Relative Intelligence · Electronic Components

How TE Connectivity (TEL) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on TEL alone. It places TEL (TE Connectivity plc) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where TEL stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: TEL's full trading record, from June 2007 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 22, 2026.
Data as of October 22, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
This page answers the following questions about TEL
Key findings
Not AI-generatedThese key findings are generated by our proprietary relative intelligence engine, directly from the data on this page.
- Right nowTEL has gone against the market, falling 5.0% over the past 6 months while the S&P 500 rose 8.0%. Its electronic component peers split over the past 6 months: VSH (Vishay Intertechnology) rose 0.8%, while CLS (Celestica) fell 33.0%. Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?TEL rose 4.5% over the past 3 months, in line with the electronic components ETF VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF), which rose 2.7%. The S&P 500 rose 2.5%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, TEL fell 7.7% while the S&P 500 rose 15.6%. By year ↓
- Long termTEL turned $10,000 into $39,600 over the past decade, against $41,600 in the S&P 500. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross six sell-offs, TEL has typically fallen 1.4 times as far as the S&P 500. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, TEL has a correlation of 0.72 over 5 years, more closely than 99% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is more of the same, not a cushion. Over 10 years, TEL's beta versus the S&P 500 was 1.26: in the S&P 500's rising months it gained 1.1 times as much as the index, and in falling months it lost 1.2 times as much. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- APH (Amphenol) earned more for the risk it took than TEL over the past 5 years, and its worst fall in 10 years was 37.5%, against 47.7% for TEL.
- Nearby categories and themes
- MSI (Motorola Solutions, communications equipment) and CSCO (Cisco Systems, communications equipment) earned more than TEL with less volatility over the past 5 years. MSI returned 15.2% a year at 23.6% volatility, against 8.9% a year at 28.7%.
- Versus the S&P 500
- Simply owning the S&P 500 would have done better over the past 5 years: 12.5% a year at 17.2% volatility, against 8.9% at 28.7% for TEL.
How much would $10,000 in TEL have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in TEL over the past 19 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of TEL over the same span and TEL's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: TEL began trading on June 14, 2007, so the chart cannot reach back to the dot-com bust. It covers the most recent 19 years of TEL's record, starting at the end of September 2007.
- $10,000 invested in TEL at the end of September 2007 would have grown to $86,827 by September 2026, more than the $70,725 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Seven of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of TEL, and APH finished highest, at $401,425.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2007 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 365 of the 1,801 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of TEL; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- APH$401,425+3,914% total · +21.5% a year
- JBL$159,635+1,496% total · +15.7% a year
- ETN$145,066+1,351% total · +15.1% a year
- TTMI$106,168+962% total · +13.2% a year
- FLEX$98,384+884% total · +12.8% a year
- GLW$95,092+851% total · +12.6% a year
- BELFB$90,050+801% total · +12.3% a year
- TEL$86,827+768% total · +12.0% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$70,725+607% total · +10.8% a year
- ON$61,199+512% total · +10.0% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 1,257 of the 3,630 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of TEL; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- BELFB$203,703+1,937% total · +82.7% a year
- JBL$49,890+399% total · +37.9% a year
- APH$48,728+387% total · +37.3% a year
- GLW$47,782+378% total · +36.7% a year
- ADI$25,751+158% total · +20.8% a year
- CSCO$22,737+127% total · +17.9% a year
- MSI$20,359+104% total · +15.3% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- ON$16,795+68.0% total · +10.9% a year
- TEL$16,677+66.8% total · +10.8% a year
TEL at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
Note: TEL began trading on June 14, 2007, so every figure here, including its worst decline, covers only the time since then. None of them reflect the dot-com bust.
- TEL's deepest decline since it began trading in 2007 was 81.1%, from May 2008 to March 2009. It took 23 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 18 full calendar years, TEL's best was 2025, when it returned 61.6%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 55.5%. It lost money in four of those years.
- TEL is 15.2% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $60B
- Industry
- Semiconductors
- Price history from
- June 2007
Returns
- Past 1 year
- −7.7%total return
- Past 3 years
- +88.4%+23.5% a year
- Past 5 years
- +53.1%+8.9% a year
- Past 10 years
- +296%+14.8% a year
- Best calendar year
- +61.6%2025
- Worst calendar year
- −55.5%2008
- Losing years
- 4 of 18full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 28.7%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.44return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −81.1%May 2008 to Mar 2009
- From its all-time high
- −15.2%below the peak
TEL against the whole market
Where TEL ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does TEL rank among all stocks?
This section ranks TEL on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how TEL stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- TEL's worst decline of the past 10 years ranks in the top 17% of the 2,184 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top fell the least.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | TEL | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | −7.7% | 2,311 of 3,282 | bottom 31% |
| 3-year return | +88.4% | 1,060 of 3,016 | top 35% |
| 5-year return | +53.1% | 1,066 of 2,897 | top 37% |
| 10-year return | +296% | 595 of 2,201 | top 27% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 28.7% | 612 of 2,897 | top 21% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.44 | 1,119 of 2,897 | top 39% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −47.7% | 366 of 2,184 | top 17% |
What has beaten TEL on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). TEL sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than TEL with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 161 stocks and 332 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than TEL over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 14% of the 3,641 screened.
- Among those with at least half TEL's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 41.7% a year at 24.7% volatility, 14% less than TEL's 28.7%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.54 against 0.44 for TEL.
- None of TEL's popular alternatives made it, but CSCO (communications equipment) did: 16.9% a year at 26.1% volatility, 9% less than TEL's 28.7%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to TEL; faint dots are 91 more of the 493 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,641 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than TEL?
Investments that beat TEL over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among TEL's popular alternatives, APH earned more for the risk it took than TEL over the past 5 years, and its worst fall in 10 years was 37.5%, against 47.7% for TEL.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, MSI (communications equipment) and CSCO (communications equipment) earned more than TEL with less volatility over the past 5 years. MSI returned 15.2% a year at 23.6% volatility, against 8.9% a year at 28.7%.
