Relative Intelligence · Entertainment

How Live Nation Entertainment (LYV) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on LYV alone. It places LYV (Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.) against 17 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where LYV stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: LYV's full trading record, from December 2005 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 22, 2026.
Data as of October 22, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
This page answers the following questions about LYV
Key findings
Not AI-generatedThese key findings are generated by our proprietary relative intelligence engine, directly from the data on this page.
- Right nowAfter a 27.8% loss from September 2025 to November 2025, LYV has bounced 28.3% off the low. Its entertainment peers were far apart over the past 6 months, from CNK (Cinemark, up 39.7%) to FWONA (Formula One Group, up 3.2%). Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?LYV fell 1.9% over the past 3 months, in line with the entertainment ETF XLC (State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR ETF), which fell 1.3%. The S&P 500 rose 2.5%. Its entertainment peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: CNK (Cinemark) rose 23.1%, while SPHR (Sphere Entertainment) fell 19.3%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsLYV has trailed the market, rising 11.8% over the past year against 15.6% for the S&P 500 and 16.9% for the Nasdaq 100. By year ↓
- Long termOver the past decade, LYV returned 20.3% a year against 15.3% a year for the S&P 500 (537% in total against 316%). That said, the past 5 years only trailed the S&P 500 (73.2% against 80.3%), after a much stronger decade (537% against 316%). Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross six sell-offs, LYV has typically fallen 1.7 times as far as the S&P 500. In the Covid crash, LYV fell 61.2%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. That was more than DIS (Walt Disney, 39.3%) but less than CNK (Cinemark, 79.6%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationLYV is some diversification, but not a hedge: a correlation of 0.60 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.63 with the total US market, more closely than 90% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- MSGS (Madison Square Garden Sports), BATRA (Atlanta Braves) and TKO earned more than LYV with less volatility over the past 5 years. MSGS returned 17.5% a year at 25.7% volatility, against 11.6% a year at 34.5%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- RHP (Ryman Hospitality Properties, live entertainment theme) and MCRI (Monarch Casino & Resort, casinos) earned more than LYV with less volatility over the past 5 years. RHP returned 13.1% a year at 29.9% volatility, against 11.6% a year at 34.5%.
- Whole market
- 427 of the 3,641 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than LYV with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL (Apple), GOOG (Alphabet) and BRK-A (Berkshire Hathaway).
How much would $10,000 in LYV have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in LYV over the past 19 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of LYV over the same span and LYV's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: The chart covers the past 19 years rather than LYV's full 20 years, because most of its popular alternatives have not traded that long.
- $10,000 invested in LYV at the end of September 2007 would have grown to $79,675 by September 2026, more than the $70,725 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of LYV, and BKNG finished highest, at $469,495.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2007 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 409 of the 1,801 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of LYV; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- BKNG$469,495+4,595% total · +22.5% a year
- TKO$238,367+2,284% total · +18.2% a year
- FAST$135,334+1,253% total · +14.7% a year
- IMAX$130,478+1,205% total · +14.5% a year
- DE$129,896+1,199% total · +14.4% a year
- LYV$79,675+697% total · +11.5% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$70,725+607% total · +10.8% a year
- DIS$37,503+275% total · +7.2% a year
- CNK$34,031+240% total · +6.7% a year
- SONY$28,488+185% total · +5.7% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 959 of the 3,630 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of LYV; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- SPHR$40,047+300% total · +32.0% a year
- TKO$34,410+244% total · +28.0% a year
- IMAX$28,873+189% total · +23.6% a year
- MSGS$22,813+128% total · +17.9% a year
- BATRA$21,767+118% total · +16.8% a year
- SPOT$21,629+116% total · +16.7% a year
- BATRK$20,038+100% total · +14.9% a year
- CNK$19,830+98.3% total · +14.7% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- LYV$18,578+85.8% total · +13.2% a year
LYV at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
Note: LYV began trading on December 21, 2005, so every figure here, including its worst decline, covers only the time since then. None of them reflect the dot-com bust.
- LYV's deepest decline since it began trading in 2005 was 89.9%, from February 2007 to March 2009. It took about five years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 20 full calendar years, LYV's best was 2013, when it returned 112%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 60.5%. It lost money in five of those years.
- LYV is 7.4% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $41B
- Industry
- Entertainment
- Price history from
- December 2005
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +11.8%total return
- Past 3 years
- +121%+30.3% a year
- Past 5 years
- +73.2%+11.6% a year
- Past 10 years
- +537%+20.3% a year
- Best calendar year
- +112%2013
- Worst calendar year
- −60.5%2008
- Losing years
- 5 of 20full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 34.5%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.49return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −89.9%Feb 2007 to Mar 2009
- From its all-time high
- −7.4%below the peak
LYV against the whole market
Where LYV ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does LYV rank among all stocks?
This section ranks LYV on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how LYV stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- LYV's 10-year return ranks in the top 12% of the 2,201 stocks worth at least $300 million with 10 years of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | LYV | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +11.8% | 1,564 of 3,282 | top 48% |
| 3-year return | +121% | 774 of 3,016 | top 26% |
| 5-year return | +73.2% | 882 of 2,897 | top 30% |
| 10-year return | +537% | 270 of 2,201 | top 12% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 34.5% | 1,110 of 2,897 | top 38% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.49 | 969 of 2,897 | top 33% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −61.2% | 930 of 2,184 | top 43% |
What has beaten LYV on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). LYV sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than LYV with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 268 stocks and 159 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than LYV over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 12% of the 3,641 screened.
