Relative Intelligence · Communications Equipment

How Nokia Oyj (NOK) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on NOK alone. It places NOK (Nokia Oyj) against 17 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where NOK stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: NOK's full trading record, from July 1994 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 22, 2026.
Data as of October 22, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
This page answers the following questions about NOK
Key findings
Not AI-generatedThese key findings are generated by our proprietary relative intelligence engine, directly from the data on this page.
- Right nowNOK has gone against the market, falling 19.6% over the past 6 months while the S&P 500 rose 8.0%. NOK is 73.2% below its high, bear-market territory, while the S&P 500 sits 1.9% below a record. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?The weakness is NOK's own: it fell 23.1% over the past 3 months while the communications equipment ETF IYZ (iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF) fell 5.2%. The S&P 500 rose 2.5%. Its communications equipment peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: MSI (Motorola Solutions) rose 18.5%, while ADTN (ADTRAN) fell 38.3%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, NOK rose 44.4% against 15.6% for the S&P 500 and 16.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (170% against 88.4%). The past 3 years (ahead of 83% of the stocks worth at least $300 million) have been far stronger than the record over 10 years (behind 61% of them). By year ↓
- Long termNOK turned $10,000 into $19,600 over the past decade, against $41,600 in the S&P 500. NOK finished ahead of the S&P 500 in ten of its 29 calendar years. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross seven sell-offs, NOK has typically fallen 1.3 times as far as the S&P 500. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, NOK has a correlation of 0.41 over 5 years, more closely than 53% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- CSCO (Cisco Systems) and MSI (Motorola Solutions) earned more than NOK with less volatility over the past 5 years. CSCO returned 16.9% a year at 26.1% volatility, against 8.7% a year at 40.7%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- TSM (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, semiconductors) and APH (Amphenol, electronic components) earned more than NOK with less volatility over the past 5 years. TSM returned 31.0% a year at 38.6% volatility, against 8.7% a year at 40.7%.
- Whole market
- 905 of the 3,641 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than NOK with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL (Apple), GOOG (Alphabet) and MSFT (Microsoft).
How much would $10,000 in NOK have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in NOK over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of NOK over the same span and NOK's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in NOK at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $36,874 by September 2026, less than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of NOK, and QCOM finished highest, at $779,813.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 814 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of NOK; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- QCOM$779,813+7,698% total · +16.2% a year
- CSCO$206,586+1,966% total · +11.0% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
- MSI$73,374+634% total · +7.1% a year
- T$65,217+552% total · +6.7% a year
- DGII$53,499+435% total · +6.0% a year
- NOK$36,874+269% total · +4.6% a year
- CIEN$20,293+103% total · +2.5% a year
- VIAV$18,542+85.4% total · +2.2% a year
- AVNW$373−96.3% total · −10.7% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 710 of the 3,630 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of NOK; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- ANET$94,783+848% total · +56.8% a year
- CIEN$68,511+585% total · +46.9% a year
- TSM$43,622+336% total · +34.3% a year
- DGII$36,266+263% total · +29.4% a year
- VIAV$26,634+166% total · +21.6% a year
- CSCO$22,737+127% total · +17.9% a year
- EXTR$21,777+118% total · +16.8% a year
- NOK$21,125+111% total · +16.1% a year
- MSI$20,359+104% total · +15.3% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
NOK at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- NOK is still 73.2% below its all-time high.
- NOK's deepest decline since it began trading in 1994 was 96.0%, from June 2000 to July 2012. It has not yet climbed back to that peak.
- Over 29 full calendar years, NOK's best was 1998, when it returned 251%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 58.2%. It lost money in 15 of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $43B
- Industry
- Communication Equipment
- Price history from
- July 1994
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +44.4%total return
- Past 3 years
- +170%+39.3% a year
- Past 5 years
- +51.9%+8.7% a year
- Past 10 years
- +96.3%+7.0% a year
- Best calendar year
- +251%1998
- Worst calendar year
- −58.2%2008
- Losing years
- 15 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 40.7%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.41return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −96.0%Jun 2000 to Jul 2012
- From its all-time high
- −73.2%below the peak
NOK against the whole market
Where NOK ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does NOK rank among all stocks?
This section ranks NOK on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how NOK stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- NOK's 3-year return ranks in the top 17% of the 3,016 stocks worth at least $300 million with 3 years of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | NOK | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +44.4% | 651 of 3,282 | top 20% |
| 3-year return | +170% | 502 of 3,016 | top 17% |
| 5-year return | +51.9% | 1,074 of 2,897 | top 37% |
| 10-year return | +96.3% | 1,352 of 2,201 | bottom 40% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 40.7% | 1,496 of 2,897 | bottom 49% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.41 | 1,200 of 2,897 | top 41% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −62.6% | 986 of 2,184 | top 45% |
What has beaten NOK on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). NOK sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than NOK with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 530 stocks and 375 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than NOK over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 25% of the 3,641 screened.
- Among those with at least half NOK's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 41.7% a year at 24.7% volatility, 39% less than NOK's 40.7%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.54 against 0.41 for NOK. PBR-A earned the most, 53.5% a year, while still swinging less than NOK (37.4% against 40.7%).
- Among NOK's popular alternatives, CSCO and MSI are in the region. CSCO earned 16.9% a year against 8.7% a year for NOK, at 26.1% volatility, 36% less than NOK's 40.7%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to NOK; faint dots are 93 more of the 905 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,641 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than NOK?
Investments that beat NOK over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among NOK's popular alternatives, CSCO and MSI earned more than NOK with less volatility over the past 5 years. CSCO returned 16.9% a year at 26.1% volatility, against 8.7% a year at 40.7%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, TSM (semiconductors) and APH (electronic components) earned more than NOK with less volatility over the past 5 years. TSM returned 31.0% a year at 38.6% volatility, against 8.7% a year at 40.7%.
