Relative Intelligence · Copper Mining

How Freeport-McMoRan (FCX) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on FCX alone. It places FCX (Freeport-McMoRan Inc.) against 17 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where FCX stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: FCX's full trading record, from July 1995 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 22, 2026.
Data as of October 22, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
This page answers the following questions about FCX
Key findings
Not AI-generatedThese key findings are generated by our proprietary relative intelligence engine, directly from the data on this page.
- Right nowFCX has gone against the market, falling 7.8% over the past 6 months while the S&P 500 rose 8.0%. Its copper mining peers split over the past 6 months: NEM (Newmont) rose 2.5%, while VALE fell 28.3%. Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?FCX held up far better than its industry: it fell 0.4% over the past 3 months while the copper mining ETF COPX (Global X - Copper Miners ETF) fell 8.6%. The S&P 500 rose 2.5%. Its copper mining peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: AEM (Agnico Eagle Mines) rose 20.1%, while RIO (Rio Tinto Group) fell 6.8%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, FCX rose 59.9% against 15.6% for the S&P 500 and 16.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (100% against 88.4%). By year ↓
- Long termFCX turned $10,000 into $70,600 over the past decade, against $41,600 in the S&P 500. FCX's 10-year return of 606% puts it ahead of 89% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 316%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross seven sell-offs, FCX has typically fallen 2.3 times as far as the S&P 500. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, FCX has a correlation of 0.54 over 5 years, more closely than 80% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge. Over 10 years, FCX's beta versus the S&P 500 was 1.74: in the S&P 500's rising months it gained 1.6 times as much as the index, and in falling months it lost 1.8 times as much. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Nearby categories and themes
- RS (Reliance Steel & Aluminum, metals & mining) and B (Barrick Mining, gold mining) earned more than FCX with less volatility over the past 5 years. RS returned 24.8% a year at 28.1% volatility, against 12.9% a year at 45.0%.
- Whole market
- 508 of the 3,641 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than FCX with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL (Apple), GOOG (Alphabet) and TSM (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing).
How much would $10,000 in FCX have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in FCX over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of FCX over the same span and FCX's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in FCX at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $86,132 by September 2026, less than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of FCX, and SCCO finished highest, at $2,677,967.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 584 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of FCX; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- SCCO$3M+26,680% total · +21.3% a year
- RS$621,583+6,116% total · +15.3% a year
- BHP$430,670+4,207% total · +13.9% a year
- RIO$271,382+2,614% total · +12.1% a year
- AEM$246,326+2,363% total · +11.7% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
- FCX$86,132+761% total · +7.7% a year
- NEM$39,676+297% total · +4.9% a year
- CENX$22,307+123% total · +2.8% a year
- TGB$17,820+78.2% total · +2.0% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 603 of the 3,630 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of FCX; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- TGB$47,141+371% total · +36.4% a year
- SCCO$47,048+370% total · +36.3% a year
- HBM$43,240+332% total · +34.0% a year
- AEM$39,659+297% total · +31.7% a year
- TECK$28,309+183% total · +23.1% a year
- COPX$27,825+178% total · +22.7% a year
- CENX$26,751+168% total · +21.7% a year
- NEM$24,375+144% total · +19.5% a year
- FCX$23,053+131% total · +18.2% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
FCX at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- FCX's deepest decline since it began trading in 1995 was 92.5%, from January 2011 to January 2016. It took about six years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, FCX's best was 2009, when it returned 228%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 75.5%. It lost money in 12 of those years.
- FCX is 19.0% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $93B
- Industry
- Copper
- Price history from
- July 1995
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +59.9%total return
- Past 3 years
- +100%+26.0% a year
- Past 5 years
- +83.7%+12.9% a year
- Past 10 years
- +606%+21.6% a year
- Best calendar year
- +228%2009
- Worst calendar year
- −75.5%2008
- Losing years
- 12 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 45.0%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.50return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −92.5%Jan 2011 to Jan 2016
- From its all-time high
- −19.0%below the peak
FCX against the whole market
Where FCX ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does FCX rank among all stocks?
This section ranks FCX on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how FCX stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- FCX's 10-year return ranks in the top 11% of the 2,201 stocks worth at least $300 million with 10 years of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | FCX | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +59.9% | 417 of 3,282 | top 13% |
| 3-year return | +100% | 933 of 3,016 | top 31% |
| 5-year return | +83.7% | 804 of 2,897 | top 28% |
| 10-year return | +606% | 232 of 2,201 | top 11% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 45.0% | 1,700 of 2,897 | bottom 42% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.50 | 953 of 2,897 | top 33% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −72.6% | 1,374 of 2,184 | bottom 38% |
What has beaten FCX on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). FCX sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than FCX with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 400 stocks and 108 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than FCX over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 14% of the 3,641 screened.
- Among those with at least half FCX's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 41.7% a year at 24.7% volatility, 45% less than FCX's 45.0%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.54 against 0.50 for FCX. INSW earned the most, 58.7% a year, while still swinging less than FCX (40.6% against 45.0%).
- Among FCX's popular alternatives, SCCO, AEM and BHP are in the region. SCCO earned 30.1% a year against 12.9% a year for FCX, at 40.8% volatility, 9% less than FCX's 45.0%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to FCX; faint dots are 88 more of the 508 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,641 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than FCX?
Investments that beat FCX over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among FCX's popular alternatives, NEM, SCCO and AEM earned more than FCX with less volatility over the past 5 years. NEM returned 17.8% a year at 39.1% volatility, against 12.9% a year at 45.0%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, RS (metals & mining) and B (gold mining) earned more than FCX with less volatility over the past 5 years. RS returned 24.8% a year at 28.1% volatility, against 12.9% a year at 45.0%.