- Simply owning the S&P 500 would have done better over the past 5 years: 12.5% a year at 17.2% volatility, against 8.9% at 28.7% for TEL.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat TEL over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks TEL's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than TEL follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than TEL's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× TEL's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than TEL's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with TEL?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +8.9% | 28.7% | 0.44 | −47.7% | +296% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.5% | 17.2% | 0.78 | −33.7% | +316% | 0.72 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 2 shownThe investments people most often weigh against TEL. 2 of 20 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +31.3% | 32.4% | 1.01 | −37.5% | +887% | 0.67 | — | ||
| Smaller losses in recent crashes | +29.7% | 42.2% | 0.83 | −51.5% | +568% | 0.40 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Electronic Components and the categories next to it (Semiconductors, Electronics Manufacturing, Communications Equipment, Electronic Equipment), plus TEL's specific themes. 14 of 131 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +15.2% | 23.6% | 0.72 | −32.8% | +639% | 0.40 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +16.9% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | +361% | 0.35 | — | ||
| Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +18.6% | 34.2% | 0.67 | −33.6% | +625% | 0.48 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +10.1% | 33.8% | 0.45 | −33.4% | +413% | 0.29 | — | ||
XSDState Street SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF · Semiconductors | Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +17.2% | 40.9% | 0.59 | −42.3% | +805% | 0.58 | 0.35% | |
| Higher return in most periods | +31.0% | 38.6% | 0.90 | −56.6% | +1,440% | 0.45 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 1,010 of 3,506 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +12.6% | 16.9% | 0.79 | −34.0% | +319% | 0.72 | 0.03% | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +13.2% | 22.9% | 0.66 | −36.4% | +435% | 0.40 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +692% | 0.44 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +12.7% | 23.8% | 0.62 | −41.0% | +551% | 0.43 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +16.5% | 20.0% | 0.87 | −42.0% | +319% | 0.43 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +11.2% | 21.8% | 0.60 | −32.7% | +402% | 0.70 | 0.18% | ||
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +9.5% | 19.3% | 0.57 | −30.1% | +357% | 0.20 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +19.1% | 28.0% | 0.77 | −38.5% | +1,194% | 0.57 | — | ||
What these numbers mean for TEL
- Annual return
- TEL returned 8.9% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.5% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $15,300. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- TEL's volatility over the past 5 years was 28.7%, 1.7 times the S&P 500's 17.2%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, TEL's return lands within 28.7% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- TEL's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.44, against 0.78 for the S&P 500, so TEL earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- TEL's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 47.7%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 47.7% fall takes a 91.2% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, TEL's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.72 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against TEL instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a TEL holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 493 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than TEL with less volatility
Out of 3,641 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with TEL | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +12.6% | 16.9% | 0.79 | −34.0% | +319% | 0.72 | 0.03% | |
| 2 | Whole market | +13.2% | 22.9% | 0.66 | −36.4% | +435% | 0.40 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +692% | 0.44 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +12.7% | 23.8% | 0.62 | −41.0% | +551% | 0.43 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +16.5% | 20.0% | 0.87 | −42.0% | +319% | 0.43 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +11.7% | 20.9% | 0.64 | −32.6% | +404% | 0.33 | — | |
| 7 | Whole market | +11.2% | 21.8% | 0.60 | −32.7% | +402% | 0.70 | 0.18% | |
| 8 | Whole market | +11.6% | 20.8% | 0.63 | −37.4% | +334% | 0.15 | — | |
| 9 | Whole market | +14.1% | 18.6% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +461% | 0.13 | — | |
| 10 | Whole market | +17.5% | 18.2% | 0.98 | −40.0% | +361% | 0.36 | — | |
| 11 | Whole market | +15.8% | 23.4% | 0.75 | −42.0% | +394% | 0.20 | — | |
| 12 | Whole market | +19.8% | 22.4% | 0.92 | −42.0% | +326% | 0.27 | — | |
| 13 | Whole market | +16.2% | 24.6% | 0.74 | −30.7% | +582% | 0.34 | — | |
| 14 | IUSGiShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF · US Growth Equity | Whole market | +12.4% | 21.3% | 0.66 | −32.4% | +390% | 0.68 | 0.04% |
| 15 | RDVYFirst Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF · Dividend Growth | Whole market | +11.3% | 18.8% | 0.67 | −40.6% | +321% | 0.63 | 0.47% |
