Relative Intelligence · US Quality Equity

How iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on QUAL alone. It places QUAL (iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where QUAL stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: QUAL's full trading record, from July 2013 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 22, 2026.
Data as of October 22, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
This page answers the following questions about QUAL
Key findings
Not AI-generatedThese key findings are generated by our proprietary relative intelligence engine, directly from the data on this page.
- What you're buyingFor a correlation of 0.98 with the S&P 500, QUAL is effectively an S&P 500 fund, while charging 0.15% a year against VOO's 0.03%. QUAL's 0.15% fee costs about $120 more than GSLC's 0.09% on $10,000 over 20 years, for a fund that tracks the same thing. Market capture ↓
- Right nowNot every peer went the same way. Over the past 3 months, USMV (iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF) rose 7.9% and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) fell 7.3%. QUAL has edged past the market, rising 3.5% over the past 3 months against 2.5% for the S&P 500. Consistency ↓
- Fund or market?QUAL rose 3.5% over the past 3 months, in line with the S&P 500, which rose 2.5%: a market move, not its own. Its similar funds did not move as one over the past 3 months: USMV (iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF) rose 7.9%, while SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) fell 7.3%.
- Long termQUAL turned $10,000 into $39,000 over the past decade, against $41,600 in the S&P 500. That said, its 10-year return of 290% puts it ahead of 89% of the ETFs with at least $100 million in assets with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 316%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashIn the 2022 bear market, QUAL fell harder than most of its similar funds, including DYNF (iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF), USMV and SPMO. QUAL fell further than the S&P 500 in two of the last three sell-offs, including the 2022 bear market (27.5% against 24.5%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationQUAL is more of the same, not a cushion: a correlation of 0.98 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.97 with the total US market, more closely than 95% of ETFs with at least $100 million in assets. When the S&P 500 had a down month, QUAL usually fell with it (19 of 22 months). By year ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- JQUA (JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF) earned more than QUAL with less volatility over the past 5 years: 13.5% a year at 15.7% volatility, against 11.2% a year at 17.3%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- SIXA (ETC 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF, US large-cap equity) and VSLU (Applied Finance Valuation Large Cap ETF, US large-cap value) earned more than QUAL with less volatility over the past 5 years. SIXA returned 12.9% a year at 12.7% volatility, against 11.2% a year at 17.3%.
- Whole market
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only 52 of the 3,641 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than QUAL with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them VTV (Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF), EFV (iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF) and FNDX (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF).
How much would $10,000 in QUAL have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in QUAL over the past 13 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of QUAL over the same span and QUAL's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: QUAL began trading on July 18, 2013, so the chart cannot reach back to the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs. It covers the most recent 13 years of QUAL's record, starting at the end of September 2013.
- $10,000 invested in QUAL at the end of September 2013 would have grown to $53,143 by September 2026, less than the $56,474 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of QUAL, and IWF finished highest, at $72,407.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2013 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 481 of the 2,314 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of QUAL; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- IWF$72,407+624% total · +16.4% a year
- MTUM$68,414+584% total · +15.9% a year
- WM$64,758+548% total · +15.5% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$56,474+465% total · +14.2% a year
- SPHQ$55,320+453% total · +14.1% a year
- AMGN$54,013+440% total · +13.9% a year
- QUAL$53,143+431% total · +13.7% a year
- DGRW$49,137+391% total · +13.0% a year
- QDF$41,683+317% total · +11.6% a year
- IWD$38,062+281% total · +10.8% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 1,077 of the 3,630 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of QUAL; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- SPMO$26,579+166% total · +21.6% a year
- DYNF$21,051+111% total · +16.1% a year
- VSLU$19,451+94.5% total · +14.2% a year
- JQUA$19,289+92.9% total · +14.0% a year
- MTUM$19,134+91.3% total · +13.9% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- SIXA$18,594+85.9% total · +13.2% a year
- MGV$18,512+85.1% total · +13.1% a year
- QUAL$17,879+78.8% total · +12.3% a year
- IWD$17,414+74.1% total · +11.7% a year
QUAL at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the fund, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
Note: QUAL began trading on July 18, 2013, so every figure here, including its worst decline, covers only the time since then. None of them reflect the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs.
- QUAL's deepest decline since it began trading in 2013 was 34.1%, from February to March 2020. It took five months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 12 full calendar years, QUAL's best was 2019, when it returned 33.9%, and its worst was 2022, when it lost 20.5%. It lost money in two of those years.
- QUAL is 1.4% below its all-time high.
The fund
- Issuer
- IShares
- Began trading
- July 2013
- Expense ratio
- 0.15%per year
- Assets
- $48B
- Category
- Broad Market
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +16.3%total return
- Past 3 years
- +76.1%+20.8% a year
- Past 5 years
- +69.8%+11.2% a year
- Past 10 years
- +290%+14.6% a year
- Best calendar year
- +33.9%2019
- Worst calendar year
- −20.5%2022
- Losing years
- 2 of 12full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 17.3%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.70return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −34.1%Feb 2020 to Mar 2020
- From its all-time high
- −1.4%below the peak
QUAL against the whole market
Where QUAL ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does QUAL rank among all ETFs?