- Among those with at least half LYV's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 41.7% a year at 24.7% volatility, 28% less than LYV's 34.5%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.54 against 0.49 for LYV. HWM earned the most, 45.1% a year, while still swinging less than LYV (32.7% against 34.5%).
- Among LYV's popular alternatives, TKO, MSGS and BATRA are in the region. TKO earned 26.1% a year against 11.6% a year for LYV, at 32.7% volatility, 5% less than LYV's 34.5%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to LYV; faint dots are 93 more of the 427 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,641 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than LYV?
Investments that beat LYV over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among LYV's popular alternatives, MSGS, BATRA and TKO earned more than LYV with less volatility over the past 5 years. MSGS returned 17.5% a year at 25.7% volatility, against 11.6% a year at 34.5%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, RHP (live entertainment theme) and MCRI (casinos) earned more than LYV with less volatility over the past 5 years. RHP returned 13.1% a year at 29.9% volatility, against 11.6% a year at 34.5%.
- Across the whole market, 427 of the 3,641 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than LYV with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL, GOOG and BRK-A.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat LYV over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks LYV's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than LYV follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than LYV's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× LYV's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than LYV's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with LYV?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +11.6% | 34.5% | 0.49 | −61.2% | +537% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.5% | 17.2% | 0.78 | −33.7% | +316% | 0.60 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against LYV. 8 of 17 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
MSGSMadison Square Garden Sports Corp. · Entertainment | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +17.5% | 25.7% | 0.76 | −41.6% | +395% | 0.23 | — | |
BATRAAtlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. · Entertainment | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +13.8% | 21.8% | 0.71 | −54.2% | +216% | 0.30 | — | |
BATRKAtlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. · Entertainment | Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +12.1% | 22.4% | 0.63 | −54.9% | +188% | 0.34 | — | |
TKOTKO Group Holdings, Inc. · Entertainment | Higher return, lower volatility | +26.1% | 32.7% | 0.88 | −69.1% | +917% | 0.35 | — | |
CNKCinemark Holdings, Inc. · Entertainment | Higher return in most periods | +14.6% | 42.3% | 0.54 | −83.8% | +14.4% | 0.23 | — | |
IMAXIMAX Corporation · Entertainment | Higher return in most periods | +19.1% | 40.0% | 0.64 | −79.4% | +68.7% | 0.07 | — | |
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 3 shownEverything else in Entertainment and the categories next to it (Streaming Media, Video Games, Gambling, Media), plus LYV's specific themes. 3 of 60 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
RHPRyman Hospitality Properties, Inc. · Hotel REITs · Live Entertainment theme | Higher return, lower volatility | +13.1% | 29.9% | 0.56 | −84.6% | +273% | 0.56 | — | |
MCRIMonarch Casino & Resort, Inc. · Casinos | Higher return, lower volatility | +13.7% | 31.5% | 0.56 | −75.1% | +429% | 0.46 | — | |
GRVYGravity Co., Ltd. · Video Games | Smaller losses in recent crashes | −7.9% | 41.9% | 0.01 | −83.2% | +2,466% | 0.27 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 876 of 3,572 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +15.1% | 29.9% | 0.62 | −37.9% | +764% | 0.38 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +17.5% | 18.2% | 0.98 | −40.0% | +361% | 0.39 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +16.2% | 24.6% | 0.74 | −30.7% | +582% | 0.51 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +14.8% | 31.6% | 0.59 | −54.6% | +678% | 0.40 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +41.7% | 24.7% | 1.54 | −46.1% | +345% | 0.22 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +41.2% | 32.8% | 1.22 | −34.5% | +1,870% | 0.01 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +18.1% | 26.1% | 0.77 | −35.1% | +753% | 0.54 | 0.09% | ||
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +11.4% | 17.5% | 0.71 | −35.0% | +298% | 0.63 | 0.03% | ||
What these numbers mean for LYV
- Annual return