- Across the whole market, 905 of the 3,641 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than NOK with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL, GOOG and MSFT.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat NOK over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks NOK's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than NOK follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than NOK's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× NOK's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than NOK's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with NOK?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +8.7% | 40.7% | 0.41 | −62.6% | +96.3% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.5% | 17.2% | 0.78 | −33.7% | +316% | 0.41 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against NOK. 6 of 17 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +16.9% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | +361% | 0.48 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +15.2% | 23.6% | 0.72 | −32.8% | +639% | 0.11 | — | ||
| Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +47.6% | 49.1% | 1.04 | −52.2% | +3,158% | 0.32 | — | ||
| Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +43.7% | 52.9% | 0.95 | −49.5% | +1,509% | 0.57 | — | ||
DGIIDigi International Inc. · Communications Equipment | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +28.0% | 42.4% | 0.80 | −65.7% | +562% | 0.26 | — | |
| Similar return, lower volatility | +9.5% | 25.4% | 0.49 | −39.4% | +63.4% | -0.07 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Communications Equipment and the categories next to it (Semiconductors, Electronic Components, Integrated Telecommunications, Telecommunications), plus NOK's specific themes. 52 of 156 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +31.0% | 38.6% | 0.90 | −56.6% | +1,440% | 0.42 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +31.3% | 32.4% | 1.01 | −37.5% | +887% | 0.40 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +18.6% | 34.2% | 0.67 | −33.6% | +625% | 0.45 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +32.2% | 37.0% | 0.94 | −45.3% | +1,570% | 0.55 | 0.35% | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +15.3% | 43.5% | 0.55 | −56.9% | +1,527% | 0.35 | — | ||
CHTChunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. · Integrated Telecommunications | Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +8.2% | 13.3% | 0.66 | −23.8% | +104% | 0.15 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 1,340 of 3,486 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +17.1% | 19.0% | 0.93 | −26.4% | +206% | 0.18 | 0.40% | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +17.5% | 18.2% | 0.98 | −40.0% | +361% | 0.24 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +19.8% | 22.4% | 0.92 | −42.0% | +326% | 0.30 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +12.8% | 20.2% | 0.70 | −32.9% | +192% | 0.27 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +41.7% | 24.7% | 1.54 | −46.1% | +345% | 0.13 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +19.1% | 28.0% | 0.77 | −38.5% | +1,194% | 0.30 | — | ||
INSWInternational Seaways, Inc. · Oil & Gas | On the frontierHigher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +58.7% | 40.6% | 1.35 | −57.4% | — | -0.03 | — | |
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +9.1% | 16.9% | 0.60 | −35.8% | +152% | 0.42 | 0.03% | ||
What these numbers mean for NOK
- Annual return
- NOK returned 8.7% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.5% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $15,200. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- NOK's volatility over the past 5 years was 40.7%, 2.4 times the S&P 500's 17.2%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, NOK's return lands within 40.7% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- NOK's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.41, against 0.78 for the S&P 500, so NOK earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- NOK's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 62.6%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 62.6% fall takes a 167% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, NOK's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.41 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against NOK instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a NOK holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 905 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than NOK with less volatility
Out of 3,641 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with NOK | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +17.1% | 19.0% | 0.93 | −26.4% | +206% | 0.18 | 0.40% | |
| 2 | Whole market | +17.5% | 18.2% | 0.98 | −40.0% | +361% | 0.24 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +19.8% | 22.4% | 0.92 | −42.0% | +326% | 0.30 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +12.8% | 20.2% | 0.70 | −32.9% | +192% | 0.27 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +41.7% | 24.7% | 1.54 | −46.1% | +345% | 0.13 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +19.1% | 28.0% | 0.77 | −38.5% | +1,194% | 0.30 | — | |