This section ranks QUAL on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every ETF worth at least $100 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how QUAL stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- QUAL's 10-year return ranks in the top 11% of the 958 ETFs with at least $100 million in assets with 10 years of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed ETFs with at least $100M in assets that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller ETFs and leveraged funds are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | QUAL | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +16.3% | 714 of 2,488 | top 29% |
| 3-year return | +76.1% | 656 of 1,950 | top 34% |
| 5-year return | +69.8% | 387 of 1,563 | top 25% |
| 10-year return | +290% | 108 of 958 | top 11% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 17.3% | 884 of 1,563 | bottom 44% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.70 | 522 of 1,563 | top 33% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −34.1% | 297 of 951 | top 31% |
What has beaten QUAL on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). QUAL sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than QUAL with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 52 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than QUAL over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 1% of the 3,641 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half QUAL's swings, LVHI has the best return for its risk: 16.9% a year at 11.1% volatility, 36% less than QUAL's 17.3%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.48 against 0.70 for QUAL.
- Among QUAL's popular alternatives, JQUA is in the region. JQUA earned 13.5% a year against 11.2% a year for QUAL, at 15.7% volatility, 9% less than QUAL's 17.3%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to QUAL; faint dots are 27 more of the 52 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,641 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than QUAL?
Investments that beat QUAL over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among QUAL's popular alternatives, JQUA earned more than QUAL with less volatility over the past 5 years: 13.5% a year at 15.7% volatility, against 11.2% a year at 17.3%.
- GSLC tracks the same thing for 0.09% a year against QUAL's 0.15%, and has kept pace over the past decade: about $60 less in fees on $10,000 over 10 years.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, SIXA (US large-cap equity) and VSLU (US large-cap value) earned more than QUAL with less volatility over the past 5 years. SIXA returned 12.9% a year at 12.7% volatility, against 11.2% a year at 17.3%.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat QUAL over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes, and, for funds, the same exposure at a lower expense ratio. It checks QUAL's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than QUAL follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than QUAL's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× QUAL's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than QUAL's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with QUAL?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +11.2% | 17.3% | 0.70 | −34.1% | +290% | 1.00 | 0.15% | |||
| +12.5% | 17.2% | 0.78 | −33.7% | +316% | 0.98 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 5 shownThe investments people most often weigh against QUAL. 5 of 19 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
JQUAJPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF · US Quality Equity | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +13.5% | 15.7% | 0.89 | −32.9% | — | 0.97 | 0.12% | |
| Higher return in most periods | +11.5% | 14.7% | 0.82 | −38.5% | +207% | 0.88 | 0.18% | ||
| Same exposure, lower expense ratio | +12.5% | 17.2% | 0.78 | −33.7% | +316% | 0.98 | 0.09% | ||
GSLCGoldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF · Multifactor Equity | Same exposure, lower expense ratio | +11.4% | 16.7% | 0.73 | −33.7% | +293% | 0.98 | 0.09% | |
| Higher return, similar volatility | +14.4% | 17.5% | 0.86 | −34.7% | — | 0.97 | 0.26% | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in US Quality Equity and the categories next to it (US Large-Cap Value, US Dividend Equity, US Large-Cap Equity, US Multifactor Equity), plus QUAL's specific themes. 54 of 174 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
SIXAETC 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +12.9% | 12.7% | 1.02 | −18.4% | — | 0.85 | 0.31% | |
VSLUApplied Finance Valuation Large Cap ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +13.7% | 16.2% | 0.88 | −23.8% | — | 0.96 | 0.49% | |
MGVVanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +12.8% | 13.4% | 0.96 | −35.4% | +247% | 0.85 | 0.05% | |
AVLVAvantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +13.9% | 16.9% | 0.86 | −19.5% | — | 0.89 | 0.15% | |
VFMFVanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF · US Multifactor Equity | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +14.5% | 17.6% | 0.86 | −41.3% | — | 0.84 | 0.18% | |