- Across the whole market, 508 of the 3,641 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than FCX with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL, GOOG and TSM.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat FCX over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks FCX's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than FCX follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than FCX's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× FCX's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than FCX's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with FCX?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +12.9% | 45.0% | 0.50 | −72.6% | +606% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.5% | 17.2% | 0.78 | −33.7% | +316% | 0.54 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against FCX. 8 of 16 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +17.8% | 39.1% | 0.62 | −62.4% | +307% | 0.53 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +30.1% | 40.8% | 0.85 | −55.3% | +915% | 0.78 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +28.2% | 38.5% | 0.84 | −54.2% | +335% | 0.49 | — | ||
TGBTrekor Metals Limited · Copper Mining | Higher return in most periods | +26.0% | 63.6% | 0.68 | −90.8% | +1,638% | 0.69 | — | |
TECKTeck Resources Limited · Copper Mining | Higher return, similar volatility | +17.8% | 45.3% | 0.59 | −79.6% | +226% | 0.62 | — | |
GOLDGold.com, Inc. · Precious Metals Dealers | Smaller losses in recent crashes | +6.5% | 48.0% | 0.37 | −62.6% | +615% | 0.58 | — | |
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Copper Mining and Metals & Mining and the categories next to it (Gold Mining, Materials Equity, Steel, Uranium), plus FCX's specific themes. 39 of 120 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
RSReliance Steel & Aluminum Co. · Metals & Mining | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +24.8% | 28.1% | 0.94 | −40.8% | +639% | 0.49 | — | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +17.8% | 37.4% | 0.63 | −53.9% | +189% | 0.51 | — | ||
RGLDRoyal Gold, Inc. · Gold Mining | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +20.2% | 32.4% | 0.73 | −49.5% | +291% | 0.58 | — | |
FRDFriedman Industries, Incorporated · Steel | Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +24.8% | 54.6% | 0.68 | −65.1% | +759% | 0.35 | — | |
ATIATI Inc. · Metals & Mining | On the frontierHigher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +58.9% | 43.2% | 1.29 | −82.4% | +809% | 0.51 | — | |
TXTernium S.A. · Steel | Similar return, lower volatility | +12.4% | 34.8% | 0.51 | −74.9% | +350% | 0.64 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 947 of 3,532 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +41.2% | 32.8% | 1.22 | −34.5% | +1,870% | 0.05 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +25.5% | 23.4% | 1.09 | −45.1% | +600% | 0.22 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +692% | 0.36 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +18.1% | 26.1% | 0.77 | −35.1% | +753% | 0.39 | 0.09% | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +21.8% | 25.7% | 0.90 | −30.3% | +849% | 0.10 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +26.3% | 39.0% | 0.80 | −45.8% | +1,297% | 0.42 | 0.33% | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +33.4% | 43.4% | 0.89 | −48.0% | +1,306% | 0.17 | — | ||
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +13.2% | 20.0% | 0.73 | −46.9% | +191% | 0.58 | — | ||
What these numbers mean for FCX
- Annual return
- FCX returned 12.9% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.5% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $18,400. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- FCX's volatility over the past 5 years was 45.0%, 2.6 times the S&P 500's 17.2%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, FCX's return lands within 45.0% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- FCX's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.50, against 0.78 for the S&P 500, so FCX earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- FCX's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 72.6%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 72.6% fall takes a 265% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, FCX's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.54 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against FCX instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a FCX holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 508 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than FCX with less volatility
Out of 3,641 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with FCX | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +41.2% | 32.8% | 1.22 | −34.5% | +1,870% | 0.05 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +25.5% | 23.4% | 1.09 | −45.1% | +600% | 0.22 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +692% | 0.36 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +18.1% | 26.1% | 0.77 | −35.1% | +753% | 0.39 | 0.09% | |