| 7 | Whole market | +18.5% | 32.0% | 0.69 | −44.6% | +696% | 0.41 | — | |
| 8 | Whole market | +11.9% | 28.2% | 0.54 | −37.1% | +862% | 0.08 | — | |
| 9 | Whole market | +41.2% | 32.8% | 1.22 | −34.5% | +1,870% | 0.10 | — | |
| 10 | Whole market | +11.4% | 17.5% | 0.71 | −35.0% | +298% | 0.39 | 0.03% | |
| 11 | EVRGEvergy, Inc. · Electric Utilities | Whole market | +9.9% | 19.0% | 0.60 | −38.8% | +113% | 0.21 | — |
| 12 | PNWPinnacle West Capital Corporation · Electric Utilities | Whole market | +14.6% | 19.9% | 0.79 | −39.3% | +110% | 0.20 | — |
| 13 | Whole market | +12.6% | 16.9% | 0.79 | −34.0% | +319% | 0.41 | 0.03% | |
| 14 | Whole market | +21.1% | 22.6% | 0.97 | −25.7% | +521% | 0.11 | — | |
| 15 | Whole market | +13.5% | 17.2% | 0.83 | −30.4% | +281% | 0.05 | — | |
| 16 | Whole market | +17.3% | 24.3% | 0.78 | −43.6% | +534% | 0.08 | — | |
| 17 | Whole market | +25.5% | 23.4% | 1.09 | −45.1% | +600% | 0.02 | — | |
| 18 | Whole market | +13.5% | 18.0% | 0.80 | −27.4% | +209% | -0.03 | — | |
| 19 | Whole market | +13.2% | 22.9% | 0.66 | −36.4% | +435% | 0.26 | — | |
| 20 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · Japan Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +415% | 0.29 | 0.48% |
| 21 | Whole market | +15.2% | 16.8% | 0.93 | −37.0% | +205% | 0.19 | — | |
| 22 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Dividend Equity | Whole market | +16.9% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.18 | 0.40% |
| 23 | Whole market | +19.7% | 25.2% | 0.84 | −55.8% | +243% | -0.04 | — | |
| 24 | Whole market | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +692% | 0.13 | — | |
| 25 | Whole market | +30.7% | 32.0% | 1.00 | −43.4% | +913% | 0.45 | — | |
| 26 | Whole market | +33.5% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −54.9% | +485% | -0.02 | — | |
| 27 | Whole market | +12.7% | 23.8% | 0.62 | −41.0% | +551% | 0.06 | — | |
| 28 | Whole market | +14.2% | 23.0% | 0.69 | −35.1% | +531% | 0.47 | 0.18% | |
| 29 | Whole market | +21.3% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +240% | 0.05 | — | |
| 30 | Whole market | +17.4% | 20.7% | 0.89 | −26.8% | +234% | 0.12 | — | |
| 31 | OTTROtter Tail Corporation · Electric Utilities | Whole market | +11.1% | 27.6% | 0.52 | −41.5% | +239% | 0.00 | — |
| 32 | Whole market | +16.1% | 24.8% | 0.73 | −43.4% | +245% | -0.06 | — | |
| 33 | Whole market | +37.8% | 25.1% | 1.41 | −38.1% | +582% | -0.09 | — | |
| 34 | Whole market | +12.2% | 13.7% | 0.91 | −36.8% | +237% | 0.28 | 0.03% | |
| 35 | Whole market | +18.7% | 24.4% | 0.83 | −52.0% | +319% | -0.07 | — | |
| 36 | Whole market | +20.1% | 24.9% | 0.86 | −24.9% | +280% | 0.13 | — | |
| 37 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +202% | 0.08 | — | |
| 38 | Whole market | +19.4% | 28.6% | 0.77 | −48.8% | +524% | 0.18 | — | |
| 39 | Whole market | +16.5% | 20.0% | 0.87 | −42.0% | +319% | 0.33 | — | |
| 40 | Whole market | +16.2% | 28.9% | 0.67 | −51.3% | +630% | 0.29 | — | |
| 41 | Whole market | +20.1% | 30.2% | 0.76 | −41.1% | +163% | 0.23 | — | |
| 42 | Whole market | +35.3% | 35.5% | 1.03 | −55.1% | +929% | 0.17 | — | |
| 43 | Whole market | +19.8% | 22.3% | 0.93 | −42.5% | +357% | 0.01 | — | |
| 44 | Whole market | +33.9% | 30.6% | 1.11 | −45.7% | +343% | -0.02 | — | |
| 45 | Whole market | +12.9% | 30.0% | 0.56 | −52.5% | +217% | 0.12 | — | |
| 46 | Whole market | +11.7% | 20.9% | 0.64 | −32.6% | +404% | 0.16 | — | |
| 47 | Whole market | +18.1% | 26.1% | 0.77 | −35.1% | +753% | 0.48 | 0.09% | |
| 48 | Whole market | +34.0% | 29.4% | 1.15 | −47.6% | +470% | 0.01 | — | |
| 49 | Whole market | +19.4% | 22.0% | 0.92 | −56.1% | +110% | -0.06 | — | |
| 50 | Whole market | +21.8% | 25.7% | 0.90 | −30.3% | +849% | -0.05 | — | |
| 51 | Whole market | +23.9% | 29.1% | 0.89 | −41.6% | +580% | 0.06 | — | |
| 52 | Whole market | +15.3% | 29.4% | 0.63 | −56.5% | +234% | 0.19 | — | |
| 53 | Whole market | +13.1% | 29.2% | 0.57 | −49.6% | +455% | 0.21 | — | |
| 54 | Whole market | +18.3% | 21.4% | 0.90 | −53.7% | +133% | 0.14 | — | |
| 55 | Whole market | +15.8% | 31.4% | 0.63 | −44.3% | +373% | 0.28 | — | |
| 56 | Whole market | +15.8% | 20.4% | 0.82 | −42.6% | +256% | 0.07 | — | |
| 57 | Whole market | +26.0% | 28.9% | 0.95 | −54.7% | +755% | 0.07 | — | |
| 58 | Whole market | +19.5% | 21.6% | 0.94 | −47.3% | +409% | 0.32 | — | |
| 59 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.4% | 0.97 | −50.5% | +332% | 0.22 | — | |
| 60 | Whole market | +15.1% | 29.9% | 0.62 | −37.9% | +764% | 0.17 | — | |
| 61 | Whole market | +19.7% | 32.2% | 0.72 | −44.5% | +636% | 0.26 | — | |
| 62 | Whole market | +10.4% | 14.1% | 0.77 | −31.7% | +258% | 0.32 | 0.04% | |
| 63 | Whole market | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +360% | -0.06 | — | |
| 64 | Whole market | +36.4% | 37.4% | 1.02 | −45.5% | +1,878% | 0.36 | — | |