FLVAmerican Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +10.5% | 12.7% | 0.85 | −15.1% | — | 0.73 | 0.42% | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 148 of 3,481 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +17.5% | 18.2% | 0.98 | −40.0% | +361% | 0.58 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +24.0% | 18.8% | 1.25 | −75.2% | +337% | 0.47 | — | ||
| Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +20.1% | 24.9% | 0.86 | −24.9% | +280% | 0.31 | — | ||
DFIVDimensional - International Value ETF · International Large-Cap Value | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +14.8% | 16.4% | 0.93 | −25.4% | — | 0.68 | 0.27% | |
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +15.2% | 16.8% | 0.93 | −37.0% | +205% | 0.36 | — | ||
FNDBSchwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF · US Total Market | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +13.1% | 15.1% | 0.90 | −38.1% | +285% | 0.91 | 0.25% | |
PJULInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · US Equity Buffer | On the frontierSimilar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +10.4% | 8.6% | 1.20 | −18.2% | — | 0.91 | 0.79% | |
| Smaller losses in recent crashes | +9.5% | 19.3% | 0.57 | −30.1% | +357% | 0.45 | — | ||
What these numbers mean for QUAL
- Annual return
- QUAL returned 11.2% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.5% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $17,000. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- QUAL's volatility over the past 5 years was 17.3%, 1.0 times the S&P 500's 17.2%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, QUAL's return lands within 17.3% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- QUAL's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.70, against 0.78 for the S&P 500, so QUAL earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- QUAL's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 34.1%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 34.1% fall takes a 51.7% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, QUAL's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.98 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They move almost in lockstep, so holding both adds little diversification. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against QUAL instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a QUAL holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 52 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than QUAL with less volatility
Out of 3,641 tested over 5 years. The strongest 32 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with QUAL | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SIXAETC 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Same or nearby category | +12.9% | 12.7% | 1.02 | −18.4% | — | 0.85 | 0.31% |
| 2 | VSLUApplied Finance Valuation Large Cap ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Same or nearby category | +13.7% | 16.2% | 0.88 | −23.8% | — | 0.96 | 0.49% |
| 3 | Same or nearby category | +12.2% | 13.7% | 0.91 | −36.8% | +237% | 0.85 | 0.03% | |
| 4 | PVALPutnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Same or nearby category | +15.9% | 15.1% | 1.06 | −41.3% | — | 0.88 | 0.56% |
| 5 | DFIVDimensional - International Value ETF · International Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +14.8% | 16.4% | 0.93 | −25.4% | — | 0.68 | 0.27% |
| 6 | RWLInvesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Same or nearby category | +13.7% | 14.4% | 0.97 | −36.1% | +287% | 0.91 | 0.39% |
| 7 | FDLFirst Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund · High Dividend Yield | Same or nearby category | +14.6% | 14.5% | 1.02 | −41.4% | +207% | 0.59 | 0.43% |
| 8 | JQUAJPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF · US Quality Equity | Popular alternative | +13.5% | 15.7% | 0.89 | −32.9% | — | 0.97 | 0.12% |
| 9 | DIVBiShares Core Dividend ETF · High Dividend Yield | Same or nearby category | +14.6% | 15.5% | 0.96 | −36.9% | — | 0.85 | 0.05% |
| 10 | PWVInvesco Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Same or nearby category | +13.7% | 14.2% | 0.98 | −37.6% | +226% | 0.77 | 0.55% |
| 11 | FNDBSchwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF · US Total Market | Whole market | +13.1% | 15.1% | 0.90 | −38.1% | +285% | 0.91 | 0.25% |
| 12 | FVALFidelity Value Factor ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Same or nearby category | +12.6% | 16.4% | 0.81 | −37.3% | +290% | 0.93 | 0.15% |
| 13 | ROUSHartford Multifactor US Equity ETF · US Multifactor Equity | Same or nearby category | +12.2% | 14.4% | 0.88 | −35.5% | +240% | 0.94 | 0.19% |
| 14 | DJDInvesco Dow Jones Industrial Average Dividend ETF · High Dividend Yield | Same or nearby category | +12.5% | 13.3% | 0.95 | −34.7% | +233% | 0.76 | 0.07% |
| 15 | FYLDCambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF · International Dividend Equity | Whole market | +13.1% | 16.0% | 0.86 | −44.6% | +203% | 0.62 | 0.59% |