| 5 | Whole market | +21.8% | 25.7% | 0.90 | −30.3% | +849% | 0.10 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +18.6% | 34.2% | 0.67 | −33.6% | +625% | 0.51 | — | |
| 7 | Whole market | +15.1% | 29.9% | 0.62 | −37.9% | +764% | 0.50 | — | |
| 8 | Whole market | +26.7% | 24.9% | 1.08 | −41.6% | +670% | 0.37 | — | |
| 9 | Whole market | +17.1% | 23.1% | 0.80 | −48.4% | +834% | 0.37 | — | |
| 10 | Whole market | +20.7% | 26.8% | 0.84 | −50.8% | +693% | 0.52 | — | |
| 11 | Whole market | +15.2% | 23.6% | 0.72 | −32.8% | +639% | 0.41 | — | |
| 12 | Whole market | +23.4% | 30.2% | 0.85 | −57.5% | +635% | 0.15 | — | |
| 13 | Whole market | +26.3% | 39.0% | 0.80 | −45.8% | +1,297% | 0.42 | 0.33% | |
| 14 | Whole market | +41.7% | 24.7% | 1.54 | −46.1% | +345% | 0.21 | — | |
| 15 | Whole market | +19.1% | 28.0% | 0.77 | −38.5% | +1,194% | 0.27 | — | |
| 16 | COKECoca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. · Food & Beverages | Whole market | +41.6% | 38.0% | 1.11 | −51.7% | +1,564% | 0.04 | — |
| 17 | FCNCAFirst Citizens BancShares, Inc. · Regional Banks | Whole market | +21.5% | 41.4% | 0.66 | −47.5% | +678% | 0.05 | — |
| 18 | HALOHalozyme Therapeutics, Inc. · Biotechnology | Whole market | +26.2% | 40.4% | 0.78 | −49.1% | +1,255% | 0.29 | — |
| 19 | ENSGThe Ensign Group, Inc. · Health Care Facilities | Whole market | +20.1% | 26.9% | 0.82 | −55.5% | +919% | 0.36 | — |
| 20 | Whole market | +21.1% | 22.6% | 0.97 | −25.7% | +521% | 0.14 | — | |
| 21 | DHTDHT Holdings, Inc. · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +40.3% | 39.0% | 1.07 | −39.7% | +1,094% | 0.24 | — |
| 22 | RSReliance Steel & Aluminum Co. · Metals & Mining | Same or nearby category | +24.8% | 28.1% | 0.94 | −40.8% | +639% | 0.49 | — |
| 23 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · Japan Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +415% | 0.43 | 0.48% |
| 24 | CSWCSW Industrials, Inc. · Industrial Products | Whole market | +17.1% | 34.4% | 0.63 | −46.2% | +893% | 0.33 | — |
| 25 | Whole market | +21.3% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +240% | 0.32 | — | |
| 26 | INSWInternational Seaways, Inc. · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +58.7% | 40.6% | 1.35 | −57.4% | — | 0.16 | — |
| 27 | Whole market | +37.8% | 25.1% | 1.41 | −38.1% | +582% | 0.10 | — | |
| 28 | Whole market | +18.7% | 24.4% | 0.83 | −52.0% | +319% | 0.30 | — | |
| 29 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +202% | 0.23 | — | |
| 30 | Whole market | +16.5% | 20.0% | 0.87 | −42.0% | +319% | 0.52 | — | |
| 31 | NWPXNWPX Infrastructure, Inc. · Infrastructure | Whole market | +32.7% | 36.3% | 0.97 | −46.5% | +619% | 0.33 | — |
| 32 | Whole market | +32.7% | 32.9% | 1.03 | −64.2% | +413% | 0.33 | — | |
| 33 | Whole market | +18.3% | 21.4% | 0.90 | −53.7% | +133% | 0.28 | — | |
| 34 | Whole market | +18.5% | 32.0% | 0.69 | −44.6% | +696% | 0.21 | — | |
| 35 | Whole market | +27.7% | 33.7% | 0.90 | −62.1% | +187% | 0.18 | — | |
| 36 | Whole market | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +360% | 0.25 | — | |
| 37 | Whole market | +23.7% | 25.6% | 0.96 | −61.4% | +283% | 0.40 | — | |
| 38 | Whole market | +21.7% | 28.6% | 0.83 | −61.3% | +544% | 0.47 | — | |
| 39 | Whole market | +23.3% | 24.0% | 1.00 | −57.5% | +386% | 0.39 | — | |
| 40 | Whole market | +20.1% | 22.3% | 0.94 | −55.1% | +159% | 0.38 | — | |
| 41 | Whole market | +32.8% | 42.3% | 0.89 | −56.9% | +481% | 0.37 | — | |
| 42 | Whole market | +16.4% | 29.2% | 0.67 | −46.4% | +407% | 0.50 | — | |
| 43 | Whole market | +25.7% | 39.1% | 0.78 | −63.3% | +1,407% | 0.42 | — | |
| 44 | Whole market | +17.9% | 26.2% | 0.76 | −41.4% | +377% | 0.09 | — | |
| 45 | Whole market | +20.4% | 23.3% | 0.92 | −48.8% | +294% | 0.22 | — | |
| 46 | Whole market | +14.4% | 17.5% | 0.86 | −34.7% | — | 0.50 | 0.26% | |
| 47 | CBOECboe Global Markets, Inc. · Capital Markets | Whole market | +22.0% | 25.1% | 0.92 | −43.2% | +481% | 0.13 | — |
| 48 | Whole market | +20.6% | 35.3% | 0.71 | −58.1% | +696% | 0.31 | — | |
| 49 | IHGInterContinental Hotels Group PLC · Hotels & Resorts | Whole market | +21.7% | 26.6% | 0.88 | −59.3% | +387% | 0.46 | — |
| 50 | UTHRUnited Therapeutics Corporation · Rare Disease Therapeutics | Whole market | +25.1% | 35.2% | 0.81 | −55.6% | +423% | -0.02 | — |
| 51 | FFIVF5, Inc. · Cybersecurity | Whole market | +16.7% | 30.8% | 0.66 | −54.6% | +279% | 0.21 | — |
| 52 | WFWoori Financial Group Inc. · Banks | Whole market | +25.4% | 31.6% | 0.88 | −67.2% | +268% | 0.42 | — |
| 53 | CLHClean Harbors, Inc. · Waste Management | Whole market | +22.8% | 28.6% | 0.87 | −64.5% | +603% | 0.37 | — |
| 54 | SNXTD Synnex Corp · Technology Distribution | Whole market | +20.2% | 30.4% | 0.76 | −55.8% | +427% | 0.32 | — |
| 55 | MOG-AMoog Inc. · Aerospace Components | Whole market | +35.1% | 32.1% | 1.10 | −63.7% | +540% | 0.43 | — |
| 56 | Whole market | +30.7% | 32.0% | 1.00 | −43.4% | +913% | 0.41 | — | |
| 57 | EXELExelixis, Inc. · Oncology | Whole market | +25.0% | 35.8% | 0.81 | −57.2% | +478% | 0.17 | — |
| 58 | EWYiShares MSCI South Korea ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +15.5% | 34.1% | 0.60 | −49.7% | +219% | 0.55 | 0.59% |
| 59 | Whole market | +53.5% | 37.4% | 1.34 | −71.7% | +733% | 0.16 | — | |