| 16 | MTUMiShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF · US Momentum Equity | Whole market | +10.3% | 22.2% | 0.56 | −34.1% | +322% | 0.45 | 0.15% |
| 17 | IOOiShares Global 100 ETF · Global Equity | Whole market | +15.6% | 17.2% | 0.94 | −31.4% | +357% | 0.70 | 0.40% |
| 18 | XLGInvesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Whole market | +13.5% | 18.9% | 0.77 | −30.5% | +369% | 0.68 | 0.20% |
| 19 | Whole market | +21.1% | 22.6% | 0.97 | −25.7% | +521% | 0.23 | — | |
| 20 | Same or nearby category | +15.2% | 23.6% | 0.72 | −32.8% | +639% | 0.40 | — | |
| 21 | THGThe Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +15.2% | 22.9% | 0.73 | −40.1% | +309% | 0.04 | — |
| 22 | RSPTInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF · Technology Equity | Whole market | +16.6% | 25.1% | 0.74 | −33.7% | +559% | 0.67 | 0.40% |
| 23 | Whole market | +13.5% | 18.0% | 0.80 | −27.4% | +209% | 0.14 | — | |
| 24 | TDIVFirst Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund · Technology Equity | Whole market | +16.5% | 21.3% | 0.83 | −32.0% | +384% | 0.65 | 0.50% |
| 25 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · Japan Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +415% | 0.43 | 0.48% |
| 26 | Whole market | +15.2% | 16.8% | 0.93 | −37.0% | +205% | 0.18 | — | |
| 27 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Dividend Equity | Whole market | +16.9% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.46 | 0.40% |
| 28 | WTVWisdomTree U.S. Value Fund · US Value Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 17.0% | 0.84 | −42.2% | +306% | 0.65 | 0.12% |
| 29 | Whole market | +37.8% | 25.1% | 1.41 | −38.1% | +582% | 0.19 | — | |
| 30 | PWBInvesco Large Cap Growth ETF · US Large-Cap Growth | Whole market | +14.0% | 22.3% | 0.70 | −32.4% | +389% | 0.63 | 0.55% |
| 31 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +202% | 0.22 | — | |
| 32 | Whole market | +18.1% | 26.1% | 0.77 | −35.1% | +753% | 0.67 | 0.09% | |
| 33 | Whole market | +21.8% | 25.7% | 0.90 | −30.3% | +849% | -0.07 | — | |
| 34 | EQLALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Whole market | +13.4% | 14.5% | 0.94 | −34.2% | +385% | 0.64 | 0.19% |
| 35 | Whole market | +26.7% | 24.9% | 1.08 | −41.6% | +670% | 0.51 | — | |
| 36 | Whole market | +23.6% | 22.8% | 1.05 | −32.4% | +403% | 0.28 | — | |
| 37 | Whole market | +11.4% | 17.5% | 0.71 | −35.0% | +298% | 0.72 | 0.03% | |
| 38 | Whole market | +17.9% | 26.2% | 0.76 | −41.4% | +377% | -0.15 | — | |
| 39 | Whole market | +12.8% | 20.2% | 0.70 | −32.9% | +192% | 0.33 | — | |
| 40 | Whole market | +14.4% | 17.5% | 0.86 | −34.7% | — | 0.72 | 0.26% | |
| 41 | Whole market | +13.5% | 22.2% | 0.68 | −42.7% | +466% | 0.65 | — | |
| 42 | Whole market | +10.9% | 21.9% | 0.58 | −41.6% | +165% | 0.20 | — | |
| 43 | Whole market | +18.3% | 25.4% | 0.79 | −42.5% | +286% | 0.34 | — | |
| 44 | FNDFSchwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF · International Large-Cap Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 16.3% | 0.87 | −40.2% | +193% | 0.55 | 0.25% |
| 45 | DFIVDimensional - International Value ETF · International Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +14.8% | 16.4% | 0.93 | −25.4% | — | 0.50 | 0.27% |
| 46 | VYMIVanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF · International Dividend Equity | Whole market | +13.2% | 14.8% | 0.92 | −40.0% | +174% | 0.49 | 0.07% |
| 47 | AVLVAvantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +13.9% | 16.9% | 0.86 | −19.5% | — | 0.64 | 0.15% |
| 48 | Whole market | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +360% | 0.10 | — | |
| 49 | PVALPutnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +15.9% | 15.1% | 1.06 | −41.3% | — | 0.64 | 0.56% |
| 50 | DGXQuest Diagnostics Incorporated · Medical Diagnostics | Whole market | +13.0% | 22.5% | 0.66 | −36.6% | +256% | 0.25 | — |
| 51 | Same or nearby category | +16.9% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | +361% | 0.35 | — | |
| 52 | EVRGEvergy, Inc. · Electric Utilities | Whole market | +9.9% | 19.0% | 0.60 | −38.8% | +113% | 0.34 | — |
| 53 | CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF · Cybersecurity | Whole market | +14.5% | 26.2% | 0.65 | −33.9% | +461% | 0.36 | 0.58% |
| 54 | EWTiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +19.8% | 24.3% | 0.87 | −38.9% | +448% | 0.46 | 0.59% |
| 55 | EHCEncompass Health Corporation · Health Care Facilities | Whole market | +18.7% | 26.9% | 0.77 | −39.5% | +354% | 0.23 | — |
| 56 | Whole market | +27.0% | 23.8% | 1.13 | −63.3% | +378% | 0.29 | — | |
| 57 | VLUEiShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +16.2% | 18.4% | 0.91 | −39.5% | +286% | 0.56 | 0.15% |
| 58 | IDViShares International Select Dividend ETF · International Dividend Equity | Whole market | +12.7% | 15.5% | 0.85 | −42.5% | +159% | 0.47 | 0.50% |
| 59 | MSGSMadison Square Garden Sports Corp. · Entertainment | Whole market | +17.5% | 25.7% | 0.76 | −41.6% | +395% | 0.21 | — |
| 60 | NEUNewMarket Corporation · Specialty Chemicals | Whole market | +20.9% | 26.8% | 0.85 | −40.7% | +162% | 0.17 | — |
| 61 | CBOECboe Global Markets, Inc. · Capital Markets | Whole market | +22.0% | 25.1% | 0.92 | −43.2% | +481% | 0.25 | — |
| 62 | Whole market | +41.7% | 24.7% | 1.54 | −46.1% | +345% | 0.25 | — | |
| 63 | Whole market | +10.5% | 24.9% | 0.53 | −38.3% | +447% | 0.41 | — | |
| 64 | Whole market | +24.0% | 18.8% | 1.25 | −75.2% | +337% | 0.34 | — | |