| 16 | DIVIFranklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF · International Dividend Equity | Whole market | +13.3% | 15.5% | 0.89 | −27.7% | +182% | 0.78 | 0.09% |
| 17 | FNDFSchwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF · International Large-Cap Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 16.3% | 0.87 | −40.2% | +193% | 0.74 | 0.25% |
| 18 | VYMIVanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF · International Dividend Equity | Whole market | +13.2% | 14.8% | 0.92 | −40.0% | +174% | 0.70 | 0.07% |
| 19 | DBEFXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +12.9% | 13.8% | 0.95 | −32.5% | +204% | 0.86 | 0.35% |
| 20 | IDViShares International Select Dividend ETF · International Dividend Equity | Whole market | +12.7% | 15.5% | 0.85 | −42.5% | +159% | 0.60 | 0.50% |
| 21 | EMLPFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund · Energy Infrastructure | Whole market | +15.2% | 14.5% | 1.06 | −43.6% | +155% | 0.63 | 0.95% |
| 22 | GCOWPacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF · Global Equity | Whole market | +14.4% | 13.6% | 1.06 | −37.6% | +170% | 0.55 | 0.60% |
| 23 | FDVVFidelity High Dividend ETF · High Dividend Yield | Same or nearby category | +13.4% | 14.6% | 0.94 | −40.2% | +255% | 0.89 | 0.15% |
| 24 | FTGCFirst Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund · Broad Commodities | Whole market | +13.1% | 15.6% | 0.87 | −35.9% | +135% | 0.12 | 0.98% |
| 25 | HDEFXtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF · International Dividend Equity | Whole market | +12.9% | 14.2% | 0.93 | −36.4% | +135% | 0.62 | 0.09% |
| 26 | DDWMWisdomTree Dynamic International Equity Fund · International Dividend Equity | Whole market | +12.2% | 13.4% | 0.93 | −35.0% | +148% | 0.75 | 0.40% |
| 27 | FLQLFranklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF · US Multifactor Equity | Same or nearby category | +13.4% | 16.3% | 0.85 | −33.6% | — | 0.97 | 0.15% |
| 28 | DHSWisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Fund · High Dividend Yield | Same or nearby category | +12.4% | 13.9% | 0.91 | −37.4% | +159% | 0.63 | 0.38% |
| 29 | USPXFranklin U.S. Equity Index ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Same or nearby category | +12.3% | 16.3% | 0.80 | −31.2% | +223% | 0.95 | 0.03% |
| 30 | AUSFGlobal X - Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF · US Multifactor Equity | Same or nearby category | +13.6% | 13.6% | 1.01 | −44.2% | — | 0.75 | 0.27% |
| 31 | QDEFNorthern Trust Quality Dividend Defensive ETF · US Dividend Equity | Same or nearby category | +12.6% | 13.7% | 0.94 | −35.7% | +228% | 0.95 | 0.40% |
| 32 | DGTState Street SPDR Global Dow ETF · Global Equity | Whole market | +13.9% | 15.1% | 0.95 | −34.4% | +260% | 0.86 | 0.50% |
QUAL against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against QUAL, compared period by period and year by year.
How do QUAL's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at QUAL, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Eight of the 18 popular alternatives, led by JQUA, LRGF and DGRW, were both more rewarding and calmer than QUAL over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, QUAL returned 11.2% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.5%, with higher volatility (17.3% against 17.2%).
Green points earned more than QUAL with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | +18.1% | 20.9% |
| DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | +14.3% | 17.5% |
| JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | +13.5% | 15.7% |
| LRGF iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF | +13.4% | 17.1% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.5% | 17.2% |
| DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | +11.7% | 14.0% |
| SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | +11.7% | 16.7% |
| IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | +11.5% | 14.7% |
| QDF Northern Trust Quality Dividend ETF | +11.5% | 15.6% |
| GSLC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | +11.4% | 16.7% |
| FQAL Fidelity Quality Factor ETF | +11.3% | 16.2% |
| IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | +11.2% | 21.8% |
| QUAL This pageiShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF | +11.2% | 17.3% |
| QUS State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | +11.1% | 14.2% |
| VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | +10.4% | 14.1% |
| MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | +10.3% | 22.2% |
| XMHQ Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF | +9.6% | 20.5% |
| OUSA ALPS Funds O’Shares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF | +9.5% | 13.4% |
| OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | +8.9% | 16.4% |
| USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | +7.7% | 12.3% |
Has QUAL consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares QUAL with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than QUAL helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Two of the 20 popular alternatives, IWD and JQUA, outperformed QUAL in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- SPMO, JQUA and DGRW earned more for the risk they took than QUAL (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