- LYV returned 11.6% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.5% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $17,300. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- LYV's volatility over the past 5 years was 34.5%, about twice the S&P 500's 17.2%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, LYV's return lands within 34.5% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- LYV's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.49, against 0.78 for the S&P 500, so LYV earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- LYV's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 61.2%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 61.2% fall takes a 158% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, LYV's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.60 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against LYV instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a LYV holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 427 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than LYV with less volatility
Out of 3,641 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with LYV | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +15.1% | 29.9% | 0.62 | −37.9% | +764% | 0.38 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +17.5% | 18.2% | 0.98 | −40.0% | +361% | 0.39 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +16.2% | 24.6% | 0.74 | −30.7% | +582% | 0.51 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +14.8% | 31.6% | 0.59 | −54.6% | +678% | 0.40 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +41.7% | 24.7% | 1.54 | −46.1% | +345% | 0.22 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +19.1% | 28.0% | 0.77 | −38.5% | +1,194% | 0.39 | — | |
| 7 | Whole market | +21.1% | 22.6% | 0.97 | −25.7% | +521% | 0.30 | — | |
| 8 | Whole market | +25.5% | 23.4% | 1.09 | −45.1% | +600% | 0.09 | — | |
| 9 | Whole market | +33.5% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −54.9% | +485% | 0.26 | — | |
| 10 | Whole market | +21.3% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +240% | 0.17 | — | |
| 11 | Whole market | +37.8% | 25.1% | 1.41 | −38.1% | +582% | 0.26 | — | |
| 12 | Whole market | +16.5% | 20.0% | 0.87 | −42.0% | +319% | 0.40 | — | |
| 13 | Whole market | +33.9% | 30.6% | 1.11 | −45.7% | +343% | 0.28 | — | |
| 14 | Whole market | +18.1% | 26.1% | 0.77 | −35.1% | +753% | 0.54 | 0.09% | |
| 15 | Whole market | +34.0% | 29.4% | 1.15 | −47.6% | +470% | 0.20 | — | |
| 16 | Whole market | +19.4% | 22.0% | 0.92 | −56.1% | +110% | 0.04 | — | |
| 17 | Whole market | +21.8% | 25.7% | 0.90 | −30.3% | +849% | 0.14 | — | |
| 18 | Whole market | +23.9% | 29.1% | 0.89 | −41.6% | +580% | 0.14 | — | |
| 19 | Whole market | +18.3% | 21.4% | 0.90 | −53.7% | +133% | 0.28 | — | |
| 20 | Whole market | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +360% | 0.24 | — | |
| 21 | Whole market | +14.0% | 21.4% | 0.72 | −51.0% | +304% | 0.54 | — | |
| 22 | Whole market | +26.7% | 24.9% | 1.08 | −41.6% | +670% | 0.51 | — | |
| 23 | Whole market | +13.2% | 20.0% | 0.73 | −46.9% | +191% | 0.59 | — | |
| 24 | Whole market | +20.1% | 22.3% | 0.94 | −55.1% | +159% | 0.32 | — | |
| 25 | Whole market | +17.1% | 23.1% | 0.80 | −48.4% | +834% | 0.41 | — | |
| 26 | Whole market | +20.7% | 26.8% | 0.84 | −50.8% | +693% | 0.55 | — | |
| 27 | Whole market | +16.4% | 29.2% | 0.67 | −46.4% | +407% | 0.53 | — | |
| 28 | Whole market | +17.9% | 26.2% | 0.76 | −41.4% | +377% | 0.01 | — | |
| 29 | Whole market | +18.3% | 25.4% | 0.79 | −42.5% | +286% | 0.41 | — | |
| 30 | RSReliance Steel & Aluminum Co. · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +24.8% | 28.1% | 0.94 | −40.8% | +639% | 0.49 | — |
| 31 | RPRXRoyalty Pharma plc · Pharmaceuticals | Whole market | +13.8% | 23.8% | 0.67 | −49.7% | — | 0.22 | — |
| 32 | FFIVF5, Inc. · Cybersecurity | Whole market | +16.7% | 30.8% | 0.66 | −54.6% | +279% | 0.56 | — |
| 33 | APGAPi Group Corporation · Engineering & Construction | Whole market | +21.9% | 32.0% | 0.78 | −49.6% | — | 0.49 | — |
| 34 | CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF · Cybersecurity | Whole market | +14.5% | 26.2% | 0.65 | −33.9% | +461% | 0.47 | 0.58% |
| 35 | EWTiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +19.8% | 24.3% | 0.87 | −38.9% | +448% | 0.41 | 0.59% |
| 36 | Whole market | +27.0% | 23.8% | 1.13 | −63.3% | +378% | 0.24 | — | |
| 37 | VLUEiShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +16.2% | 18.4% | 0.91 | −39.5% | +286% | 0.55 | 0.15% |
| 38 | AIQGlobal X - Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF · Artificial Intelligence | Whole market | +14.7% | 26.7% | 0.65 | −44.6% | — | 0.52 | 0.68% |
| 39 | NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Health Care Facilities | Whole market | +31.2% | 28.6% | 1.10 | −35.3% | +385% | 0.28 | — |
| 40 | RSPTInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF · Technology Equity | Whole market | +16.6% | 25.1% | 0.74 | −33.7% | +559% | 0.58 | 0.40% |
| 41 | Whole market | +41.8% | 31.7% | 1.27 | −90.8% | +829% | 0.39 | — | |
| 42 | Whole market | +21.4% | 27.7% | 0.84 | −40.5% | +927% | 0.34 | — | |
| 43 | GARPiShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF · US Large-Cap Growth | Whole market | +16.6% | 22.5% | 0.80 | −31.4% | — | 0.59 | 0.15% |
| 44 | NICNicolet Bankshares, Inc. · Regional Banks | Whole market | +19.7% | 30.2% | 0.75 | −44.3% | +354% | 0.42 | — |
| 45 | Whole market | +15.2% | 23.6% | 0.72 | −32.8% | +639% | 0.47 | — | |
| 46 | MSGSMadison Square Garden Sports Corp. · Entertainment | Popular alternative | +17.5% | 25.7% | 0.76 | −41.6% | +395% | 0.23 | — |