| 65 | IDMOInvesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +12.8% | 18.3% | 0.76 | −31.3% | +224% | 0.58 | 0.25% |
| 66 | FRDMFreedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF · Emerging Markets Equity | Whole market | +16.8% | 22.9% | 0.80 | −40.5% | — | 0.51 | 0.49% |
| 67 | DIVBiShares Core Dividend ETF · High Dividend Yield | Whole market | +14.6% | 15.5% | 0.96 | −36.9% | — | 0.59 | 0.05% |
| 68 | JMOMJPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF · US Momentum Equity | Whole market | +12.3% | 19.1% | 0.70 | −34.3% | — | 0.66 | 0.12% |
| 69 | FBTFirst Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology Index Fund · Biotechnology | Whole market | +10.8% | 22.2% | 0.58 | −33.3% | +205% | 0.34 | 0.55% |
| 70 | IHEiShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF · Pharmaceuticals | Whole market | +12.9% | 16.8% | 0.81 | −29.6% | +157% | 0.25 | 0.37% |
| 71 | XCEMColumbia EM Core ex-China ETF · Emerging Markets Equity | Whole market | +10.3% | 19.5% | 0.60 | −40.9% | +160% | 0.50 | 0.16% |
| 72 | Whole market | +12.3% | 25.3% | 0.59 | −42.1% | +334% | 0.02 | — | |
| 73 | VFMOVanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF · US Momentum Equity | Whole market | +10.9% | 22.1% | 0.58 | −36.8% | — | 0.63 | 0.13% |
| 74 | VFMFVanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF · US Multifactor Equity | Whole market | +14.5% | 17.6% | 0.86 | −41.3% | — | 0.63 | 0.18% |
| 75 | Whole market | +17.3% | 24.3% | 0.78 | −43.6% | +534% | 0.52 | — | |
| 76 | USXFiShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF · Large-Cap ESG | Whole market | +12.7% | 20.2% | 0.69 | −29.6% | — | 0.69 | 0.10% |
| 77 | DBJPXtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF · Japan Equity | Whole market | +20.9% | 19.3% | 1.09 | −31.3% | +339% | 0.52 | 0.45% |
| 78 | Whole market | +25.5% | 23.4% | 1.09 | −45.1% | +600% | 0.04 | — | |
| 79 | DUSADavis Select U.S. Equity ETF · Concentrated Equity | Whole market | +11.5% | 18.4% | 0.69 | −36.7% | — | 0.55 | 0.59% |
| 80 | IAIiShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF · Capital Markets | Whole market | +11.2% | 21.6% | 0.60 | −40.4% | +404% | 0.59 | 0.37% |
| 81 | Whole market | +32.8% | 25.9% | 1.23 | −62.3% | +314% | 0.24 | — | |
| 82 | EWJViShares MSCI Japan Value ETF · Japan Equity | Whole market | +15.1% | 18.2% | 0.87 | −30.1% | — | 0.45 | 0.15% |
| 83 | FDRRFidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +12.7% | 15.0% | 0.88 | −36.5% | +264% | 0.68 | 0.15% |
| 84 | DGTState Street SPDR Global Dow ETF · Global Equity | Whole market | +13.9% | 15.1% | 0.95 | −34.4% | +260% | 0.62 | 0.50% |
| 85 | FDDFirst Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +12.5% | 18.5% | 0.73 | −41.4% | +174% | 0.46 | 0.56% |
| 86 | FLCAFranklin FTSE Canada ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +11.7% | 16.7% | 0.75 | −41.5% | — | 0.57 | 0.09% |
| 87 | EYLDCambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF · Emerging Markets Equity | Whole market | +11.4% | 18.4% | 0.68 | −41.8% | +191% | 0.45 | 0.63% |
| 88 | FIVAFidelity International Value Factor ETF · International Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +13.1% | 16.4% | 0.83 | −39.7% | — | 0.53 | 0.18% |
| 89 | SPHQInvesco S&P 500 Quality ETF · US Quality Equity | Whole market | +11.7% | 16.7% | 0.75 | −31.6% | +295% | 0.65 | 0.20% |
| 90 | Whole market | +21.3% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +240% | 0.13 | — | |
| 91 | IETCiShares U.S. Tech Independence Focused ETF · Technology Equity | Whole market | +13.2% | 25.4% | 0.61 | −38.5% | — | 0.63 | 0.18% |
| 92 | Whole market | +18.7% | 24.4% | 0.83 | −52.0% | +319% | 0.28 | — | |
| 93 | TECBiShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF · Thematic Equity | Whole market | +13.0% | 23.9% | 0.63 | −41.6% | — | 0.63 | 0.30% |
| 94 | Whole market | +13.5% | 17.2% | 0.83 | −30.4% | +281% | 0.26 | — | |
| 95 | Whole market | +19.4% | 22.0% | 0.92 | −56.1% | +110% | 0.15 | — | |
| 96 | Whole market | +18.3% | 21.4% | 0.90 | −53.7% | +133% | 0.18 | — | |
| 97 | Whole market | +25.2% | 24.1% | 1.06 | −68.1% | +291% | 0.21 | — | |
| 98 | Whole market | +19.5% | 21.6% | 0.94 | −47.3% | +409% | 0.48 | — | |
| 99 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.4% | 0.97 | −50.5% | +332% | 0.55 | — | |
| 100 | Whole market | +23.7% | 25.6% | 0.96 | −61.4% | +283% | 0.28 | — |
TEL against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against TEL, compared period by period and year by year.
How do TEL's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at TEL, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- None of the 20 popular alternatives earned more than TEL over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- Over the past 5 years, TEL returned 8.9% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.5%, with higher volatility (28.7% against 17.2%).
Green points earned more than TEL with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| CLS Celestica Inc. | +95.8% | 59.9% |
| BELFB Bel Fuse Inc. | +75.9% | 52.3% |
| TTMI TTM Technologies, Inc. | +40.6% | 55.8% |
| JBL Jabil Inc. | +34.5% | 39.7% |
| FLEX Flex Ltd. | +32.6% | 48.5% |
| SANM Sanmina Corporation | +32.4% | 48.0% |
| APH Amphenol Corporation | +31.3% | 32.4% |
| GLW Corning Inc | +29.8% | 42.2% |
| ETN Eaton Corporation plc | +19.7% | 32.2% |
| PLXS Plexus Corp. | +18.4% | 34.1% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.5% | 17.2% |
| BDC Belden Inc. | +11.7% | 37.9% |
| CTS CTS Corporation | +11.0% | 34.0% |
| ON ON Semiconductor Corporation | +9.8% | 55.9% |