- SPY outperformed QUAL over all three long-term periods but in none of the five short-term ones, so QUAL has had the better of it lately.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than QUAL over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (this page) | — | +0.7% | +3.5% | +8.8% | +13.4% | +16.3% | +76.1% | +69.8% | +290% | 17.3% | 0.70 | −34.1% | 0.15% | $48B | — |
| IWD QualifiediShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | 5/5 short2/3 long | +2.5% | +5.0% | +15.1% | +23.4% | +28.8% | +86.8% | +72.4% | +207% | 14.7% | 0.82 | −38.5% | 0.18% | $84B | 76% |
| JQUA QualifiedJPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 5/5 short2/3 long | +2.1% | +6.6% | +16.0% | +21.6% | +22.8% | +85.6% | +88.7% | — | 15.7% | 0.89 | −32.9% | 0.12% | $9.2B | 91% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 2/5 short3/3 long | −9.4% | −7.3% | +7.9% | +16.7% | +17.2% | +149% | +130% | +485% | 20.9% | 0.91 | −30.9% | 0.13% | $22B | 80% |
| SPY Broad MarketState Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 0/5 short3/3 long | −1.2% | +2.5% | +8.0% | +12.7% | +15.6% | +88.4% | +80.3% | +316% | 17.2% | 0.78 | −33.7% | 0.09% | $823B | 98% |
| MTUM Broad MarketiShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 1/5 short2/3 long | −9.2% | −8.0% | +4.9% | +14.6% | +15.8% | +113% | +63.6% | +322% | 22.2% | 0.56 | −34.1% | 0.15% | $19B | 77% |
| IWF Broad MarketiShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0/5 short2/3 long | −5.2% | −0.6% | +0.5% | +2.1% | +2.9% | +83.6% | +70.3% | +402% | 21.8% | 0.60 | −32.7% | 0.18% | $125B | 76% |
| LRGF Broad MarketiShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF | 0/5 short2/3 long | −1.2% | +2.7% | +9.0% | +13.0% | +14.7% | +90.6% | +87.6% | +270% | 17.1% | 0.83 | −36.0% | 0.08% | $3.7B | 98% |
| DYNF Broad MarketiShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | 0/5 short2/3 long | −2.6% | +1.1% | +7.6% | +13.0% | +16.8% | +104% | +95.5% | — | 17.5% | 0.86 | −34.7% | 0.26% | $42B | 92% |
| ROE Broad MarketAstoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF | 3/5 short1/3 long | −0.4% | +2.5% | +10.8% | +21.0% | +27.0% | +96.3% | — | — | — | — | −19.1% | 0.49% | $255M | 97% |
| SPHQ Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 0/5 short1/3 long | −1.3% | −1.3% | +5.0% | +12.1% | +14.7% | +75.0% | +73.7% | +295% | 16.7% | 0.75 | −31.6% | 0.20% | $19B | 79% |
| GSLC Broad MarketGoldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 0/5 short1/3 long | −0.6% | +3.1% | +7.8% | +11.3% | +13.9% | +82.8% | +71.7% | +293% | 16.7% | 0.73 | −33.7% | 0.09% | $15B | 96% |
| FQAL Broad MarketFidelity Quality Factor ETF | 0/5 short1/3 long | +0.2% | +3.7% | +9.2% | +12.9% | +15.6% | +80.7% | +71.2% | +288% | 16.2% | 0.75 | −33.7% | 0.15% | $1.4B | 95% |
| DGRW Dividend & IncomeWisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 0/5 short1/3 long | +0.3% | +3.5% | +6.0% | +11.4% | +12.7% | +65.3% | +74.0% | +271% | 14.0% | 0.87 | −32.0% | 0.28% | $17B | 89% |
| QDF Dividend & IncomeNorthern Trust Quality Dividend ETF | 0/5 short1/3 long | −0.4% | +0.8% | +7.9% | +13.2% | +16.8% | +75.5% | +72.3% | +213% | 15.6% | 0.78 | −36.7% | 0.40% | $2.2B | 93% |
| QUS Broad MarketState Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 4/5 short0/3 long | +2.5% | +5.6% | +10.2% | +14.0% | +16.7% | +73.5% | +69.3% | +276% | 14.2% | 0.81 | −33.8% | 0.15% | $1.6B | 86% |
| OMFL Broad MarketInvesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 4/5 short0/3 long | +1.1% | +4.1% | +9.9% | +16.2% | +19.6% | +67.0% | +53.0% | — | 16.4% | 0.60 | −33.2% | 0.29% | $4.8B | 91% |
| OUSA Dividend & IncomeALPS Funds O’Shares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF | 3/5 short0/3 long | +4.8% | +7.1% | +11.2% | +11.6% | +14.0% | +60.2% | +57.2% | +189% | 13.4% | 0.75 | −33.1% | 0.48% | $728M | 80% |
| USMV Broad MarketiShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 3/5 short0/3 long | +4.7% | +7.9% | +10.7% | +11.7% | +10.9% | +52.3% | +44.8% | +179% | 12.3% | 0.66 | −33.1% | 0.15% | $24B | 82% |
| VIG Dividend & IncomeVanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 1/5 short0/3 long | +3.4% | +3.6% | +8.8% | +12.5% | +15.2% | +69.2% | +63.9% | +258% | 14.1% | 0.77 | −31.7% | 0.04% | $128B | 73% |
| XMHQ Broad MarketInvesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF | 1/5 short0/3 long | +1.9% | +3.8% | +7.5% | +12.3% | +13.1% | +61.4% | +57.8% | +241% | 20.5% | 0.55 | −36.9% | 0.30% | $5.4B | 65% |
How did QUAL do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2014, along with where QUAL ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with QUAL and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
Note: QUAL began trading on July 18, 2013, so the table starts with 2014, its first full calendar year, and cannot show how it fared during the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs.
- QUAL finished ahead of the S&P 500 in three of its 12 full calendar years, and behind it in each of the last two.