| 47 | CASYCasey's General Stores, Inc. · Convenience Stores | Whole market | +30.8% | 29.4% | 1.06 | −36.1% | +560% | 0.28 | — |
| 48 | AGMFederal Agricultural Mortgage · Mortgage Finance | Whole market | +14.1% | 30.0% | 0.59 | −53.3% | +560% | 0.44 | — |
| 49 | RBCAARepublic Bancorp, Inc. · Regional Banks | Whole market | +14.8% | 28.0% | 0.63 | −44.7% | +287% | 0.35 | — |
| 50 | Whole market | +18.5% | 32.0% | 0.69 | −44.6% | +696% | 0.21 | — | |
| 51 | THFFFirst Financial Corporation · Regional Banks | Whole market | +16.2% | 26.2% | 0.71 | −42.8% | +164% | 0.32 | — |
| 52 | TRSTTrustCo Bank Corp NY · Regional Banks | Whole market | +15.5% | 26.8% | 0.67 | −49.5% | +127% | 0.30 | — |
| 53 | ORRFOrrstown Financial Services, Inc. · Regional Banks | Whole market | +16.9% | 28.7% | 0.69 | −54.7% | +187% | 0.33 | — |
| 54 | FBIZFirst Business Financial Services, Inc. · Regional Banks | Whole market | +23.2% | 29.4% | 0.86 | −50.2% | +315% | 0.35 | — |
| 55 | RCBCRiver City Bank · Regional Banks | Whole market | +15.3% | 27.2% | 0.66 | −45.5% | +354% | 0.12 | — |
| 56 | NXTGFirst Trust Indxx NextG ETF · Technology Equity | Whole market | +16.1% | 19.1% | 0.88 | −33.6% | +323% | 0.48 | 0.70% |
| 57 | FNGSMicroSectors FANG+ ETN · US Large-Cap Equity | Whole market | +18.9% | 30.3% | 0.72 | −49.0% | — | 0.42 | 0.58% |
| 58 | Whole market | +13.5% | 17.2% | 0.83 | −30.4% | +281% | 0.32 | — | |
| 59 | Whole market | +17.3% | 24.3% | 0.78 | −43.6% | +534% | 0.41 | — | |
| 60 | Whole market | +33.1% | 32.5% | 1.05 | −73.5% | +289% | 0.04 | — | |
| 61 | Whole market | +13.5% | 18.0% | 0.80 | −27.4% | +209% | 0.10 | — | |
| 62 | Whole market | +13.2% | 22.9% | 0.66 | −36.4% | +435% | 0.41 | — | |
| 63 | Whole market | +23.3% | 24.0% | 1.00 | −57.5% | +386% | 0.31 | — | |
| 64 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · Japan Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +415% | 0.30 | 0.48% |
| 65 | Whole market | +24.3% | 31.2% | 0.86 | −74.4% | +330% | 0.08 | — | |
| 66 | Whole market | +33.7% | 32.0% | 1.07 | −77.1% | +411% | 0.19 | — | |
| 67 | Whole market | +15.2% | 16.8% | 0.93 | −37.0% | +205% | 0.06 | — | |
| 68 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Dividend Equity | Whole market | +16.9% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.29 | 0.40% |
| 69 | Whole market | +19.7% | 25.2% | 0.84 | −55.8% | +243% | 0.19 | — | |
| 70 | Whole market | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +692% | 0.51 | — | |
| 71 | Whole market | +30.7% | 32.0% | 1.00 | −43.4% | +913% | 0.39 | — | |
| 72 | Whole market | +12.7% | 23.8% | 0.62 | −41.0% | +551% | 0.39 | — | |
| 73 | Whole market | +16.9% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | +361% | 0.42 | — | |
| 74 | Whole market | +17.4% | 20.7% | 0.89 | −26.8% | +234% | 0.21 | — | |
| 75 | Whole market | +23.4% | 30.2% | 0.85 | −57.5% | +635% | 0.18 | — | |
| 76 | Whole market | +16.1% | 24.8% | 0.73 | −43.4% | +245% | -0.05 | — | |
| 77 | Whole market | +18.7% | 24.4% | 0.83 | −52.0% | +319% | 0.17 | — | |
| 78 | Whole market | +20.1% | 24.9% | 0.86 | −24.9% | +280% | -0.01 | — | |
| 79 | Whole market | +31.3% | 32.4% | 1.01 | −37.5% | +887% | 0.42 | — | |
| 80 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +202% | 0.03 | — | |
| 81 | Whole market | +19.4% | 28.6% | 0.77 | −48.8% | +524% | 0.43 | — | |
| 82 | Whole market | +16.2% | 28.9% | 0.67 | −51.3% | +630% | 0.41 | — | |
| 83 | Whole market | +20.1% | 30.2% | 0.76 | −41.1% | +163% | 0.15 | — | |
| 84 | BAPCredicorp Ltd. · Banks | Whole market | +29.7% | 30.3% | 1.01 | −59.2% | +281% | 0.38 | — |
| 85 | Whole market | +19.8% | 22.3% | 0.93 | −42.5% | +357% | 0.32 | — | |
| 86 | Whole market | +17.1% | 19.0% | 0.93 | −26.4% | +206% | 0.11 | 0.40% | |
| 87 | Whole market | +15.8% | 31.4% | 0.63 | −44.3% | +373% | 0.29 | — | |
| 88 | Whole market | +15.8% | 20.4% | 0.82 | −42.6% | +256% | 0.22 | — | |
| 89 | IHGInterContinental Hotels Group PLC · Hotels & Resorts | Whole market | +21.7% | 26.6% | 0.88 | −59.3% | +387% | 0.58 | — |
| 90 | Whole market | +26.0% | 28.9% | 0.95 | −54.7% | +755% | 0.53 | — | |
| 91 | Whole market | +19.5% | 21.6% | 0.94 | −47.3% | +409% | 0.51 | — | |
| 92 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.4% | 0.97 | −50.5% | +332% | 0.40 | — | |
| 93 | USFDUS Foods Holding Corp. · Food Distribution | Whole market | +23.3% | 29.8% | 0.85 | −77.3% | +353% | 0.45 | — |
| 94 | Whole market | +19.7% | 32.2% | 0.72 | −44.5% | +636% | 0.44 | — | |
| 95 | WFWoori Financial Group Inc. · Banks | Whole market | +25.4% | 31.6% | 0.88 | −67.2% | +268% | 0.33 | — |
| 96 | CLHClean Harbors, Inc. · Waste Management | Whole market | +22.8% | 28.6% | 0.87 | −64.5% | +603% | 0.46 | — |
| 97 | Whole market | +23.6% | 22.8% | 1.05 | −32.4% | +403% | 0.24 | — | |
| 98 | MOG-AMoog Inc. · Aerospace Components | Whole market | +35.1% | 32.1% | 1.10 | −63.7% | +540% | 0.42 | — |
| 99 | Whole market | +17.4% | 24.9% | 0.77 | −30.4% | +278% | 0.27 | — | |
| 100 | Whole market | +19.5% | 20.8% | 0.97 | −54.9% | +344% | 0.24 | — |
LYV against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against LYV, compared period by period and year by year.