| VSH Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. | +9.0% | 47.5% |
| TEL This pageTE Connectivity plc | +8.9% | 28.7% |
| NXPI NXP Semiconductors N.V. | +5.5% | 42.3% |
| LFUS Littelfuse, Inc. | +4.6% | 35.9% |
| ALGM Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. | −0.9% | 53.5% |
| LEA Lear Corporation | −4.6% | 34.3% |
| ST Sensata Technologies Holding plc | −5.2% | 37.4% |
| MEI Methode Electronics, Inc. | −19.1% | 68.3% |
Has TEL consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares TEL with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than TEL helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Two of the 20 popular alternatives, APH and ON, outperformed TEL in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- APH and ETN earned more for the risk they took than TEL (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
- CLS outperformed TEL over all three long-term periods but in only one of the five short-term ones, so TEL has had the better of it lately.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than TEL over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| TEL TE Connectivity plc (this page) | — | −2.4% | +4.5% | −5.0% | −9.7% | −7.7% | +88.4% | +53.1% | +296% | 28.7% | 0.44 | −47.7% | — | $60B | — |
| APH QualifiedAmphenol Corporation | 3/5 short3/3 long | −11.8% | −7.1% | −1.1% | +5.3% | +14.6% | +282% | +290% | +887% | 32.4% | 1.01 | −37.5% | — | $180B | — |
| ON QualifiedON Semiconductor Corporation | 3/5 short2/3 long | −0.5% | −20.7% | −17.7% | +29.2% | +41.0% | −12.4% | +59.3% | +506% | 55.9% | 0.45 | −70.4% | — | $29B | — |
| JBL Hardware, Equipment & PartsJabil Inc. | 2/5 short3/3 long | −13.5% | −16.0% | −20.5% | +11.3% | +34.7% | +116% | +341% | +1,210% | 39.7% | 0.95 | −57.3% | — | $28B | — |
| BELFB Hardware, Equipment & PartsBel Fuse Inc. | 2/5 short3/3 long | −19.9% | −29.1% | −23.9% | +15.8% | +34.9% | +393% | +1,586% | +818% | 52.3% | 1.35 | −79.8% | — | $2.5B | — |
| ETN Electrical Equipment & PartsEaton Corporation plc | 2/5 short3/3 long | −16.6% | −9.1% | −10.4% | +13.7% | +3.5% | +96.0% | +146% | +636% | 32.2% | 0.72 | −44.5% | — | $143B | — |
| GLW Hardware, Equipment & PartsCorning Inc | 2/5 short3/3 long | −22.4% | −19.4% | −26.3% | +37.5% | +48.7% | +390% | +268% | +568% | 42.2% | 0.83 | −51.5% | — | $107B | — |
| TTMI Hardware, Equipment & PartsTTM Technologies, Inc. | 2/5 short3/3 long | −42.0% | −48.9% | −41.7% | +4.6% | +32.7% | +525% | +450% | +518% | 55.8% | 0.90 | −66.6% | — | $7.8B | — |
| FLEX Hardware, Equipment & PartsFlex Ltd. | 2/5 short3/3 long | −33.0% | −39.6% | −10.2% | +20.4% | +25.0% | +223% | +311% | +457% | 48.5% | 0.83 | −70.0% | — | $28B | — |
| SANM Hardware, Equipment & PartsSanmina Corporation | 2/5 short3/3 long | −28.4% | −28.9% | −12.3% | −3.0% | +21.4% | +207% | +307% | +428% | 48.0% | 0.83 | −55.9% | — | $8.3B | — |
| PLXS Hardware, Equipment & PartsPlexus Corp. | 2/5 short3/3 long | −16.2% | −14.8% | −9.4% | +45.0% | +51.1% | +147% | +133% | +381% | 34.1% | 0.67 | −53.7% | — | $5.9B | — |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 1/5 short3/3 long | −24.5% | −19.8% | −33.0% | −11.0% | −0.7% | +946% | +2,780% | +2,215% | 59.9% | 1.43 | −80.6% | — | $34B | — |
| CTS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCTS Corporation | 3/5 short1/3 long | −9.1% | −10.9% | −1.4% | +22.3% | +31.0% | +39.5% | +68.8% | +227% | 34.0% | 0.48 | −52.6% | — | $1.5B | — |
| BDC Communication EquipmentBelden Inc. | 0/5 short1/3 long | −8.5% | −1.9% | −21.2% | −12.1% | −11.9% | +48.9% | +73.5% | +54.3% | 37.9% | 0.48 | −67.7% | — | $4.0B | — |
| NXPI SemiconductorsNXP Semiconductors N.V. | 4/5 short0/3 long | +0.1% | −14.3% | +6.2% | +8.9% | +11.4% | +37.5% | +30.4% | +166% | 42.3% | 0.33 | −53.3% | — | $60B | — |
| VSH SemiconductorsVishay Intertechnology, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | −18.4% | −32.0% | +0.8% | +78.7% | +65.3% | +26.0% | +54.0% | +127% | 47.5% | 0.42 | −63.5% | — | $3.8B | — |
| ST Hardware, Equipment & PartsSensata Technologies Holding plc | 3/5 short0/3 long | −3.5% | −11.2% | 0.0% | +17.7% | +30.4% | +22.0% | −23.5% | +14.6% | 37.4% | 0.04 | −71.7% | — | $5.9B | — |
| MEI Hardware, Equipment & PartsMethode Electronics, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | −6.0% | −22.7% | +64.6% | +93.0% | +85.1% | −38.9% | −65.4% | −52.6% | 68.3% | 0.02 | −88.8% | — | $451M | — |
| LFUS Hardware, Equipment & PartsLittelfuse, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | −16.4% | −15.7% | −10.9% | +34.2% | +34.5% | +62.2% | +25.0% | +197% | 35.9% | 0.30 | −54.2% | — | $8.9B | — |
| LEA Auto - PartsLear Corporation | 2/5 short0/3 long | −3.1% | −16.9% | −6.3% | +1.8% | +21.5% | −1.7% | −20.9% | +22.8% | 34.3% | 0.03 | −64.5% | — | $5.9B | — |
| ALGM SemiconductorsAllegro MicroSystems, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | −10.8% | −36.5% | −25.0% | +17.8% | +3.2% | +11.8% | −4.3% | — | 53.5% | 0.25 | −68.7% | — | $5.9B | — |
How did TEL do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2008, along with where TEL ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with TEL and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
Note: TEL began trading on June 14, 2007, so the table starts with 2008, its first full calendar year, and cannot show how it fared during the dot-com bust.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, TEL finished in the top quarter in five of 18 years and in the bottom quarter in two. In 2025, it ranked 7 of 21.