| 60 | CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF · Cybersecurity | Whole market | +14.5% | 26.2% | 0.65 | −33.9% | +461% | 0.30 | 0.58% |
| 61 | Whole market | +50.0% | 33.4% | 1.39 | −79.7% | +1,314% | 0.31 | — | |
| 62 | EHCEncompass Health Corporation · Health Care Facilities | Whole market | +18.7% | 26.9% | 0.77 | −39.5% | +354% | 0.35 | — |
| 63 | IOOiShares Global 100 ETF · Global Equity | Whole market | +15.6% | 17.2% | 0.94 | −31.4% | +357% | 0.50 | 0.40% |
| 64 | Whole market | +31.3% | 32.4% | 1.01 | −37.5% | +887% | 0.33 | — | |
| 65 | LAURLaureate Education, Inc. · Education Services | Whole market | +36.9% | 32.8% | 1.13 | −64.5% | — | 0.14 | — |
| 66 | WTSWatts Water Technologies, Inc. · Industrial Machinery | Whole market | +14.8% | 28.4% | 0.63 | −44.1% | +533% | 0.46 | — |
| 67 | MSGSMadison Square Garden Sports Corp. · Entertainment | Whole market | +17.5% | 25.7% | 0.76 | −41.6% | +395% | 0.38 | — |
| 68 | NEUNewMarket Corporation · Specialty Chemicals | Whole market | +20.9% | 26.8% | 0.85 | −40.7% | +162% | 0.11 | — |
| 69 | Whole market | +16.2% | 28.9% | 0.67 | −51.3% | +630% | 0.40 | — | |
| 70 | FRHCFreedom Holding Corp. · Investment Banking & Brokerage | Whole market | +20.5% | 40.5% | 0.66 | −45.9% | — | -0.04 | — |
| 71 | AIQGlobal X - Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF · Artificial Intelligence | Whole market | +14.7% | 26.7% | 0.65 | −44.6% | — | 0.42 | 0.68% |
| 72 | Whole market | +35.3% | 35.5% | 1.03 | −55.1% | +929% | 0.26 | — | |
| 73 | Whole market | +14.8% | 31.6% | 0.59 | −54.6% | +678% | 0.21 | — | |
| 74 | VCTRVictory Capital Holdings, Inc. · Asset Management | Whole market | +27.7% | 35.0% | 0.88 | −45.2% | — | 0.43 | — |
| 75 | THGThe Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +15.2% | 22.9% | 0.73 | −40.1% | +309% | 0.07 | — |
| 76 | ACAArcosa, Inc. · Construction Materials | Whole market | +23.4% | 34.0% | 0.79 | −36.8% | — | 0.36 | — |
| 77 | AVTAvnet, Inc. · Technology Distribution | Whole market | +21.5% | 30.8% | 0.79 | −58.4% | +161% | 0.44 | — |
| 78 | KNSLKinsale Capital Group, Inc. · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +18.9% | 38.8% | 0.64 | −46.8% | +1,690% | 0.20 | — |
| 79 | NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Health Care Facilities | Whole market | +31.2% | 28.6% | 1.10 | −35.3% | +385% | 0.12 | — |
| 80 | MATXMatson, Inc. · Marine Shipping | Whole market | +23.5% | 39.5% | 0.73 | −53.6% | +554% | 0.52 | — |
| 81 | Same or nearby category | +17.8% | 37.4% | 0.63 | −53.9% | +189% | 0.51 | — | |
| 82 | FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +21.3% | 24.4% | 0.92 | −38.0% | — | 0.47 | 0.19% |
| 83 | GFFGriffon Corporation · Building Products | Whole market | +36.9% | 41.7% | 0.96 | −61.3% | +774% | 0.28 | — |
| 84 | RSPTInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF · Technology Equity | Whole market | +16.6% | 25.1% | 0.74 | −33.7% | +559% | 0.49 | 0.40% |
| 85 | Whole market | +26.0% | 28.9% | 0.95 | −54.7% | +755% | 0.40 | — | |
| 86 | Whole market | +41.8% | 31.7% | 1.27 | −90.8% | +829% | 0.42 | — | |
| 87 | CNOCNO Financial Group, Inc. · Life Insurance | Whole market | +19.1% | 28.1% | 0.77 | −63.8% | +348% | 0.37 | — |
| 88 | GHCGraham Holdings Company · Industrial Conglomerates | Whole market | +17.6% | 26.3% | 0.75 | −62.5% | +191% | 0.31 | — |
| 89 | Whole market | +19.7% | 32.2% | 0.72 | −44.5% | +636% | 0.29 | — | |
| 90 | Whole market | +24.0% | 18.8% | 1.25 | −75.2% | +337% | 0.39 | — | |
| 91 | TDIVFirst Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund · Technology Equity | Whole market | +16.5% | 21.3% | 0.83 | −32.0% | +384% | 0.49 | 0.50% |
| 92 | MCYMercury General Corporation · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +16.9% | 34.3% | 0.63 | −55.3% | +203% | 0.27 | — |
| 93 | Whole market | +36.4% | 37.4% | 1.02 | −45.5% | +1,878% | 0.26 | — | |
| 94 | VIRTVirtu Financial, Inc. · Capital Markets | Whole market | +20.4% | 33.8% | 0.72 | −56.2% | +520% | 0.33 | — |
| 95 | Popular alternative | +17.8% | 39.1% | 0.62 | −62.4% | +307% | 0.53 | — | |
| 96 | RGLDRoyal Gold, Inc. · Gold Mining | Same or nearby category | +20.2% | 32.4% | 0.73 | −49.5% | +291% | 0.58 | — |
| 97 | Whole market | +21.4% | 27.7% | 0.84 | −40.5% | +927% | 0.35 | — | |
| 98 | FHIFederated Hermes, Inc. · Asset Management | Whole market | +16.0% | 24.6% | 0.73 | −64.9% | +226% | 0.40 | — |
| 99 | NICNicolet Bankshares, Inc. · Regional Banks | Whole market | +19.7% | 30.2% | 0.75 | −44.3% | +354% | 0.29 | — |
| 100 | DIVBiShares Core Dividend ETF · High Dividend Yield | Whole market | +14.6% | 15.5% | 0.96 | −36.9% | — | 0.65 | 0.05% |
FCX against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against FCX, compared period by period and year by year.
How do FCX's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at FCX, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Five of the 16 popular alternatives, led by SCCO, AEM and NEM, were both more rewarding and calmer than FCX over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, FCX returned 12.9% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.5%, with higher volatility (45.0% against 17.2%).