How do LYV's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at LYV, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Four of the 17 popular alternatives, led by TKO, MSGS and BATRA, were both more rewarding and calmer than LYV over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, LYV returned 11.6% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.5%, with higher volatility (34.5% against 17.2%).
Green points earned more than LYV with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| SPHR Sphere Entertainment Co. | +28.3% | 52.4% |
| TKO TKO Group Holdings, Inc. | +26.1% | 32.7% |
| IMAX IMAX Corporation | +19.1% | 40.0% |
| SPOT Spotify Technology S.A. | +18.2% | 48.0% |
| MSGS Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. | +17.5% | 25.7% |
| CNK Cinemark Holdings, Inc. | +14.6% | 42.3% |
| BATRA Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. | +13.8% | 21.8% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.5% | 17.2% |
| BATRK Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. | +12.1% | 22.4% |
| LYV This pageLive Nation Entertainment, Inc. | +11.6% | 34.5% |
| BKNG Booking Holdings Inc. | +11.5% | 33.3% |
| FWONK Liberty Media Corporation | +11.4% | 27.2% |
| FWONA Formula One Group | +11.3% | 27.2% |
| SONY Sony Group Corporation | +3.6% | 29.3% |
| MSGE Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. | +2.4% | 44.9% |
| ABNB Airbnb, Inc. | +1.1% | 44.3% |
| WMG Warner Music Group Corp. | −5.8% | 34.7% |
| DIS The Walt Disney Company | −7.2% | 29.5% |
| AMC AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. | −61.9% | 102% |
Has LYV consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares LYV with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than LYV helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Three of the 17 popular alternatives, CNK, IMAX and MSGS, outperformed LYV in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- MSGS, BATRA and BATRK earned more for the risk they took than LYV (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
- TKO outperformed LYV over all three long-term periods but in none of the five short-term ones, so LYV has had the better of it lately.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than LYV over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| LYV Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (this page) | — | +2.7% | −1.9% | +12.8% | +20.1% | +11.8% | +121% | +73.2% | +537% | 34.5% | 0.49 | −61.2% | — | $41B | — |
| CNK QualifiedCinemark Holdings, Inc. | 5/5 short2/3 long | +10.4% | +23.1% | +39.7% | +69.9% | +52.5% | +160% | +98.0% | +14.4% | 42.3% | 0.54 | −83.8% | — | $4.6B | — |
| IMAX QualifiedIMAX Corporation | 4/5 short2/3 long | −2.4% | +33.1% | +44.4% | +45.2% | +63.2% | +191% | +139% | +68.7% | 40.0% | 0.64 | −79.4% | — | $2.9B | — |
| MSGS QualifiedMadison Square Garden Sports Corp. | 3/5 short2/3 long | −1.8% | −2.0% | +16.1% | +50.5% | +72.7% | +129% | +124% | +395% | 25.7% | 0.76 | −41.6% | — | $9.4B | — |
| TKO EntertainmentTKO Group Holdings, Inc. | 0/5 short3/3 long | −5.9% | −1.8% | −3.8% | −13.1% | −3.4% | +131% | +219% | +917% | 32.7% | 0.88 | −69.1% | — | $13B | — |
| SPOT Internet Content & InformationSpotify Technology S.A. | 2/5 short2/3 long | +16.4% | +23.1% | +11.6% | +1.5% | −13.6% | +278% | +131% | — | 48.0% | 0.59 | −80.5% | — | $120B | — |
| SPHR EntertainmentSphere Entertainment Co. | 1/5 short2/3 long | −21.4% | −19.3% | −13.6% | +18.4% | +73.2% | +235% | +247% | — | 52.4% | 0.74 | −65.7% | — | $4.0B | — |
| MSGE EntertainmentMadison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. | 4/5 short1/3 long | −2.2% | +0.3% | +27.1% | +44.3% | +69.8% | +164% | +12.8% | — | 44.9% | 0.31 | −75.9% | — | $3.7B | — |
| BATRA EntertainmentAtlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. | 3/5 short1/3 long | −5.3% | −0.9% | +1.6% | +27.3% | +26.8% | +46.5% | +91.1% | +216% | 21.8% | 0.71 | −54.2% | — | $3.5B | — |
| BATRK EntertainmentAtlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. | 3/5 short1/3 long | −5.9% | −0.9% | +1.9% | +24.7% | +26.1% | +45.4% | +77.0% | +188% | 22.4% | 0.63 | −54.9% | — | $3.2B | — |
| ABNB Travel ServicesAirbnb, Inc. | 5/5 short0/3 long | +8.6% | +25.5% | +21.9% | +32.1% | +37.9% | +46.0% | +5.5% | — | 44.3% | 0.24 | −62.0% | — | $105B | — |
| SONY Consumer ElectronicsSony Group Corporation | 3/5 short0/3 long | +12.3% | +25.8% | +26.3% | +1.7% | −8.5% | +60.2% | +19.5% | +332% | 29.3% | 0.27 | −50.6% | — | $155B | — |
| AMC EntertainmentAMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | −1.3% | +30.2% | +71.3% | +82.0% | +6.5% | −68.0% | −99.2% | −98.8% | 102% | -0.45 | −99.9% | — | $2.6B | — |
| DIS EntertainmentThe Walt Disney Company | 2/5 short0/3 long | +9.0% | +18.0% | +8.8% | +1.9% | +1.5% | +40.4% | −31.1% | +31.5% | 29.5% | -0.11 | −60.7% | — | $195B | — |
| WMG EntertainmentWarner Music Group Corp. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +15.7% | +16.6% | +9.5% | +6.1% | −2.1% | +7.1% | −25.8% | — | 34.7% | 0.00 | −54.0% | — | $17B | — |
| FWONK EntertainmentLiberty Media Corporation | 0/5 short0/3 long | −3.7% | −6.0% | +3.7% | −7.0% | −6.8% | +34.9% | +71.7% | +236% | 27.2% | 0.54 | −57.7% | — | $23B | — |
| FWONA EntertainmentFormula One Group | 0/5 short0/3 long | −3.4% | −6.2% | +3.2% | −6.0% | −7.3% | +40.1% | +71.1% | +206% | 27.2% | 0.53 | −60.8% | — | $21B | — |
| BKNG Travel ServicesBooking Holdings Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −1.9% | −9.2% | −9.8% | −23.8% | −22.3% | +46.2% | +72.2% | +180% | 33.3% | 0.49 | −47.8% | — | $121B | — |
How did LYV do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2006, along with where LYV ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with LYV and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
Note: LYV began trading on December 21, 2005, so the table starts with 2006, its first full calendar year, and cannot show how it fared during the dot-com bust.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, LYV finished in the top quarter in seven of 20 years and in the bottom quarter in three. In 2025, it ranked 8 of 18.