| 65 | Whole market | +11.6% | 13.8% | 0.87 | −35.2% | +209% | 0.28 | 0.04% | |
| 66 | Whole market | +10.2% | 14.4% | 0.75 | −33.4% | +256% | 0.23 | 0.06% | |
| 67 | Whole market | +21.4% | 27.7% | 0.84 | −40.5% | +927% | 0.36 | — | |
| 68 | Whole market | +23.3% | 24.0% | 1.00 | −57.5% | +386% | 0.16 | — | |
| 69 | Whole market | +14.0% | 21.4% | 0.72 | −51.0% | +304% | 0.23 | — | |
| 70 | Whole market | +26.7% | 24.9% | 1.08 | −41.6% | +670% | 0.19 | — | |
| 71 | Whole market | +13.2% | 20.0% | 0.73 | −46.9% | +191% | 0.30 | — | |
| 72 | Whole market | +12.5% | 24.4% | 0.61 | −36.7% | +226% | -0.15 | — | |
| 73 | Whole market | +23.6% | 22.8% | 1.05 | −32.4% | +403% | 0.04 | — | |
| 74 | Whole market | +28.2% | 38.5% | 0.84 | −54.2% | +335% | 0.14 | — | |
| 75 | Whole market | +20.1% | 22.3% | 0.94 | −55.1% | +159% | 0.07 | — | |
| 76 | Whole market | +12.3% | 18.9% | 0.71 | −38.4% | +178% | 0.16 | — | |
| 77 | Whole market | +17.1% | 23.1% | 0.80 | −48.4% | +834% | -0.07 | — | |
| 78 | Whole market | +11.9% | 29.0% | 0.54 | −37.5% | +427% | 0.32 | — | |
| 79 | Whole market | +17.4% | 24.9% | 0.77 | −30.4% | +278% | 0.15 | — | |
| 80 | Whole market | +20.7% | 26.8% | 0.84 | −50.8% | +693% | 0.15 | — | |
| 81 | Whole market | +11.6% | 20.8% | 0.63 | −37.4% | +334% | -0.06 | — | |
| 82 | Whole market | +10.1% | 16.2% | 0.68 | −34.2% | +220% | 0.43 | 0.06% | |
| 83 | Whole market | +19.5% | 20.8% | 0.97 | −54.9% | +344% | 0.06 | — | |
| 84 | Whole market | +13.2% | 20.8% | 0.70 | −51.6% | +188% | 0.00 | — | |
| 85 | Whole market | +14.1% | 18.6% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +461% | -0.06 | — | |
| 86 | Whole market | +14.0% | 30.1% | 0.59 | −54.7% | +517% | 0.19 | — | |
| 87 | Whole market | +16.4% | 29.2% | 0.67 | −46.4% | +407% | 0.30 | — | |
| 88 | Whole market | +15.8% | 23.4% | 0.75 | −42.0% | +394% | -0.08 | — | |
| 89 | Whole market | +19.3% | 29.0% | 0.76 | −44.0% | +429% | 0.28 | — | |
| 90 | Whole market | +17.8% | 29.5% | 0.71 | −51.4% | +311% | 0.07 | — | |
| 91 | Whole market | +23.4% | 30.2% | 0.85 | −57.5% | +635% | -0.18 | — | |
| 92 | Whole market | +12.3% | 22.6% | 0.63 | −39.2% | +125% | 0.32 | — | |
| 93 | Whole market | +12.9% | 27.7% | 0.58 | −50.8% | +307% | 0.14 | — | |
| 94 | Whole market | +17.9% | 26.2% | 0.76 | −41.4% | +377% | -0.16 | — | |
| 95 | Whole market | +20.4% | 23.3% | 0.92 | −48.8% | +294% | 0.12 | — | |
| 96 | ESLTElbit Systems Ltd. · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +39.7% | 34.6% | 1.14 | −35.4% | +763% | 0.01 | — |
| 97 | Whole market | +25.8% | 37.0% | 0.81 | −46.7% | +488% | 0.12 | — | |
| 98 | Whole market | +16.2% | 24.6% | 0.74 | −30.7% | +582% | -0.09 | — | |
| 99 | Same or nearby category | +31.0% | 38.6% | 0.90 | −56.6% | +1,440% | 0.42 | — | |
| 100 | Whole market | +17.7% | 26.2% | 0.76 | −37.9% | +314% | -0.04 | — |
NOK against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against NOK, compared period by period and year by year.
How do NOK's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at NOK, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- CSCO, MSI and T were both more rewarding and calmer than NOK over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, NOK returned 8.7% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.5%, with higher volatility (40.7% against 17.2%).
Green points earned more than NOK with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| ANET Arista Networks, Inc. | +47.6% | 49.1% |
| CIEN Ciena Corporation | +43.7% | 52.9% |
| DGII Digi International Inc. | +28.0% | 42.4% |
| EXTR Extreme Networks, Inc. | +17.7% | 48.8% |
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | +16.9% | 26.1% |
| UI Ubiquiti Inc. | +15.5% | 49.1% |
| MSI Motorola Solutions, Inc. | +15.2% | 23.6% |
| VIAV Viavi Solutions Inc. | +14.5% | 48.3% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.5% | 17.2% |
| T AT&T Inc. | +9.5% | 25.4% |
| NOK This pageNokia Oyj | +8.7% | 40.7% |
| QCOM QUALCOMM Incorporated | +7.9% | 42.8% |
| TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | +7.4% | 26.1% |
| VZ Verizon Communications Inc. | +3.3% | 22.9% |
| ERIC Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | +1.6% | 35.7% |
| AMT American Tower Corporation | −5.6% | 27.3% |
| CALX Calix, Inc. | −7.3% | 48.5% |
| AVNW Aviat Networks, Inc. | −8.5% | 51.5% |
| ADTN ADTRAN Holdings Inc. | −17.6% | 56.4% |
Has NOK consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares NOK with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than NOK helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Seven of the 17 popular alternatives, led by DGII, ANET and CIEN, outperformed NOK in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- DGII, ANET and CIEN outperformed NOK in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- ANET, CIEN and CSCO earned more for the risk they took than NOK (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than NOK over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| NOK Nokia Oyj (this page) | — | −27.3% | −23.1% | −19.6% | +22.4% | +44.4% | +170% | +51.9% | +96.3% | 40.7% | 0.41 | −62.6% | — | $43B | — |