- TEL finished ahead of the S&P 500 in ten of its 18 full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, APH came out ahead of TEL most often, in 11 of the 18 years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of TEL; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places TEL among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of TEL | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEL This pageTE Connectivity plc | — | +61.6% | +3.5% | +24.6% | −27.7% | +35.1% | +28.9% | +29.4% | −18.9% | +39.9% | +9.8% | +4.2% | +16.9% | +51.6% | +23.4% | −11.1% | +47.5% | +57.0% | −55.5% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 5 of 18 | 7 of 21 | 13 of 21 | 8 of 21 | 17 of 21 | 8 of 21 | 5 of 20 | 12 of 20 | 11 of 20 | 2 of 20 | 16 of 20 | 5 of 20 | 11 of 20 | 8 of 20 | 8 of 20 | 4 of 20 | 5 of 18 | 13 of 17 | 11 of 17 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 8 of 18 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% |
| APH Amphenol Corporation | 11 of 18 | +97.6% | +41.6% | +31.5% | −11.9% | +35.0% | +22.1% | +34.9% | −6.9% | +32.1% | +31.0% | −1.0% | +21.7% | +38.7% | +43.6% | −13.6% | +13.9% | +92.9% | −48.2% |
| ON ON Semiconductor Corporation | 9 of 18 | −14.1% | −24.5% | +33.9% | −8.2% | +108% | +34.3% | +47.7% | −21.1% | +64.1% | +30.2% | −3.3% | +22.9% | +16.9% | −8.7% | −21.9% | +12.0% | +159% | −61.7% |
| JBL Jabil Inc. | 10 of 18 | +58.7% | +13.3% | +87.4% | −2.5% | +66.4% | +3.9% | +68.5% | −4.4% | +12.2% | +3.4% | +8.2% | +27.3% | −8.2% | −0.4% | −0.7% | +18.2% | +166% | −54.6% |
| BELFB Bel Fuse Inc. | 7 of 18 | +106% | +24.0% | +104% | +159% | −12.3% | −24.9% | +13.1% | −25.9% | −17.7% | +81.6% | −35.9% | +29.9% | +10.9% | +5.9% | −20.4% | +12.8% | +3.0% | −26.7% |
| ETN Eaton Corporation plc | 11 of 18 | −2.8% | +39.5% | +56.2% | −7.2% | +46.7% | +31.0% | +42.8% | −10.0% | +21.5% | +33.8% | −20.7% | −8.2% | +44.2% | +28.6% | −11.8% | +64.0% | +33.3% | −47.1% |
| GLW Corning Inc | 7 of 18 | +87.8% | +60.7% | −1.2% | −11.6% | +5.9% | +27.6% | −1.0% | −3.3% | +34.6% | +36.3% | −18.4% | +31.2% | +45.1% | −0.2% | −31.9% | +1.1% | +106% | −59.8% |
| TTMI TTM Technologies, Inc. | 6 of 18 | +179% | +56.5% | +4.8% | +1.2% | +8.0% | −8.3% | +54.7% | −37.9% | +15.0% | +109% | −13.6% | −12.2% | −6.6% | −16.2% | −26.5% | +29.4% | +121% | −55.3% |
| FLEX Flex Ltd. | 7 of 18 | +57.4% | +73.2% | +3.3% | +17.1% | +1.9% | +42.5% | +65.8% | −57.7% | +25.2% | +28.2% | +0.3% | +43.9% | +25.1% | +9.7% | −27.9% | +7.4% | +186% | −78.8% |
| SANM Sanmina Corporation | 7 of 18 | +98.3% | +47.3% | −10.3% | +38.2% | +30.0% | −6.9% | +42.3% | −27.1% | −10.0% | +78.1% | −12.5% | +40.9% | +50.9% | +18.9% | −18.9% | +4.1% | +291% | −74.2% |
| PLXS Plexus Corp. | 8 of 18 | −6.1% | +44.7% | +5.1% | +7.3% | +22.6% | +1.7% | +50.6% | −15.9% | +12.4% | +54.8% | −15.3% | −4.8% | +67.8% | −5.8% | −11.5% | +8.6% | +68.0% | −35.4% |
| CLS Celestica Inc. | 8 of 18 | +220% | +215% | +160% | +1.3% | +37.9% | −2.4% | −5.7% | −16.3% | −11.6% | +7.4% | −6.0% | +12.9% | +27.6% | +11.2% | −24.4% | +2.8% | +105% | −20.5% |
| CTS CTS Corporation | 7 of 18 | −18.4% | +20.9% | +11.4% | +7.8% | +7.5% | +15.2% | +16.6% | +1.1% | +15.8% | +28.1% | −0.2% | −9.6% | +89.3% | +17.3% | −15.7% | +16.4% | +77.8% | −43.8% |
| BDC Belden Inc. | 10 of 18 | +3.7% | +46.1% | +7.7% | +9.8% | +57.4% | −23.4% | +32.1% | −45.7% | +3.5% | +57.3% | −39.3% | +12.2% | +57.1% | +35.9% | −9.1% | +69.2% | +6.3% | −52.8% |
| NXPI NXP Semiconductors N.V. | 8 of 15 | +6.4% | −8.0% | +48.4% | −29.2% | +44.8% | +26.6% | +75.7% | −37.0% | +19.5% | +16.3% | +10.3% | +66.3% | +74.5% | +71.2% | −26.6% | — | — | — |
| VSH Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. | 5 of 18 | −12.2% | −27.9% | +13.0% | +0.7% | +7.4% | −0.5% | +20.6% | −11.9% | +30.0% | +37.1% | −13.1% | +8.5% | +24.7% | +18.2% | −38.8% | +124% | +144% | −70.0% |
| ST Sensata Technologies Holding plc | 2 of 15 | +23.6% | −26.1% | −5.8% | −34.0% | +17.0% | −2.1% | +20.1% | −12.3% | +31.2% | −15.4% | −12.1% | +35.2% | +19.4% | +23.6% | −12.8% | — | — | — |
| MEI Methode Electronics, Inc. | 6 of 18 | −40.6% | −46.0% | −47.9% | −8.5% | +29.9% | −1.3% | +71.6% | −41.2% | −2.2% | +31.4% | −11.9% | +7.9% | +245% | +25.9% | −34.4% | +53.5% | +34.9% | −58.1% |
| LFUS Littelfuse, Inc. | 8 of 18 | +8.6% | −11.0% | +22.7% | −29.4% | +24.4% | +34.5% | +12.7% | −12.6% | +31.4% | +43.3% | +11.9% | +5.1% | +52.3% | +45.6% | −7.4% | +46.9% | +93.7% | −49.6% |
| LEA Lear Corporation | 3 of 16 | +24.9% | −31.2% | +16.4% | −30.7% | +16.2% | +16.9% | +14.4% | −29.3% | +35.2% | +8.9% | +26.4% | +22.2% | +74.7% | +19.3% | −18.5% | +45.9% | — | — |
| ALGM Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. | 1 of 5 | +20.7% | −27.8% | +0.8% | −17.0% | +35.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How TEL has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were TEL's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents TEL's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2007, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
Note: TEL began trading on June 14, 2007, so this list cannot include the dot-com bust. The crash tests on this page show how older funds and the S&P 500 fared through those years.
