | −59.3% | +4.4% | 28.8% | -0.48 | −65.7% | — | $370M | — |
| UHT REIT - Healthcare FacilitiesUniversal Health Realty Income Trust | 0/5 short0/3 long | −2.9% | −11.0% | −3.4% | +2.0% | +11.5% | +25.5% | −8.2% | +3.0% | 24.4% | 0.05 | −69.2% | — | $526M | — |
| ARE REIT - OfficeAlexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −18.3% | −11.4% | −4.5% | −7.6% | −41.0% | −46.0% | −73.8% | −41.2% | 34.7% | -0.60 | −77.9% | — | $7.6B | — |
How did VTR do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where VTR ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with VTR and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- VTR finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 18 of its 29 full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, CTRE came out ahead of VTR most often, in eight of the 11 years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, VTR finished in the top quarter in six of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in four. In 2025, it ranked 7 of 18.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of VTR; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places VTR among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of VTR | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VTR This pageVentas, Inc. | — | +35.1% | +22.2% | +15.1% | −8.6% | +7.7% | −9.8% | +3.4% | +3.5% | +0.7% | +16.1% | −4.9% | +32.7% | −6.4% | +23.8% | +11.2% | +27.2% | +41.3% | −20.7% | +13.8% | +40.0% | +24.4% | +32.9% | +110% | +10.7% | +130% | +68.4% | −64.1% | −20.5% | −22.6% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 6 of 29 | 7 of 18 | 6 of 17 | 8 of 17 | 8 of 17 | 10 of 17 | 12 of 17 | 16 of 17 | 9 of 17 | 10 of 16 | 8 of 16 | 6 of 15 | 8 of 14 | 11 of 14 | 8 of 14 | 5 of 13 | 4 of 13 | 4 of 13 | 10 of 13 | 2 of 12 | 6 of 12 | 1 of 11 | 4 of 11 | 4 of 11 | 7 of 10 | 1 of 10 | 1 of 10 | 9 of 9 | 8 of 9 | 8 of 8 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 11 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| WELL Welltower Inc. | 13 of 29 | +49.9% | +43.1% | +41.8% | −21.2% | +37.0% | −17.2% | +23.1% | +15.3% | +0.2% | +3.4% | −5.8% | +48.6% | −8.4% | +18.2% | +21.1% | +14.2% | +12.6% | +0.2% | +9.7% | +37.1% | −4.7% | +13.6% | +44.0% | +20.7% | +66.3% | +22.9% | −35.0% | +0.2% | +24.6% |
| DHC Diversified Healthcare Trust | 7 of 26 | +114% | −37.9% | +498% | −78.6% | −24.1% | −49.9% | −22.0% | −32.8% | +9.3% | +38.6% | −26.5% | +6.6% | −0.1% | +12.9% | +9.3% | +7.1% | +32.8% | −15.4% | −1.7% | +55.3% | −4.0% | +18.0% | +78.5% | −11.2% | +61.5% | −9.0% | — | — | — |
| HCA HCA Healthcare, Inc. | 10 of 14 | +56.7% | +11.8% | +13.8% | −5.6% | +57.6% | +11.6% | +20.2% | +43.4% | +18.7% | +9.4% | −7.8% | +53.8% | +58.1% | +70.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ENSG The Ensign Group, Inc. | 11 of 18 | +31.3% | +18.6% | +18.9% | +13.0% | +15.4% | +61.4% | +25.6% | +75.6% | +0.8% | −1.1% | +2.6% | +78.3% | +64.0% | +11.9% | −0.8% | +63.7% | −7.0% | +18.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| OHI Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. | 16 of 29 | +25.5% | +33.6% | +19.9% | +3.5% | −12.1% | −6.8% | +29.0% | +40.0% | −4.8% | −3.9% | −5.3% | +38.7% | +32.6% | +30.7% | −7.1% | +22.9% | +31.8% | +7.1% | −2.8% | +51.1% | +14.3% | +35.4% | +154% | −38.1% | +61.2% | −66.0% | −53.0% | −10.1% | +26.5% |