| DGII QualifiedDigi International Inc. | 5/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | −2.7% | +10.0% | +30.0% | +68.7% | +88.6% | +187% | +243% | +562% | 42.4% | 0.80 | −65.7% | — | $2.8B | — |
| ANET QualifiedArista Networks, Inc. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | −16.6% | −2.2% | −3.7% | +28.0% | +16.7% | +267% | +601% | +3,158% | 49.1% | 1.04 | −52.2% | — | $216B | — |
| CIEN QualifiedCiena Corporation | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | −12.5% | −18.8% | −35.3% | +31.1% | +96.2% | +686% | +513% | +1,509% | 52.9% | 0.95 | −49.5% | — | $46B | — |
| VIAV QualifiedViavi Solutions Inc. | 3/5 short3/3 long | −16.8% | −28.3% | −31.6% | +66.9% | +129% | +302% | +97.3% | +316% | 48.3% | 0.52 | −62.9% | — | $7.5B | — |
| CSCO QualifiedCisco Systems, Inc. | 5/5 short2/3 long | −1.1% | −6.2% | +17.7% | +39.7% | +51.2% | +117% | +118% | +361% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | — | $414B | — |
| MSI QualifiedMotorola Solutions, Inc. | 4/5 short2/3 long | +4.6% | +18.5% | +8.8% | +26.4% | +8.2% | +76.6% | +103% | +639% | 23.6% | 0.72 | −32.8% | — | $79B | — |
| EXTR QualifiedExtreme Networks, Inc. | 3/5 short2/3 long | −0.3% | −27.2% | +25.4% | +33.3% | +7.5% | +5.7% | +126% | +438% | 48.8% | 0.58 | −87.5% | — | $2.9B | — |
| UI Communication EquipmentUbiquiti Inc. | 2/5 short3/3 long | +2.5% | +11.0% | −40.5% | +5.6% | −13.4% | +428% | +105% | +1,117% | 49.1% | 0.54 | −72.2% | — | $36B | — |
| CALX Communication EquipmentCalix, Inc. | 3/5 short1/3 long | +5.0% | +3.0% | −13.5% | −31.1% | −37.8% | −13.3% | −31.4% | +451% | 48.5% | 0.09 | −65.3% | — | $2.3B | — |
| AVNW Communication EquipmentAviat Networks, Inc. | 3/5 short1/3 long | −6.5% | −9.2% | −17.1% | −13.3% | −18.9% | −27.6% | −35.9% | +319% | 51.5% | 0.09 | −68.6% | — | $241M | — |
| QCOM SemiconductorsQUALCOMM Incorporated | 3/5 short1/3 long | −12.8% | −1.1% | +28.2% | +1.5% | +4.2% | +69.5% | +46.5% | +230% | 42.8% | 0.39 | −44.3% | — | $185B | — |
| TMUS Telecommunications ServicesT-Mobile US, Inc. | 3/5 short1/3 long | −2.2% | −16.4% | −15.0% | −19.2% | −28.7% | +21.3% | +42.9% | +226% | 26.1% | 0.41 | −44.0% | — | $170B | — |
| ERIC Communication EquipmentTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | 3/5 short1/3 long | +7.5% | +11.3% | −8.0% | +12.7% | +12.6% | +161% | +8.5% | +168% | 35.7% | 0.23 | −66.6% | — | $34B | — |
| AMT REIT - SpecialtyAmerican Tower Corporation | 3/5 short1/3 long | +4.7% | +10.5% | +5.1% | +7.1% | −1.2% | +26.7% | −24.9% | +102% | 27.3% | -0.07 | −45.4% | — | $85B | — |
| T Telecommunications ServicesAT&T Inc. | 3/5 short1/3 long | −8.4% | −0.2% | −10.3% | −3.0% | −6.8% | +76.8% | +57.5% | +63.4% | 25.4% | 0.49 | −39.4% | — | $156B | — |
| VZ Telecommunications ServicesVerizon Communications Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | −1.2% | +3.6% | +1.5% | +19.0% | +21.1% | +75.1% | +17.6% | +61.2% | 22.9% | 0.26 | −41.2% | — | $188B | — |
| ADTN Communication EquipmentADTRAN Holdings Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −11.5% | −38.3% | −61.9% | −25.7% | −30.0% | −6.0% | −61.9% | −60.3% | 56.4% | -0.05 | −82.0% | — | $526M | — |
How did NOK do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where NOK ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with NOK and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- Among its popular alternatives, ANET came out ahead of NOK most often, in nine of the 11 years both traded.
- NOK finished ahead of the S&P 500 in ten of its 29 full calendar years, and ahead of it in each of the last two.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, NOK finished in the top quarter in six of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in seven. In 2025, it ranked 5 of 18.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of NOK; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places NOK among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of NOK | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOK This pageNokia Oyj | — | +50.7% | +34.6% | −23.9% | −24.4% | +59.3% | +5.2% | −34.9% | +29.7% | −0.3% | −27.8% | −8.4% | +3.0% | +105% | −11.5% | −50.3% | −16.0% | −14.5% | −58.2% | +93.4% | +13.5% | +20.0% | −6.1% | +12.0% | −36.1% | −43.0% | −8.6% | +219% | +251% | +21.6% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 6 of 29 | 5 of 18 | 7 of 18 | 14 of 18 | 13 of 18 | 6 of 18 | 12 of 18 | 18 of 18 | 5 of 18 | 13 of 18 | 17 of 18 | 12 of 18 | 5 of 17 | 2 of 17 | 14 of 17 | 14 of 16 | 14 of 15 | 14 of 15 | 11 of 15 | 1 of 14 | 9 of 14 | 5 of 14 | 8 of 14 | 12 of 14 | 6 of 14 | 7 of 14 | 5 of 14 | 5 of 13 | 1 of 12 | 8 of 11 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 19 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| DGII Digi International Inc. | 14 of 29 | +43.2% | +16.3% | −28.9% | +48.8% | +30.0% | +6.7% | +75.6% | +5.7% | −30.6% | +20.8% | +22.5% | −23.4% | +28.0% | −15.1% | +0.5% | +21.7% | +12.4% | −42.9% | +2.9% | +31.5% | −39.0% | +79.1% | +230% | −54.3% | +3.9% | −41.3% | −6.2% | −34.5% | +79.0% |