- Among its popular alternatives, OMFL came out ahead of QUAL most often, in six of the eight years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, QUAL finished in the top quarter in two of 12 years and in the bottom quarter in two. In 2025, it ranked 15 of 20.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of QUAL; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places QUAL among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of QUAL | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QUAL This pageiShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF | — | +12.7% | +22.3% | +30.9% | −20.5% | +26.9% | +17.0% | +33.9% | −5.7% | +22.3% | +9.2% | +5.4% | +11.7% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 2 of 12 | 15 of 20 | 8 of 20 | 3 of 19 | 18 of 19 | 7 of 19 | 8 of 19 | 3 of 18 | 13 of 18 | 7 of 16 | 11 of 15 | 4 of 10 | 9 of 10 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 8 of 12 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% |
| IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | 4 of 12 | +15.7% | +14.2% | +11.3% | −7.7% | +24.9% | +2.7% | +26.1% | −8.4% | +13.4% | +17.3% | −4.0% | +13.2% |
| JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 3 of 8 | +11.7% | +21.2% | +25.1% | −13.4% | +28.7% | +16.6% | +28.5% | −2.9% | — | — | — | — |
| SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 6 of 10 | +26.6% | +45.8% | +17.6% | −10.4% | +22.7% | +28.2% | +25.9% | −0.9% | +27.8% | +7.4% | — | — |
| MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 8 of 12 | +22.1% | +32.9% | +9.2% | −18.3% | +13.4% | +29.8% | +27.3% | −1.7% | +37.5% | +5.0% | +8.9% | +14.6% |
| IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 8 of 12 | +18.3% | +33.1% | +42.6% | −29.3% | +27.4% | +38.3% | +35.9% | −1.7% | +29.9% | +7.0% | +5.5% | +12.7% |
| LRGF iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF | 4 of 10 | +16.5% | +26.6% | +25.8% | −14.8% | +25.0% | +11.1% | +26.1% | −9.6% | +21.2% | +12.9% | — | — |
| DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | 3 of 6 | +20.0% | +30.3% | +36.2% | −20.3% | +24.9% | +13.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ROE Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF | 1 of 2 | +17.2% | +18.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 6 of 12 | +13.3% | +25.4% | +24.8% | −15.8% | +28.0% | +17.4% | +33.6% | −7.0% | +19.1% | +14.3% | +1.7% | +16.1% |
| GSLC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 5 of 10 | +16.2% | +24.2% | +25.1% | −18.7% | +27.2% | +19.0% | +30.7% | −4.1% | +22.5% | +8.7% | — | — |
| FQAL Fidelity Quality Factor ETF | 5 of 9 | +16.9% | +21.9% | +24.2% | −19.7% | +32.1% | +16.2% | +28.1% | −4.4% | +23.0% | — | — | — |
| DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 4 of 12 | +12.2% | +16.8% | +18.7% | −6.3% | +24.5% | +13.8% | +29.5% | −5.4% | +25.7% | +12.2% | −0.3% | +13.8% |
| QDF Northern Trust Quality Dividend ETF | 3 of 12 | +16.6% | +17.0% | +19.7% | −12.1% | +26.7% | +4.9% | +25.7% | −8.0% | +17.4% | +17.0% | −0.9% | +11.8% |
| QUS State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 4 of 10 | +14.1% | +19.0% | +21.8% | −14.1% | +26.7% | +12.4% | +32.4% | −3.6% | +21.7% | +9.7% | — | — |
| OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 6 of 8 | +13.6% | +6.8% | +21.6% | −14.0% | +28.9% | +20.9% | +35.6% | −2.6% | — | — | — | — |
| OUSA ALPS Funds O’Shares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF | 3 of 10 | +10.2% | +17.1% | +13.4% | −9.3% | +23.7% | +7.0% | +24.8% | −3.1% | +18.8% | +12.3% | — | — |
| USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 4 of 12 | +7.6% | +15.7% | +10.3% | −9.4% | +20.8% | +5.7% | +27.7% | +1.4% | +18.9% | +10.6% | +5.5% | +16.3% |
| VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 4 of 12 | +14.2% | +17.0% | +14.5% | −9.8% | +23.8% | +15.4% | +29.6% | −2.1% | +22.2% | +12.0% | −1.9% | +10.1% |
| XMHQ Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF | 4 of 12 | +4.7% | +16.8% | +29.5% | −12.4% | +21.0% | +26.6% | +27.2% | −9.1% | +15.7% | +16.1% | −6.5% | +13.1% |
Risk and diversification
How QUAL has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were QUAL's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents QUAL's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2013, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
Note: QUAL began trading on July 18, 2013, so this list cannot include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs. The crash tests on this page show how older funds and the S&P 500 fared through those years.
- In four of QUAL's five worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- The longest climb back to a previous high took 14 months, after QUAL fell 28.2% from December 2021 to October 2022.