| CTRE CareTrust REIT, Inc. | 8 of 11 | +39.4% | +26.3% | +27.3% | −13.6% | +7.9% | +13.7% | +16.4% | +16.0% | +14.0% | +47.1% | −6.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SBRA Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc. | 11 of 23 | +17.1% | +31.2% | +26.2% | +0.4% | −16.2% | −11.3% | +41.1% | −3.7% | −18.2% | +31.2% | −29.0% | +22.9% | +26.5% | +94.0% | −29.0% | +45.2% | +3.5% | −48.4% | +36.0% | +90.8% | −28.1% | −7.6% | +616% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BKD Brookdale Senior Living Inc. | 9 of 20 | +115% | −13.6% | +113% | −47.1% | +16.5% | −39.1% | +8.5% | −30.9% | −21.9% | −32.7% | −49.7% | +34.9% | +7.3% | +45.6% | −18.8% | +17.7% | +226% | −79.6% | −37.8% | +66.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| LTC LTC Properties, Inc. | 13 of 29 | +6.2% | +14.9% | −3.3% | +10.6% | −6.8% | −7.5% | +12.8% | +1.1% | −2.7% | +14.1% | +4.8% | +28.5% | +5.6% | +20.4% | +16.9% | +11.4% | +41.6% | −13.6% | −2.4% | +38.2% | +12.8% | +43.8% | +134% | +11.5% | +78.6% | −49.5% | −41.4% | −12.5% | +20.3% |
| AHR American Healthcare REIT, Inc. | 1 of 1 | +70.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| DOC Healthpeak Properties, Inc. | 11 of 29 | −15.2% | +10.1% | −12.6% | −25.2% | +27.3% | −4.6% | +33.1% | +17.9% | −4.5% | −16.8% | −8.5% | +32.1% | −16.2% | +13.7% | +18.0% | +26.9% | +17.8% | −15.9% | −0.8% | +52.4% | −2.3% | +15.6% | +57.1% | +14.3% | +32.5% | +39.4% | −14.1% | −12.8% | +15.8% |
| VICI VICI Properties Inc. | 4 of 8 | +1.9% | −3.1% | +3.6% | +13.0% | +23.8% | +6.1% | +43.1% | −3.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| NHI National Health Investors, Inc. | 15 of 29 | +15.7% | +30.7% | +14.6% | −3.3% | −11.8% | −8.7% | +13.7% | +5.9% | +6.9% | +28.1% | −8.2% | +31.0% | +4.6% | +35.1% | +3.9% | +28.7% | +45.6% | +6.5% | −7.2% | +38.1% | −4.8% | +25.0% | +68.5% | +18.9% | +106% | −44.4% | −30.2% | −35.4% | +19.3% |
| HR Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated | 13 of 29 | +6.9% | +6.3% | −4.1% | −20.7% | +11.5% | −8.3% | +26.6% | −3.6% | +14.0% | +15.4% | +13.8% | +41.4% | −2.3% | +40.2% | −6.3% | +4.1% | −0.2% | −1.7% | −31.4% | +28.2% | −12.3% | +22.1% | +32.2% | +13.2% | +44.4% | +52.3% | −21.4% | −18.3% | +17.6% |
| CHCT Community Healthcare Trust Incorporated | 5 of 10 | −3.8% | −21.4% | −21.5% | −20.7% | +4.1% | +14.3% | +54.9% | +9.0% | +30.0% | +35.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| UHT Universal Health Realty Income Trust | 11 of 29 | +13.3% | −7.5% | −3.6% | −15.3% | −3.4% | −43.2% | +96.9% | −14.9% | +18.8% | +37.2% | +9.6% | +27.1% | −16.4% | +37.5% | +13.8% | +22.3% | +5.1% | −0.4% | −2.8% | +32.5% | +4.1% | +13.8% | +23.1% | +20.3% | +28.4% | +51.6% | −18.1% | −2.0% | +15.9% |
| ARE Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. | 10 of 28 | −46.6% | −19.4% | −9.1% | −32.6% | +28.1% | +13.3% | +44.0% | −9.0% | +20.9% | +26.9% | +5.3% | +44.8% | −4.5% | +3.5% | −3.3% | +16.4% | +11.3% | −38.3% | +4.4% | +28.5% | +12.2% | +33.7% | +42.4% | +9.7% | +15.8% | +21.6% | +8.8% | +4.7% | — |
Risk and diversification
How VTR has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were VTR's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents VTR's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1989, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all four of VTR's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: VTR fell 89.5% from June 1997 to March 2000, while the S&P 500 rose 65.0%.