| ANET Arista Networks, Inc. | 9 of 11 | +18.6% | +87.7% | +94.1% | −15.6% | +97.9% | +42.9% | −3.5% | −10.5% | +143% | +24.2% | +28.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| CIEN Ciena Corporation | 16 of 28 | +176% | +88.4% | −11.7% | −33.8% | +45.6% | +23.8% | +25.9% | +62.0% | −14.3% | +18.0% | +6.6% | −18.9% | +52.4% | +29.8% | −42.5% | +94.2% | +61.8% | −80.4% | +23.1% | +33.3% | −11.1% | −49.1% | +27.6% | −64.1% | −82.4% | +183% | +293% | −76.1% | — |
| VIAV Viavi Solutions Inc. | 13 of 29 | +76.4% | +0.3% | −4.2% | −40.4% | +17.6% | −0.1% | +49.3% | +15.0% | +6.9% | +34.3% | −21.9% | +5.5% | −3.8% | +29.3% | −27.9% | +75.7% | +125% | −72.5% | −20.2% | −11.7% | −25.6% | −12.9% | +47.3% | −71.5% | −79.2% | −48.3% | +830% | +67.6% | +57.7% |
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 16 of 29 | +33.5% | +21.0% | +9.3% | −22.5% | +45.8% | −3.5% | +13.8% | +16.6% | +31.3% | +15.1% | +0.6% | +28.0% | +16.7% | +11.6% | −9.6% | −15.5% | +46.9% | −39.8% | −1.0% | +59.7% | −11.4% | −20.3% | +85.0% | −27.7% | −52.6% | −28.6% | +131% | +150% | +31.2% |
| MSI Motorola Solutions, Inc. | 17 of 29 | −16.2% | +49.1% | +23.0% | −3.8% | +61.9% | +7.4% | +42.2% | +29.6% | +10.8% | +23.9% | +4.3% | +1.4% | +23.6% | +22.6% | +28.9% | +16.9% | +75.2% | −71.6% | −21.1% | −8.2% | +32.4% | +34.1% | +64.5% | −41.6% | −25.1% | −58.5% | +142% | +7.8% | −5.9% |
| EXTR Extreme Networks, Inc. | 14 of 26 | −0.5% | −5.1% | −3.7% | +16.6% | +128% | −6.5% | +20.8% | −51.3% | +149% | +23.3% | +15.6% | −49.4% | +91.8% | +24.7% | −5.5% | +7.7% | +22.7% | −33.9% | −15.5% | −11.8% | −27.5% | −9.2% | +120% | −74.7% | −67.0% | −6.3% | — | — | — |
| UI Ubiquiti Inc. | 10 of 14 | +67.7% | +141% | −48.2% | −10.0% | +10.8% | +48.5% | +91.7% | +40.7% | +22.9% | +82.4% | +7.0% | −35.2% | +279% | −32.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| CALX Calix, Inc. | 8 of 15 | +51.8% | −20.2% | −36.1% | −14.4% | +169% | +272% | −17.9% | +63.9% | −22.7% | −2.2% | −21.5% | +3.9% | +25.4% | +18.9% | −61.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AVNW Aviat Networks, Inc. | 13 of 29 | +18.1% | −44.5% | +4.7% | −2.8% | +87.8% | +143% | +6.0% | −12.7% | +9.7% | +49.8% | −48.7% | −33.6% | −31.3% | +79.8% | −63.9% | −26.6% | +33.9% | −69.1% | −13.6% | +34.9% | +58.4% | −47.4% | +94.6% | −71.6% | −48.1% | −36.0% | +242% | −52.8% | +4.0% |
| QCOM QUALCOMM Incorporated | 16 of 29 | +13.8% | +8.3% | +35.1% | −38.6% | +22.3% | +77.1% | +60.8% | −7.6% | +1.1% | +35.1% | −30.6% | +2.3% | +22.4% | +14.9% | +12.3% | +9.0% | +31.1% | −7.6% | +5.5% | −11.3% | +2.5% | +58.3% | +49.1% | −28.0% | −38.5% | −53.3% | +2,621% | +6.4% | +27.2% |
| TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | 12 of 18 | −6.6% | +39.7% | +15.0% | +20.7% | −14.0% | +72.0% | +23.3% | +0.1% | +10.4% | +47.0% | +45.2% | −19.9% | +69.2% | +14.5% | −31.3% | +65.5% | −48.6% | −23.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ERIC Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | 14 of 29 | +24.0% | +33.5% | +13.2% | −44.4% | −7.2% | +38.3% | +0.1% | +35.2% | +16.7% | −36.4% | −18.1% | +2.3% | +25.5% | +3.4% | −9.5% | +28.7% | +20.9% | −30.3% | −40.7% | +18.8% | +10.6% | +77.8% | +162% | −87.1% | −53.0% | −31.7% | +177% | +29.3% | +24.7% |
| AMT American Tower Corporation | 16 of 27 | −0.9% | −12.2% | +5.4% | −25.7% | +32.9% | −0.5% | +47.9% | +13.3% | +37.7% | +11.2% | 0.0% | +25.8% | +4.8% | +30.4% | +16.9% | +19.5% | +47.3% | −31.2% | +14.3% | +37.5% | +47.2% | +70.0% | +207% | −62.8% | −75.0% | +23.9% | +3.4% | — | — |
| T AT&T Inc. | 17 of 29 | +14.0% | +44.0% | −2.8% | +6.5% | −5.9% | −19.6% | +48.5% | −20.8% | −2.4% | +32.0% | +10.3% | +2.4% | +11.6% | +19.4% | +11.1% | +14.0% | +6.9% | −26.9% | +22.1% | +55.6% | +1.9% | +5.5% | +3.6% | −27.6% | −15.4% | +0.6% | −6.7% | +50.8% | +46.9% |
| VZ Verizon Communications Inc. | 16 of 29 | +8.9% | +13.1% | +2.7% | −20.0% | −7.5% | −0.1% | +13.8% | +11.3% | +4.0% | +20.7% | +3.6% | −0.5% | +18.6% | +13.2% | +18.2% | +23.0% | +3.8% | −20.1% | +22.1% | +34.0% | −22.2% | +20.1% | −5.7% | −15.3% | −2.6% | −16.9% | +17.0% | +22.4% | +46.6% |
| ADTN ADTRAN Holdings Inc. | 12 of 29 | +4.3% | +13.5% | −59.9% | −16.3% | +57.4% | +54.4% | −5.2% | −43.2% | −12.0% | +32.4% | −19.3% | −18.0% | +40.5% | −34.2% | −15.9% | +62.7% | +54.2% | −29.1% | −4.4% | −22.5% | +57.6% | −37.7% | +98.0% | +28.8% | +20.1% | −58.7% | +181% | −33.4% | −33.7% |
Risk and diversification
How NOK has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were NOK's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents NOK's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1994, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all five of NOK's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: NOK fell 96.0% from June 2000 to July 2012, while the S&P 500 rose 14.4%.
- The longest climb back to a previous high took 14 months, after NOK fell 57.6% from September 1995 to April 1996.