- LYV finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 11 of its 20 full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, BKNG came out ahead of LYV most often, in 13 of the 20 years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of LYV; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places LYV among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of LYV | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LYV This pageLive Nation Entertainment, Inc. | — | +10.0% | +38.4% | +34.2% | −41.7% | +62.9% | +2.8% | +45.1% | +15.7% | +60.0% | +8.3% | −5.9% | +32.1% | +112% | +12.0% | −27.2% | +34.2% | +48.3% | −60.5% | −35.2% | +71.0% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 7 of 20 | 8 of 18 | 8 of 18 | 6 of 18 | 13 of 18 | 2 of 18 | 6 of 14 | 3 of 14 | 3 of 13 | 3 of 13 | 7 of 11 | 10 of 10 | 1 of 9 | 2 of 7 | 5 of 7 | 4 of 7 | 3 of 7 | 5 of 7 | 7 of 7 | 6 of 6 | 2 of 6 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 9 of 20 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% |
| CNK Cinemark Holdings, Inc. | 8 of 18 | −24.1% | +120% | +62.7% | −46.3% | −7.4% | −47.8% | −1.9% | +6.4% | −6.4% | +18.3% | −3.5% | +10.0% | +32.3% | +45.8% | +11.9% | +25.5% | +108% | −53.4% | — | — |
| IMAX IMAX Corporation | 9 of 20 | +44.4% | +70.4% | +2.5% | −17.8% | −1.0% | −11.8% | +8.6% | −18.8% | −26.3% | −11.7% | +15.0% | +4.8% | +31.1% | +22.6% | −34.7% | +111% | +198% | −34.6% | +81.4% | −46.7% |
| MSGS Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. | 4 of 10 | +14.6% | +24.1% | −0.8% | +10.5% | −5.6% | +26.2% | +9.9% | +27.0% | +22.9% | +6.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| TKO TKO Group Holdings, Inc. | 10 of 20 | +48.9% | +74.2% | +23.9% | +39.9% | +3.6% | −25.1% | −12.6% | +146% | +69.8% | +5.9% | +48.8% | −23.1% | +120% | −10.6% | −30.2% | +1.9% | +54.5% | −17.6% | −3.9% | +17.7% |
| SPOT Spotify Technology S.A. | 4 of 7 | +29.8% | +138% | +138% | −66.3% | −25.6% | +110% | +31.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SPHR Sphere Entertainment Co. | 3 of 5 | +136% | +18.7% | +63.5% | −36.1% | −33.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| MSGE Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. | 2 of 5 | +51.4% | +12.0% | −29.3% | −36.1% | −33.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BATRA Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. | 1 of 9 | +4.1% | −4.6% | +30.9% | +14.7% | +15.6% | −16.1% | +18.9% | +13.1% | +7.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BATRK Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. | 1 of 9 | +3.1% | −3.3% | +22.8% | +14.7% | +13.0% | −15.8% | +18.7% | +12.0% | +7.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ABNB Airbnb, Inc. | 1 of 5 | +3.3% | −3.5% | +59.2% | −48.6% | +13.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SONY Sony Group Corporation | 6 of 20 | +21.7% | +12.4% | +24.9% | −39.3% | +25.6% | +49.7% | +41.7% | +8.1% | +61.1% | +14.8% | +20.7% | +19.0% | +56.6% | −36.7% | −48.8% | +24.1% | +34.2% | −59.3% | +27.3% | +5.6% |
| AMC AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. | 2 of 12 | −60.8% | −35.0% | −85.0% | −85.0% | +1,183% | −70.6% | −37.1% | −8.3% | −53.3% | +44.1% | −5.7% | +30.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| DIS The Walt Disney Company | 6 of 20 | +3.3% | +24.4% | +4.3% | −43.9% | −14.5% | +25.3% | +33.5% | +3.6% | +4.8% | +0.7% | +12.9% | +24.9% | +55.3% | +34.8% | +1.6% | +17.6% | +43.8% | −28.7% | −4.6% | +44.3% |
| WMG Warner Music Group Corp. | 1 of 5 | +1.4% | −11.5% | +4.4% | −17.2% | +15.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FWONK Liberty Media Corporation | 5 of 11 | +6.3% | +46.8% | +9.2% | −5.5% | +48.4% | −7.3% | +49.7% | −10.1% | +9.0% | +12.4% | +8.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FWONA Formula One Group | 5 of 12 | +6.3% | +45.0% | +13.3% | −9.9% | +56.2% | −13.2% | +47.3% | −9.2% | +4.4% | +13.8% | +11.3% | −8.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BKNG Booking Holdings Inc. | 13 of 20 | +8.6% | +41.3% | +76.0% | −16.0% | +7.7% | +8.5% | +19.2% | −0.9% | +18.5% | +15.0% | +11.8% | −1.9% | +87.3% | +32.7% | +17.1% | +82.8% | +197% | −35.7% | +164% | +94.9% |
Risk and diversification
How LYV has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were LYV's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents LYV's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2005, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
Note: LYV began trading on December 21, 2005, so this list cannot include the dot-com bust. The crash tests on this page show how older funds and the S&P 500 fared through those years.