- The slowest recovery came after VTR fell 76.9% from October 2019 to March 2020; it did not regain that peak until August 2024, four years later.
Green means VTR fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | VTR fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dot-com bust | −89.5% | +65.0% | Jun 1997 | Mar 2000 | 2.8 years | Jul 2003 | 3.3 years |
| Covid crash | −76.9% | −18.1% | Oct 2019 | Mar 2020 | 5 months | Aug 2024 | 4.4 years |
| 2008 financial crisis | −64.1% | −33.9% | Sep 2008 | Dec 2008 | 3 months | Mar 2010 | 15 months |
| No named crash | −49.0% | — | Jan 1992 | Sep 1993 | 20 months | Aug 1994 | 11 months |
| No named crash | −36.1% | −1.7% | Mar 1996 | Jul 1996 | 4 months | Apr 1997 | 9 months |
How did VTR do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far VTR, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- Among its popular alternatives, VICI held up best, falling less than VTR in four of the five crashes they both traded through.
- VTR fell further than the S&P 500 in six of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the Covid crash, when VTR fell 73.1% and the S&P 500 fell 33.7%.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than VTR.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VTR This pageVentas, Inc. | — | −6.9% | −41.0% | −73.1% | −12.2% | −6.3% | −17.3% | −20.8% | −0.8% | −64.1% | −24.1% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 6 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| WELL Welltower Inc. | 4 of 10 | −9.2% | −40.8% | −61.9% | −11.1% | −6.5% | −22.3% | −23.3% | −0.5% | −47.5% | −18.1% |
| DHC Diversified Healthcare Trust | 3 of 10 | −22.4% | −72.7% | −73.2% | −35.4% | −5.0% | −18.1% | −22.1% | −0.2% | −57.9% | −35.8% |
| HCA HCA Healthcare, Inc. | 4 of 7 | −2.2% | −39.5% | −54.4% | −20.6% | −3.8% | −31.3% | −49.0% | — | — | — |
| ENSG The Ensign Group, Inc. | 5 of 8 | −2.4% | −24.6% | −52.2% | −24.1% | −1.0% | −24.6% | −29.6% | 0.0% | — | — |
| OHI Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. | 5 of 10 | −2.8% | −18.9% | −66.9% | −11.8% | −3.8% | −23.3% | −30.7% | −2.3% | −44.3% | −83.6% |
| CTRE CareTrust REIT, Inc. | 4 of 6 | −4.5% | −29.0% | −65.7% | −11.7% | −4.3% | −17.7% | — | — | — | — |
| SBRA Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc. | 3 of 9 | −5.7% | −24.6% | −73.5% | −29.8% | −6.8% | −40.9% | −41.8% | −0.8% | −58.2% | — |
| BKD Brookdale Senior Living Inc. | 0 of 9 | −14.3% | −46.4% | −79.3% | −35.6% | −7.4% | −59.0% | −50.8% | −4.5% | −93.5% | — |
| LTC LTC Properties, Inc. | 6 of 10 | −3.8% | −19.3% | −49.4% | −13.0% | −5.8% | −12.0% | −22.8% | −2.5% | −51.1% | −57.7% |
| DOC Healthpeak Properties, Inc. | 7 of 10 | −8.9% | −37.7% | −46.5% | −11.4% | −5.1% | −34.0% | −23.1% | 0.0% | −61.1% | −11.4% |
| VICI VICI Properties Inc. | 4 of 5 | −5.6% | −16.3% | −60.2% | −18.6% | −5.3% | — | — | — | — | — |