Green means QUAL fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | QUAL fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Covid crash | −34.1% | −33.7% | Feb 2020 | Mar 2020 | 1 month | Aug 2020 | 5 months |
| 2022 bear market | −28.2% | −24.2% | Dec 2021 | Oct 2022 | 10 months | Dec 2023 | 14 months |
| Late-2018 sell-off | −20.5% | −19.3% | Sep 2018 | Dec 2018 | 3 months | Apr 2019 | 4 months |
| No named crash | −18.0% | −17.8% | Dec 2024 | Apr 2025 | 4 months | Jul 2025 | 3 months |
| 2015 China and oil sell-off | −11.5% | −11.9% | Jul 2015 | Aug 2015 | 1 month | Oct 2015 | 2 months |
How did QUAL do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far QUAL, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: QUAL began trading on July 18, 2013, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- Among its popular alternatives, OUSA held up best, falling less than QUAL in five of the six crashes they both traded through.
- QUAL began trading after the 2008 financial crisis, but five of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was VIG's 46.8%, against 55.2% for the S&P 500.
- QUAL fell further than the S&P 500 in two of the six crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when QUAL fell 27.5% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than QUAL.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QUAL This pageiShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF | — | −3.3% | −27.5% | −34.1% | −20.5% | −6.1% | −11.2% | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 2 of 6 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | 2 of 6 | −4.6% | −19.0% | −38.4% | −18.0% | −6.4% | −14.3% | −19.5% | −1.6% | −59.9% | — |
| JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 3 of 5 | −3.2% | −21.8% | −32.9% | −17.1% | −8.4% | — | — | — | — | — |
| SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 3 of 5 | −2.4% | −22.7% | −30.9% | −23.4% | −6.7% | — | — | — | — | — |
| MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 0 of 6 | −3.0% | −27.9% | −34.1% | −22.1% | −6.4% | −13.0% | — | — | — | — |
| IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 1 of 6 | −3.4% | −31.2% | −31.5% | −21.9% | −6.4% | −13.4% | −18.2% | −2.0% | −51.2% | — |
| LRGF iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF | 1 of 6 | −4.1% | −21.6% | −36.0% | −21.3% | −6.2% | −15.2% | — | — | — | — |
| DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | 1 of 3 | −3.6% | −26.0% | −34.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 4 of 6 | −2.5% | −25.0% | −31.5% | −20.8% | −6.3% | −8.5% | −15.3% | −3.2% | −57.8% | — |
| GSLC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 2 of 5 | −3.4% | −24.6% | −33.7% | −19.6% | −6.1% | — | — | — | — | — |
| FQAL Fidelity Quality Factor ETF | 2 of 5 | −3.8% | −24.8% | −33.7% | −18.6% | −5.9% | — | — | — | — | — |
| DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 3 of 6 | −3.2% | −17.3% | −31.9% | −18.6% | −6.6% | −11.8% | — | — | — | — |
| QDF Northern Trust Quality Dividend ETF | 2 of 6 | −3.6% | −22.1% | −36.1% | −19.9% | −6.2% | −12.0% | — | — | — | — |
| QUS State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 2 of 6 | −3.0% | −22.1% | −33.8% | −17.4% | −6.4% | −11.5% | — | — | — | — |
| OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 4 of 5 | −2.2% | −21.5% | −32.8% | −18.2% | −6.1% | — | — | — | — | — |
| OUSA ALPS Funds O’Shares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF | 5 of 6 | −2.3% | −19.0% | −32.6% | −13.3% | −6.2% | −9.9% | — | — | — | — |
| USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 5 of 6 | −2.2% | −17.0% | −33.0% | −12.7% | −6.2% | −9.5% | — | — | — | — |
| VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 4 of 6 | −3.1% | −20.4% | −31.6% | −17.3% | −6.3% | −10.1% | −15.6% | −1.4% | −46.8% | — |
| XMHQ Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF | 1 of 6 | −6.1% | −23.4% | −36.9% | −21.8% | −6.3% | −18.7% | −21.3% | 0.0% | −57.3% | — |
How closely does QUAL move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares QUAL with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Nine of the 15 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than QUAL's 0.96, led by SPMO, MTUM and IWF.
- SPMO took just 76% of the S&P 500's losses, against 102% for QUAL, while still keeping 102% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, QUAL captured 98% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 102% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.00. Its share of the market's losses was slightly larger than its share of the gains.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than QUAL's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QUAL This pageiShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF | 98% | 102% | 0.96 | 1.00 |
| SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 102% | 76% | 1.35 | 0.99 |
| MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 94% | 81% | 1.16 | 0.99 |
| IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 110% | 104% | 1.06 | 1.10 |
| SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 91% | 87% | 1.05 | 0.91 |
| FQAL Fidelity Quality Factor ETF | 95% | 96% | 0.99 | 0.96 |
| DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 91% | 93% | 0.99 | 0.88 |
| QUS State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 90% | 90% | 0.99 | 0.88 |
| VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 85% | 86% | 0.99 | 0.84 |
| GSLC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 97% | 99% | 0.98 | 0.98 |
| LRGF iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF | 95% | 99% | 0.96 | 0.99 |
| USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 70% | 75% | 0.94 | 0.70 |
| XMHQ Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF | 94% | 105% | 0.90 | 1.01 |
| QDF Northern Trust Quality Dividend ETF | 91% | 103% | 0.89 | 0.96 |
| IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | 87% | 99% | 0.88 | 0.93 |
| OUSA ALPS Funds O’Shares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF | 80% | 91% | 0.88 | 0.79 |
What diversifies QUAL?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with QUAL's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing QUAL with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in QUAL into DBMF would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 23% over the past 5 years while keeping its annual return (+12.3% for QUAL alone, +12.3% for the mix).