Green means NOK fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | NOK fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dot-com bust | −96.0% | +14.4% | Jun 2000 | Jul 2012 | 12.1 years | Not yet | — |
| No named crash | −57.6% | +13.3% | Sep 1995 | Apr 1996 | 7 months | Jun 1997 | 14 months |
| No named crash | −36.6% | −2.9% | Oct 1997 | Dec 1997 | 2 months | Mar 1998 | 3 months |
| No named crash | −31.9% | −15.0% | Jul 1998 | Oct 1998 | 3 months | Oct 1998 | Under a month |
| Dot-com bust | −23.0% | −6.2% | May 2000 | May 2000 | Under a month | Jun 2000 | 1 month |
How did NOK do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far NOK, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- Among its popular alternatives, T held up best, falling less than NOK in six of the ten crashes they both traded through.
- NOK fell further than the S&P 500 in six of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when NOK fell 82.1% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than NOK.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOK This pageNokia Oyj | — | −2.1% | −32.1% | −42.4% | −9.7% | −2.8% | −23.3% | −21.1% | 0.0% | −78.1% | −82.1% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 6 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| DGII Digi International Inc. | 2 of 10 | −4.7% | −26.1% | −57.4% | −30.9% | −4.7% | −39.4% | −26.9% | −2.7% | −61.8% | −84.3% |
| ANET Arista Networks, Inc. | 2 of 6 | −1.5% | −36.6% | −31.2% | −31.2% | −6.1% | −36.6% | — | — | — | — |
| CIEN Ciena Corporation | 1 of 10 | −2.9% | −48.4% | −22.4% | −11.8% | −4.7% | −31.7% | −41.8% | −5.1% | −89.5% | −98.4% |
| VIAV Viavi Solutions Inc. | 2 of 10 | −3.0% | −27.2% | −37.5% | −26.5% | −3.0% | −27.6% | −41.5% | −4.5% | −86.0% | −98.8% |
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 5 of 10 | −1.4% | −35.4% | −29.1% | −17.5% | −5.3% | −22.8% | −16.6% | −3.1% | −60.0% | −89.3% |
| MSI Motorola Solutions, Inc. | 4 of 10 | −2.4% | −25.0% | −32.8% | −18.2% | −4.9% | −16.2% | −16.5% | −1.2% | −83.5% | −85.2% |
| EXTR Extreme Networks, Inc. | 1 of 10 | −4.6% | −43.9% | −71.0% | −23.0% | −26.4% | −46.8% | −30.5% | −4.8% | −75.8% | −98.0% |
| UI Ubiquiti Inc. | 2 of 6 | −3.5% | −26.5% | −22.7% | −17.6% | −14.4% | −26.2% | — | — | — | — |
| CALX Calix, Inc. | 0 of 8 | −7.8% | −56.1% | −44.0% | −21.9% | −2.4% | −34.3% | −64.5% | −10.3% | — | — |
| AVNW Aviat Networks, Inc. | 1 of 10 | −6.9% | −27.6% | −45.0% | −28.3% | −9.8% | −54.9% | −45.8% | −2.7% | −83.4% | −97.8% |
| QCOM QUALCOMM Incorporated | 3 of 10 | −5.6% | −41.5% | −32.2% | −26.8% | −6.6% | −30.7% | −19.2% | −0.5% | −48.0% | −84.9% |
| TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | 4 of 9 | −2.6% | −12.1% | −26.0% | −13.7% | −7.4% | −21.2% | −52.5% | −11.3% | −57.5% | — |
| ERIC Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | 3 of 10 | −2.3% | −53.5% | −31.3% | −13.3% | −7.5% | −19.2% | −31.9% | −0.8% | −71.4% | −98.6% |
| AMT American Tower Corporation | 5 of 10 | −2.3% | −34.2% | −28.8% | −8.4% | −8.0% | −19.2% | −13.6% | −2.9% | −56.5% | −98.7% |
| T AT&T Inc. | 6 of 10 | −1.6% | −29.2% | −30.6% | −18.3% | −6.5% | −8.6% | −9.1% | −0.3% | −44.4% | −63.5% |
| VZ Verizon Communications Inc. | 5 of 10 | −2.6% | −33.2% | −13.6% | −12.5% | −7.4% | −10.5% | −9.9% | 0.0% | −43.9% | −55.2% |
| ADTN ADTRAN Holdings Inc. | 4 of 10 | −8.6% | −28.9% | −45.4% | −43.5% | −2.5% | −13.2% | −26.6% | −0.1% | −52.3% | −81.1% |
How closely does NOK move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares NOK with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, NOK captured 63% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 72% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.01. Its share of the market's losses was slightly larger than its share of the gains.
- Ten of the 17 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than NOK's 0.87, led by CIEN, ANET and TMUS.
- TMUS took just 37% of the S&P 500's losses, against 72% for NOK, while still keeping 63% of its gains.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than NOK's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOK This pageNokia Oyj | 63% | 72% | 0.87 | 1.01 |
| CIEN Ciena Corporation | 129% | 64% | 2.02 | 1.07 |
| ANET Arista Networks, Inc. | 174% | 91% | 1.92 | 1.40 |
| TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | 63% | 37% | 1.72 | 0.46 |
| MSI Motorola Solutions, Inc. | 97% | 62% | 1.57 | 0.84 |
| VIAV Viavi Solutions Inc. | 98% | 76% | 1.30 | 0.97 |
| AVNW Aviat Networks, Inc. | 86% | 70% | 1.22 | 1.41 |
| UI Ubiquiti Inc. | 150% | 125% | 1.19 | 1.35 |
| CALX Calix, Inc. | 96% | 85% | 1.14 | 1.40 |
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 101% | 96% | 1.06 | 0.97 |
| DGII Digi International Inc. | 137% | 137% | 1.00 | 1.29 |
| EXTR Extreme Networks, Inc. | 144% | 172% | 0.84 | 1.88 |
| QCOM QUALCOMM Incorporated | 115% | 139% | 0.83 | 1.51 |
| AMT American Tower Corporation | 61% | 79% | 0.78 | 0.60 |
| T AT&T Inc. | 47% | 62% | 0.76 | 0.50 |
| VZ Verizon Communications Inc. | 44% | 60% | 0.74 | 0.36 |
| ERIC Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | 73% | 108% | 0.67 | 0.71 |
| ADTN ADTRAN Holdings Inc. | 47% | 150% | 0.31 | 1.46 |
What diversifies NOK?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with NOK's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing NOK with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in NOK into MCK would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 20% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+16.1% for NOK alone, +22.1% for the mix).