| NHI National Health Investors, Inc. | 7 of 10 | −2.9% | −22.6% | −63.0% | −8.8% | −6.1% | −14.0% | −19.5% | −0.9% | −45.6% | −60.1% |
| HR Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated | 6 of 10 | −3.8% | −28.5% | −34.8% | −13.4% | −5.8% | −11.5% | −25.7% | −2.1% | −57.8% | −16.7% |
| CHCT Community Healthcare Trust Incorporated | 4 of 6 | −6.2% | −33.7% | −57.5% | −12.4% | −6.3% | −14.3% | — | — | — | — |
| UHT Universal Health Realty Income Trust | 7 of 10 | −2.4% | −29.2% | −54.7% | −19.2% | −8.0% | −13.5% | −23.8% | 0.0% | −40.6% | −16.2% |
| ARE Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. | 2 of 10 | −12.6% | −40.6% | −32.1% | −13.2% | −7.7% | −23.5% | −32.1% | −2.9% | −70.7% | −21.0% |
How closely does VTR move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares VTR with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- ENSG took just 55% of the S&P 500's losses, against 98% for VTR, while still keeping 105% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, VTR captured 70% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 98% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.96. Its share of the market's losses was larger than its share of the gains.
- Five of the 15 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than VTR's 0.72, led by ENSG, WELL and OHI.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than VTR's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VTR This pageVentas, Inc. | 70% | 98% | 0.72 | 0.96 |
| ENSG The Ensign Group, Inc. | 105% | 55% | 1.93 | 0.83 |
| WELL Welltower Inc. | 87% | 72% | 1.22 | 0.90 |
| OHI Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. | 70% | 67% | 1.05 | 0.77 |
| CTRE CareTrust REIT, Inc. | 93% | 90% | 1.04 | 0.91 |
| HCA HCA Healthcare, Inc. | 135% | 140% | 0.97 | 1.37 |
| LTC LTC Properties, Inc. | 48% | 68% | 0.70 | 0.75 |
| SBRA Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc. | 76% | 111% | 0.68 | 1.05 |
| NHI National Health Investors, Inc. | 60% | 92% | 0.65 | 0.71 |
| CHCT Community Healthcare Trust Incorporated | 47% | 79% | 0.59 | 0.61 |
| HR Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated | 59% | 104% | 0.57 | 0.80 |
| DOC Healthpeak Properties, Inc. | 61% | 110% | 0.55 | 0.88 |
| UHT Universal Health Realty Income Trust | 63% | 123% | 0.51 | 0.80 |
| DHC Diversified Healthcare Trust | 94% | 223% | 0.42 | 1.84 |
| ARE Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. | 58% | 145% | 0.40 | 0.97 |
| BKD Brookdale Senior Living Inc. | 40% | 111% | 0.36 | 1.15 |
What diversifies VTR?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with VTR's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing VTR with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in VTR into DXJ would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 17% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+12.7% for VTR alone, +16.1% for the mix).
- CAH made money in six of the eight calendar years in which VTR lost money.