Green points earned more than FCX with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| SCCO Southern Copper Corporation | +30.1% | 40.8% |
| AEM Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | +28.2% | 38.5% |
| TGB Trekor Metals Limited | +26.0% | 63.6% |
| HBM Hudbay Minerals Inc. | +25.1% | 55.9% |
| NEM Newmont Corporation | +17.8% | 39.1% |
| TECK Teck Resources Limited | +17.8% | 45.3% |
| COPX Global X - Copper Miners ETF | +16.5% | 37.5% |
| CENX Century Aluminum Company | +15.9% | 70.6% |
| BHP BHP Group Limited | +15.8% | 31.4% |
| FCX This pageFreeport-McMoRan Inc. | +12.9% | 45.0% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.5% | 17.2% |
| RIO Rio Tinto Group | +11.9% | 29.0% |
| PICK iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF | +9.9% | 28.1% |
| ERO Ero Copper Corp. | +8.8% | 56.0% |
| GOLD Gold.com, Inc. | +6.5% | 48.0% |
| VALE Vale S.A. | +6.5% | 35.0% |
| NEXA Nexa Resources S.A. | +2.6% | 56.8% |
| AA Alcoa Corporation | −3.7% | 55.1% |
Has FCX consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares FCX with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than FCX helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Three of the 17 popular alternatives, TGB, SCCO and NEM, outperformed FCX in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- SCCO, AEM and BHP earned more for the risk they took than FCX (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than FCX over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| FCX Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (this page) | — | −12.9% | −0.4% | −7.8% | +25.5% | +59.9% | +100% | +83.7% | +606% | 45.0% | 0.50 | −72.6% | — | $93B | — |
| TGB QualifiedTrekor Metals Limited | 3/5 short3/3 long | −22.0% | −3.7% | −1.2% | +30.4% | +88.1% | +582% | +217% | +1,638% | 63.6% | 0.68 | −90.8% | — | $2.7B | — |
| SCCO QualifiedSouthern Copper Corporation | 3/5 short3/3 long | −10.9% | −4.4% | +1.1% | +26.9% | +51.0% | +202% | +273% | +915% | 40.8% | 0.85 | −55.3% | — | $155B | — |
| NEM QualifiedNewmont Corporation | 3/5 short2/3 long | −10.3% | +19.4% | +2.5% | +13.5% | +32.4% | +214% | +127% | +307% | 39.1% | 0.62 | −62.4% | — | $120B | — |
| AEM GoldAgnico Eagle Mines Limited | 1/5 short2/3 long | −13.5% | +20.1% | −13.3% | +4.0% | +8.7% | +275% | +246% | +335% | 38.5% | 0.84 | −54.2% | — | $89B | — |
| HBM CopperHudbay Minerals Inc. | 0/5 short2/3 long | −21.1% | −7.0% | −11.3% | +9.1% | +45.3% | +414% | +207% | +470% | 55.9% | 0.68 | −86.3% | — | $9.7B | — |
| COPX MaterialsGlobal X - Copper Miners ETF | 0/5 short2/3 long | −18.7% | −8.6% | −13.6% | +0.4% | +27.2% | +133% | +115% | +429% | 37.5% | 0.60 | −65.4% | 0.65% | $6.9B | — |
| CENX AluminumCentury Aluminum Company | 0/5 short2/3 long | −17.1% | −28.0% | −48.2% | −20.2% | +12.7% | +454% | +109% | +339% | 70.6% | 0.56 | −87.5% | — | $3.2B | — |
| BHP Industrial MaterialsBHP Group Limited | 3/5 short1/3 long | −11.7% | −6.2% | −1.6% | +30.9% | +44.9% | +62.0% | +109% | +373% | 31.4% | 0.63 | −44.3% | — | $197B | — |
| TECK CopperTeck Resources Limited | 2/5 short1/3 long | −14.5% | +3.1% | −0.3% | +23.2% | +40.6% | +56.4% | +127% | +226% | 45.3% | 0.59 | −79.6% | — | $28B | — |
| ERO CopperEro Copper Corp. | 2/5 short1/3 long | −19.2% | +11.3% | +9.0% | +3.7% | +46.8% | +121% | +52.7% | — | 56.0% | 0.43 | −67.2% | — | $3.1B | — |
| NEXA Industrial MaterialsNexa Resources S.A. | 2/5 short1/3 long | −16.0% | −17.3% | −24.2% | +28.3% | +108% | +114% | +13.8% | — | 56.8% | 0.33 | −85.0% | — | $1.5B | — |
| PICK InternationaliShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF | 1/5 short0/3 long | −12.1% | −6.0% | −12.3% | +6.0% | +25.0% | +65.9% | +60.5% | +247% | 28.1% | 0.48 | −52.7% | 0.39% | $2.4B | — |
| GOLD Financial - Capital MarketsGold.com, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −13.4% | −1.4% | −15.7% | +15.0% | +49.4% | +47.6% | +36.8% | +615% | 48.0% | 0.37 | −62.6% | — | $1.1B | — |
| RIO Industrial MaterialsRio Tinto Group | 0/5 short0/3 long | −13.7% | −6.8% | −14.2% | +5.6% | +23.3% | +62.1% | +75.6% | +427% | 29.0% | 0.54 | −37.5% | — | $137B | — |
| VALE Industrial MaterialsVale S.A. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −14.0% | −15.9% | −28.3% | −5.4% | +14.7% | +28.8% | +36.8% | +278% | 35.0% | 0.35 | −57.6% | — | $52B | — |
| AA AluminumAlcoa Corporation | 0/5 short0/3 long | −13.5% | −16.1% | −43.4% | −31.2% | +9.4% | +71.0% | −17.3% | +103% | 55.1% | 0.21 | −90.9% | — | $10B | — |
| IE CopperIvanhoe Electric Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −26.5% | −13.7% | −47.9% | −51.7% | −48.4% | −27.4% | — | — | — | — | −71.1% | — | $1.3B | — |