- FIX made money in 11 of the 15 calendar years in which NOK lost money.
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of NOK over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.29 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which NOK lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% NOK and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2023 | 2022 | 2019 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2004 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOK Nokia Oyj (this page) | 1.00 | +51.9% | 0.41 | −23.9% | −24.4% | −34.9% | −0.3% | −27.8% | −8.4% | −11.5% | −50.3% | −16.0% | −14.5% | −58.2% | −6.1% | −36.1% | −43.0% | −8.6% | 45.8% | +16.1% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.18 | +119% | 1.48 | +17.4% | +3.8% | +17.8% | +10.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 37.0% | +17.9% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.29 | +225% | 1.34 | +42.0% | +6.0% | +18.9% | +22.8% | +1.1% | +7.7% | +19.6% | −16.1% | −1.8% | +2.0% | −20.8% | — | — | — | — | 37.5% | +19.7% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.14 | +103% | 1.06 | +8.0% | +10.4% | +23.4% | +1.1% | +29.8% | −25.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 37.2% | +17.6% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.13 | +86.8% | 1.03 | +1.7% | +7.0% | +20.2% | +13.3% | +15.8% | −0.3% | +9.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 37.1% | +17.0% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.39 | +83.6% | 0.95 | +20.1% | −5.1% | +24.9% | +16.7% | +6.3% | +4.1% | +20.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 37.6% | +17.1% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | -0.02 | +178% | 0.94 | −0.6% | +64.4% | +11.7% | −0.9% | +28.0% | −21.5% | +5.2% | +2.8% | +21.9% | +21.8% | −39.0% | +33.8% | −14.8% | −18.2% | +24.4% | 36.9% | +19.8% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.18 | +120% | 0.93 | +12.7% | −0.8% | +17.9% | +12.8% | +8.0% | −10.7% | +6.6% | +9.6% | +29.3% | +24.0% | +4.9% | — | — | — | — | 37.4% | +18.2% |
| DFIV InternationalDimensional - International Value ETF | 0.24 | +99.4% | 0.93 | +17.7% | −3.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 37.5% | +17.6% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2023 | 2022 | 2019 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2004 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOK Nokia Oyj (this page) | 1.00 | +51.9% | 0.41 | −23.9% | −24.4% | −34.9% | −0.3% | −27.8% | −8.4% | −11.5% | −50.3% | −16.0% | −14.5% | −58.2% | −6.1% | −36.1% | −43.0% | −8.6% | 45.8% | +16.1% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.13 | +471% | 1.54 | +34.1% | +54.1% | +18.0% | −12.7% | −17.5% | +12.6% | +3.8% | +8.1% | +21.4% | −4.4% | −39.6% | −4.7% | −8.3% | −2.5% | +108% | 37.7% | +22.2% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.34 | +2,780% | 1.43 | +160% | +1.3% | −5.7% | −11.6% | +7.4% | −6.0% | +11.2% | −24.4% | +2.8% | +105% | −20.5% | −6.4% | −65.1% | −25.6% | −2.3% | 42.1% | +34.5% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | -0.09 | +397% | 1.41 | +24.1% | +51.8% | +26.7% | +12.0% | −28.3% | −4.5% | +25.6% | +11.8% | +13.8% | +62.9% | −40.4% | −1.4% | −27.2% | +4.9% | +61.2% | 36.5% | +22.1% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.27 | +1,452% | 1.41 | +79.6% | +17.0% | +15.1% | +32.1% | +18.3% | +67.7% | +15.7% | −17.0% | +8.7% | +17.8% | −15.2% | +40.0% | −9.4% | +73.7% | −71.1% | 40.0% | +30.9% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.01 | +660% | 1.39 | +30.4% | +86.6% | +6.0% | +34.8% | +0.7% | +17.4% | +94.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 37.3% | +24.7% |
Common questions
What was NOK's worst drawdown?
NOK's deepest decline since it began trading in 1994 was 96.0%, from June 2000 to July 2012. It has not yet climbed back to that peak.
What were NOK's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, NOK's best year was 1998, when it returned 251%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -58.2%.
Is there a better investment than NOK?
Among NOK's popular alternatives, CSCO and MSI earned more than NOK with less volatility over the past 5 years. CSCO returned 16.9% a year at 26.1% volatility, against 8.7% a year at 40.7%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, TSM (semiconductors) and APH (electronic components) earned more than NOK with less volatility over the past 5 years. TSM returned 31.0% a year at 38.6% volatility, against 8.7% a year at 40.7%.
Is NOK more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. NOK's volatility over the past 5 years was 40.7%, 2.4 times the S&P 500's 17.2%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, NOK's return lands within 40.7% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is NOK's Sharpe ratio?
NOK's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.41, against 0.78 for the S&P 500, so NOK earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is NOK with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, NOK's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.41 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against NOK instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a NOK holding.
What are the best alternatives to NOK?
Of the 17 popular alternatives we compared, seven outperformed NOK in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: DGII, ANET and CIEN.
Did NOK outperform the S&P 500?
NOK finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in ten of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +50.7%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did NOK do in stock market crashes?
NOK fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in four of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in six. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when NOK fell 82.1% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
What diversifies NOK?
These had a low correlation with NOK over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.18), DXJ (correlation 0.29) and EMLP (correlation 0.14); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.13), CLS (correlation 0.34) and MCK (correlation -0.09). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than NOK's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of NOK's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to NOK
ANETArista Networks
CIENCiena
CSCOCisco Systems
MSIMotorola Solutions
QCOMQUALCOMM
TMUST-Mobile US
AMTAmerican Tower
TAT&T
VZVerizon Communications