- In all five of LYV's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: LYV fell 27.8% from September to November 2025, while the S&P 500 rose 2.0%.
- The slowest recovery came after LYV fell 89.9% from February 2007 to March 2009; it did not regain that peak until July 2014, five years later.
Green means LYV fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | LYV fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 financial crisis | −89.9% | −44.4% | Feb 2007 | Mar 2009 | 2.1 years | Jul 2014 | 5.3 years |
| Covid crash | −61.2% | −29.1% | Feb 2020 | Mar 2020 | 1 month | Jan 2021 | 10 months |
| 2022 bear market | −48.2% | −8.4% | Feb 2022 | Mar 2023 | 13 months | Nov 2024 | 20 months |
| 2015 China and oil sell-off | −33.7% | −11.0% | Jun 2015 | Feb 2016 | 8 months | Feb 2017 | 12 months |
| No named crash | −27.8% | +2.0% | Sep 2025 | Nov 2025 | 2 months | Jun 2026 | 7 months |
How did LYV do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far LYV, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: LYV began trading on December 21, 2005, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- LYV fell further than the S&P 500 in seven of the nine crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2008 financial crisis, when LYV fell 88.5% and the S&P 500 fell 55.2%.
- Among its popular alternatives, BATRA held up best, falling less than LYV in four of the five crashes they both traded through.
- LYV began trading after the dot-com bust, but five of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was TKO's 66.0%, against 47.5% for the S&P 500.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than LYV.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LYV This pageLive Nation Entertainment, Inc. | — | −5.1% | −41.5% | −61.2% | −19.6% | −4.5% | −29.2% | −37.3% | −2.4% | −88.5% | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 7 of 9 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| CNK Cinemark Holdings, Inc. | 5 of 9 | −4.4% | −47.8% | −79.6% | −15.3% | −3.0% | −29.2% | −13.0% | −2.7% | −62.0% | — |
| IMAX IMAX Corporation | 4 of 9 | −5.7% | −36.5% | −58.4% | −31.4% | −3.5% | −33.9% | −52.5% | −8.2% | −67.4% | −98.0% |
| MSGS Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. | 3 of 5 | −3.5% | −24.5% | −39.0% | −23.1% | −5.3% | — | — | — | — | — |
| TKO TKO Group Holdings, Inc. | 7 of 9 | −1.8% | −12.0% | −39.2% | −36.2% | −2.1% | −30.2% | −14.3% | 0.0% | −50.7% | −66.0% |
| SPOT Spotify Technology S.A. | 2 of 4 | −4.2% | −65.7% | −20.6% | −42.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SPHR Sphere Entertainment Co. | 0 of 2 | −8.2% | −47.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| MSGE Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. | 0 of 2 | −8.2% | −47.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BATRA Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. | 4 of 5 | −3.9% | −15.4% | −52.1% | −13.2% | −4.3% | — | — | — | — | — |
| BATRK Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. | 4 of 5 | −4.2% | −15.7% | −53.1% | −13.1% | −4.5% | — | — | — | — | — |
| ABNB Airbnb, Inc. | 0 of 2 | −7.2% | −52.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SONY Sony Group Corporation | 5 of 9 | −3.8% | −50.6% | −22.9% | −24.3% | −9.7% | −30.2% | −32.0% | −1.0% | −72.3% | −76.2% |
| AMC AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. | 0 of 6 | −7.9% | −80.1% | −68.0% | −39.5% | −5.3% | −34.3% | — | — | — | — |
| DIS The Walt Disney Company | 6 of 9 | −6.8% | −41.8% | −39.3% | −14.9% | −6.8% | −25.5% | −28.7% | −1.8% | −54.9% | −67.6% |
| WMG Warner Music Group Corp. | 0 of 2 | −4.8% | −49.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FWONK Liberty Media Corporation | 4 of 6 | −3.1% | −20.7% | −56.3% | −25.7% | −12.0% | −21.7% | — | — | — | — |
| FWONA Formula One Group | 4 of 6 | −2.9% | −19.1% | −59.2% | −24.5% | −12.4% | −23.3% | — | — | — | — |
| BKNG Booking Holdings Inc. | 4 of 9 | −5.6% | −39.5% | −41.5% | −19.1% | −6.3% | −33.7% | −17.8% | −3.2% | −66.3% | −98.9% |
How closely does LYV move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares LYV with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- TKO took just 110% of the S&P 500's losses, against 123% for LYV, while still keeping 135% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, LYV captured 127% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 123% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.23. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
- Four of the 12 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than LYV's 1.03, led by MSGS, TKO and BATRA.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than LYV's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LYV This pageLive Nation Entertainment, Inc. | 127% | 123% | 1.03 | 1.23 |
| MSGS Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. | 94% | 75% | 1.25 | 1.02 |
| TKO TKO Group Holdings, Inc. | 135% | 110% | 1.23 | 1.04 |
| BATRA Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. | 74% | 64% | 1.15 | 0.85 |
| BATRK Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. | 71% | 66% | 1.09 | 0.87 |
| FWONK Liberty Media Corporation | 86% | 87% | 0.99 | 0.97 |
| SONY Sony Group Corporation | 96% | 99% | 0.97 | 0.86 |
| FWONA Formula One Group | 84% | 88% | 0.95 | 0.97 |
| BKNG Booking Holdings Inc. | 99% | 123% | 0.81 | 1.17 |
| IMAX IMAX Corporation | 70% | 95% | 0.74 | 1.02 |
| DIS The Walt Disney Company | 90% | 162% | 0.56 | 1.32 |
| CNK Cinemark Holdings, Inc. | 87% | 160% | 0.54 | 1.71 |
| AMC AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. | 11% | 307% | 0.04 | 1.84 |