How did FCX do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where FCX ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with FCX and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- FCX finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 14 of its 29 full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, SCCO came out ahead of FCX most often, in 21 of the 29 years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, FCX finished in the top quarter in seven of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in five. In 2025, it ranked 14 of 18.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of FCX; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places FCX among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of FCX | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCX This pageFreeport-McMoRan Inc. | — | +35.4% | −9.4% | +13.7% | −7.3% | +61.4% | +99.1% | +29.6% | −45.1% | +43.8% | +94.9% | −70.2% | −35.8% | +19.9% | −4.0% | −36.9% | +52.7% | +228% | −75.5% | +86.9% | +11.6% | +49.1% | −6.6% | +154% | +25.5% | +56.5% | −59.5% | +102% | −32.9% | −45.6% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 7 of 29 | 14 of 18 | 12 of 18 | 7 of 18 | 10 of 17 | 3 of 17 | 3 of 17 | 6 of 17 | 13 of 17 | 8 of 15 | 4 of 15 | 13 of 15 | 11 of 14 | 2 of 14 | 12 of 13 | 7 of 13 | 3 of 12 | 4 of 12 | 7 of 12 | 5 of 12 | 10 of 12 | 5 of 12 | 9 of 12 | 4 of 11 | 4 of 9 | 2 of 9 | 9 of 9 | 3 of 9 | 8 of 9 | 7 of 9 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 15 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| TGB Trekor Metals Limited | 14 of 29 | +192% | +38.6% | −4.8% | −28.3% | +55.3% | +175% | +1.5% | −79.7% | +173% | +151% | −67.0% | −51.4% | −29.3% | +9.9% | −48.0% | +24.4% | +640% | −89.0% | +100% | +112% | −29.1% | +3.0% | +519% | −6.9% | −59.7% | −49.0% | −47.6% | −4.3% | −50.1% |
| SCCO Southern Copper Corporation | 21 of 29 | +66.7% | +10.7% | +50.3% | +4.5% | −0.4% | +59.0% | +44.6% | −33.0% | +50.3% | +23.1% | −6.2% | −0.3% | −22.5% | +41.2% | −33.4% | +56.3% | +109% | −50.2% | +111% | +79.5% | +60.3% | +7.2% | +236% | +23.5% | −4.2% | −14.2% | +65.5% | −26.5% | −1.5% |
| NEM Newmont Corporation | 10 of 29 | +173% | −7.8% | −8.8% | −20.8% | +7.4% | +40.3% | +30.5% | −6.2% | +10.9% | +90.1% | −4.4% | −17.2% | −48.5% | −20.4% | −0.6% | +31.0% | +17.3% | −15.9% | +9.1% | −14.8% | +21.4% | −8.1% | +68.2% | +52.6% | +12.7% | −29.9% | +35.0% | −37.7% | −34.1% |
| AEM Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | 15 of 29 | +120% | +46.0% | +9.0% | +1.1% | −22.8% | +16.2% | +54.2% | −11.5% | +10.5% | +61.2% | +6.8% | −4.7% | −48.3% | +47.1% | −52.1% | +42.5% | +5.6% | −5.8% | +32.9% | +109% | +43.9% | +14.2% | −18.6% | +50.8% | +65.0% | −19.2% | +82.3% | −23.1% | −61.3% |
| HBM Hudbay Minerals Inc. | 9 of 22 | +145% | +47.2% | +9.1% | −29.9% | +3.9% | +69.4% | −11.5% | −46.3% | +54.9% | +49.3% | −55.8% | +6.2% | −17.8% | +3.3% | −44.7% | +41.9% | +407% | −87.0% | +4.7% | +272% | +179% | −67.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| COPX Global X - Copper Miners ETF | 8 of 15 | +93.5% | +3.5% | +8.4% | −0.8% | +23.4% | +51.5% | +12.6% | −31.3% | +38.9% | +70.4% | −45.9% | −19.6% | −27.5% | +4.8% | −31.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| CENX Century Aluminum Company | 11 of 29 | +115% | +50.1% | +48.4% | −50.6% | +50.1% | +46.7% | +2.9% | −62.8% | +129% | +93.7% | −81.9% | +133% | +19.4% | +2.9% | −45.2% | −4.1% | +61.9% | −81.5% | +20.8% | +70.3% | −0.2% | +38.1% | +157% | −43.8% | +18.5% | −22.8% | +63.4% | −28.9% | −20.7% |
| BHP BHP Group Limited | 14 of 29 | +28.9% | −24.6% | +16.4% | +29.4% | +2.0% | +25.3% | +24.6% | +10.5% | +33.8% | +41.9% | −38.1% | −27.9% | −9.8% | +14.9% | −22.0% | +24.5% | +85.2% | −37.4% | +79.4% | +21.2% | +42.0% | +34.3% | +62.6% | +50.4% | +8.7% | −16.6% | +91.5% | −18.9% | −32.0% |
| TECK Teck Resources Limited | 10 of 23 | +19.2% | −2.6% | +14.0% | +33.8% | +59.8% | +5.8% | −18.7% | −16.9% | +33.4% | +421% | −71.1% | −44.9% | −25.8% | +5.9% | −42.1% | +78.7% | +611% | −86.1% | −2.8% | +47.1% | +81.7% | +87.5% | +148% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ERO Ero Copper Corp. | 4 of 8 | +110% | −14.6% | +14.8% | −10.1% | −5.7% | −11.0% | +152% | +21.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| NEXA Nexa Resources S.A. | 3 of 8 | +2.7% | +23.3% | +21.8% | −20.0% | −16.4% | +28.6% | −28.3% | −37.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PICK iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF | 5 of 13 | +51.9% | −16.4% | +9.7% | +2.6% | +22.6% | +27.5% | +16.5% | −18.6% | +38.5% | +54.7% | −40.5% | −19.7% | −8.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| GOLD Gold.com, Inc. | 6 of 11 | +29.5% | −7.4% | −8.9% | +18.4% | +146% | +241% | −29.9% | −18.9% | −23.4% | +5.0% | +92.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| RIO Rio Tinto Group | 16 of 29 | +44.5% | −15.4% | +11.1% | +18.4% | −0.4% | +36.2% | +37.5% | −2.9% | +44.9% | +39.2% | −33.4% | −15.3% | +0.6% | +22.4% | −30.5% | +35.3% | +195% | −78.5% | +102% | +23.6% | +57.1% | +9.7% | +45.6% | +5.1% | +12.6% | −20.9% | +115% | −8.9% | −16.4% |
| VALE Vale S.A. | 12 of 23 | +66.3% | −38.8% | +1.6% | +32.5% | −1.7% | +32.0% | +2.7% | +12.3% | +62.2% | +134% | −57.8% | −44.1% | −23.2% | +3.3% | −34.0% | +21.2% | +145% | −61.8% | +123% | +47.5% | +46.9% | +50.6% | +108% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AA Alcoa Corporation | 13 of 29 | +42.5% | +12.5% | −24.3% | −23.1% | +159% | +7.1% | −19.1% | −50.7% | +91.8% | +28.3% | −36.8% | +49.9% | +24.3% | +1.7% | −43.3% | −3.6% | +47.7% | −68.2% | +24.3% | +4.2% | −3.7% | −15.7% | +71.3% | −34.5% | +8.0% | −17.9% | +126% | +7.7% | +11.9% |
| IE Ivanhoe Electric Inc. | 1 of 3 | +112% | −25.1% | −17.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How FCX has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were FCX's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents FCX's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1995, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all five of FCX's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: FCX fell 92.5% from January 2011 to January 2016, while the S&P 500 rose 62.7%.