- In all five of TEL's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- The longest climb back to a previous high took 23 months, after TEL fell 81.1% from May 2008 to March 2009.
Green means TEL fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | TEL fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 financial crisis | −81.1% | −50.5% | May 2008 | Mar 2009 | 10 months | Feb 2011 | 23 months |
| Late-2018 sell-off | −47.7% | −10.7% | Mar 2018 | Mar 2020 | 2 years | Sep 2020 | 6 months |
| 2022 bear market | −34.3% | −22.4% | Nov 2021 | Oct 2022 | 11 months | Jul 2024 | 21 months |
| 2011 euro debt crisis | −28.3% | −18.4% | Jul 2011 | Oct 2011 | 3 months | Dec 2012 | 14 months |
| 2015 China and oil sell-off | −27.7% | −10.5% | Mar 2015 | Feb 2016 | 11 months | Dec 2016 | 10 months |
How did TEL do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far TEL, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: TEL began trading on June 14, 2007, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- TEL fell further than the S&P 500 in eight of the nine crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2008 financial crisis, when TEL fell 81.1% and the S&P 500 fell 55.2%.
- Among its popular alternatives, APH held up best, falling less than TEL in eight of the nine crashes they both traded through.
- TEL began trading after the dot-com bust, but 14 of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was ETN's 31.6%, against 47.5% for the S&P 500.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than TEL.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEL This pageTE Connectivity plc | — | −4.3% | −33.3% | −42.9% | −23.2% | −6.8% | −22.7% | −24.7% | −3.5% | −81.1% | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 8 of 9 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| APH Amphenol Corporation | 8 of 9 | −3.8% | −27.8% | −33.8% | −20.4% | −7.5% | −19.0% | −21.9% | −1.7% | −63.6% | −60.7% |
| ON ON Semiconductor Corporation | 2 of 9 | −6.4% | −34.0% | −59.6% | −23.7% | −12.2% | −39.2% | −28.5% | 0.0% | −80.0% | — |
| JBL Jabil Inc. | 2 of 9 | −4.1% | −28.9% | −51.4% | −28.1% | −3.5% | −28.3% | −30.5% | −3.8% | −85.0% | −82.5% |
| BELFB Bel Fuse Inc. | 2 of 9 | −13.5% | −24.7% | −55.1% | −34.7% | −9.3% | −39.1% | −34.6% | −5.1% | −73.6% | −57.0% |
| ETN Eaton Corporation plc | 3 of 9 | −4.5% | −26.3% | −44.5% | −26.0% | −6.7% | −22.3% | −34.6% | −1.4% | −68.5% | −31.6% |
| GLW Corning Inc | 6 of 9 | −3.8% | −30.9% | −36.7% | −21.7% | −9.0% | −13.5% | −31.1% | 0.0% | −71.6% | −99.0% |
| TTMI TTM Technologies, Inc. | 4 of 9 | −6.2% | −27.4% | −35.3% | −46.9% | −7.0% | −39.7% | −43.2% | 0.0% | −74.7% | — |
| FLEX Flex Ltd. | 3 of 9 | −8.0% | −24.2% | −57.5% | −48.0% | −6.1% | −22.8% | −27.3% | −1.8% | −87.9% | −86.7% |
| SANM Sanmina Corporation | 3 of 9 | −5.2% | −15.7% | −38.2% | −22.7% | −4.8% | −32.4% | −46.4% | −4.9% | −92.4% | −96.0% |
| PLXS Plexus Corp. | 5 of 9 | −5.1% | −23.8% | −49.9% | −21.7% | −3.9% | −28.5% | −30.1% | −0.9% | −66.8% | −90.2% |
| CLS Celestica Inc. | 4 of 9 | −5.9% | −35.6% | −63.9% | −22.4% | −1.5% | −38.0% | −25.8% | −0.4% | −73.4% | −88.1% |
| CTS CTS Corporation | 3 of 9 | −1.2% | −20.6% | −38.5% | −33.7% | −7.5% | −34.2% | −26.4% | −5.1% | −84.2% | −94.3% |
| BDC Belden Inc. | 1 of 9 | −4.7% | −25.2% | −42.9% | −46.7% | −10.1% | −42.2% | −35.8% | −4.5% | −85.7% | −82.4% |
| NXPI NXP Semiconductors N.V. | 1 of 7 | −4.2% | −38.8% | −52.0% | −27.4% | −4.0% | −35.5% | −39.8% | — | — | — |
| VSH Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. | 5 of 9 | −2.4% | −22.2% | −42.4% | −21.6% | −20.8% | −16.4% | −46.6% | −2.0% | −84.8% | −88.5% |
| ST Sensata Technologies Holding plc | 1 of 8 | −7.8% | −42.4% | −52.4% | −20.6% | −7.1% | −41.4% | −33.6% | −4.0% | — | — |
| MEI Methode Electronics, Inc. | 2 of 9 | −13.1% | −29.1% | −32.9% | −42.0% | −6.3% | −32.8% | −36.3% | −4.9% | −80.9% | −78.7% |
| LFUS Littelfuse, Inc. | 4 of 9 | −3.7% | −38.8% | −43.8% | −25.5% | −9.5% | −17.2% | −31.3% | −3.0% | −77.4% | −71.5% |
| LEA Lear Corporation | 2 of 8 | −5.3% | −37.0% | −43.5% | −26.2% | −4.0% | −24.7% | −24.9% | −2.2% | — | — |
| ALGM Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. | 0 of 2 | −5.9% | −44.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
How closely does TEL move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares TEL with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Ten of the 19 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than TEL's 0.91, led by GLW, APH and CLS.