What diversifies LYV?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with LYV's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing LYV with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in LYV into LVHI would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 18% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+13.2% for LYV alone, +14.7% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of LYV over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.46 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- GLD made money in three of the five calendar years in which LYV lost money.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which LYV lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% LYV and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2015 | 2011 | 2008 | 2007 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LYV Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +73.2% | 0.49 | −41.7% | −5.9% | −27.2% | −60.5% | −35.2% | 30.6% | +13.2% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.29 | +119% | 1.48 | +3.8% | — | — | — | — | 25.1% | +14.7% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.30 | +225% | 1.34 | +6.0% | +7.7% | −16.1% | −20.8% | −7.4% | 25.4% | +16.6% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.46 | +103% | 1.06 | +10.4% | −25.3% | — | — | — | 26.0% | +14.3% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.47 | +83.6% | 0.95 | −5.1% | +4.1% | — | — | — | 25.6% | +13.9% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.46 | +304% | 0.94 | −33.5% | −0.3% | +6.8% | −44.7% | +6.0% | 28.4% | +18.7% |
| IOO InternationaliShares Global 100 ETF | 0.47 | +107% | 0.94 | −16.3% | −1.8% | −4.1% | −36.1% | +11.1% | 26.1% | +14.5% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.17 | +178% | 0.94 | +64.4% | −21.5% | +2.8% | −39.0% | +36.8% | 25.9% | +16.3% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.11 | +120% | 0.93 | −0.8% | −10.7% | +9.6% | +4.9% | +30.4% | 25.1% | +15.2% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2015 | 2011 | 2008 | 2007 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LYV Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +73.2% | 0.49 | −41.7% | −5.9% | −27.2% | −60.5% | −35.2% | 30.6% | +13.2% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.22 | +471% | 1.54 | +54.1% | +12.6% | +8.1% | −39.6% | −9.8% | 26.2% | +18.9% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.29 | +2,780% | 1.43 | +1.3% | −6.0% | −24.4% | −20.5% | −25.7% | 30.0% | +31.3% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.26 | +397% | 1.41 | +51.8% | −4.5% | +11.8% | −40.4% | +29.7% | 26.3% | +18.3% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.35 | +1,452% | 1.41 | +17.0% | +67.7% | −17.0% | −15.2% | +2.1% | 28.9% | +27.3% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.08 | +660% | 1.39 | +86.6% | +17.4% | — | — | — | 25.8% | +21.2% |
Common questions
What was LYV's worst drawdown?
LYV's deepest decline since it began trading in 2005 was 89.9%, from February 2007 to March 2009. It took about five years from the low to climb back to its old high. Because LYV launched in December 2005, that record does not include the dot-com bust.
What were LYV's best and worst years?
Over 20 full calendar years, LYV's best year was 2013, when it returned 112%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -60.5%.
Is there a better investment than LYV?
Among LYV's popular alternatives, MSGS, BATRA and TKO earned more than LYV with less volatility over the past 5 years. MSGS returned 17.5% a year at 25.7% volatility, against 11.6% a year at 34.5%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, RHP (live entertainment theme) and MCRI (casinos) earned more than LYV with less volatility over the past 5 years. RHP returned 13.1% a year at 29.9% volatility, against 11.6% a year at 34.5%.
Is LYV more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. LYV's volatility over the past 5 years was 34.5%, about twice the S&P 500's 17.2%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, LYV's return lands within 34.5% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is LYV's Sharpe ratio?
LYV's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.49, against 0.78 for the S&P 500, so LYV earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is LYV with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, LYV's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.60 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against LYV instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a LYV holding.
What are the best alternatives to LYV?
Of the 17 popular alternatives we compared, three outperformed LYV in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: CNK, IMAX and MSGS.
Did LYV outperform the S&P 500?
LYV finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 11 of 20 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +10.0%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did LYV do in stock market crashes?
LYV fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in one of the nine major crashes it has traded through, and further in seven. The clearest case was the 2008 financial crisis, when LYV fell 88.5% and the S&P 500 fell 55.2%.
What diversifies LYV?
These had a low correlation with LYV over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.29), DXJ (correlation 0.30) and EMLP (correlation 0.46); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.22), CLS (correlation 0.29) and MCK (correlation 0.26). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than LYV's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of LYV's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.