- The slowest recovery came after FCX fell 92.5% from January 2011 to January 2016; it did not regain that peak until March 2022, six years later.
Green means FCX fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | FCX fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 China and oil sell-off | −92.5% | +62.7% | Jan 2011 | Jan 2016 | 5 years | Mar 2022 | 6.2 years |
| 2008 financial crisis | −86.4% | −37.4% | May 2008 | Dec 2008 | 7 months | Jan 2011 | 2.1 years |
| Dot-com bust | −80.1% | +118% | May 1996 | Nov 2000 | 4.5 years | Sep 2003 | 2.8 years |
| 2022 bear market | −51.3% | −16.2% | Mar 2022 | Jul 2022 | 4 months | Apr 2024 | 21 months |
| No named crash | −46.3% | −3.5% | May 2024 | Apr 2025 | 11 months | Jan 2026 | 9 months |
How did FCX do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far FCX, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- FCX fell further than the S&P 500 in all ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2015 China and oil sell-off, when FCX fell 72.2% and the S&P 500 fell 12.8%.
- Among its popular alternatives, SCCO held up best, falling less than FCX in all ten crashes they both traded through.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than FCX.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCX This pageFreeport-McMoRan Inc. | — | −7.2% | −51.3% | −56.1% | −32.8% | −8.4% | −72.2% | −46.7% | −2.1% | −86.4% | −51.4% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| TGB Trekor Metals Limited | 5 of 10 | −6.3% | −61.9% | −50.2% | −44.2% | −5.4% | −55.6% | −48.6% | −1.2% | −91.2% | −82.1% |
| SCCO Southern Copper Corporation | 10 of 10 | −3.4% | −43.0% | −38.7% | −32.0% | −5.3% | −26.0% | −32.9% | −0.4% | −78.5% | −42.5% |
| NEM Newmont Corporation | 7 of 10 | −1.0% | −51.8% | −24.5% | −9.5% | −6.0% | −20.2% | −12.0% | −2.3% | −61.5% | −53.0% |
| AEM Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | 10 of 10 | 0.0% | −42.0% | −31.6% | −11.6% | −6.4% | −20.2% | −18.9% | −0.4% | −72.9% | −42.4% |
| HBM Hudbay Minerals Inc. | 3 of 9 | −9.2% | −63.3% | −57.9% | −30.1% | −10.0% | −74.5% | −38.9% | 0.0% | −91.9% | — |
| COPX Global X - Copper Miners ETF | 8 of 8 | −5.1% | −42.1% | −47.4% | −20.1% | −7.5% | −46.2% | −45.8% | −0.2% | — | — |
| CENX Century Aluminum Company | 4 of 10 | −19.8% | −82.1% | −51.8% | −48.6% | −5.2% | −59.6% | −45.5% | −4.3% | −98.7% | −72.6% |
| BHP BHP Group Limited | 10 of 10 | −2.2% | −31.8% | −38.1% | −12.8% | −6.4% | −49.4% | −30.7% | 0.0% | −73.7% | −32.6% |
| TECK Teck Resources Limited | 5 of 9 | −8.2% | −43.6% | −54.0% | −26.9% | −8.1% | −65.4% | −48.9% | 0.0% | −94.8% | — |
| ERO Ero Copper Corp. | 5 of 5 | −6.2% | −49.1% | −53.9% | −29.2% | −6.3% | — | — | — | — | — |
| NEXA Nexa Resources S.A. | 3 of 5 | −5.1% | −53.3% | −68.0% | −14.3% | −7.1% | — | — | — | — | — |
| PICK iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF | 6 of 6 | −4.0% | −36.4% | −41.4% | −18.0% | −6.2% | −41.8% | — | — | — | — |
| GOLD Gold.com, Inc. | 5 of 6 | −2.0% | −43.6% | −14.7% | −20.9% | −15.8% | −19.6% | — | — | — | — |
| RIO Rio Tinto Group | 9 of 10 | −2.6% | −35.3% | −30.0% | −13.2% | −5.3% | −43.9% | −41.3% | 0.0% | −89.0% | −33.9% |
| VALE Vale S.A. | 9 of 9 | −3.1% | −41.4% | −45.5% | −20.9% | −5.3% | −61.1% | −33.4% | −0.8% | −79.5% | — |
| AA Alcoa Corporation | 4 of 10 | −12.4% | −64.5% | −67.2% | −42.6% | −7.1% | −38.6% | −43.6% | 0.0% | −87.8% | −59.3% |
| IE Ivanhoe Electric Inc. | 0 of 1 | −15.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
How closely does FCX move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares FCX with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Nine of the 14 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than FCX's 0.90, led by GOLD, NEM and SCCO.
- SCCO took just 103% of the S&P 500's losses, against 181% for FCX, while still keeping 139% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, FCX captured 164% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 181% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.74. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than FCX's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCX This pageFreeport-McMoRan Inc. | 164% | 181% | 0.90 | 1.74 |
| GOLD Gold.com, Inc. | 70% | 2% | 37.13 | 0.10 |
| NEM Newmont Corporation | 68% | 45% | 1.52 | 0.39 |
| SCCO Southern Copper Corporation | 139% | 103% | 1.35 | 1.13 |
| RIO Rio Tinto Group | 98% | 72% | 1.35 | 0.63 |
| AEM Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | 77% | 57% | 1.34 | 0.70 |
| VALE Vale S.A. | 100% | 88% | 1.13 | 0.74 |
| BHP BHP Group Limited | 106% | 97% | 1.10 | 0.87 |
| TGB Trekor Metals Limited | 217% | 214% | 1.01 | 1.89 |
| COPX Global X - Copper Miners ETF | 144% | 155% | 0.93 | 1.35 |
| TECK Teck Resources Limited | 115% | 128% | 0.90 | 1.10 |
| PICK iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF | 115% | 133% | 0.86 | 1.12 |
| HBM Hudbay Minerals Inc. | 193% | 234% | 0.82 | 1.95 |
| CENX Century Aluminum Company | 218% | 296% | 0.74 | 2.41 |
| AA Alcoa Corporation | 187% | 303% | 0.62 | 2.17 |
What diversifies FCX?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with FCX's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing FCX with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in FCX into FTLS would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 18% over the past 5 years for a small cut in its annual return (+18.2% for FCX alone, +18.0% for the mix).