- Among large ETFs, DXJ, MLPX and SMH have moved largely independently of VTR over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.47 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which VTR lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% VTR and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2020 | 2015 | 2013 | 2008 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VTR Ventas, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +86.4% | 0.62 | −8.6% | −9.8% | −4.9% | −6.4% | −20.7% | −64.1% | −20.5% | −22.6% | 27.6% | +12.7% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.28 | +225% | 1.34 | +6.0% | +3.9% | +7.7% | +41.3% | −20.8% | — | — | — | 22.9% | +16.1% |
| MLPX EnergyGlobal X - MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 0.47 | +138% | 0.98 | +21.5% | −20.3% | −35.3% | — | — | — | — | — | 24.1% | +14.7% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.19 | +304% | 0.94 | −33.5% | +55.5% | −0.3% | +33.4% | −44.7% | — | — | — | 24.3% | +18.7% |
| DIVO Dividend & IncomeAmplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 0.47 | +67.8% | 0.94 | −1.5% | +12.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 23.3% | +13.0% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.26 | +178% | 0.94 | +64.4% | −32.7% | −21.5% | +26.3% | −39.0% | +18.1% | — | — | 24.0% | +15.6% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.32 | +120% | 0.93 | −0.8% | +24.8% | −10.7% | −28.3% | +4.9% | — | — | — | 23.4% | +14.4% |
| VLUE Broad MarketiShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | 0.40 | +112% | 0.91 | −14.2% | −0.2% | −4.1% | — | — | — | — | — | 23.9% | +14.2% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.22 | +130% | 0.91 | −10.4% | +28.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 23.3% | +15.2% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2020 | 2015 | 2013 | 2008 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VTR Ventas, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +86.4% | 0.62 | −8.6% | −9.8% | −4.9% | −6.4% | −20.7% | −64.1% | −20.5% | −22.6% | 27.6% | +12.7% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.25 | +471% | 1.54 | +54.1% | +10.1% | +12.6% | +66.0% | −39.6% | −36.8% | +51.7% | +29.1% | 23.9% | +18.3% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.06 | +2,780% | 1.43 | +1.3% | −2.4% | −6.0% | +27.6% | −20.5% | +350% | — | — | 25.6% | +31.5% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.18 | +397% | 1.41 | +51.8% | +27.1% | −4.5% | +67.7% | −40.4% | −71.3% | +46.9% | +96.3% | 23.5% | +17.8% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.07 | +1,452% | 1.41 | +17.0% | +6.7% | +67.7% | +61.7% | −15.2% | −58.7% | −9.5% | — | 24.4% | +27.4% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.12 | +660% | 1.39 | +86.6% | −27.4% | +17.4% | +48.6% | — | — | — | — | 23.7% | +20.5% |
Common questions
What was VTR's worst drawdown?
VTR's deepest decline since it began trading in 1989 was 89.5%, from June 1997 to March 2000. It took about three years from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were VTR's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, VTR's best year was 2001, when it returned 130%. Its worst was 1999, with a return of -64.1%.
Is there a better investment than VTR?
Among VTR's popular alternatives, WELL earned more than VTR with less volatility over the past 5 years: 27.0% a year at 23.8% volatility, against 13.3% a year at 25.3%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, ABBV (specialty pharmaceuticals) and NVS (pharmaceuticals) earned more than VTR with less volatility over the past 5 years. ABBV returned 25.5% a year at 23.4% volatility, against 13.3% a year at 25.3%.
Is VTR more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. VTR's volatility over the past 5 years was 25.3%, 1.5 times the S&P 500's 17.2%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, VTR's return lands within 25.3% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is VTR's Sharpe ratio?
VTR's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.62, against 0.78 for the S&P 500, so VTR earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is VTR with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, VTR's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.41 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against VTR instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a VTR holding.
What are the best alternatives to VTR?
Of the 17 popular alternatives we compared, two outperformed VTR in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: WELL and DHC.
Did VTR outperform the S&P 500?
VTR finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 18 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +35.1%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did VTR do in stock market crashes?
VTR fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in three of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in six. The clearest case was the Covid crash, when VTR fell 73.1% and the S&P 500 fell 33.7%.
What diversifies VTR?
These had a low correlation with VTR over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, DXJ (correlation 0.28), MLPX (correlation 0.47) and SMH (correlation 0.19); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.25), CLS (correlation 0.06) and MCK (correlation 0.18). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than VTR's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of VTR's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.