- GLW took just 67% of the S&P 500's losses, against 120% for TEL, while still keeping 107% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, TEL captured 109% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 120% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.26. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than TEL's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEL This pageTE Connectivity plc | 109% | 120% | 0.91 | 1.26 |
| GLW Corning Inc | 107% | 67% | 1.61 | 1.14 |
| APH Amphenol Corporation | 125% | 79% | 1.59 | 1.24 |
| CLS Celestica Inc. | 183% | 115% | 1.59 | 2.17 |
| JBL Jabil Inc. | 138% | 91% | 1.53 | 1.32 |
| ETN Eaton Corporation plc | 114% | 80% | 1.43 | 1.16 |
| PLXS Plexus Corp. | 101% | 82% | 1.23 | 1.03 |
| SANM Sanmina Corporation | 127% | 111% | 1.15 | 1.37 |
| TTMI TTM Technologies, Inc. | 155% | 140% | 1.11 | 1.87 |
| FLEX Flex Ltd. | 136% | 124% | 1.10 | 1.57 |
| BELFB Bel Fuse Inc. | 168% | 160% | 1.05 | 1.61 |
| CTS CTS Corporation | 94% | 104% | 0.91 | 0.87 |
| ON ON Semiconductor Corporation | 161% | 185% | 0.87 | 1.95 |
| LFUS Littelfuse, Inc. | 124% | 154% | 0.81 | 1.34 |
| VSH Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. | 118% | 160% | 0.74 | 1.61 |
| NXPI NXP Semiconductors N.V. | 115% | 157% | 0.73 | 1.63 |
| BDC Belden Inc. | 97% | 156% | 0.62 | 1.26 |
| LEA Lear Corporation | 91% | 165% | 0.55 | 1.40 |
| ST Sensata Technologies Holding plc | 85% | 157% | 0.54 | 1.33 |
| MEI Methode Electronics, Inc. | 70% | 184% | 0.38 | 1.43 |
What diversifies TEL?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with TEL's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing TEL with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in TEL into GLD would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 17% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+10.8% for TEL alone, +12.9% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of TEL over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.46 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- Among large stocks, CAH, MCK and MPC have moved largely independently of TEL over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.25 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which TEL lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% TEL and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2018 | 2011 | 2008 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEL TE Connectivity plc (this page) | 1.00 | +53.1% | 0.44 | −27.7% | −18.9% | −11.1% | −55.5% | 25.0% | +10.8% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.46 | +119% | 1.48 | +3.8% | −5.2% | — | — | 20.9% | +12.4% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.43 | +225% | 1.34 | +6.0% | −19.8% | −16.1% | −20.8% | 21.2% | +14.3% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.40 | +103% | 1.06 | +10.4% | −8.7% | — | — | 21.3% | +12.2% |
| EWP Broad MarketiShares MSCI Spain ETF | 0.46 | +141% | 0.97 | −5.2% | −15.3% | −9.8% | −36.8% | 22.0% | +13.2% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.21 | +178% | 0.94 | +64.4% | −18.2% | +2.8% | −39.0% | 21.7% | +14.0% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.11 | +120% | 0.93 | −0.8% | −1.9% | +9.6% | +4.9% | 20.6% | +12.9% |
| AMLP EnergyAlerian MLP ETF | 0.33 | +114% | 0.90 | +25.5% | −12.6% | +10.2% | — | 21.5% | +12.8% |
| EFV InternationaliShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF | 0.49 | +89.4% | 0.89 | −5.2% | −14.7% | −12.4% | −41.7% | 21.6% | +11.9% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2018 | 2011 | 2008 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEL TE Connectivity plc (this page) | 1.00 | +53.1% | 0.44 | −27.7% | −18.9% | −11.1% | −55.5% | 25.0% | +10.8% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.25 | +471% | 1.54 | +54.1% | −24.5% | +8.1% | −39.6% | 21.9% | +16.6% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.19 | +397% | 1.41 | +51.8% | −28.4% | +11.8% | −40.4% | 21.5% | +16.1% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.23 | +660% | 1.39 | +86.6% | −8.2% | — | — | 22.4% | +18.6% |
| PBR Oil & Gas IntegratedPetróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras | 0.13 | +721% | 1.32 | +55.4% | +27.7% | −32.1% | −55.6% | 22.2% | +18.5% |
| ATI Manufacturing - Metal FabricationATI Inc. | 0.35 | +913% | 1.29 | +87.5% | −9.8% | −12.2% | −70.0% | 24.9% | +21.4% |
Common questions
What was TEL's worst drawdown?
TEL's deepest decline since it began trading in 2007 was 81.1%, from May 2008 to March 2009. It took 23 months from the low to climb back to its old high. Because TEL launched in June 2007, that record does not include the dot-com bust.
What were TEL's best and worst years?
Over 18 full calendar years, TEL's best year was 2025, when it returned 61.6%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -55.5%.
Is there a better investment than TEL?
Among TEL's popular alternatives, APH earned more for the risk it took than TEL over the past 5 years, and its worst fall in 10 years was 37.5%, against 47.7% for TEL. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, MSI (communications equipment) and CSCO (communications equipment) earned more than TEL with less volatility over the past 5 years. MSI returned 15.2% a year at 23.6% volatility, against 8.9% a year at 28.7%.
Is TEL more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. TEL's volatility over the past 5 years was 28.7%, 1.7 times the S&P 500's 17.2%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, TEL's return lands within 28.7% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is TEL's Sharpe ratio?
TEL's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.44, against 0.78 for the S&P 500, so TEL earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is TEL with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, TEL's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.72 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against TEL instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a TEL holding.
What are the best alternatives to TEL?
Of the 20 popular alternatives we compared, two outperformed TEL in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: APH and ON.
Did TEL outperform the S&P 500?
TEL finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in ten of 18 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +61.6%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did TEL do in stock market crashes?
TEL fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in none of the nine major crashes it has traded through, and further in eight. The clearest case was the 2008 financial crisis, when TEL fell 81.1% and the S&P 500 fell 55.2%.
What diversifies TEL?
These had a low correlation with TEL over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.46), DXJ (correlation 0.43) and EMLP (correlation 0.40); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.25), MCK (correlation 0.19) and MPC (correlation 0.23). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than TEL's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of TEL's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.