- CAH made money in nine of the 12 calendar years in which FCX lost money.
- Among large ETFs, DXJ, EMLP and FTLS have moved largely independently of FCX over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.48 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which FCX lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% FCX and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2024 | 2022 | 2018 | 2015 | 2014 | 2012 | 2011 | 2008 | 2004 | 2000 | 1998 | 1997 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCX Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +83.7% | 0.50 | −9.4% | −7.3% | −45.1% | −70.2% | −35.8% | −4.0% | −36.9% | −75.5% | −6.6% | −59.5% | −32.9% | −45.6% | 40.9% | +18.2% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.43 | +225% | 1.34 | +29.8% | +6.0% | −19.8% | +7.7% | +8.1% | +19.6% | −16.1% | −20.8% | — | — | — | — | 33.9% | +21.2% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.48 | +103% | 1.06 | +33.4% | +10.4% | −8.7% | −25.3% | +23.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 34.2% | +18.8% |
| FTLS Broad MarketFirst Trust Long/Short Equity ETF | 0.42 | +61.5% | 0.97 | +18.8% | −5.6% | −4.8% | +4.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.5% | +18.0% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.41 | +304% | 0.94 | +39.1% | −33.5% | −9.1% | −0.3% | +30.2% | +8.6% | +6.8% | −44.7% | −19.3% | — | — | — | 36.1% | +23.4% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.43 | +178% | 0.94 | +5.6% | +64.4% | −18.2% | −21.5% | −8.7% | +5.2% | +2.8% | −39.0% | +33.8% | +24.4% | — | — | 35.3% | +20.4% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.44 | +120% | 0.93 | +26.7% | −0.8% | −1.9% | −10.7% | −2.2% | +6.6% | +9.6% | +4.9% | — | — | — | — | 34.4% | +19.4% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.34 | +130% | 0.91 | +45.8% | −10.4% | −0.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 34.3% | +20.2% |
| AMLP EnergyAlerian MLP ETF | 0.35 | +114% | 0.90 | +22.8% | +25.5% | −12.6% | −25.7% | +4.8% | +1.9% | +10.2% | — | — | — | — | — | 34.2% | +19.5% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2024 | 2022 | 2018 | 2015 | 2014 | 2012 | 2011 | 2008 | 2004 | 2000 | 1998 | 1997 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCX Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +83.7% | 0.50 | −9.4% | −7.3% | −45.1% | −70.2% | −35.8% | −4.0% | −36.9% | −75.5% | −6.6% | −59.5% | −32.9% | −45.6% | 40.9% | +18.2% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.21 | +471% | 1.54 | +19.0% | +54.1% | −24.5% | +12.6% | +23.0% | +3.8% | +8.1% | −39.6% | −4.7% | +108% | +51.7% | +29.1% | 34.2% | +23.6% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.04 | +2,780% | 1.43 | +215% | +1.3% | −16.3% | −6.0% | +12.9% | +11.2% | −24.4% | −20.5% | −6.4% | −2.3% | — | — | 35.2% | +37.4% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.10 | +397% | 1.41 | +23.7% | +51.8% | −28.4% | −4.5% | +29.3% | +25.6% | +11.8% | −40.4% | −1.4% | +61.2% | +46.9% | +96.3% | 33.6% | +23.2% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.15 | +1,452% | 1.41 | +107% | +17.0% | +0.8% | +67.7% | −10.4% | +15.7% | −17.0% | −15.2% | +40.0% | −71.1% | −9.5% | — | 35.2% | +32.8% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.31 | +660% | 1.39 | −4.0% | +86.6% | −8.2% | +17.4% | +0.4% | +94.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 35.3% | +25.5% |
Common questions
What was FCX's worst drawdown?
FCX's deepest decline since it began trading in 1995 was 92.5%, from January 2011 to January 2016. It took about six years from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were FCX's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, FCX's best year was 2009, when it returned 228%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -75.5%.
Is there a better investment than FCX?
Among FCX's popular alternatives, NEM, SCCO and AEM earned more than FCX with less volatility over the past 5 years. NEM returned 17.8% a year at 39.1% volatility, against 12.9% a year at 45.0%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, RS (metals & mining) and B (gold mining) earned more than FCX with less volatility over the past 5 years. RS returned 24.8% a year at 28.1% volatility, against 12.9% a year at 45.0%.
Is FCX more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. FCX's volatility over the past 5 years was 45.0%, 2.6 times the S&P 500's 17.2%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, FCX's return lands within 45.0% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is FCX's Sharpe ratio?
FCX's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.50, against 0.78 for the S&P 500, so FCX earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is FCX with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, FCX's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.54 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against FCX instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a FCX holding.
What are the best alternatives to FCX?
Of the 17 popular alternatives we compared, three outperformed FCX in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: TGB, SCCO and NEM.
Did FCX outperform the S&P 500?
FCX finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 14 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +35.4%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did FCX do in stock market crashes?
FCX fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in none of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in ten. The clearest case was the 2015 China and oil sell-off, when FCX fell 72.2% and the S&P 500 fell 12.8%.
What diversifies FCX?
These had a low correlation with FCX over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, DXJ (correlation 0.43), EMLP (correlation 0.48) and FTLS (correlation 0.42); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.21), CLS (correlation 0.04) and MCK (correlation 0.10). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than FCX's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of FCX's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.