- PBR made money in two of the two calendar years in which QUAL lost money.
- Among large ETFs, XLE, GLD and AMLP have moved largely independently of QUAL over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.45 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which QUAL lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% QUAL and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2018 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (this page) | 1.00 | +69.8% | 0.70 | −20.5% | −5.7% | 16.0% | +12.3% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.28 | +178% | 0.94 | +64.4% | −18.2% | 15.1% | +15.0% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.18 | +120% | 0.93 | −0.8% | −1.9% | 13.9% | +13.9% |
| AMLP EnergyAlerian MLP ETF | 0.45 | +114% | 0.90 | +25.5% | −12.6% | 14.8% | +13.8% |
| DBA AlternativesInvesco DB Agriculture Fund | 0.17 | +66.7% | 0.81 | +2.5% | −8.7% | 13.4% | +12.3% |
| DBMF AlternativesiMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | -0.28 | +57.5% | 0.80 | +21.6% | — | 12.3% | +12.3% |
| USO CommoditiesUnited States Oil Fund, LP | -0.06 | +180% | 0.74 | +29.0% | −19.6% | 14.5% | +15.7% |
| GDX MaterialsVanEck Gold Miners ETF | 0.31 | +165% | 0.70 | −9.0% | −8.8% | 16.8% | +16.1% |
| FLSP AlternativesFranklin Systematic Style Premia ETF | 0.10 | +51.1% | 0.69 | +0.5% | — | 13.1% | +11.8% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2018 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (this page) | 1.00 | +69.8% | 0.70 | −20.5% | −5.7% | 16.0% | +12.3% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.32 | +471% | 1.54 | +54.1% | −24.5% | 15.3% | +17.6% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.47 | +2,780% | 1.43 | +1.3% | −16.3% | 21.1% | +30.0% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.21 | +397% | 1.41 | +51.8% | −28.4% | 14.7% | +17.1% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.26 | +660% | 1.39 | +86.6% | −8.2% | 15.8% | +19.7% |
| PBR Oil & Gas IntegratedPetróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras | 0.10 | +721% | 1.32 | +55.4% | +27.7% | 15.5% | +19.6% |
Common questions
What was QUAL's worst drawdown?
QUAL's deepest decline since it began trading in 2013 was 34.1%, from February to March 2020. It took five months from the low to climb back to its old high. Because QUAL launched in July 2013, that record does not include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs.
What were QUAL's best and worst years?
Over 12 full calendar years, QUAL's best year was 2019, when it returned 33.9%. Its worst was 2022, with a return of -20.5%.
Is there a better investment than QUAL?
Among QUAL's popular alternatives, JQUA earned more than QUAL with less volatility over the past 5 years: 13.5% a year at 15.7% volatility, against 11.2% a year at 17.3%. GSLC tracks the same thing for 0.09% a year against QUAL's 0.15%, and has kept pace over the past decade: about $60 less in fees on $10,000 over 10 years.
Is QUAL more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. QUAL's volatility over the past 5 years was 17.3%, 1.0 times the S&P 500's 17.2%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, QUAL's return lands within 17.3% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is QUAL's Sharpe ratio?
QUAL's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.70, against 0.78 for the S&P 500, so QUAL earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is QUAL with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, QUAL's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.98 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They move almost in lockstep, so holding both adds little diversification. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against QUAL instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a QUAL holding.
What are the best alternatives to QUAL?
Of the 20 popular alternatives we compared, two outperformed QUAL in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: IWD and JQUA.
Did QUAL outperform the S&P 500?
QUAL finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in three of 12 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +12.6%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did QUAL do in stock market crashes?
QUAL fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in one of the six major crashes it has traded through, and further in two. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when QUAL fell 27.5% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
What diversifies QUAL?
These had a low correlation with QUAL over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, XLE (correlation 0.28), GLD (correlation 0.18) and AMLP (correlation 0.45); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.32), CLS (correlation 0.47) and MCK (correlation 0.21). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than QUAL's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of QUAL's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to QUAL
IWDiShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
SPYState Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
IWFiShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
DYNFiShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
VIGVanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF